Clinician-researchers seeking answers to complex clinical dilemmas strive to translate research findings to their field of practice. This research note outlines application of a methodological approach of interpretive description to research in the discipline of psychiatry. It gives examples of conflicts that arise from the author’s dual role as a clinician-researcher and reflects on the utility of interpretive description in returning the analysis to the context of clinical practice. The research note concludes that interpretive description is a coherent methodological tool to formulate complex phenomena and apply findings in the field of mental health.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
2.
BrewerKMHarwoodMLNMccannCM, et al (2014) The use of interpretive description within Kaupapa Māori research. Qualitative Health Research24(9): 1287–1297.
3.
LiamputtongP (2013) Qualitative Research Methods. 4th edn.Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
4.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
MayK (1991) Interview techniques in qualitative research: concerns and challenges. In: MorseJM (ed.), Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
MorseJM (1994) Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
NgLL (2016) Forging steel from fire: emerging as a forensic psychiatrist. Academic Psychiatry40(6): 958–959.
8.
NgLCullumSCheungG, et al. (2018) Transforming an idea into a scholarly project. Australasian Psychiatry26(2): 210–213.
9.
RitchieJLewisJMcnaughton NichollsC, et al. (2014) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 2nd edn.Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
SandelowskiM (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health23(4): 334–340.
11.
SelzerREllenS (2014) Formulation for beginners. Australasian Psychiatry22(4): 397–401.
12.
SpencerLRitchieJLewisJ, et al. (2003) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. London: Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office.
13.
SperryL (1989) Integrative case formulations - what they are and how to write them. Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice45(4): 500–508.
14.
StevensonKNJackSMO’maraL, et al (2015) Registered nurses’ experiences of patient violence on acute care psychiatric inpatient units: an interpretive descriptive study. BMC Nursing14(35): 35.
15.
TeodoroIPPRebouçasVDCFThorneSE, et al. (2018) Interpretive description: a viable methodological approach for nursing research. Escola Anna Nery22(3): 1–8.
16.
TeucherU (2011) Interpretive description. British Journal of Psychology102(1): 135–137.
17.
ThorneSKirkhamSRMacdonald-EmesJ (1997) Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Research in Nursing & Health20(2): 169–177.
18.
ThorneSKirkhamSRO’Flynn-MageeK (2004) The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods3(1): 1–11.
19.
ThorneS (2008) Interpretive Description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
20.
WeerasekeraP (1996) Multiperspective Case Formulation: A Step Towards Treatment Integration. Malabar: Krieger Pub Co.
