This paper contends that Henri Bergson’s The Two Sources of Morality and Religion (1977 [1932]) is in pervasive and critical engagement with Émile Durkheim. We argue that both thinkers advance a sui generis concept of society that frames the organizing problem of their exchange: the relationship between society and biology. Our analysis traces the concept of society sui generis through Durkheim’s Division of Labor (1893) and Rules of Sociological Method (1895) to its reconfiguration in Bergson’s Two Sources. We argue that Durkheim’s concept of society sui generis avoids biological reductionism because it highlights the role of moral obligation in separating society from biology. Bergson assumes that social and biological life are inseparable and thereby disputes the privilege Durkheim gives to obligation. For Bergson, the sui generis nature of society is expressed by the singularity of human society in grasping the creative power of life.
Allcock JB ( 1983) Editorial introduction to the English translation. In: Pragmatism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, xxiii-xli.
2.
Alliez E. ( 2001) Deleuze’s Bergsonism. In: Genosko G (ed.) Deleuze and Guattari: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers. London: Routledge, 394-411.
3.
Ansell Pearson K. and Mullarkey J. ( 2002) Bergson: Key Writings. London: Continuum.
4.
Bergson H. ( 1974[1934]) The Creative Mind: An Introduction to Metaphysics . New York: Citadel.
5.
Bergson H. ( 1977[1932]) The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
6.
Bergson H. ( 1991[1896]) Matter and Memory. New York : Zone.
7.
Bergson H. ( 1998[1907]) Creative Evolution. New York : Dover Thrift.
8.
Bergson H. ( 1999[1922]) Duration and Simultaneity. Manchester: Clinamen.
9.
Bergson H. ( 2001[1889]) Time and Free Will. Mineola, NY: Dover.
10.
Bergson H. ( 2002 [1932]) Bergson à [P. Masson-Oursel] In Correspondances. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1386-1388.
11.
Belloy C. ( 2002) Une mise au point de Bergson sur les Deux sources. In: Worms F (ed.) Annales bergsoniennes I: Bergson dans le siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 133-142.
12.
Boutroux É. ( 1991 [1874]) De la contingence des Lois de la nature . Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
13.
Cariou M. ( 1976) Bergson et le fait mystique. Paris : Aubier Montaigne.
14.
Cipriani R. ( 2000) Sociology of Religion: An Historical Introduction. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
15.
Deleuze G. ( 1986) Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
16.
Deleuze G. ( 1988) Bergsonism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
Deleuze G. ( 2004) Cours inédit de Gilles Deleuze sur le chapitre III de L’Evolution Créatrice. In: Worms F (ed.) Annales bergsonniennes II. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 151-188.
18.
Deleuze G. and Guattari F. ( 1994) What is Philosophy?New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
Durkheim É. ( 1917) Société. Bulletin de la societé française de philosophie15: 57.
20.
Durkheim É. ( 1961 [1925]) Moral Education. New York: Free Press.
21.
Durkheim É. ( 1982 [1895]) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
22.
Durkheim É (1983 [1955]) Pragmatism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Durkheim É (1984 [1893]) The Division of Labour. New York: Free Press.
24.
Durkheim É (1995 [1912]) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life . New York: Free Press.
25.
Durkheim É. ( 2005 [1914]) The dualism of human nature and its social conditions. Durkheimian Studies11: 35-45.
26.
Emerson RW ( 2000) Self-reliance. In: Oliver M (ed.) The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: Modern Library, 132-153.
27.
Espinas A. ( 1977[1878]) Des sociétés animales. New York: Arno Press.
28.
François A. ( 2007) Life and will in Nietzsche and Bergson. SubStance36: 100-114.
29.
Gane M. ( 1983) Durkheim: The sacred language. Economy and Society12: 1-47.
30.
Giddens A. ( 1971) Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Giddens A (ed.) (1972) Émile Durkheim: Selected Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Goddard M. ( 2001) The scattering of time crystals: Deleuze, mysticism and cinema. In: Bryden M (ed.) Deleuze and Religion. London: Routledge , 53-64.
33.
Guerlac S. ( 1997) Literary Polemics: Bataille, Sartre, Valery, Breton. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
34.
Guerlac S. ( 2006) Thinking in Time: An Introduction to Henri Bergson. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
35.
Hirst PQ ( 1973) Morphology and pathology: Biological analogies and metaphors in Durkheim’s Rules of Sociological Method. Economy and Society2: 1-34.
36.
Hughes HS ( 2002) Consciousness and Society. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
37.
James W. ( 1996[1909]) A Pluralistic Universe. Lincoln : University of Nebraska Press.
38.
Kant I. ( 1996[1785]) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Kant I. ( 1998[1781/1787]) Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Keck F. ( 2005) The virtual, the symbolic, and the actual in Bergsonian philosophy and Durkheimian sociology. MLN20: 1133-1145.
41.
Kolakowski L. ( 1985) Bergson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
LaCapra D. ( 1985) Émile Durkheim: Sociologist and Philosopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Lawlor L. ( 2003) The Challenge of Bergsonism. London : Continuum.
44.
Lefebvre A. ( 2008) The Image of Law: Bergson, Spinoza, Deleuze. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
45.
Levine DN ( 1995) The organism metaphor in sociology. Social Research62: 239-265.
46.
Lukes S. ( 1985) Émile Durkheim: His Life and Work. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
47.
Marrati P. ( 2006) Mysticism and the foundation of the open society: Bergsonian politics. In: de Vries H (ed.) Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World. New York: Fordham University Press, 591-601.
48.
Mellor PA ( 1998) Sacred contagion and social vitality: Collective effervescence in Les Formes Élémentaires de la vie Religieuse. Durkheimian Studies4: 87-114.
49.
Merleau-Ponty M. ( 1960) Éloge de la philosophie, et autres essais. Paris: Gallimard.
Moscovici S. ( 1993) The Invention of Society: Psychological Explanations for Social Phenomena. Cambridge: Polity .
52.
Mullarkey J. ( 2000) The New Bergson. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
53.
Pearce F. ( 2001) The Radical Durkheim (2nd edn). Toronto: Canadian Scholar’s Press.
54.
Ramp W. ( 1998) Effervescence, differentiation and representation in The Elementary Forms. In: Allen NJ, Pickering WSF and Miller WW (eds) On Durkheim’s Elementary Forms of Religious Life. London: Routledge, 136-148.
55.
Ramp W. ( 2003) Religion and the dualism of the social condition in Durkheim and Bataille. Economy and Society32(1): 119-140.
56.
Riley AT ( 2002) Durkheim contra Bergson? The hidden roots of postmodern theory and the postmodern ‘return’ of the sacred. Sociological Perspectives45: 243-265.
57.
Schmaus W. ( 1994) Durkheim’s Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
Stedman Jones S. ( 2001) Durkheim Reconsidered. Cambridge: Polity.
59.
Vernon R. ( 2003) Bergson’s Two Sources revisited: The moral possibility of nationalism. Contemporary Political Theory2: 271-288.
60.
Wilson EO ( 2000[1975]) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
61.
Worms F. ( 2004) Bergson et les deux sens de la vie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
