Against the background of Michael Kamil and Sam Intrator’s landmark reviews of research about new technologies and literacy development, this article maps recent research concerned specifically with the 0–8 years age group. Drawing on databases of research conducted in North America, Britain and Australasia, it affirms that the early childhood dimension is even more radically underresearched than other age ranges with respect to new technologies and literacy development. The authors develop an analytic framework comprising four quadrants to categorize the various studies conducted in the early childhood age range, and assign these to their appropriate quadrants. This reveals a lopsided distribution of the meagre corpus of studies available. The article provides a map of the field against which early childhood educators can judge ‘at a glance’ how far their personal areas of interest are served by existing research. It simultaneously pinpoints areas where new research is needed to fill important gaps.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, K. (2001) ‘Analysis of Collaborative E-mail use on the Language Acquisition of Pre-School Children Aged 4 and 5’, PhD thesis, School of Technology Management, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ.
2.
Balson, S. (2001) Personal email communication (28 October).
3.
Bangert-Drowns, R. (1993) ‘The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Metaanalysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction’ , Review of Educational Research63(1): 63–93 .
4.
Banister, S. (2001) ‘Computers in the Elementary Classroom: Teacher and Student Perspective’, PhD thesis, School of Education, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
5.
Barnett, J. (1999) ‘Rivergum Plains Primary’, in B. Comber and B. Green (eds) Information Technology, Literacy and Education Disadvantage Research and Development Project, Vol. 2, pp. 159–204. Adelaide, South Australia: University of South Australia .
6.
Bills, D. and Thomson, P. (1999) ‘Greentown District Primary’, in B. Comber and B. Green (eds) Information Technology, Literacy and Education Disadvantage Research and Development Project, Vol. 2, pp. 123–158. Adelaide, South Australia: University of South Australia .
7.
Boone, R., Higgins, K., Notari, A. and Stump, C. (1996) ‘Hypermedia Pre-reading Lessons: Learner-centered Software for Kindergarten’ , Journal of Computing in Childhood Education7(1–2): 39–70 .
8.
Brett, A. (1997) ‘Assistive and Adaptive Technology Supporting Competence and Independence in Young Children with Disabilities’ , Dimensions of Early Childhood25(3): 18–20 .
9.
Bump, J. (1990) ‘Radical Changes in Class Discussion using Networked Computers’ , Computers and the Humanities24(1): 49–65 .
10.
Casey, J. (1999) ‘Hope of the New Century: Early Literacy, the Empowerment of Technology’ , Sixty-third Yearbook of the Claremont Reading Conference, pp. 117–124 .
11.
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell .
12.
Clements, D. (1998) ‘Young Children and Technology’, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED416991.
13.
Comber, B. and Green, B., eds (1999) Information Technology, Literacy and Education Disadvantage Research and Development Project, Vol. 2. Adelaide, South Australia: University of South Australia .
14.
Computers in the Schools(1998) 15(1): entire issue.
15.
Dickenson, D. (1986) ‘Cooperation, Collaboration, and a Computer: Integrating a Computer into a First–Second Grade Writing Program’ , Research in the Teaching of English20(4): 357–378 .
16.
Doty, D., Popplewell, S. and Byers, G. (2001) ‘Interactive CD-ROM Storybooks and Young Readers’ Reading Comprehension’ , Journal of Research on Computing on Education33(4): 374–384 .
17.
Drake, K. (2001) ‘A Study of Technology-based Best Practices which Support Literacy Learning in Elementary Schools’, PhD thesis,Graduate School of Education, Pepperdine University, Los Angeles, CA.
18.
Erdner, R., Guy, R. and Bush, A. (1996) ‘The Impact of a Year of Computer Assisted Instruction on the Development of First Grade Reading Skills’ , Journal of Educational Computing Research18(4): 369–386 .
19.
Fleming, T. and Raptis, H. (2000) ‘A Topographical Analysis of Research, 1990–1999’ , Teacher Librarian25(5): 9–15 .
20.
Gee, J. (1996) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, 2nd edn. London: Falmer Press .
21.
Gee, J., Hull, G. and Lankshear, C. (1996) The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism. Sydney: Allen and Unwin .
22.
Godt, P., Hutinger, P., Robinson, L. and Schneider, C. (1998) ‘A Simple Strategy to Encourage Emergent Literacy in Young Children with Disabilities’ , Teaching Exceptional Children32(2): 38–44 .
23.
Haugland, S. (1999) ‘What Role Should Technology Play in Young Children’s Learning?’ , Young Children54(6): 26–31 .
24.
Hawkins, J., Sheingold, K., Gearhart, M. and Berger, C. (1982) ‘Microcomputers in Schools: Impact on the Social Life of Elementary Classrooms’ , Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology3(4): 361–373 .
25.
Higgins, N. and Cox, P. (1998) ‘The Effects of Animation Clues on Third Grade Children’s Ability to Learn the Meanings of Unfamiliar Words’, ERIC Document No: ED418686.
26.
Higgins, N. and Hess, L. (1998) ‘Using Electronic Books to Promote Vocabulary Development’, ERIC Document No: ED418687.
27.
Hill, S. (1999) ‘In “Screenland” at Fairtown Primary’, in B. Comber and B. Green (eds) Information Technology, Literacy and Education Disadvantage Research and Development Project, Vol. 2, pp. 89–122. Adelaide, South Australia: University of South Australia .
28.
Howell, R. (2000) ‘Evaluation of a Computer-based Program on the Reading Performance of First Grade Students with Potential for Reading Failure’ , Journal of Special Education Technology15(4): 5–14 .
29.
Humble, A. (2000) ‘A Comparison Study of the Traditional Ready Strategy of Reading Aloud with an Adult and the Technology Based Strategy of Computerized Talking Books’, ERIC Document No: DE450349.
30.
Hutinger, P., Bell, C., Beard, M., Bond, J., Johanson, J. and Terry, C. (1997) Final Report: The Early Childhood Emergent Literacy Technology Research Study. Macomb, IL: Western Illinois University. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 418545.
31.
Hutinger, P. and Clark, L. (2000) ‘TEChPLACEs: An Internet Community for Young Children, their Teachers and their Families’ , Teaching Exceptional Children32(4): 56–63 .
32.
Hutinger, P. and Johanson, J. (2000) ‘Implementing and Maintaining an Effective Early Childhood Comprehensive Technology’ , Topics in Early Childhood Special Education20(3): 159–178 .
33.
Kahn, J. (1997) ‘Scaffolding in the Classroom: Using CD ROM Storybooks at a Computer Reading Center’ , Learning and Leading with Technology25(2): 17–19 .
34.
Kamil, M. and Intrator, S. (1998) ‘Quantitative Trends in Publication of Research on Technology and Reading, Writing, and Literacy’, in T. Shanahan and F. RodrÌguez-Beown (eds) National Reading Conference Yearbook 47,pp. 385–396. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference .
35.
Kamil, M., Intrator, S. and Kim, H. (2000) ‘The Effects of Other Technologies on Literacy and Literacy Learning’, in M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, D. Reason and R. Barr (eds) Handbook of Reading Research: Volume 3, pp. 771–788. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
36.
Kamil, M. and Lane D. (1998) ‘Researching the Relationship between Technology and Literacy: Agenda for the 21st Century’, in D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo and R. Keiffer (eds) Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World, pp. 323–341. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
37.
Kent, J. and Rakestraw, J. (1994) ‘The Role of Computers in Functional Language: A Take on Two Writers’ , Journal of Computing in Childhood Education5(3–4): 329–337 .
38.
Kress, G. and Jewitt, C., eds (2003) Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang .
39.
Labbo, L. and Kuhn, M. (2000) ‘Weaving Chains of Affect and Cognition: A Young Child’s Understanding of CD-ROM Talking Books’ , Journal of Literacy Research32(2): 187–210 .
40.
Labbo, L., Reinking, D. and McKenna, M. (1995) ‘Incorporating the Computer into Kindergarten: A Case Study’, in K. Hinchman, D. Leu and C. Kinzer (eds) Perspectives on Literacy Research and Practice: Forty-Fourth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 459–465. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference .
41.
Lankshear, C. (1997) Changing Literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press .
42.
Lankshear, C., Bigum, C., Durrant, C., Green, B., Honan, E., Morgan, W., Murray, J., Snyder, I. and Wild, M. (1997) Digital Rhetorics: Literacies and Technologies in Education–Current Practices and Future Directions. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs .
43.
Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (2002) ‘Children, Literacy and the UK National Grid for Learning’ , Journal of Early Childhood Literacy2(2): 167–195 .
44.
Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (2003) New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press .
45.
Leu, D. (2000) ‘Literacy and Technology: Deictic Consequences for Literacy Education in an Information Age’, in M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, D. Reason and R. Barr (eds) Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 3, pp. 743–770. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
46.
Lyke, L. (2001) ‘Analysis of Primary Education Websites’, PhD thesis, College of Education, Florida Atlantic University, Miami..
47.
MacArthur, C. (1998) ‘Word Processing with Speech Synthesis and Word Prediction: Effects on the Dialogue Journal Writing of Students with Learning Disabilities’ , Learning Disability Quarterly21(1): 1–16 .
48.
Matthews, K. (1997) ‘A Comparison of the Influence of Interactive CD-ROM Storybooks and Traditional Print Storybooks on Reading Comprehension’ , Journal of Research on Computing in Education29(3): 263–270 .
49.
Mayer, R. (1997) ‘Multimedia Learning: Are we Asking the Right Questions?’ , Educational Psychologist32(1): 1–19 .
50.
Mehan, H., Moll, L. and Riel, M. (1985) ‘Computers in Classrooms: A Quasi-Experiment in Guided Change’, Final Report NIE 6–83–0027. San Diego: University of California.
51.
Mott, M. and Klomes, J. (2001) ‘The Synthesis of Writing Workshop and Hypermediaauthoring: Grades 1–4’ , Early Childhood Research and Practice3(2), URL (consulted October 2002): http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v3n2/mott.html
52.
Neuman, S. and Dickinson, D. (2001) Handbook of Early Literacy Research. New York: Guilford Press .
53.
Parette, H. and Murdick, N. (1998) ‘Assistive Technology and IEPs for Young Children with Disabilities’ , Early Childhood Education Journal25(3): 193–198 .
54.
Phillips, C. (2000) ‘The Effects of an Integrated Computer Program on Math and Reading Improvement in Grades 3 through 5’, PhD thesis, College of Health and Human Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
55.
Ross, J., Hogaboam-Gray, A. and Hannay, L. (2001) ‘Collateral Benefits of an Interactive Literacy Program for Grade 1 and 2 Students’ , Journal of Research on Technology in Education33(3): 219–234 .
56.
Sharp, D., Bransford, J., Goldman, S., Kinzer, V. and Vye, N. (1995) ‘Dynamic Visual Support for Story Comprehension and Mental Model Building by Young At-risk Children’ , Educational Technology Research and Development43(1): 25–42 .
57.
Smith, C. (2001) ‘Click and Turn the Page: An Exploration of Multiple Storybook Literacy’ , Reading Research Quarterly36(2): 152–183 .
58.
Smith, C. (2002) ‘Click on Me! An Example of how a Toddler used Technology in Play’ , Journal of Early Childhood Literacy2(1): 5–20 .
59.
Turbill, J. (2001) ‘A Researcher goes to School: Using Technology in the Kindergarten Literacy Curriculum’ , Journal of Early Childhood Literacy1(3): 255–280 .
60.
Wepner, S. and Tao, L. (2002) ‘From Master Teacher to Master Novice: Shifting Responsibilities in Technology-infused Classrooms’ , The Reading Teacher55(7): 643–653 .
