Use of a codebook to categorize meaning units is a well-known research strategy in qualitative inquiry. However, methodology for the creation of a codebook in practice is not standardized, and specific guidance for codebook ideation is sometimes unclear, especially to novice qualitative researchers. This article describes the procedure that was utilized to create a codebook, which adapted an affinity diagram methodology (Scupin, 1997), an approach used in user-centered design. For this research, affinity diagramming was applied to a method outlined by Kurasaki (2000) for codebook ideation. Annotations of a subset of military veterans’ transcripts were utilized in congruence with affinity diagramming to create a codebook to categorize the phenomenon of reintegration into the civilian community after service (Haskins Lisle, 2017). This method could be useful in exploratory research that utilizes a codebook generated in vivo from annotations, especially for novice researchers who are overwhelmed by the codebook creation phase.
AndoHCousinsRYoungC (2014) Achieving saturation in thematic analysis: development and refinement of a codebook. Comprehensive Psychology. DOI: 10.2466/03.CP.3.4
2.
ArmentaRFRushTLeardMannCAMilleganJCooperAHogeCW (2018) Factors associated with persistent posttraumatic stress disorder among US military service members and veterans. BMC Psychiatry18(1): 1–11.
3.
BernardH (1988) Research Methods in Cultural Anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
5.
CapraMG (2006) Usability Problem Description and the Evaluator Effect in Usability Testing. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Tech, USA.
6.
DavisTMWoodPS (1999) Substance abuse and sexual trauma in a female veteran population. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment16(2): 123–127.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(1): 80–92.
9.
GuestGMcLellanE (2003) Distinguishing the trees from the forest: applying cluster analysis to thematic qualitative data. Field Methods15(2): 186–201.
10.
Haskins LisleA (2017) A Phenomenological Approach to User-Centered Design: Conceptualizing the Technology Design Space to Assist Military Veterans with Community Reintegration. PhD Dissertation, Virginia Tech, USA.
11.
Institute of Medicine (IOM) (2013) Returning Home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Readjustment Needs of Veterans, Service Members, and their Families. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
12.
IversonSVSeherCLDiRamioDJarvisKAndersonR (2016) Walking a gender tightrope: a qualitative study of female student veterans’ experiences within military and campus cultures. NASPA journal about women in higher education9(2): 152–168.
13.
JohnsonDRRosenheckRFontanaALubinHCharneyDSouthwickS (1996) Outcome of intensive inpatient treatment for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry153(6): 771– 777.
14.
KawakitaJ (1982) The Original KJ Method. Tokyo: Kawakita Research Institute.
15.
KeurhorstMHeinenMColomJ, et al. (2016) Strategies in primary healthcare to implement early identification of risky alcohol consumption: why do they work or not? A qualitative evaluation of the ODHIN study. BMC Family Practice17(1): 70–86.
16.
KurasakiK (2000) Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods12(3): 179–194.
17.
LeBlancMRCliffordCPLathropSL (2017) Evaluation of non-natural deaths among veterans: New Mexico medical examiner-investigated deaths, 2002–2011. Forensic Sciences62(3): 668– 673.
18.
McCollMACarlsonPJohnstonJMinnesPShueKDaviesDKarlovitsT (1998) The definition of community integration: perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury12(1): 15–30.
19.
McCollMADavisDCarlsonPJohnstonJMinnesP (2001) The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil82(4): 429–34.
MoustakasC (1994) Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (second edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
PerskyKPOliverDE (2010) Veterans coming home to the community college: linking research to practice. Community College Journal of Research and Practice35(1–2): 111–120.
24.
RegerMASmolenskiDJSkoppNAMetzger-AbamukangMJKangHKBullmanTAPerdueSGahmGA (2015) Risk of suicide among US military service members following Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom deployment and separation from the US military. JAMA Psychiatry72(6): 561–569.
25.
RichardsLMorseJM (2013) Readme First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods (third edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
SayerNANoorbaloochiNSFrazierPCarlsonKGravelyAMurdochM (2010) Reintegration problems and treatment interests among Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans receiving VA medical care. Psychiatric Services61(6): 589–597.
27.
SchroederSL (2016) Addressing the risk of postpartum depression in female veterans. International Journal of Childbirth Education31(4): 21–23.
28.
ScupinR (1997) The KJ method: a technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Human Organization56(2): 233–237.
29.
SmithTCRyanMAWingardDLSlymenDJSallisJFKritz-SilversteinD (2008) New onset and persistent symptoms of post- traumatic stress disorder self reported after deployment and combat exposures: prospective population based US military cohort study. British Medical Journal336(7640): 366–371.
30.
Van ManenM (1990) Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
ZatzickDFRussoJRajotteEUeharaERoy-ByrnePGhesquiereAJurkovichGRivaraF (2007) Strengthening the patient-provider relationship in the aftermath of physical trauma through understanding of the nature and severity of posttraumatic concerns. Psychiatry70(3): 260–273.
