Drawing on case illustrations of a six-year-old child as he ‘assembles’ a digital world using Webkinz™, this paper proposes an approach that researchers and educators might use to understand, analyse and critique multimodality. This multidisciplinary theoretical framework integrates new literacies, social semiotics and critical literacy perspectives. Data were collected during a broader three-week case study via a side-shadowing interview technique (McClay and Mackey, 2009), where the first author sat next to the child, making detailed research notes, interviewing him and taking screenshots of his digital productions. The findings suggest that authorship is rarely linear as authors continually remix, layer, embed and inter-animate semiotic resources as they assemble their sociocultural worlds and critical positions within these worlds.
BartonDHamiltonMIvanicR (1999) Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, London: Routledge.
6.
BeelerS (2001) Throw your Tooth on the Roof: Tooth Traditions from around the World, New York: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Burke A, Hammett R, Hughes J, King A and Toope D (2010) ‘Challenging Notions of Literacy: Living and Learning in Webkinz World™.’ Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Education (CSSE), Montreal, May.
8.
DaviesBHarréR (1990) ‘Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20(1): 43–63.
9.
DysonAH (1997) Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy, New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
GainerJLappD (2010) Literacy Remix: Bridging Adolescents' in and out of School Literacies, Newark, MD: International Reading Association.
11.
HollandDLachicotteWSkinnerSCainC (1998) Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
HullGShultzK (2002) School’s Out! Bridging Out of School Literacies with Curriculum Practices, New York: Teacher’s College Press.
13.
HullGANelsonME (2005) ‘Locating the Semiotic Power of Multimodality’. Written Communication22(2): 224–261.
14.
JewittCKressG (2003) Multimodal Literacy, New York: Peter Lang.
15.
KendrickM (2003) Converging Worlds: Play, Literacy, and Culture in Early Education, Bern: Peter Lang.
16.
KendrickM (2005) ‘Playing House: A Sideways Glance at Literacy and Identity in Early Childhood’. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy5(1): 5–28.
17.
KendrickMMcKayR (2004) ‘Drawing as an Alternative Way of Understanding Young Children’s Constructions of Literacy’. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy4(1): 109–128.
18.
KressG (1997) Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy, London: Routledge.
19.
KressGvan LeeuwenT (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication, London: Arnold.
20.
LabboLDReinkingD (1999) ‘Negotiating the Multiple Realities of Technology in Literacy Research and Instruction’. Reading Research Quarterly34(4): 478–493.
21.
LankshearCGeeJKnobelMSearleC (1997) Changing Literacies, Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
22.
LarsonJMarshJ (2005) Making Literacy Real: Theories and Practices for Learning and Teaching, London: SAGE.
23.
McClayJMackeyM (2009) ‘Distributed Assessment in OurSpace: This Is Not a Rubric’. In: BurkeAHammettRH (eds) Assessing New Literacies: Perspectives from the Classroom, New York: Peter Lang.
24.
MarshJ (2011) ‘Young Children's Literacy Practices in a Virtual World: Establishing an Online Interaction Order’. Reading Research Quarterly46(2): 101–118.
25.
MishraPKoehlerMJ (2006) ‘Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge’. Teachers College Record108(6): 1017–1054.
26.
The New London Group, (2000) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures, in Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (eds) for the New London Group. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
27.
O’BrienDScharberC (2008) ‘Digital Literacies Go to School: Potholes and Possibilities’. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy52(1): 66–68.
28.
PahlK (2009) ‘Interactions, Intersections and Improvisations: Studying the Multimodal Texts and Classroom Talk of Six to Seven Year Olds’. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy9(2): 188–210.
29.
PahlKRowsellJ (2005) Literacy and Education: The New Literacy Studies in the Classroom, London: Paul Chapman.
30.
RosenblattL (1978) The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
31.
Sefton-Green J (2011) ‘From Othering to Incorporation: Theoretical, Ethical and Practical Dilemmas in Crossing Informal and Formal Learning Boundaries.’ Paper presented at the University of British Columbia’s New Literacies Conference, Vancouver, May.
32.
SiegelM (2006) ‘Rereading the Signs: Multimodal Transformations in the Field of Literacy Education’. Language Arts20(4): 455–475.
33.
SteinP (2008) Multimodal Pedagogies in Diverse Classrooms: Representation, Rights, and Resources, London: Routledge.
34.
VasquezV (2005) Creating Spaces for Critical Literacy with Young Children: Using Everyday Issues and Everyday Print. In: EvansJ (eds) Reading Isn’t Just about Books: 21st Century Approaches for 21st Century Children, London: David Fulton Publishers.
35.
VygotskyL (1978) Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Winters K (2009) ‘Authorship as Assemblage: Multimodal Literacies of Play, Literature, and Drama’, Doctoral Thesis, University of British Columbia.
