This article discusses a number of epistemological dilemmas faced by a Black female hearing researcher while conducting research with culturally Deaf women during a PhD pilot study. It makes some comparisons with experiences of research with Black women in the same study. It uses a theoretical framework of ‘Africanist Sista-hood in Britain’ to reflect issues of privilege and power in research relationships as well as issues of commonality and difference. It takes the specific experiences of the researcher’s reflections to add to current discourse on insider/outsider positions in research, by applying some of the debates to the discourse of Deaf/hearing relations. It both begins with and ends with perspectives on research as interpretive partial and situated when undertaking any qualitative research study.
AndersenML (1993) Studying across difference: race, class and gender in qualitative research. In: StanfieldJHDennisRM (eds) Race and Ethnicity in Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 39–52.
2.
BahanB (2008) On the formation of a visual variety of the human race. In: BaumanHD (ed.) Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 83–99.
3.
BiernackiPWaldorfD (1981) Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research10(2): 141–163.
4.
BrayboyBM (2000) The Indian and the researcher: tales from the field. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education13(4): 415–426.
5.
BrayboyBMDeyhleD (2000) Insider-outsider: researchers in American Indian communities. Theory into Practice39(3): 163–169.
6.
BrowneK (2005) Snowball sampling: using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology8(1): 47–60.
7.
CollinsPH (1996) What’s in a name? Womanism, black feminism, and beyond. Black Scholar26: 9–17.
8.
CollinsPH (1998) Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.
10.
DickinsonJ (2010) Access all areas: identity issues and researcher responsibilities in workplace setting. Text & Talk30(2): 105–124.
11.
Gertz (2008) Dysconscious audism: a theoretical proposition. In: BaumanHD (ed.) Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 219–234.
12.
GoughB (2003) Deconstructing reflexivity. In: FinlayLGoughB (2003) (eds) Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Qualitative Researchers. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 21–36.
13.
GunaratnamY (2003) Researching ‘Race’ and Ethnicity: Methods, Knowledge and Power. London: Sage.
14.
Hesse-BiberSN (2007) The practice of feminist in-depth interviewing. In: Hesse-BiberSNLeavyPL (eds) Feminist Research Practice. London: Sage, 111–148.
15.
hooksb (1984) Feminist Theory from the Margin to the Center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
16.
hooksb (1990) Yearning: Race, Culture and Cultural Politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.
InnesRA (2009) ‘Wait a second. Who are you anyways?’: the insider/outsider debate and American Indian studies. American Indian Quarterly33(4): 440–461.
19.
Johnson-BaileyJ (1999) The ties that bind and the shackles that separate: race, gender, class, and color in a research process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education12(6): 659–670.
20.
KingJ (1991) Dysconscious racism: ideology, identity and miseducation of teachers. Journal of Negro Education60(2): 133–146.
21.
KnowlesC (2010) Theorising race and ethnicity: contemporary paradigms and perspectives. In: CollinsPHSolomosJ (eds) The Sage Handbook of Race and Ethnic Studies. London: Sage.
22.
LaddP (2003) Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood. Avon: Multilingual Matters.
23.
LaddP (2008) Colonialism and resistance: a brief history of deafhood. In: BaumanH-D (ed.) Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 42–59.
24.
LaneH (2005) Ethnicity, ethics and the deaf-world. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education10: 291–310.
25.
MaylorU (2009) Is it because I’m Black? A Black female research experience. Race, Ethnicity and Education12(1): 53–64.
26.
MerriamSJohnson-BaileyJBMing-YehL. (2001) Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International Journal of Lifelong Education20(5): 405–416.
27.
MertonR (1972) Insider and outsider: a chapter in sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology78(1): 9–47.
28.
MullingsB (1999) Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum30: 337–350.
29.
NapierJ (2002) The D/deaf H/hearing debate. Sign Language Studies2(2): 141–149.
30.
OakleyA (1981) Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. In: RobertsH (ed.) Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge.
31.
ObasiC (2008) Seeing the deaf in ‘deafness’. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 13(4): 455–465.
32.
PaddenCHumphriesT (1988) Deaf in America – Voices from a Culture. London: Harvard University Press.
33.
PaddenCHumphriesT (2005) Inside Deaf Culture. London: Harvard University Press.
34.
ReynoldsT (2002) Re-thinking a black feminist standpoint. Ethnic and Racial Studies25(4): 591–606.
35.
Sutton-SpenceRWollB (2000) The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Van TeijlingenERRennieAHundleyV. (2001) The importance of conducting and reporting pilot studies: the example of the Scottish Births Survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing34(3): 289–295.
37.
WalkerA (1984) In Search of Our Mothers Gardens. London: The Women’s Press.
38.
WoodwardJ (1972) Implications for sociolinguistics research among the deaf. Sign Language Studies1: 1–7.
39.
YoungAMAckermanJ (2001) Reflections on validity and epistemology in a study of working relations between deaf and hearing professionals. Qualitative Health Research11(2): 179–189.
