Researching mobile practices: participant reflection and audio-recording in Repeat Question Diaries

Abstract

The Repeat Question Diary method involves research participants audio-recording many answers to a single question. This article investigates some of the features of the method that are relevant to the study of mobile practices. Particularly, the method encourages participant reflection and the paper argues that this can facilitate the study of mobile practices through enabling participants to notice and analyse previously taken-for-granted, pre-conscious, or corporeal aspects of their practices. The paper also explores the use of audio-recording in diary research and argues that audio-diaries can facilitate participant expression, particularly of emotions, and can avoid the stifling effects of self-editing in written diaries.

Keywords

audio-recording longitudinal methods Repeat Question Diary (RQD)mobile methods reflection representation Twenty Statements Test (TST)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adey

(2010) Mobility. Abingdon: Routledge.

Boud

Walker

(1998) Promoting reflection in professional courses: the challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education 23(2): 191.

Bourdieu

(1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Büscher

Urry

(2009) Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory 12(1): 99–116.

Büscher

Urry

Witchger

(2011) Mobile Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.

Cook

Shaw

Simpson

(2016) Jography: exploring meanings, experiences and spatialities of recreational road-running. Mobilities 11(5): 744–769.

Cowan

(2014) Noteworthy matters for attention in reflective journal writing. Active Learning in Higher Education 15(1): 53–64.

de Vet

(2013) Exploring weather-related experiences and practices: examining methodological approaches. Area 45(2): 198–206.

Ferguson

(2011) Mobilities of welfare. In: Büscher

Urry

Witchger

(eds) Mobile Methods. Abingdon: Routledge, 72–87.

10.

Fincham

McGuiness

Murray

(2010) Mobile Methodologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

11.

Fitt

(2014) Using Repeat Question Diaries to investigate social meanings in transport. Working Paper Series for the New Zealand Aotearoa Mobilities Network: Working Paper 2(2): 1–15. Retrieved from: http://esocsci.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Working-paper-No2-Helen-Fitt-2014.pdf

12.

Grace

Cramer

(2003) The elusive nature of self-measurement: the self-construal scale versus the Twenty Statements Test. The Journal of Social Psychology 143(5): 649–668.

13.

Guell

Ogilvie

(2015) Picturing commuting: photovoice and seeking well-being in everyday travel. Qualitative Research 15(2): 201–218.

14.

Guell

Panter

Jones

et al . (2012) Towards a differentiated understanding of active travel behaviour: using social theory to explore everyday commuting. Social Science & Medicine 75(1): 233–239.

15.

Haldrup

(2004) Laid-back mobilities: second-home holidays in time and space. Tourism Geographies 6(4): 434–454.

16.

Hitchings

(2012) People can talk about their practices. Area 44(1): 61–67.

17.

Holliday

(2007) Performances, confessions, and identities: using video diaries to research sexualities. In: Stanczak

(ed) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society, and Representation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

18.

Jirón

(2011) On becoming ‘la sombra/the shadow’. In: Büscher

Urry

Witchger

(eds) Mobile Methods. Abingdon: Routledge, 36–53.

19.

Johansson-Stenman

Martinsson

(2006) Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60(2):129–146.

20.

Joshi

Senior

Smith

(2001) A diary study of the risk perceptions of road users. Health, Risk & Society 3(3): 261–279.

21.

Kuhn

McPartland

(1954) An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review 19(1): 68–76.

22.

Kusenbach

(2003) Street phenomenology: the go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography 4(3): 455–485.

23.

Latham

(2003) Research, performance, and doing human geography: some reflections on the diary-photograph, diary-interview method. Environment and Planning A 35(11): 1993–2017.

24.

Latham

(2014) Using diaries to study urban worlds. In: Ward

(ed) Researching the City. London: SAGE, 99–115.

25.

Leijen

Sööt

(2016) Supporting pre-service dance teachers’ reflection with different reflection procedures. Research in Dance Education 17(3): 176–188.

26.

Mead

(1970) Field work in Pacific islands, 1925–1967. In: Golde

(ed) Women in the Field: Anthropological Experiences. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 293–331.

27.

Merriman

(2009) Mobility. In: Kitchin

Thrift

(eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 134–143.

28.

Merriman

(2014) Rethinking mobile methods. Mobilities 9(2): 167–187.

29.

Meth

(2003) Entries and omissions: using solicited diaries in geographical research. Area 35(2): 195–205.

30.

Middleton

(2010) Sense and the city: exploring the embodied geographies of urban walking. Social & Cultural Geography 11(6): 575–596.

31.

Monrouxe

(2009) Solicited audio diaries in longitudinal narrative research: a view from inside. Qualitative Research 9(1): 81–103.

32.

Morgan

(1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

33.

Murray

(2009) Looking at and looking back: visualization in mobile research. Qualitative Research 9(4): 469–488.

34.

Murtagh

(2012) When it comes to how I travel…who am I? The Psychologist 25(9): 679.

35.

Murtagh

Gatersleben

Uzzell

(2012) Multiple identities and travel mode choice for regular journeys. Transportation Research Part F 15(5): 514–524.

36.

Palen

Salzman

(2002) Voice-mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions. The Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference (CSCW 02). New Orleans.

37.

Pendry

(2008) Social cognition. In: Hewstone

Stroebe

Jonas

(eds) Introduction to Social Psychology: A European Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 66–86.

38.

Pile

(2010) Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35(1): 5–20.

39.

Pow

(2000) ‘Sense and sensibility’: Social-spatial experiences of the visually-impaired in Singapore. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 21(2): 166–182.

40.

Rees

Nicholson

(2004) The Twenty Statements Test. In: Cassell

Symon

(eds) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. London: SAGE, 86–97.

41.

Sanjek

(1990) A vocabulary for fieldnotes. In: Sanjek

(ed) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 92–121.

42.

Seamon

(1979) A Geography of the Lifeworld: Movement, Rest and Encounter. London: Croom Helm.

43.

Shapiro

MacInnis

Heckler

et al . (1999) An experimental method for studying unconscious perception in a marketing context. Psychology & Marketing 16(6): 459–477.

44.

Sheller

Urry

(2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38(2): 207–226.

45.

Simpson

(2014) Video. In: Adey

Bissell

Hannam

et al . (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities. Abingdon: Routledge, 542–552.

46.

Spinney

(2009) Cycling the city: movement, meaning, and method. Geography Compass 3(2): 817–835.

47.

Spinney

(2011) A chance to catch a breath: using mobile video ethnography in cycling research. Mobilities 6(2): 161–182.

48.

Spowart

Nairn

(2014) (Re)performing emotions in diary-interviews. Qualitative Research 14(3): 327–340.

49.

Steg

(2005) Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A 39(2–3): 147–162.

50.

Vergunst

(2011) Technology and technique in a useful ethnography of movement. Mobilities 6(2): 203–219.

51.

Walker

Symon

Davies

(1996) Assessing organizational culture: a comparison of methods. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 4(2): 96–105.

52.

Watkins

Yau

Dahlin

et al . (1997) The Twenty Statements Test: some measurement issues. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 28(5): 626–633.

53.

Zimmerman

Wieder

(1977) The diary: diary-interview method. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 5(4): 479–498.