CarlsP (2019) Modern democracy as the cult of the individual: Durkheim on religious coexistence and conflict. Critical Research on Religion7: 292–311.
2.
CarlsP (2021) The social fact in Durkheim’s late work: Structural hermeneutics, positive sociology, and causality. Journal of Classical Sociology. Published online. DOI: 10.1177/1468795x20980660
3.
DerridaJ (2005) Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Writing and Difference. Translated by BassA. London and New York: Routledge, pp.351–370.
4.
LukesS (2007) Searle versus Durkheim. In: TsohatzidisS (ed.) Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle’s Social Ontology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.191–202.
5.
SawyerRK (2002) Durkheim’s dilemma: Toward a sociology of emergence. Sociological Theory20(2): 227–247.
6.
SchmausW (1994) Durkheim’s Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge: Creating an Intellectual Niche. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
SearleJR (2006) Searle versus Durkheim and the waves of thought. Anthropological Theory6(1): 57–69.
8.
TillyC (ed.) (1981) Useless Durkheim. In: As Sociology Meets History. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.95–108.
