With the revolution that has taken place in the functionality and uptake of portable networked ‘smart’ technologies, educators are looking to see what potential applications such technologies might have for school education. This article reports on a study on the use of portable personal computing devices in the early years of schooling. Specifically, it focuses on emerging patterns of use of Apple iPads in an Australian Preparatory (first year of compulsory schooling) classroom during the first year of implementation of these devices. We draw on student and teacher interviews and classroom observation data to provide a research meta-narrative of the intentions, practices and reflections of a ‘first year out’ teacher, and to discuss points of tension found in the contested space of early years literacy education, which are highlighted when potentially transformative technologies meet institutionalized literacy education practices. Our findings suggest that the broader policy and curriculum context of early years literacy education, and institutionalized practices found in this space, is potentially at odds with teacher-held intentions to transform learning through technology use, particularly with respect to tensions between print-based traditions and new digital literacies, and those between standards-based classroom curricula and more emancipatory agendas.
AMCEETYA (Australian Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs) (2010) National Assessment Program – ICT Literacy Years 6 & 10 Report 2008. Carlton South: Curriculum Corporation.
BaguleyMPullenDShortM (2010) Multilmodal, Multiliteracies: Texts and Literacies for the 21st Century. In: PullenDColeD (eds) Multiliteracies and Technology Enhanced Education, Hershey, PA: Information Science References.
7.
BoldC (2012) Using Narrative in Research, New Delhi: SAGE.
8.
BurnettC (2009) ‘Research into Literacy and Technology in Primary Classrooms: An Exploration of Understandings Generated by Recent Studies’. Journal of Research in Reading (Special Issue: New Developments in Literacy and Technology)32(1): 22–37.
9.
BurnettC (2010) ‘Technology and Literacy in Early Childhood Educational Settings: A Review of Research’. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy10(3): 247–270.
10.
CopeBKalantzisM (2000) Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, Melbourne: Macmillan.
11.
DavidsonC (2009) ‘Young Children’s Engagement with Digital Texts and Literacies in the Home: Pressing Matters for the Teaching of English in the Early Years of Schooling’. English Teaching: Practice and Critique8(3): 36–54.
12.
DavisD (2008) First We See: The National Review of Visual Education, Canberra: Department of Employment, Education and Workplace Relations, Australian Government.
FleerM (2011) ‘Technologically Constructed Childhoods: Moving Beyond a Reproductive to a Productive View of Curriculum Development’. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood36(1): 16–24.
15.
FowlerLC (2006) A Curriculum of Difficulty: Narrative Research in Education and the Practice of Teaching, New York: Peter Lang.
16.
GoodmanYM (2011) ‘Sixty Years of Language Arts Education: Looking Back in Order to Look Forward’. English Journal101(1): 17–25.
17.
GoodsonI (2003) Professional Knowledge, Professional Lives, Glasgow: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Groundwater-SmithSMocklerN (2009) Teacher Professional Learning in an Age of Compliance: Mind the Gap, Dordrecht: Springer.
19.
HonanE (2009) ‘Fighting the Rip: Using Digital Texts in Classrooms’. English Teaching: Practice and Critique8(3): 21–35.
20.
JosselsonR (2011) Narrative Research: Constructing, Deconstructing, and Reconstructing Story. In: WertzFJCharmazKMcMullenLMJosselsonRAndersonR (eds) Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis: Phenomenological Psychology, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research and Intuitive Inquiry, London: The Guilford Press.
21.
KalantzisMCopeBCloonanA (2010) A Multiliteracies Perspective on the New Literacies. In: BakerE (eds) The New Literacies: Multiple Perspectives on Research and Practice, New York: The Guilford Press.
22.
KressG (2000) ‘A Curriculum for the Future’. Cambridge Journal of Education30(1): 133–145.
23.
LankshearCKnobelM (2003) New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning, Buckingham: Open University Press.
24.
LaytonLMillerC (2004) ‘Interpretations of Literacy’. Cambridge Journal of Education34(1): 51–63.
25.
LoudenWRohlMBarratt PughC (2005) In Teachers’ Hands: Effective Teaching Practices in the Early Years of Schooling, Mount Lawley: Edith Cowan University.
26.
Lynch J (2003) Why Have Computer-Based Technologies Failed to Radically Transform Schooling? Looking for the Right Question, Online Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association (BERA), Edinburgh. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00003272.htm.
27.
LynchJ (2006) ‘Assessing Effects of Technology Usage on Mathematics Learning’. Mathematics Education Research Journal18(3): 29–43.
28.
MarshJ (2004) ‘The Techno-Literacy Practices of Young Children’. Journal of Early Childhood Research2(1): 51–66.
29.
MarshJ (2005) Digikids: Young Children, Popular Culture and Media. In: YellandN (eds) Critical Issues in Early Childhood Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
30.
NICHHD (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction. NIH Publication No. 00-4769. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
31.
NITL (National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy) (Australia) (2005) Teaching Reading: A Review of the Evidence-Based Research Literature on Approaches to the Teaching of Literacy, Particularly those that are Effective in Assisting Students with Reading Difficulties. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training.
32.
OakleyGFellowesJ (2011) Language, Literacy & Early Childhood Education, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
33.
OhiS (2008) ‘The Teacher’s Role in the Research-Policy-Practice Nexus’. Australian Journal of Education52(1): 95–109.
34.
O’MaraJLaidlawL (2011) ‘Living in the iWorld: Two Literacy Researchers Reflect on the Changing Texts and Literacy Practices of Childhood’. English Teaching: Practice and Critique10(4): 149–159.
35.
OttesenE (2007) ‘Learning to Teach with Technology: Authoring Practised Identities’. Technology, Pedagogy and Education15(3): 275–290.
36.
RogersT (2010) Theorizing Media Productions as Complex Literacy Performances among Youth In and Out of Schools. In: PullenDLColeD (eds) Handbook of Research on Multiliteracies and Technology Enhanced Education, Philadelphia, PA: IGI Publications.
37.
RoseJ (2006) Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading: Final Report (The Rose Review), London: Department for Education and Skills.
38.
RowanLBigumC (2010) At the Hub of It All: Knowledge Producing Schools as Sites for Educational and Social Innovation. In: ClandfieldDMartellG (eds) The School as Community Hub: Beyond Education’s Iron Cage, Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
39.
RowanLHonanE (2005) Literarily Lost: The Quest for Quality Literacy Agendas in Early Childhood Education. In: YellandN (eds) Critical Issues in Early Childhood Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
40.
SelwynN (2010) ‘Looking beyond Learning: Notes towards the Critical Study of Educational Technology’. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning26(1): 65–73.
41.
SnyderI (2008) The Literacy Wars: Why Teaching Children to Read and Write is a Battleground in Australia, Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
42.
State Government of Victoria (2007) Victorian Essential Learning Standards. Melbourne: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. Available at: http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au.
State Government of Victoria (2010) Coaching Teachers in Effective Instruction, Melbourne: State Government of Victoria.
45.
UnderatuinX (2011) ‘Can’t We All Get Along? Content. Technology and the Battle for Literacy’, Journal of Literacy and Technology12(3): 86–111.
46.
UnsworthL (2002) ‘Changing Dimensions of School Literacies’. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy25(1): 62–77.
47.
van der WaalK (2009) Getting Going: Organizing Ethnographic Fieldwork. In: YbemaSYanowDWelsHKamsteegFK (eds) Organizational Ethnography: Studying the Complexities of Everyday Life, London: SAGE.
48.
VerenikinaIKervinL (2011) ‘iPads, Digital Play and Preschoolers’. He Kupu2(5): 4–19.
49.
WhitebreadDAndersonHColtmanP (2005) ‘Developing Independent Learning in the Early Years’. Education 3–1333: 40–50.
50.
WohlwendK (2010) ‘A is for Avatar: Young Children in Literacy 2.0 Worlds and Literacy 1.0 School’. Language Arts88(2): 144–152.
51.
YellandN (2005) Curriculum, Pedagogies and Practice with ICT in the Information Age. In: YellandN (eds) Critical Issues in Early Childhood Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
