The method of performance ethnography includes participation in the community being studied, performance as a way of communicating with the community, and performance as a way of sharing findings beyond the community of study. “Performance” can be taken here in the more theatrical, staged sense, or in the sense of engaging with the social dramas of a community. The performance ethnographer understands that they are not a neutral observer and owns and contextualizes their subjectivity. Although used across multiple disciplines, performance ethnography is not a common method in Library and Information Science. This article argues for the value of using this embodied method to study embodied information practices, specifically describing research on the American reality (true, personal, edgy) storytelling movement. Using performance ethnography allows the researcher to enter into a meaningful dialog with the community of study and bring others into that dialog as they share their research. Embodied information research can challenge the conceptualization of information as a disembodied object, while facilitating critical conversations about information needs and access.
Alexander CraftR (2015) When the Devil Knocks: The Congo Tradition and the Politics of Blackness in Twentieth-Century Panama. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
BordonaroK (2020) Adult learning theories and autoethnography: Informing the practice of information literacy. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions46(2): 163–171.
CaseGA (2005) “Tic(k)”: A performance of time and memory. In PollockD (ed.) Remembering: Oral History Performance. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan, pp. 129–142.
ConquergoodD (2016) Cultural struggles: Performance, Ethnography, Praxis. EPJohnson (ed). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
CoxAGriffinBLHartelJ (2017) What every body knows: Embodied information in serious leisure. Journal of Documentation73(3): 1–28.
10.
DanzakRLGuntherCBColeMA (2021) Someone else’s child: A co-constructed, performance autoethnography of adoption from three perspectives. The Qualitative Report26(3): 637–651.
11.
DayRE (2010) The self-imposed limits of library and information science: Remarks on the discipline, on the profession, on the university, and on the state of “information” in the U.S. at large today. Interactions: UCLS Journal of Education and Information Studies6(2): 1–15.
12.
DenzinNK (2003) Performance Ethnography: Critical Pedagogy and the Politics of Culture. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
13.
DenzinNK (2018) A new critical inquiry through performance autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research11(1): 51–56.
GarciaACStandleeAIBechkoffJ, et al. (2009) Ethnographic approaches to the internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography38(1): 52–84.
16.
GherardiS (2009) Introduction: The critical power of the “practice lens”. Management Learning40(2): 115–128.
17.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
18.
GuzikE (2013) Representing ourselves in information science research: A methodological essay on autoethnography. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science37(4): 267–283.
19.
HameraJ (2016) Response-ability, vulnerability, and other(s’) bodies. In: JohnsonEP (eds) Cultural Struggles: Performance, Ethnography, Praxis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 306–309.
20.
HavenK (2007) Story proof: The science behind the startling power of story. Westport, Connecticut, USA: Libraries Unlimited.
21.
JacksonS (2003) Lines of Activity: Performance, Historiography, Hull-House Domesticity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
22.
JohnsonEP (2016) Introduction: ‘Opening and interpreting lives’. In: JohnsonEP (eds) Cultural Struggles: Performance, Ethnography, Praxis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1–14.
23.
LinettP (2013) Interview: Ben Lillie on science and the storytelling revival. Curator: The Museum Journal56(1): 15–19.
24.
LloydA (2010) Corporeality and practice theory: Exploring emerging research agendas for information literacy. Information Research15(3): 1–13.
25.
LloydAOlssonM (2018) Enacting and capturing embodied knowledge in the practices of enthusiast car restorers: Emerging themes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science51(4): 1033–1040.
26.
MadisonDS (2012) Critical Ethnography: Methods, Ethics, and Performance (Second). Los Angeles: Sage.
27.
ManningEMassumiB (2016) JUST LIKE THAT: William Forsyth: Between movement and language. In: HunterLKrimmerELichtenfelsP (eds) Sentient Performativities of Embodiment: Thinking Alongside the Human. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 119–144.
28.
MarshalMMcLuhanE (1988) Laws of media: The new science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
29.
MichelsDH (2012) Seeking God’s will: The experience of information seeking by leaders of a church in transition. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences36(1/2): 16–27.
30.
MosherRLongJLeE, et al. (2017) Agency and agendas: Revisiting the roles of the researcher and the researched in ethnographic fieldwork. Anthropologica59(1): 145–156.
31.
NelsonSB (2019) Coming Out of Our Shells: Safety and Vulnerability in Reality Storytelling [Dissertation]. University of North Carolina.
32.
NelsonSB (2022) A zoom tetrad: Applying McLuhan’s laws of Media to video conferencing. Storytelling, Self, Society18(1): 83–121.
33.
NelsonSB (2024) Holding a brave space: Lessons from reality storytelling. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion8(3/4): 6–27.
34.
NelsonSBSturmB (2017) Storytelling. In McDonaldJLevine-ClarkM (eds) The Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (4th ed.). Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press, 4437–4446.
35.
OlssonM (2016) Making sense of the past: The embodied information practices of field archaeologists. Journal of Information Science42(3): 410–419.
36.
OlssonMHanssonJ (2019) Embodiment, information practices and documentation: A study of mid-life martial artists. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 24(4). Available at: http://informationr.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1928.html (accessed 8 May 2024).
OlssonMLloydA (2017b) Losing the art and craft of know-how: Capturing vanishing embodied knowledge in the 21st century. Information Research22(4): 1–12.
39.
OlssonMR (2010) The play’s the thing: Theater professionals make sense of Shakespeare. Library & Information Science Research32(4): 272–280.
40.
PollockD (2005) Remembering: Oral history performance. New York, NY, USA: Macmillan.
41.
ReyesV (2018) Three models of transparency in ethnographic research. Ethnography19(2): 204–226.
42.
RichardsonM (2020) Embodiment and affect. In: VintS (eds) After the Human: Culture, Theory and Criticism in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 58–71.
43.
Schlesselman-TarangoG (2019) Reproductive failure and information work: An autoethnography. Library Trends67(3): 436–454.
44.
ShearerJJChiewphasaBB (2022) Radical re-imagination: Centering a BIPOC library workforce in an asset-based autoethnography. Reference Services Review50(1): 113–126.
45.
SobolJD (1999) The storyteller’s journey: An American revival. Urbana, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press.
46.
SpellerM (2015) Half the battle. Storytelling Magazine27(3): 5.
47.
SpryT (2009) Bodies of/as evidence in autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research1(4): 603–610.
48.
Story Collider Inc. (2021) The story collider: True, personal stories about science. Available at: https://www.storycollider.org/ (accessed 8 May 2024).
49.
The Moth (2022) The Moth. Available at: https://themoth.org/ (accessed 8 May 2024).
