This article covers a number of strategies for audio recording everyday, naturally occurring interactions. Drawing on fieldwork where the author observed and recorded eleven key informants in New York City, the author provides a guide applicable to a number of research situations, but especially relevant to studies that require continuous observations—from unobtrusive to participant—across various social contexts. The author provides practical suggestions for choosing an audio recorder, recording in the field, managing informed consent issues, and addressing observer effects.
BernardH. R.. In: Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.2006;Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira,
2.
BlaxterL.HughesC.TightM.. In: How to research.1996;Buckingham, England: Open University Press,
3.
DressingT.PehlT.GeorgiD.. 2010. First comparison of audio digital recorders, http://www.audiotranskription.de(accessed August 10, 2010)
4.
DurantiA.. In: Linguistic anthropology.1997;Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
5.
FeldS.BrenneisD.. Doing anthropology in sound. American Ethnologist. 2004;31:461–74.
6.
GeertzC.Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures.1973;New York: Basic Books, 3–30.
7.
GoodwinC.. Recording human interaction in natural settings. Pragmatics. 1993;3:181–209.
8.
GoodwinM. H.. In: The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion.2006;Oxford, England: Blackwell,
9.
GumperzJ.1964. Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. In The ethnography of communication, eds. GumperzJ.HymesD.American Anthropologist66:137–53.
10.
HammersleyM.. “Analytics” are no substitute for methodology: A response to Speer and Hutchby. Sociology. 2003;37:339–51.
LabovW.Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In: BaughJ.SherzerJ. (Eds.), Language in use.1984;Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 28–53.
13.
LabovW.CohenP.RobbinsC.LewisJ.. In: A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican Speakers in New York City.1968;Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey,
14.
MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W.CrowM. D.DabbsJ.PriceJ. H.. The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 2001;33:517–23.
15.
ModaffJ. V.ModaffD. P.. Technical notes on audio recording. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 2000;33:101–18.
16.
MonahanT.FisherJ. A.. Benefits of “observer effects”: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Research. 2010;10:357–76.
17.
NegrónR.2007. Switching of ethnic identification among New York City Latinos. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Florida
18.
NegrónR.2011. Ethnic identification among urban Latinos: Language and flexibility. El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing.
19.
OchsE.GraeschA.MittmanA.BradburyT.RepettiR.Video ethnogra-phy and ethnoarcheological tracking. In: Pitt-CatsouphesM.KossekE. E.SweetS. (Eds.), The handbook of work and family: Multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches.2006;Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 387–410.
RussellM. L.MoralejoD. G.BurgessE. D.. Paying research subjects: Participants' perspectives. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2000;26:126–30.
22.
StockdaleA.. Tools for digital audio recording in qualitative research. Social Research Update. 2002;38:http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU38.html (accessed December 12, 2011)
