South Korea is slowly but steadily becoming a country of immigrants. In 1998, there were barely 300,000 foreign residents in South Korea. As of 2018, there were more than 2.3 million. The immigrant population has yet to reach 5% of the total population, but it is predicted to rise significantly in the years to come. Despite the increase in newcomers, it is not well understood who native South Koreans prefer as immigrants and why. Are immigrant attitudes motivated by co-ethnic solidarity, or are they primarily based on economic and sociotropic concerns? To isolate attitudes on these crucial questions, this research uses a conjoint experiment that simultaneously tests the influence of seven immigrant attributes in generating support for admission. Our results show that broad sociotropic concerns largely drive attitudes towards immigrants in South Korea, but an immigrant’s origin also matters. Prospective newcomers from culturally similar and higher-status countries who can speak Korean and have clear plans to work are most preferred. The research findings will be relevant to the comparative study of immigration attitudes, as well as to researchers interested in the specifics of the South Korean case.
AnBP (2015)
The role of social desirability bias and racial/ethnic composition on the relation between education and attitude toward immigration restrictionism. The Social Science Journal52: 459–467.
2.
AndersonB (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.
London:
Verso.
3.
BlinderS (2013)
Imagined immigration: The impact of different meanings of ‘immigrants’ in public opinion and policy debates in Britain. Political Studies63(1): 80–100.
4.
BoyonN (2018) The Inclusiveness of Nationalities: A Global Advisor Survey. Report, Ipsos Public Affairs.
5.
CampbellE (2016) South Korea’s New Nationalism: The End of ‘One Korea’?
Boulder, CO:
Lynne Rienner.
6.
CheveKFSlaughterMJ (2001)
Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy. Review of Economics and Statistics83(1): 133–145.
7.
ChoSY (2018)
A bride deficit and marriage migration in South Korea. International Migration56(6): 100–119.
8.
ChoiW (2016)
The transformation of the Korean Chinese community: The case of the age of migration in China. Journal of Contemporary Korean Studies3(1–2): 245–264.
9.
CitrinJGreenDPMusteC, et al. (1997)
Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivations. The Journal of Politics59(3): 858–881.
10.
CreightonMAmaneyJMalancuN (2015)
Has opposition to immigration increased in the united states after the economic crisis? An experimental approach. International Migration Review49(3): 727–756.
de VriesCEHakhverdianALanceeB (2013)
The dynamics of voters’ left/right identification: The role of economic and cultural attitudes. Political Science Research and Methods1(2): 223–238.
13.
DonnellyM (2017) Canadian Exceptionalism: Are We Good or Are We Lucky? Montreal, Canada:McGill Institute for the Study of Canada (MISC).
14.
DraudtD (2019) Multiculturalism as state developmental policy in Global Korea. In: BrazinskyGregg A. (ed) Korea and the World: New Frontiers in Korean Studies.
New York:
Lexington, pp. 157–178.
15.
DustmannCPrestonI (2007)
Racial and economic factors in attitudes to immigration. BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy7(1): 1–39.
16.
Henry EmHH (2013) The Great Enterprise: Sovereignty and Historiography in Modern Korea.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
17.
EpsteinSGreenC (2019) Revealing voices? North Korean Males and the South Korean Mediascape. In: KimYouna (ed.) South Korean Popular Culture and North Korea. London: Routledge, pp. 176–188.
18.
EspenshadeTJCalhounCA (1993)
An analysis of public opinion toward undocumented immigration. Population Research and Policy Review12(3): 189–224.
19.
FacchiniGMaydaAM (2009)
Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries. Review of Economics and Statistics91(2): 295–314.
20.
HaSEChoSJKangJH (2016)
Group cues and public opposition to immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment in South Korea. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(1): 136–149.
21.
HainmuellerJHangartnerDLawrenceD (2016)
When lives are put on hold: Lengthy asylum processes decrease employment among refugees. Science Advances2(8): e1600432.
22.
HainmuellerJHangartnerDPietrantuonoG (2015)
Naturalization fosters the long-term political integration of immigrants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112(41): 12651–12656.
23.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014)
Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17(1): 225–249.
24.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJYamamotoT (2013)
Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via state preferences experiments. Political Analysis22(1): 1–30.
25.
HammarT (2009) European Immigration Policy: A Comparative Study.
New York, NY:
Cambridge UP.
26.
HansenR (2017)
Why both the left and the right are wrong: Immigration and multiculturalism in Canada. PS: Political Science & Politics50(3): 712–716.
27.
HansonGHScheve KF and SlaughterM (2005) Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 11028.
28.
HansonGHScheveKSlaughterMJ (2007)
Public finance and individual preferences over globalization strategies. Economics & Politics19(1): 1–33.
29.
HarellASorokaSIyengarS, et al. (2012)
The impact of economic and cultural cues on support for immigration in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Political Science45(3): 499–530.
30.
HundtD (2016)
Public opinion, social cohesion, and the politics of immigration in South Korea. Contemporary Politics22(4): 487–504.
31.
JeongHO (2016)
A new comparison of the East and West: National identity and attitudes toward immigration. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal25(2): 206–219.
32.
JohnsonCRodgerS (2015)
Did perception of the economy affect attitudes to immigration at the 2010 British General Election?Social Science Quarterly96(5): 1214–1225.
33.
KimAE (2009)
Global migration and South Korea: Foreign workers, foreign brides and the making of a multicultural society. Ethnic and Racial Studies32(1): 70–92.
34.
KimGCKilkeyM (2018)
Marriage migration policy in South Korea: Social investment beyond the nation state. International Migration56(1): 23–38.
35.
KimHMChoiJYChoJ (2008)
Changing cleavage structure in new democracies: An empirical analysis of political cleavages in Korea. Electoral Studies27(1): 136–150.
36.
KimJYLee JJ and KangCK (2015) Measuring A Giant: South Korean Perceptions of the United States. Report, Asian Institute for Policy Studies Public Opinion Studies Program.
37.
KimNK (2014)
Multicultural challenges in Korea: The current stage and a prospect. International Migration52(2): 100–121.
38.
KimSW (2003) Korean General Social Survey (KGSS).
Ann Arbor, MI:
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2015-06-16.
39.
KimWB (2004)
Migration of foreign workers into South Korea: From periphery to semi-periphery in the global labor market. Asian Survey44(2): 316–335.
40.
KongDSYoonKWYuSY (2010)
The social dimensions of immigration in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia40(2): 252–274.
41.
Korea Immigration Service (2018) The 3rd Master Plan for Immigration Policy. Policy document, June. Available at: http://bit.ly/2rhZPr8 (accessed 22 November 2019).
LeeJJGSkrentnyJD (2015) Korean multiculturalism in comparative perspective. In: LieJohn (ed) Multiethnic Korea? Multiculturalism, Migration, and Peoplehood Diversity in Contemporary South Korea.
Berkeley, CA:
Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, pp. 301–330.
45.
LeeNYYunIJ (eds) (2016) 한국인 의 정체성: 변화 와 연속, 2005–2015 [South Korean Identity: Change And Continuity, 2005–2015].
Seoul:
East Asia Institute.
46.
LeeSChienYC (2017)
The making of ‘skilled’ overseas Koreans: Transformation of visa policies for co-ethnic migrants in South Korea. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43(13): 2193–2210.
47.
LeeperTJHoboltSBTilleyJ (2019) Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.30 (accessed 23 March 2020).
48.
LimT (2009) Who is Korean? Migration, immigration, and the challenge of multiculturalism in homogenous societies. The Asia-Pacific Journal 7: (30. 1). Available at: https://apjjf.org/-Timothy-Lim/3192/article.html (accessed 10 March 2020)
49.
LimTSeolDH (2018)
Explaining South Korea’s diaspora engagement policies. Journal of Asian Sociology47(4): 633–662.
50.
MaydaAM (2006)
Who is against immigrants? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes towards immigrants. Review of Economics and Statistics88(3): 510–530.
51.
NewmanBJHartmanTKTaberCS (2014)
Social dominance and the cultural politics of immigration. Political Psychology35: 165–186.
SeolDHSkrentnyJD (2009)
Ethnic return migration and hierarchical nationhood: Korean Chinese foreign workers in South Korea. Ethnicities9(2): 147–174.
58.
ShinGW (2006) Ethnic Nationalism in Korea: Genealogy, Politics, and Legacy.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
59.
SnidermannPMHagendoornLPriorM (2004)
Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review98(1): 35–49.
60.
SobolewskaMGalandiniSLessard-PhillipsL (2017)
The public view of immigrant integration: Multidimensional and consensual. Evidence from survey experiments in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43(1): 58–79.
61.
SohnSH (2013)
Living in a consumer society: Adaptation experiences of North Korean youth defectors in South Korea. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal22(1): 109–131.
ValentinoNA, et al. (2017)
Economic and cultural drivers of immigrant support worldwide. British Journal of Political Science1–26.
65.
YoonIJ (2016) Changes in Koreans’ perceptions of multiculturalism and multicultural minorities: From paternalism to indifference? [한국인의 다문화와 다문화 소수자에 대한 인식 변화: 온정주의에서 냉담주의로?]. In: LeeNae-youngYoonIn-Jin (eds) South Korean Identity: Change and Continuity, 2005∼2015 [한국인의 정체성: 변화와 연속, 2005∼2015].
Seoul:
East Asia Institute, pp. 71–99.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
