This Note reflects on the challenges of being a qualitative researcher, emphasising the ongoing struggle for recognition and credibility within certain quantitatively oriented circles. Drawing on personal experience as a human geographer and on the history of qualitative research within geography, it offers practical guidance for qualitative researchers across disciplines on how to assert themselves and succeed despite methodological tensions. Furthermore, the piece explores how publishers, funders, and academic institutions can support qualitative research and enhance its visibility in scholarly discourse. Ultimately, the aim is to encourage further discussion on addressing scepticism towards qualitative work and to inspire others to share their insights and experiences on this important topic.
AguzzoliRLenglerJMillerSR, et al. (2024) Paradigms in qualitative IB research: Trends, analysis and recommendations. Management International Review64: 165–198.
2.
AitkenSCValentineG (eds) (2014) Approaches to Human Geography: Philosophies, Theories, People and Practices. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
3.
AshJKitchinRLeszczynskiA (eds) (2018) Digital Geographies. London: Sage Publications.
4.
BarnesTJSheppardE (2010) ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography34(2): 193–214.
5.
BeckerHS (1999) The Chicago school, so-called. Qualitative Sociology22: 3–12.
6.
BerchtAL (2021) How qualitative approaches matter in climate and ocean change research: Uncovering contradictions about climate concern. Global Environmental Change70: 102326.
7.
BerchtAL (2023) Appreciate qualitative research as being of equal value to quantitative research. Nature Water1: 302–303.
8.
BerchtALSandner Le GallVStraubJ, et al. (2024) Give qualitative research the recognition it deserves. Journal of Environmental Psychology96: 102320.
9.
BonacheJ (2020) The challenge of using a ‘non-positivist’ paradigm and getting through the peer-review process. Human Resource Management Journal31: 37–48.
10.
BrinkmannSJacobsenMHKristiansenS (2020) Historical overview of qualitative research in the social sciences. In: LeavyP (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, Second edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 23–58.
11.
BrowneALPullingerMMeddW, et al. (2014) Patterns of practice: A reflection on the development of quantitative/mixed methodologies capturing everyday life related to water consumption in the UK. International Journal of Social Research Methodology17(1): 27–43.
12.
ButtimerA (1976) Grasping the dynamism of lifeworld. Annals of the Association of American Geographers66(2): 277–292.
13.
CartwrightEIgudiaE (2024) The case for mixed methods research: Embracing qualitative research to understand the (informal) economy. Review of Development Economics28(4): 1947–1970.
14.
ChapoulieJ (2020) Chicago Sociology. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
CharmazK (2014) Constructing Grounded Theory, Second editionLondon: Sage Publications.
16.
ClokePCrangPGoodwinM (eds) (2004) Envisioning Human Geographies. London: Edward Arnold.
17.
CohenB (2019) The role of qualitative approaches in formulating long-term low GHG emissions development strategies. In: World Resources Institute (WRI) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (eds) Climate Action with Tomorrow in Mind. Expert Perspectives on Long-Term Climate and Development Strategies. Vol. 2. Washington: WRI and UNDP, 23–27.
18.
ColvenEThomsonMJ (2018) Bridging the divide between human and physical geography: Potential avenues for collaborative research on climate modeling. Geography Compass13(2): e12418.
19.
CopeM (2010) A history of qualitative research in geography. In: DelyserDAitkenSCrangMHerbertSMcDowellL (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: Sage Publications, 25–45.
20.
CopeM (2014) Researching. In: LeeRCastreeNKitchinRLawsonVPaasiAPhiloCRadcliffeSRobertsSWithersC (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Human Geography. London: Sage Publications, 316–342.
21.
CouclelisH (1982) Philosophy in the construction of geographic reality: Some thoughts upon the event of the ‘qualitative revolution’ in human geography. In: GouldPOlssonG (eds) A Search for Common Ground. London: Pion Limited, 105–138.
22.
CoxKR (2014) Making Human Geography. New York: Guilford Publications.
23.
CoxS (2019) Qualitative analysis to support long-term strategies. In: World Resources Institute (WRI) and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (eds) Climate Action with Tomorrow in Mind. Expert Perspectives on Long-Term Climate and Development Strategies. Vol. 2. Washington: WRI and UNDP, 35–40.
24.
CresswellT (2024) Geographic Thought: A Critical Introduction, Second editionHoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
25.
CreswellJWClarkVLP (2018) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Third editionThousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
26.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) (2018) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, Fifth editionLos Angeles: Sage Publications.
EldenSCramptonJW (eds) (2012) Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
29.
ElwoodSLeszczynskiA (2018) Feminist digital geographies. Gender, Place & Culture25(5): 629–644.
30.
EnglandKVL (1994) Getting personal: Reflexivity, positionality, and feminist research. The Professional Geographer46(1): 80–89.
31.
EricksonF (1984) What makes school ethnography “ethnographic?”. Anthropology & Education Quarterly15(1): 51–66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3216442.
32.
EylesJSmithDM (eds) (1988) Qualitative Methods in Human Geography. Oxford: Polity Press.
33.
FieldingN (2005) The resurgence, legitimation and institutionalization of qualitative methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research6(2): Art. 32. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502324.
34.
FlickU (2018) Managing Quality in Qualitative Research, Second editionLondon: Sage Publications.
35.
FlickU (2023) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Seventh editionLondon: Sage Publications.
36.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick and London: Aldine.
37.
GregoryD (1994) Geographical Imaginations. Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
GyurisFMichelBPaulusK (eds) (2022) Recalibrating the Quantitative Revolution in Geography: Travels, Networks, Translations. Abington and New York: Routledge.
39.
HammarbergKKirkmanMde LaceyS (2016) Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction31(3): 498–501.
40.
HarveyD (1973) Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.
41.
HayICopeM (eds) (2021) Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, Fifth editionOxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
HendrenKNewcomerKPandeySK, et al. (2023) How qualitative research methods can be leveraged to strengthen mixed methods research in public policy and public administration?Public Administration Review83: 468–485.
43.
HolmPWiniwarterV (2017) Climate change studies and the human sciences. Global and Planetary Change156: 115–122.
44.
Holt-JensenA (2022) Synthesis of physical and human geography: Necessary and impossible? In: JakobsenPJönssonELarsenHG (eds) Socio-Spatial Theory in Nordic Geography: Intellectual Histories and Critical Interventions. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 69–85.
45.
KitchinR (2014) Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society1(1): 1–12.
46.
LeesL (2004) Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography28(1): 101–107.
47.
LengerA (2019) The rejection of qualitative research methods in economics. Journal of Economic Issues53(4): 946–965.
48.
LevittHMBambergMCreswellJW, et al. (2018) Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist73(1): 26–46.
49.
LovellSACoenSERosenbergMW (eds) (2023) The Routledge Handbook of Methodologies in Human Geography. London and New York: Routledge.
50.
LundC (2014) Of what is this a case?: Analytical movements in qualitative social science research. Human Organization73(3): 224–234. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/44148783.
51.
MabonLKitaJOnchiH, et al. (2020) What natural and social scientists need from each other for effective marine environmental assessment: Insights from collaborative research on the Tomakomai CCS Demonstration Project. Marine Pollution Bulletin159: 111520.
52.
Martin-OrtegaJ (2023) We cannot address global water challenges without social sciences. Nature Water1: 2–3.
53.
MarvastiAB (2004) Qualitative Research in Sociology. An Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
54.
MasseyD (1984) Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production. London: Macmillan.
55.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
56.
MaxwellJA (2020) The value of qualitative inquiry for public policy. Qualitative Inquiry26(2): 177–186.
57.
McDowellL (1992) Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers17(4): 399–416.
58.
McMullenLMWinston-ProctorCE (2018) Qualitative inquiry in undergraduate psychology curricula and research training: Contexts and practices for transforming the optional into the obligatory. Qualitative Psychology5(2): 191–196.
Nature Sustainability. (2020) Make the most of qualitative research. Nature Sustainability3: 73.
61.
NordstromSNHappel-ParkinsA (2016) Methodological drag: Subversive performances of qualitative methodologist and pedagogical practices. Qualitative Inquiry22(2): 149–153.
62.
Notes from the Editors. (2022) Increasing qualitative submissions. American Political Science Review116(2): v–vi.
63.
PaulusK (2022) Mehr “Quantitatives zur quantitativen und theoretischen Revolution in der deutschsprachigen Geographie”. Berichte. Geographie und Landeskunde95(1): 26–49.
64.
RatcliffeEOgunbodeCWilkieS, et al. (2024) On the importance of qualitative research in environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology93: 102199.
RogerKBoneTAHeinonenT, et al. (2018) Exploring identity: What we do as qualitative researchers. The Qualitative Report23(3): 532–546.
67.
RoseG (1993) Feminist and Geography. Cambridge: Polity Press.
68.
RoseG (1997) Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography21(3): 305–320.
69.
RosenbergMW (2023) The quantitative revolution. In: LovellSACoenSERosenbergMW (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Methodologies in Human Geography. London and New York: Routledge, 39–46.
70.
RubinAT (2021) Rocking Qualitative Social Science: An Irreverent Guide to Rigorous Research. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
71.
Santiago-DelefosseMGavinABruchezC, et al. (2016) Quality of qualitative research in the health sciences: Analysis of the common criteria present in 58 assessment guidelines by expert users. Social Science & Medicine148: 142–151.
72.
SchultzPWMcCunnLJ (2024) Publishing in the journal of environmental psychology: Editorial priorities for a second term as co-editors-in-chief. Journal of Environmental Psychology100: 102456.
73.
SealeC (1999) The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
74.
ShawRLBishopFLHorwoodJ, et al. (2019) Enhancing the quality and transparency of qualitative research methods in health psychology. British Journal of Health Psychology24(4): 739–745.
Stainton RogersWWilligC (2017) Introduction. In: WilligCStainton RogersW (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, Second edition. London: Sage Publications, 1–13.
77.
StickleyTO’CaithainAHomerC (2022) The value of qualitative methods to public health research, policy and practice. Perspectives in Public Health142(4): 237–240.
78.
TaylorJFCrestaniI (2024) Living with the scepticism for qualitative research: A phenomenological polyethnography. Qualitative Research Journal24(3): 221–232.
79.
TuanY-F (1976) Humanistic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers66(2): 266–276.
80.
WaittG (2021) Revealing the construction of social realities: Foucauldian discourse analysis. In: HayICopeM (eds) Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 333–354.
81.
WelchCPiekkariR (2017) How should we (not) judge the ‘quality’ of qualitative research?Journal of World Business52(5): 714–725.
82.
WilligCStainton RogersW (eds) (2017) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, Second editionLondon: Sage Publications.
