In order to illustrate the degradation of a method, we will examine Herbert Spencer’s Principles of Sociology (1874–1898, three volumes). The analytic-synthetic method introduced into ‘civil philosophy’ by Thomas Hobbes in the 17th century is chosen as the point of reference for the assessment of the status the analysis acquires in Spencer’s work. A comparison of the two editions of The Principles of Psychology reinforces our epistemological reading of a man who, despite his best efforts, could not rid himself of a method whose legitimacy he denied.
BecquemontDOttaviD (2011) Prophète dans son pays: Spencer dans la monde anglo-saxon. In: BecquemontDOttaviD (eds) Penser Spencer. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, pp.25–46.
2.
BellDSylvestC (2006) International society and Victorian political thought: Herbert Spencer, T. H. Green, and Henry Sidgwick. Modern Intellectual History3(2): 207–238.
3.
BourdieuP (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BurrowJW (1966) Evolution and Society. A Study in Victorian Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CanguilhemG (2000) Qu’est-ce qu’une idéologie scientifique? In: CanguilhemG (ed.) Idéologie et rationalité dans l’histoire des sciences de la vie. Nouvelles études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin, pp.33–45.
6.
CarneiroRL (1981) Herbert Spencer as an anthropologist. The Journal of Libertarian Studies5(2): 153–210.
7.
CazeneuveJ (1961) Société industrielle et société militaire selon Spencer. Revue Française de Sociologie2(2): 48–53.
8.
ClainOMaršálekJ (2016) Transformation, degradation, disappearance of scientific objects. Teorie vědy /Theory of Science38(3): 263–268.
9.
CollinsHF (1889) An Epitome of the Synthetic Philosophy. Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
10.
ComteA (1841) Cours de philosophie positive, tome cinquième contenant la partie historique de la philosophie sociale et tout ce qui concerne l’état théologique et l’état métaphysique. Paris: Bachelier.
11.
CooleyCH (2000) Reflections upon the sociology of Herbert Spencer (orig. 1920). In: OfferJ (ed.) Herbert Spencer. Critical Assessments, vol. III. London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp.7–19.
12.
DurkheimÉ (2007) Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
13.
ElwickJ (2007) Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820–1858. London: Pickering & Chatto.
14.
FrancisM (1980) The nineteenth century theory of sovereignty and Thomas Hobbes. History of Political Thought1(3): 517–540.
15.
GordinM (2016) “What a go-a-head people they are!”: The hostile appropriation of Herbert Spencer in imperial Russia. In: LightmanB (ed.) Global Spencerism. The Communication and Appropriation of a British Evolutionist. Leiden – Boston: Brill, pp.13–34.
16.
HainesVA (1988) Is Spencer’s theory an evolutionary theory ? In: OfferJ (ed.) Herbert Spencer. Critical Assessments, vol. II. London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp.471–493.
17.
HainesVA (1992) Spencer’s philosophy of science. In: OfferJ (ed.) Herbert Spencer. Critical Assessments, Vol. I. London and New York, NY: Routledge, pp.126–143.
18.
HobbesT (1651a) Leviathan (Leviathan, or The Matter, Forme, & Power of a Common-Wealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil). Oxford: Oxford University Press1996.
19.
HobbesT (1651b) The English Works of Thomas Hobbes. Collected and edited by Sir W. Molesworth. Vol. 2. Philosophical rudiments concerning government and society (De Cive). London: John Bohn 1841.
20.
HobbesT (1655) The English Works of Thomas Hobbes. Collected and edited by Sir W. Molesworth. Vol. 1. Elements of philosophy. The first section, Concerning body (De Corpore). London: John Bohn 1839.
21.
HolmwoodJO’MalleyM (2003) Evolutionary and functionalist historical sociology. In: DelantyGIsinEF (eds) Handbook of Historical Sociology. London: Sage, pp.39–57.
22.
JolyM (2017) La révolution sociologique. De la naissance d’un régime de pensée scientifique à la crise de la philosophie (XIXe–XXe siècle). Paris: Éditions La Découverte.
23.
LatourB (1996) Philosophie contre sociologie des sciences. Une querelle enfin dépassée?Le Débat92(5): 153–163.
24.
LaudanL (1971) William Whewel on the consilience of inductions. The Monist55(3): 368–391.
25.
MarsalekJ (2022) Auguste Comte’s concept of systematic obsolescence, by which all truly unarguable views must spontaneously fade away. Philosophia Scientiae. Studies in History of Science and Philosophy26(1): 111–131.
26.
McCannCR (2004) Individualism and the Social Order. The Social Element in Liberal Thought. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
OfferJ (2010) Herbert Spencer and Social Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
OfferJ (2014) From ‘natural selection’ to ‘survival of the fittest’: On the significance of Spencer’s refashioning of Darwin in the 1860s. Journal of Classical Sociology14(2): 156–177.
29.
OfferJ (2019) Social solidarity and Herbert Spencer: Not the oxymoron that might be assumed. Frontiers in Sociology4(1): 1–11.
30.
PerrinRG (1976) Herbert Spencer’s four theories of social evolution. American Journal of Sociology81(6): 1339–1359.
31.
PerrinRG (1988) Herbert Spencer: A renewed appreciation by Jonathan H. Turner. Review. Sociological Analysis49(3): 309–310.
32.
RousseauJ-J (1755) Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. In: RousseauJ-J (ed.) Œuvres complètes, vol. III. Paris: Éditions Gallimard, pp.109–223.
33.
SackstederW (1980) Hobbes: The art of geometricians. Journal of the History of Philosophy18(2): 131–146.
34.
SackstederW (1982) Hobbes’ logistica: Definition and commentary. Philosophy Research Archives8: 55–94.
35.
SackstederW (1988) Hobbes and Talaska on the order of the sciences. Journal of the History of Philosophy26(4): 643–647.
ShapinSSchafferS (2011) Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
SpencerH (1851) Social Statics, or The Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of them Developed. London: John Chapman.
39.
SpencerH (1855) The Principles of Psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.
40.
SpencerH (1860) The social organism. In: SpencerH (ed.) Essays: Scientific, Political and Speculative, vol. 1. Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate, pp.265–307.
41.
SpencerH (1862) The First Principles, 2nd edn.London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
42.
SpencerH (1864) The Principles of Biology, vol. I. London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
43.
SpencerH (1867) The Principles of Biology, vol. II. London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
44.
SpencerH (1870) The Principles of Psychology, vol. I. London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
45.
SpencerH (1872) The Principles of Psychology, vol. II. London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
46.
SpencerH (1873) The Study of Sociology. London: Henry S. King & Co.
47.
SpencerH (1877) The Principles of Sociology, vol. I. London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
48.
SpencerH (1882) The Principles of Sociology, vol. II. London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
49.
SpencerH (1884) The Man Versus the State. London – Edinburgh: Williams and Norgate.
50.
SpencerH (1896) The Principles of Sociology, vol. III. London – Edinburgh – Oxford: Williams and Norgate.
51.
SpencerH (1897) Various Fragments. London – Edinburgh – Oxford: Williams and Norgate.
52.
SuppeF (1998) The structure of scientific paper. Philosophy of Science65(3): 381–405.
53.
TalaskaRA (1988a) Analytic and synthetic method according to Hobbes. Journal of the History of Philosophy26(2): 207–237.
54.
TalaskaRA (1988b) Sacksteder and Talaska on system in Hobbes. Journal of the History of Philosophy26(4): 648–653.
55.
TurnerJ (1985) Herbert Spencer: A Renewed Appreciation. London: Sage.
56.
TurnerJ (2013) Theoretical Sociology: 1830 to the Present. London: Sage.
57.
WeinbergerJ (1975) Hobbes’s doctrine of method. The American Political Science Review69(4): 1336–1353.
58.
WhewellW (1847) Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences Founded upon Their History, vol. II, 2nd edn.London: John W. Parker.