Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The importance of dialectic to sociological thought has been recognised by many of the discipline’s most eminent thinkers. Adopting a dialectical world view infused with irony provokes insights revealing logical contradictions, so opening up possibilities for the development of alternative interpretations of the social world. There is, however, very little in the way of method to support the development of dialectical irony as a key analytical tool for the social sciences. This article seeks to remedy this deficit. Drawing on three key examples (trained incapacity, functional stupidity and interpassivity) the article examines Kenneth Burke’s ‘perspective by incongruity’ as a means for interrogating the dialectical moment, so contributing towards the development of dialectical ironic analysis within a methodology of humour.

Keywords

comic frame functional stupidity interpassivity methodology of humour planned incongruity sociological imagination trained incapacity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvesson

Spicer

(2012) A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies 49(7): 1194–220.

Amiel

H-F

(1906) Amiel’s Journal. Available at: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/8545/8545-h/8545-h.htm

Anderson

Warren

(2011) The entrepreneur as hero and jester: enacting the entrepreneurial discourse. International Small Business Journal 29(6): 589–609.

Argyris

(1986) Skilled incompetence. Harvard Business Review 64(5): 74–79.

Aylett

(2013) The socio-institutional dynamics of urban climate governance: a comparative analysis of innovation and change in Durban (KZN, South Africa) and Portland (OR, USA). Urban Studies 50(7): 1386–402.

Ball

R A

(1979) The dialectical method: its application to social theory. Social Forces 57(3): 785–798.

Berthold

(1976) Kenneth Burke’s cluster-agon method: its development and an application. Communication Studies 27(4): 302–309.

Brown

(1983) Dialectical irony. Literary form and sociological theory. Poetics Today 4(3): 543–564.

Burke

(1941) Four master tropes. The Kenyon Review 3(4): 421–438.

10.

Burke

(1953) Freedom and authority in the realm of the poetic imagination. In: Freedom and Authority in our Time. Twelfth Symposium on Science, Philosophy and Religion. Bryson

Finkelstein

MacIver

, et al. (eds). New York: Harper and Brothers, 365–375.

11.

Burke

(1973) The Philosophy of Literary Form (third edition). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

12.

Burke

(1974) Why satire, with a plan for writing one. Michigan Quarterly Review 13(4): 307–337

13.

Burke

(1984a) Attitudes Toward History. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

14.

Burke

(1984b) Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

15.

Carlson

(1992) Creative casuistry and feminist consciousness: the rhetoric of moral reform. Quarterly Journal of Speech 78(1): 16–32.

16.

Fine

Martin

(1990) A partisan view. Sarcasm, satire and irony as voices in Erving Goffman’s Asylums. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 19(1): 89–115.

17.

Haynes

Podobsky

(2016) Guilt-free food consumption: one of your five ideologies a day. Journal of Consumer Marketing 33(3): 202–212.

18.

Herppich

(2012) Cultural bias in missionary education. In: Danielson

Hartley

(2014) Transforming Teaching for Mission. Wilmore: First Fruits Press, 203–226.

19.

Hook

(1939) Dialectic in social and historical inquiry. The Journal of Philosophy 36(14): 365–378.

20.

Jagodzinski

(2004) Looping back to video games: the question of technological interpassivity. In: Youth Fantasies: The Perverse Landscape of the Media. Springer: Berlin, 221–230.

21.

Jaworski

(2000) Erving Goffman: the reluctant apprentice. Symbolic Interaction 23(3): 299–308.

22.

Johnsen

Muhr

Pedersen

(2009) The frantic gesture of interpassivity. Management 22(2): 202–213.

23.

Josephson

(1952) Irrational leadership in formal organizations. Social Forces 31(2): 109–117.

24.

Kanter

(1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic.

25.

Kaufmann

(1965) Hegel: Reinterpretation, Texts. Commentary. Doubleday: Garden City.

26.

Lacan

(2008) The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book VII. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

27.

Mackie

(2013) Believing for me: Žižek, interpassivity, and Christian experience. (ICS 2400AC W13 – IDS: What Is This Thing Called Religion? Spiritual Difference, Secular Critique, and Human Maturity. Available at: http://ir.icscanada.edu/icsir/bitstream/10756/305289/1/Mackie_20130502.pdf

28.

Macksoud

(1969) Kenneth Burke on perspective and rhetoric. Western Journal of Communication 33(3): 167–74.

29.

Mannheim

(1960) Ideology and Utopia. London and Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

30.

Merton

(1936) The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1(6): 894–904.

31.

Merton

(1940) Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces 18(4): 560–568.

32.

Mills

(1959) The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

33.

Muhr

Pedersen

(2010) Recently updated selves-on facebook and interpassive gestures. In: Wittkower

(ed.) Facebook and Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 265–276

34.

Mulkay

(1988) On Humour. Cambridge: Polity Press

35.

Overington

(1977) Kenneth Burke and the method of dramatism. Theory and Society 4(1): 131–156.

36.

Paulsen

(2016) Slipping into functional stupidity: the bifocality of organizational compliance. Human Relations 70(2): 185–210.

37.

Pfaller

(2003) Little gestures of disappearance: interpassivity and the theory of ritual. Journal of European Psychoanalysis 16: 3–16.

38.

Pfaller

(2007) Interpassivity and misdemeanors: the analysis of ideology and the Žižekian toolbox. International Journal of Žižek Studies 1(1): 35–50.

39.

Reiss

(1949) Franz Kafka’s conception of humour. The Modern Language Review 44(4): 534–542.

40.

Rueckert

(1994) Encounters with Kenneth Burke. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

41.

Schneider

(1971) Dialectic in sociology. American Sociological Review 36(4): 667–678.

42.

Schneider

(1975) Ironic perspective and sociological thought. In: The Idea of Social Structure. Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. Coser LA (ed.) New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 323–338.

43.

Schoenberger

(1997) Cultural Crisis of the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.

44.

Scoles

(2018) Exploring professional engineers’ knowings-in-practice in an emerging industry: an actor-network theory approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Stirling, UK.

45.

Veblen

(1914) The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts. New York. Available at: http://www.searchengine.org.uk/ebooks/49/55.pdf

46.

Veblen

(1918) The Higher Learning in America. Dodo Press.

47.

Veblen

(1994) The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Dover Publications.

48.

Walz

Hingston

Andéhn

(2014) The magic of ethical brands: interpassivity and the thievish joy of delegated consumption. Ephemera 14(1): 57–80.

49.

Watson

(2013) How (and why) to avoid making rational decisions: embracing paradox in school leadership. School Leadership & Management 33(3): 256–269.

50.

Watson

(2015a) Comedy and Social Science: Towards a Methodology of Funny. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

51.

Watson

(2015b) A sociologist walks into a bar (and other academic challenges): towards a methodology of humour. Sociology 49(3): 407–421.

52.

Watson

Wilson

Drew

Thompson

(2016) Criticality and the exercise of politeness in online spaces for professional learning. The Internet and Higher Education 31: 43–51.

53.

Weber

(2002) The Protestant Ethic and the ‘Spirit’ of Capitalism and Other Writings. London: Penguin.

54.

Williams

(1998) ISSA proceedings encompassing and enacting dialectic: Kenneth Burke’s theory of dramatism. Available at: http://rozenbergquarterly.com/issa-Proceedings-1998-Encompassing-and-Enacting-Dialectic-Kenneth-Burkes-Theory-of-Dramatism/

55.

Žižek

(1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

56.

Žižek

(1998) The interpassive subject. Traverses, Centre Georges Pompidou. Available at: http://www.lacan.com/zizek-pompidou.htm

Perspective by incongruity in the performance of dialectical ironic analysis: a disciplined approach

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References