Central to any anti-oppressive research endeavour is the importance of reflexivity and the genuine attempt from researchers to turn the research tools on themselves (Hermans, 2019). Beyond research, the social work profession has much to learn from the reflexive accounts of researchers. Issues of identity, language and culture are widely recognised as important when working with service users and carers in social work; however, this is much less the case when considering identities of social work practitioners. Starting with personal and professional positions of Black female and Deaf female social workers, this article reveals the reflexive journey of the Black female hearing researcher undertaking the research. The article takes an original approach to theory construction by introducing ‘Africanist Sista-hood in Britain’ and marrying this with Deaf cultural discourse in the form of Deafhood, Deaf ethnicity and Deaf Gain, all of which make valuable contribution to existing debates in identity politics and the importance of self-naming and self-actualisation. Within the article the author discusses epistemological challenges in theory construction, data collection, language, transcription and dissemination, as they linked to power, privilege and the different forms this took within the research.
The article makes a number of significant contributions. It introduces Africanist Sista-hood in Britain as a useful theoretical framework in research and at the same time encourages theoretical alliances across other marginalised groups. In discussing issues of knowledge production beyond existing hegemonic frames, it offers a broadening of the lens beyond the ways in which identity, culture and ethnicity are currently understood in the mainstream. In discussing Deaf cultural discourse and its influence on methodological choices it invites researchers to better engage with these issues from perspectives articulated by Deaf people.
Alexander-FloydNGSimienEM (2006) Revisiting ‘what’s in a name?’: exploring the contours of Africana womanist thought. Frontiers27(1): 67–89.
2.
AnthiasFYuval-DaviesN (1992) Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class and the Anti-Racist Struggle. London: Routledge.
3.
AtkinsonRFlintJ (2001) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Social Research Update33(1): 1–4.
4.
AymerC (2009) Reflections at the waterhole: black professionals researching together. Journal of Social Work Practice33(4): 443–450.
5.
BahanB (2008) Upon the formation of a visual variety of the human race. In: BaumanH-DL (ed.), Open Your Eyes Deaf Studies Talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 83–99.
6.
BaumanH-DLMurrayJJ (2009) Reframing: from hearing loss to deaf-gain. Deaf Studies Digital Journal1.
7.
BaumanH-DLMurrayJJ (2014a) Deaf gain: an introduction. In BaumanH-DLMurrayJJ (eds), Deaf Gain Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, xv–xlii.
8.
BaumanH-DLMurrayJJ (2014b) Deaf Gain Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
10.
BrowneK (2005) Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 47–60.
11.
BrueggemannJ (2009) Deaf Subjects: Between Identities. London: New York University Press.
12.
ChannerYDoelM (2009) Beyond qualification: experiences of black social workers on a post-qualifying course. Social Work Educatioin28(4): 396–412.
13.
ChilisaBNtseaneG (2010) Resisting dominant discourses: implications of indigenous, African feminist theory and methods for gender and education research. Gender and Education22(6): 617–632.
14.
CohenNArieliT (2011) Field research in conflict environments: methodological challenges and snowball sampling. Journal of Peace Research48: 423–435.
15.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.
16.
CrenshawK (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and Antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum139–167.
17.
CroweMInderMPorterR (2015) Conducting qualitative research in mental health: thematic and content analyses. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry49(7): 616–623.
18.
DavisLJ (1995) Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness and the Body. London: Verso.
19.
EckertRC (2005) Deafnicity: A Study of Strategic and Adaptive Responses to Audism by Members of the Deaf American Community of Culture. United States: UMI.
20.
EckertRC (2010) Towards a theory of deaf ethnos: deafnicity~ d/Deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education15(4): 317–333.
21.
EmejuluASobandeF (2019) To Exist is to Resist: Black Feminism in Europe (EmejuluASobandeF eds), London: Pluto.
22.
FaugierJSargeantM (1997) Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing26: 790–797.
23.
FossKA (2014) Constructing hearing loss or ‘Deaf Gain?’ Voice, agency, and identity in television's representations of d/Deafness. Critical Studies in Media Communication31(5): 426–447.
24.
GarnerS (2010) Racisms an Introduction. London: Sage.
25.
HermansK (2019, April10) Human rights, social justice and social work research. European conference on social work research, Leuven, Belgium.
26.
HolcombTK (2013) Introduction to American Deaf Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
hooksb (1984) Feminist Theory from the Margin to the Center. United States: South End Press.
28.
Hudson-WeemsC (1998) Africana womanism. In: NnaemekaO (ed.), Sisterhood, Feminisms & Power- From Africa to the Diaspora. Trenten: Africa World Press Inc, 149–162.
29.
JainDTurnerC (2012) Purple is to lavender: womanism, resistance, and the politics of naming. The Negro Education Review62 & 63(1–4): 67–88.
30.
Johnson-BaileyJ (1999) The ties that bind and the shackles that separate: race, gender, class, and color in a research process. Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education12(6): 659–670.
31.
KwameA (2017) Reflexivity and the insider/outsider discourse in indigenous research: my personal experiences. AlterNative13(4): 218–225.
32.
LaddP (2003) Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Multilingual Matters.
33.
LaddP (2008) Colonialism and resistance: a brief history of deafhood. In BaumanH-DL (ed.), Open Your Eyes Deaf Studies Talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 42–59.
34.
LaddPLaneH (2013) Deaf ethnicity, deafhood and thier relationship. Sign Language Studies13(4): 565–579.
35.
LaneH (1992) The Mask of Benevolence: Disabling The Deaf Community. New York: Alfred Knopf.
36.
LaneH (2005) Ethnicity, ethics and the deaf-world. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(3): 291–310.
37.
LaneH (2008) Do deaf people have a disability? In BaumanH-DL (ed.), Open Your Eyes Deaf Studies Talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 277–292.
38.
LaneHPillardRCHedbergU (2011) People of the Eye: Deaf Ethnicity and Ancestry (1st edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
LizardLMcAvoyJ (2020) Doing reflexivity in psychological research: what’s the point? Whats the practice?Qualitative Researh in Psychology17(2): 159–177.
40.
MacanGhailM (1999) Contemporary Racism and Ethnicities Social and Cultural Transformations. Buckingham: Open University Press.
41.
MaylorU (2009) What is the meaning of ‘Black’? Researching 'Black' respondents. Ethnic And Racial Studies32(2): 369–387.
42.
Mayorga-GalloSHordge-Freeman (2017) Between marginality and privilege: gaining acces and navigating the field in multiethnic settings. Qualitative Research17(4): 377–394.
43.
MightyJE (1997) Triple jeopardy: immigrant women of color in the labor force. In: PrasadPMillsAJElmesM, et al. (eds), Managing the Organizational Melting Pot: Dilemmas of Workplace Diversity. London: Sage, 312–337.
44.
ModoodT (1994) Political blackness and British Asians. Sociology28(4): 859–876.
45.
MorrisonT (1993) Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. London: Macmillon.
46.
MullingsB (1999) Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum30: 337–350.
47.
NajarianCG (2006) ‘Between Worlds’ Deaf Women, Work, and Intersections of Gender and Ability. London: Routledge.
48.
NelsonR (2020) Questioning identities/shifting identities: the impact of researching sex and gender on a researcher's LGBT+identity. Qualitative Research20(6): 910–926.
49.
ObasiC (2008) Seeing the deaf in “deafness”. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education13(4): 455–465.
50.
ObasiC (2013) Race and ethnicity in sign language interpreter education, training and practice. Race Ethnicity and Education16(1): 103–120.
51.
ObasiC (2014) Negotiating the insider/outsider continua: a Black female hearing perspective on research with Deaf women and Black women. Qualitative Research14(1): 61–78.
52.
ObasiC (2017) Space, place, common wounds and boundaries: insider/outsider debates in research with black women and deaf women. In: LiamputtongP (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Singapore: Springer Nature, 1579–1600.
53.
ObasiC (2019) Africanist Sista-hood in Britain: creating our own pathways. In: EmejuluASobandeF (eds), To Exist is to Resist: Black Feminism in Europe. London: Pluto Press, 229–241.
54.
Osanami TörngrenSNgehJ (2018) Reversing the gaze: methodological reflections from the perspective of racial- and ethnic-minority researchers. Qualitative Research18(1): 3–18.
55.
PaddenC (1996) From the cultural to the bicultural: the modern deaf community. In: PasasnisI (ed.), Cultural and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 79–98.
56.
PaddenCHumphriesT (1988) Deaf in America - Voices From a Culture. London: Harvard University Press.
57.
PaddenCHumphriesT (2005) Inside Deaf Culture. London: Harvard University Press.
58.
ProbstBBerensonL (2014) The double arrows: how qualitative social work researchers use reflexivity. Qualitative Social Work13(6): 813–827.
59.
ReynoldsT (2002) Re-thinking a black feminist standpoint. Ethnic and Racial Studies25(4): 591–606.
SadlerGRLeeH-CLimRS-H, et al. (2010) Recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nursing And Health Sciences12: 369–374.
62.
ShawRHoweJBeazerJ, et al. (2019) Ethics and positionality in qualitative research with vulnerable and marginal groups. Qualitative Research20(3): 277–293.
63.
StoneCWestD (2012) Translation, representation and the deaf ‘voice’. Qualitative Research12(6): 645–665.
64.
TempleBYoungA (2004) Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research4(2): 161–178.
65.
TinarwoMT (2015) Discrimination as experienced by overseas social workers employed within the British welfare state. International Social Work60(3): 707–719.
66.
WalkerA (1983) In Search of our Mother's Gardens. New York: Harcourt, Bruce Jovanovich.
67.
WoodleyXMLockardM (2016) Womanism and snowball sampling: engaging marginalized populations in holistic research. The Qualitative Report21(2): 321–329.
68.
YoungAHuntR (2011) Research with d/Deaf People. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
69.
YoungATempleB (2014) Approaches to Social Research: The Case of Deaf Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
