Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Humour and laughter have been regarded as suitable topics for research in the social sciences, but as methodological principles to be adopted in carrying out and representing the findings of research they have been neglected. Indeed, those scholars who have made use of humour – wit, satire, jokes etc. – risk being regarded as trivial and marginalised from the mainstream. Yet, in literature the idea that comedy can tell us something important about the human condition is widely recognised. This neglect of the potential of humour and laughter represents a serious omission. The purpose of this article is to make a sensible case for the place of humour as a methodology for the social sciences.

Keywords

comedy humour irony laughter perspective by incongruity planned incongruity qualitative research research methodology satire social sciences sociological imagination theories of humour

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrovandi

(1610) Ornithologiae. Frankfurt.

Alvesson

Spicer

(2012) A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies 49(7): 1194–220.

Arnold

(1937) The Folklore of Capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bakhtin

(1984) Rabelais and his World. Trans. Iswolsky

. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Borch-Jacobsen

(1987) The laughter of being. MLN 102(4): 737–760.

Brown

(2005) Test Tube Envy: Science and Power in Argentine Narrative. Cranberry, NJ: Bucknell University Press.

Brown

(1989) A Poetic for Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Burke

(1964) Perspectives by Incongruity. Hyman

Karmiller

(eds). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Burke

(1969) A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

10.

Burke

(1978) Methodological repression and/or strategies of containment. Critical Inquiry 5(2): 401–16.

11.

Burke

(1984) Attitudes Toward History. Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Chambers

(1989) Thalia’s revenge: Ethnography and the theory of comedy. American Anthropologist 91(3): 589–98.

13.

Conroy

(1968) Thorstein Veblen’s prose. American Quarterly 20(3): 605–15.

14.

Dawe

(1973) The underworld view of Erving Goffman. British Journal of Sociology 24(2): 246–53.

15.

Fine

(1994) The social construction of style: Thorstein Veblen’s ‘The Theory of the Leisure Class’ as contested text. The Sociological Quarterly 35(3): 457–72.

16.

Foucault

(2005[1970]) The Order of Things. London: Routledge.

17.

Freud

(2002[1905]) The Joke and its Relation to the Unconscious. London: Penguin.

18.

Frye

(1957) Anatomy of Criticism. London: Penguin.

19.

Grønnerød

(2004) On the meanings and uses of laughter in research interviews: Relationships between interviewed men and a woman interviewer. Young 12(1): 31–49.

20.

Gunter

(1968) Nietzschean laughter. The Sewanee Review 76(3): 493–506.

21.

Hobbes

(2008) In: Gaskin

JCA

(ed.) Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

22.

Johnsen

Muhr

Pedersen

(2009) The frantic gesture of interpassivity. Management 22(2): 202–13.

23.

Kant

(2008[1790]) The Critique of Judgement. Trans. Walker

. Oxford: Oxford World Classics.

24.

Koeppel

(2008) Banana: The Fate of the Fruit that Changed the World. New York: Hudson Street Press.

25.

Kreuz

Roberts

(1993) On satire and parody: The importance of being ironic. Metaphor and Symbol 8(2): 97–109.

26.

Lacan

(2006) Écrits. Trans. Fink

. New York: WW Norton.

27.

Lewis

Sebberson

(1997) The rhetoricality of economic theory: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Thorstein Veblen. Journal of Economic Issues 31(2): 417–24.

28.

Lippitt

(1994) Humour and incongruity. Cogito 8(2): 147–53.

29.

Lippitt

(1996) Existential laughter. Cogito 10(1): 63–72.

30.

Lippitt

(1999) Illusion and satire in Kierkegaard’s postscript. Continental Philosophy Review 32(4): 451–66.

31.

McFarlane

(2011) The universal literary solvent: Northrop Frye and the problem of satire, 1942 to 1957. ESC: English Studies in Canada 37(2): 153–72.

32.

McPherson

(2008) I don’t know why they call it the Lake District they might as well call it the rock district! The workings of humour and laughter in research with members of visually impaired walking groups. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 1080–95.

33.

Machalek

(1979) Thorstein Veblen, Louis Schneider and the ironic imagination. Social Science Quarterly 60(3): 460–64.

34.

Malinowksi

(1966) Introduction. In: Lips

(ed.) The Savage Hits Back. New Hyde Park: University Books, vii–ix.

35.

Morreall

(1989)The rejection of humor in western thought. Philosophy East and West 39(3): 243–65.

36.

Morreall

(2009) Humor as cognitive play. JLT Articles 3(2): 241–60.

37.

Mulkay

(1985) The Word and the World. Explorations in the Form of Sociological Analysis. London: George Allen and Unwin.

38.

Nealon

(2005[1970]) Disastrous aesthetics: Irony, ethics, and gender in Barthelme’s ‘Snow White’. Twentieth Century Literature 51(2): 123–41.

39.

Nietzsche

(1969[1885]) Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Trans. Hollingdale

. London: Penguin.

40.

Perks

(2012) The ancient roots of humor theory. Humor 25(2): 119–32.

41.

Pye

(2006) Comedy theory and the postmodern. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research 19(1): 53–70.

42.

Raskin

(1985) Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.

43.

Reiss

(1949) Franz Kafka’s conception of humour. Modern Language Review 44(4): 534–42.

44.

Sagi

Yechiam

(2008) Amusing titles in scientific journals and article citations. Journal of Information Science 34(5): 680–7.

45.

Samuels

(1979) Thorstein Veblen: Heterodox economist, in retrospect. Social Science Quarterly 60(3): 454–9.

46.

Schneider

(1975) Dialectic in sociology. American Sociological Review 36(4): 667–78.

47.

Shaw

(2010) Philosophy of humor. Philosophy Compass 5(2): 112–26.

48.

Smith

(2006) Erving Goffman. Abingdon: Routledge.

49.

Solomon

(2002) Are the three stooges funny? Soitainly! (or when is it OK to laugh?). In: Rudinow

Graybosch

(eds) Ethics and Values in the Information Age. Cambridge, MA: Wadsworth Press, 604–10.

50.

Stronach

(2007) On promoting rigour in educational research: The example of the RAE. Journal of Education Policy 22(3): 343–52.

51.

Strong

(1983) Review essay the importance of being Erving: Erving Goffman, 1922–1982. Sociology of Health and Illness 5(3): 345–55.

52.

Suto

(1979) Some neglected aspects of Veblen’s social thought. Social Science Quarterly 60(3): 439–53.

53.

Sypher

(1956) The meanings of comedy. In: Sypher

(ed.) Comedy. ‘An Essay on Comedy’ by George Meredith and ‘Laughter’ by Henri Bergson. Berkeley, CA: JohnS Hopkins University Press, 193–255.

54.

Van Oenen

(2008) Interpassivity revisited: A critical and historical reappraisal of interpassive phenomena. International Journal of Žižek Studies 2(2): 1–16.

55.

Veatch

(1998) A theory of humor. Humor 11(2): 161–215.

56.

Veblen

(1994[1899]) The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Dover.

57.

Walton

(1979) The sociological imagination of Thorstein Veblen. Social Science Quarterly 60(3): 432–8.

58.

Watson

(2008) Reflexive Research and the (Re)Turn to the Baroque. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

59.

Watson

(2011a) Notes on the variety and uses of satire, sarcasm and irony in social research, with some observations on vices and follies in the academy. Power and Education 3(2): 139–49.

60.

Watson

(2011b) Accountability, transparency, redundancy: Academic identities in an era of ‘excellence’. British Educational Research Journal 37(6): 955–71.

61.

Watson

(2012) Today, how can we not speak of the university? Towards the next generation. Power and Education 4(3): 342–54.

62.

Wright Mills

(1967) The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

63.

Žižek

(1998) The interpassive subject. Traverses, Centre Georges Pompidou. Available at: http://www.lacan.com/zizek-pompidou.htm (accessed 14 February 2013).

64.

Zook

(2008) The irony of it all: Soren Kierkegaard and the anxious pleasures of civil society. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16(2): 393–419.

65.

Zupančič

(2008) The Odd One in: On Comedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

A Sociologist Walks into a Bar (and Other Academic Challenges): Towards a Methodology of Humour

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References