In this article we present a cross-national comparison of framing of the issue of the ‘Syria fighters’ in Flanders and the Netherlands. We examine this topic using inductive and deductive framing analysis and interpret the results in terms of the advocates expressing the frames and the newspapers they were published in. We argue that variation in frame use can be explained by considering the background and social identification of the frame advocates. Furthermore, the subject of the ‘Syria fighters’ is depicted as mostly relating to (Islamic) religious motives and the overall societal construction is relatively one-sided and problematized in a negative sense. This article serves as a preliminary step to a multi-level analysis of societal discourse on integration-related issues in online and offline networks, with an emphasis on Moroccan minorities in Flanders and the Netherlands.
ArnautKBrackeSCeuppensB (2009) Een leeuw in een kooi. De grenzen van het multiculturele Vlaanderen, Antwerpen: Meulenhoff-Manteau.
2.
BenigerJR (1993) Communication – embrace the subject, not the field. Journal of Communication43(3): 18–25.
3.
BrüggemannM (2014) Between frame setting and frame sending: How journalists contribute to news frames. Communication Theory24: 61–81.
4.
Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia (2004) Islamophobia: Issues, Challenges and Action, Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
5.
D’AngeloP (2002) News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication52(4): 870–888.
6.
De VreeseCH (2012) New avenues for framing research. American Behavioral Scientist56(3): 365–375.
7.
De WaeleMPauwelsLPonsaersP (2013) De overbodige punitieve reactie tot uitbreiding van de wet op private milities [the redundant punitive response to expansion of the law on private militias]. Orde van de dag69(1): 20–28.
8.
d’HaenensLBinkS (2007) Islam in the Dutch press: With special attention to the Algemeen Dagblad. Media, Culture and Society29(1): 135–149.
9.
EntmanR (1993) Framing: Towards a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
10.
GamsonWAModiglianiA (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology95(1): 1–37.
11.
HarcupTO’NeillD (2001) What is News? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2(2): 261–280.
12.
HayesAFKrippendorffK (2007) Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures1(1): 77–89.
13.
IyengarS (1990) Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior12(1): 19–40.
14.
LechelerSDe VreeseCH (2012) News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly89(2): 185–204.
15.
MalcolmDBairnerACurryG (2010) “Woolmergate”: Cricket and the representation of Islam and Muslims in the British press. Journal of Sport and Social Issues34(2): 215–235.
16.
MalyI (2007) Cultu (u) renpolitiek. Over media, globalisering en culturele identiteiten, Antwerpen: Garant.
17.
MaraS (2013) Objectivity in Journalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
18.
MatthesJ (2012) Framing politics: An integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist56(3): 247–259.
19.
MatthesJKohringM (2008) The content analysis of media frames: Towards improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication58: 258–279.
20.
Moha AA and Bovendeert S (2013) “Syrië-ganger doet wat VN nalaat”: Opiniepeiling naar de houding en opvattingen van Nederlandse moslims en autochtonen over Syrië en Syrië-gangers [“Syria-fighter does what UN neglects”: Poll on attitudes and beliefs of Dutch Muslims and natives on Syria and Syria-goers]. Report, Motivaction, The Netherlands, May.
21.
PleijterAHermansLVergeerM (2012) Journalists and journalism in the Netherlands. In: WeaverDHWillnatL (eds) The Global Journalist in the 21st Century, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 242–254.
22.
RaeymaeckersKPaulussenSDe KeyserJ (2012) A survey of professional journalists in Flanders (Belgium). In: WeaverDHWillnatL (eds) The Global Journalist in the 21st Century, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 141–154.
23.
ReeseSD (2010) Finding frames in a web of culture: The case of the war on terror. In: D’AngeloPKuypersJA (eds) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 84–109.
24.
RoggebandCVliegenthartR (2007) Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics30(3): 524–548.
25.
RosengrenKE (1993) From field to frog ponds. Journal of Communication43(3): 6–17.
26.
RuigrokNVan AtteveldtW (2007) Global angling with a local angle: How U.S., British, and Dutch newspapers frame global and local terrorist attacks. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics12(1): 68–90.
27.
ShahidW (2005) Berichtgeving over moslims en de Islam in de westerse media: Beeldvorming, oorzaken en alternatieve strategieën [Reporting on Muslims and Islam in western media: Portrayal, causes and alternative strategies]. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap33(4): 330–346.
28.
TajfelH (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
TajfelHTurnerJ (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, pp. 33–47.
30.
TurgenevISpiegelM (1965) Hamlet and Don Quixote. Chicago Review17(4): 92–109.
31.
Van GorpB (2005) Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication20(4): 484–507.
32.
Van GorpB (2007) The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back. Journal of Communication57: 60–78.
33.
Van GorpB (2010) Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In: D’AngeloPKuypersJA (eds) Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 84–109.
34.
VerkuytenM (2005) Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology88(1): 121–138.
35.
VerkuytenMReijerseA (2008) Intergroup structure and identity management among ethnic minority and majority groups: The interactive effects of perceived stability, legitimacy, and permeability. European Journal of Social Psychology38: 106–127.
