This study contributes to the literature on migration and the construction of the symbolic boundaries of belonging. It explores the neglected topic of the role of collective memory and, in particular, cultural trauma, in the processes of negotiation of the symbolic boundaries between immigrants and the native-born. It does so by studying the case of post-Cold War immigration from three countries of the former Soviet Union—Belarus, Ukraine, and Russia—to the Czech Republic, focusing on immigrants’ experiences of being assigned responsibility for “1968,” the Warsaw Treaty Troops’ military intervention into Czechoslovakia and its subsequent occupation by the Soviet army. Analysis of the narratives of immigrants about their everyday encounters with Czechs advances the understanding of symbolic boundary-making processes by identifying two types of responses the immigrants employ for contesting the stigma of the perpetrators imposed on them in the Czech immigration context. The first involves “differentiation,” which aims at redrawing the symbolic boundaries between perpetrators and victims. The second response involves “individualization,” in which immigrants completely dissociate from the past acts of violence of the Soviet regime. This study offers insight into the micro-politics of nation-building in Central and Eastern Europe.
Abu-RasWSenzaiFLairdL (2013)
American Muslim physicians’ experiences since 9/11. Cultural trauma and the formation of Islamic identity. Traumatology19(1): 11–19.
2.
AlexanderJC (2004) Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In: AlexanderJCEyermanRGiesenBet al. (eds) Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity.
Berkeley and Los Angeles:
University of California Press, pp. 1–30.
3.
AlexanderJCEyermanRGiesenBet al. (2004) Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity.
Berkeley and Los Angeles:
University of California Press.
4.
AndersonB (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised. Verso.
5.
ArandaEVaqueraESousa-RodriguezI (2015)
Personal and cultural trauma and the ambivalent national identities of undocumented young adults in the USA. Journal of Intercultural Studies36(5): 600–619.
6.
BeierHKronebergC (2013)
Language boundaries and the subjective well-being of immigrants in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies39(10): 1535–1553.
7.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.
New York:
Anchor Books.
8.
BrubakerR (2004) Ethnicity Without Groups.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
9.
ChariSVerderyK (2009)
Thinking between the posts: Postcolonialism, postsocialism, and ethnography after the Cold War. Comparative Studies in Society and History51(01): 6–34.
10.
DavisKNencelL (2011)
Border skirmishes and the question of belonging: An authoethnographic account of everyday exclusion in multicultural society. Ethnicities11(4): 467–488.
11.
EcklundEH (2005)
‘Us’ and ‘them’: The role of religion in mediating and challenging the ‘model minority’ and other civic boundaries. Ethnic and Racial Studies28(1): 132–150.
12.
EyermanR (2002) Cultural Trauma Slavery and the Formation of African American Identity.
New York, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
13.
FlemingCM (2012)
White cruelty or Republican sins? Competing frames of stigma reversal in French commemorations of slavery. Ethnic and Racial Studies35(3): 488–505.
14.
GiesenB (2004) The trauma of perpetrators: The holocaust as the traumatic reference of German national identity. In: Alexander JC (ed) Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
15.
GoffmanE (1986) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity.
New York:
Simon and Schuster.
16.
HellgrenZ (2014)
Negotiating the boundaries of social membership: Undocumented migrant claims-making in Sweden and Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40(8): 1175–1191.
17.
HladíkR (2012)
A theory’s travelogue: Post-colonial theory in post-socialist space. Teorie Vědy/Theory of Science33(4): 561–590.
18.
HolsteinJAGubriumJF (2007)
Constructionist perspectives on the life course. Sociology Compass1(1): 335–352.
19.
HolyL (1996) The Little Czech and the Great Czech Nation: National Identity and the Post-Communist Transformation of Society.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
20.
JaworskyBN (2013)
Immigrants, aliens and Americans: Mapping out the boundaries of belonging in a new immigrant gateway. American Journal of Cultural Sociology1(2): 221–253.
KlvačováP (2006) Uznání cizinců v každodenním životě. In: Šanderová J (ed) Nerovnosti kolem nás. Analýza utváření sociálních nerovností v každodenním životě (Working Papers). Prague: UK FSV, pp. 9–28.
23.
KlvaňováR (2017) The Brother of the Other. Immigration from Belarus, Russia and Ukraine to the Czech Republic and the Boundaries of Belonging.
Brno:
Masaryk University.
24.
KratochvílPCibulkováPBenešV (2006)
Foreign policy, rhetorical action and the idea of otherness: The Czech Republic and Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies39(4): 497–511.
25.
KuzioT (2006)
National identity and history writing in Ukraine. Nationalities Papers34(4): 407–427.
26.
LamontMMizrachiN (2012)
Ordinary people doing extraordinary things: Responses to stigmatization in comparative perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies35(3): 365–381.
27.
LamontMMorningAMooneyM (2002)
Particular universalisms: North African immigrants respond to French racism. Ethnic and Racial Studies25(3): 390–414.
28.
Laughland-BooÿJSkrbišZTranterB (2015) Crossing boundaries: Understanding the pro-asylum narratives of young Australians. Ethnicities 16(5): 752–769.
29.
LazarALitvak-HirschT (2009)
Cultural trauma as a potential symbolic boundary. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society22: 183–190.
30.
LazarALitvak-HirschTChaitinJ (2008)
Between culture and family: Jewish-Israeli young adults’ relation to the holocaust as a cultural trauma. Traumatology14(4): 93–102.
31.
LeontiyevaJNečasováM (2009) Kulturně blízcí? Integrace přistěhovalců ze zemí bývalého Sovětského svazu. In: RákoczyováMTrbolaR (eds) Sociální Integrace Přistěhovalců v České Republice.
Praha:
SLON, pp. 117–160.
32.
LevyDSznaiderN (2010) Human Rights and Memory.
Pennsylvania:
Pennsylvania State University Press.
33.
MamulN (2009) Fragmented collective memory and negative Belarusian identity. In: RosenthalGBognerA (eds) Ethnicity, Belonging and Biography: Ethnographical and Biographical Perspectives.
Berlin:
LIT Verlag Münster, pp. 145–160.
34.
MaradaR (2007)
Paměť, trauma, generace. Sociální Studia4(1–2): 79–95.
35.
MarkJ (2010) The Unfinished Revolution: Making Sense of the Communist Past in Central-Eastern Europe.
New Haven:
Yale University Press.
36.
MasuokaNJunnJ (2013) The Politics of Belonging: Race, Public Opinion, and Immigration.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
37.
MobasherM (2006)
Cultural trauma and ethnic identity formation among Iranian immigrants in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist50(1): 110–117.
38.
MooreDC (2001)
Is the post-in postcolonial the post-in post-Soviet? Toward a global postcolonial critique. PMLA116(1): 111–128.
39.
NagataDKKimJHJNguyenTU (2015)
Processing cultural trauma: Intergenerational effects of the Japanese American incarceration. Journal of Social Issues71: 356–370.
40.
NeumannIB (2002) Europe’s post-Cold War remembrance of Russia: Cui bono? In: MüllerJ-W (ed) Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past.
Cambridge, New York:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–136.
41.
OostindieG (2012) History brought home: Post-colonial migrations and the Dutch rediscovery of slavery. IMISCOE. In: BosmaU (ed) Post-Colonial Immigrants and Identity Formations in the Netherlands.
Amsterdam:
Amsterdam University Press, pp. 155–173.
42.
PazderkaJ (ed) (2011) Invaze 1968: Ruský Pohled.
Praha:
Ústav pro studium totalitních režimů; Torst.
43.
PeškováM (2006) Jsem Immigrant: Imigranti z Bývalých Zemí SSSR v České Republice.
Ústí nad Labem:
Vlasta Králová.
44.
PlokhySM (1995)
The history of a ‘non-historical’ nation: Notes on the nature and current problems of Ukrainian historiography. Slavic Review54(3): 709–716.
RiessmanCK (2008) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences.
Los Angeles:
SAGE.
47.
SiddiM (2012)
Russia and the forging of memory and identity in Europe. Studia Diplomatica65(4): 77–103.
48.
SládekK (2010) Ruská diaspora v České republice.
Praha:
Pavel Mervart.
49.
SohoniDMendezJB (2014)
Defining immigrant newcomers in new destinations: Symbolic boundaries in Williamsburg, Virginia. Ethnic and Racial Studies37(3): 496–516.
TodorovaM (1997) Imagining the Balkans.
New York, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
52.
TollarováB (2007) Je normální, že cizinec není normální In: ŠanderováJ (ed) Sociální nerovnosti v kvalitativním výzkumu.
Prague:
Institute of Sociological Studies Charles University, pp. 72–88.
53.
TomášekMŠubrtJ (2014)
Jak se vyrovnáváme s naší minulostí? České a československé nedávné dějiny prizmatem teorie kolektivní paměti a kvalitativní metodologie (focus groups). Sociológia (Sociology)46(1): 88–115.
54.
UherekZ (2003)
Cizinecké komunity a městský prostor v České republice. Sociologický Časopis39(2): 193–216.
55.
UherekZ (2009) Immigrants from Ukraine in the Czech Republic: Foreigners in the border zone. In: KürtiL andSkalníkP (eds) Postsocialist Europe: Anthropological Perspectives from Home.
New York:
Berghan Books, pp. 270–294.
56.
WengrafT (2001) Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narratives and Semi-Structured Methods.
London:
SAGE.
57.
WilliamsK (1997) The Prague Spring and Its Aftermath: Czechoslovak Politics, 1968-1970.
Cambridge, New York:
Cambridge University Press.
58.
WinshipGKnowlesJ (1996)
The transgenerational impact of cultural trauma: Linking phenomena in treatment of third generation survivors of the holocaust. British Journal of Psychotherapy13: 259–266.
59.
WolffL (1994) Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment.
Stanford University Press.
60.
Yuval-DavisN (2006)
Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns of Prejudice40: 197–214.
61.
Yuval-DavisN (2011) The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations.
London:
SAGE.
62.
ZaryckiT (2013) Debating Soviet imperialism in contemporary Poland: On the polish uses of postcolonial theory and their contexts. In: WaldsteinMTuromaS (eds) Empire De/Centered: New Spatial Histories of Russia and the Soviet Union.
Farnham:
Ashgate, pp. 191–215.
