Dancing with danger: ethnographic safety,male bravado and gang research in Colombia

Abstract

This article considers the dilemmas and challenges of conducting fieldwork with youth gang members in Medellín, Colombia. It draws upon the author’s experiences to develop the notion of ‘ethnographic safety’, where researchers learn to perceive and avert danger by gaining a ‘feel for the rules of the game’ (Bourdieu, 1992) in violent communities; it problematizes the role that the researcher’s gender and ‘male bravado’ played in accessing and interviewing gang members; considers the ethical conundrums of building rapport with criminal subjects; and discusses the challenges of working in complex, chronically violent communities where there are no simple dichotomies between victims and perpetrators of violence.

Keywords

Bourdieu dangerous research ethnography gangs masculinities Medellín research ethics researcher safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arias

(ed.) (2014) Working Papers on Research Security. New York: Drugs, Security and Democracy Program.

Avruch

(2001) Notes Toward Ethnographies of Conflict and Violence. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Sage Publications 30(5): 637–648. Available at: http://jce.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/089124101129024295.

Baird

(2009) Methodological dilemmas: researching violent young men in Medellín, Colombia In: McGee

Pearce

(eds) IDS Bulletin. Violence, Social Action and Research 40(3).

Baird

(2015) Duros and gangland girlfriends: male identity and gang socialisation in Medellín. In: Auyero

Bourgois

Scheper-Hughes

(eds) Violence at the Urban Margins in the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baird

(2017) Becoming the baddest: masculine trajectories of gang violence in Medellín. Journal of Latin American Studies 50(1): 183–210.

Belousov

Horlick-Jones

Bloor

Gilinskiy

Golbert

Kostikovsky

Levi

Pentsov

(2007) Any port in a storm: fieldwork difficulties in dangerous and crisis-ridden settings. Qualitative Research 7(2): 155–175.

Bernal Franco

Navas Caputo

(2013) Urban violence and humanitarian action in Medellin. Available at: http://reliefweb.int/report/colombia/urban-violence-and-humanitarian-action-medellin.

Bloor

Fincham

Sampson

(2007) Qualiti (NCRM) Commissioned Inquiry into the Risk to Well-being of Researchers in Qualitiative Research. Available at: https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=qualiti-risks-to-researchers-report.pdf&site=377.

Bourdieu

(1992) The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

10.

Bourgois

(1995) In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio (second edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Butler

(2011) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York and London: Routledge.

12.

Castañeda Naranjo

Henao Slazar

(2005) El Diccionario del Parlache. Medellín: La Carreta Editores EU.

13.

Clark

(2012) Fieldwork and its ethical challenges: reflections from research in Bosnia. Human Rigths Quarterly 34(3): 823–839.

14.

Connell

(2005) Masculinities (second edition). Cambridge: Polity Pres.

15.

Cruz

(2014) Maras and the politics of violence in El Salvador. In: Hazen

Rodgers

(eds) Global Gangs: Street Violence Across the World. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 123–144.

16.

Davis Rodrigues

(2014) Doing Research in Violent Settings: Ethical Considerations and Ethics Committees. DSD Working Papers on Research Security: New York.

17.

De Laine

(2000) Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.

18.

Dixit

(2012) Field research in conflict zones: experience from India and Sierra Leone. International Studies 49(1–2): 133–150.

19.

Durán-Martínez

(2014) Building an Effective Research Safety Protocol and Emergency Exit Strategies. DSD Working Papers on Research Security: New York.

20.

Felab-Brown

(2014) Security Considerations for Conducting Fieldwork in Highly Dangerous Places or on Highly Dangerous Subjects. DSD Working Papers on Resarch Security: New York.

21.

Finlay

(2001) Reflexivity, the dilemmas of identification and an ethnographic encounter in Northern Ireland. In: Smyth

M GR

(eds) Researching Violent Societies: Ethical and Methodological Issues. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

22.

García

et al . (2012) Treinta años de homicidios en Medellín, Colombia, 1979–2008. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 28(9): 1699–1712. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2012000900009.

23.

Gill

(2004) Finding a middle ground between extremes: notes on researching transnational crime and violence. Anthropology Matters 6(2). Available at: https://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php/anth_matters/article/view/100/197

24.

Goffman

(2014) On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Goldsmith

(2003) Fear, fumbling and frustration: reflections on doing criminological fieldwork in Colombia. Criminal Justice 3(1): 103–125.

26.

Goldstein

(2014) Qualitative Research in Dangerous Places: Becoming an ‘ethnographer’ of violence and personal safety. Drugs, Security and Democracy Working Papers on Research Security: New York. Available at: http://webarchive.ssrc.org/working-papers/DSD_ResearchSecurity_01_Goldstein.pdf.

27.

Greenhouse

Mertz

Warren

(2002) Ethnography in Unstable Places: Everyday Lives in Contexts of Dramtic Political Change. London: Duke University Press.

28.

Greig

(2010) Troublesome masculinities: masculinity in trouble. IDS Bulletin 40(1): 69–76.

29.

Gutmann

(2003) Changing men and masculinities in Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press.

30.

Haer

Becher

(2012) A methodological note on quantitative field research in conflict zones: get your hands dirty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15(1): 1–13.

31.

Hallowell

Lawton

Gregory

(2005) Reflections on Research: The Realities of Doing Research in the Social Sciences. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

32.

Hanson

Richards

(2017) Sexual harassment and the construction of ethnographic knowledge. Sociological Forum. DOI: 10.1111/socf.12350.

33.

Henao Salazar

Castañeda Naranjo

(2001) El Parlache. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia.

34.

Henry

(1966) The role of the fieldworker in an explosive political situation 2015) [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology 7(5): 522–559.

35.

Holmes

(2013) ‘Is it worth risking your life?’: ethnography, risk and death on the US–Mexico border. Social Science & Medicine 99: 153–161.

36.

Howell

(1986) Occupational health and safety: an issue in the culture of anthropology. Anthropology News 27(5): 2–10.

37.

Howell

(1990) Surviving Fieldwork: A Report of the Advisory Panel on Health and Safety in Fieldwork. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.

38.

Huang

(2016) Vulnerable observers: notes on fieldwork and rape. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Available at: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Vulnerable-Observers-Notes-on/238042.

39.

Hume

Wilding

(2015) ‘Es que para ellos el deporte es matar’: rethinking the scripts of violent men in El Salvador and Brazil. In: Auyero

Bourgois

Scheper-Hughes

(eds) Violence at the Urban Margins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

40.

Kovats-Bernat

(2002) Negotiating dangerous fields: pragmatic strategies for fieldwork amid violence and terror. American Anthropologist 104(1): 208–222.

41.

Lee

(1995) Dangerous Fieldwork. Qualitative Research Methods. Volume 34. London: SAGE.

42.

Lee

Stanko

(2003) Researching Violence : Essays on Methodology and Measurement. London and New York: Routledge.

43.

Linkogle

Lee-Treweek

(2000) Danger in the field: risk and ethics in social research. In: Linkogle

Lee-Treweek

(eds) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. London: Routledge.

44.

Lubet

(2015) Ethics on the run. New Rambler Review. Available at: http://newramblerreview.com/book-reviews/law/ethics-on-the-run.

45.

Maanen Van

(1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

46.

Mahmood

(2008) Anthropology from the bones: a memoir of fieldwork, survival and commitment. Anthropology and Humanism 33(1–2): 1–11.

47.

McGee

Pearce

(2009) Violence, social action and research. IDS Bulletin 40(3).

48.

Mertus

(2009a) Introduction: surviving field research. In: Sriram

King

Mertus

Martin-Ortega

Herman

(eds) Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations. London: Routledge.

49.

Mertus

(2009b) Maintenance of personal security: ethical and operational issues. In: Sriram

King

Mertus

Martin-Ortega

Herman

(eds) Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations. London: Routledge.

50.

Moreno

(1995) Rape in the field: reflections from a survivor. In: Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork, 219–250.

51.

Nordstrom

(1997) A Different Kind of War Story. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

52.

Nordstrom

Robben

ACGM

(1995) Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.

53.

Oglesby

(1995) Myrna Mack. In: Nordstrom

Robben

ACGM

(eds) Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.

54.

Osorio

(2014) Numbers Under Fire: The Challenges of Gathering Quantitative Data in Highly Violent Settings. DSD Working Papers on Research Security: New York.

55.

Pearce

(2007) Violence, Power and Participation: Building Citizenship in Contexts of Chronic Violence. IDS Working Paper, IDS Participation Group.

56.

Pearlman

(2010) Favela: Four Decades of Living on the Edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

57.

Pecaut

(1999) From the banality of violence to real terror: the case of Colombia. In: Koonings

Kruijt

(eds) Societies of Fear. London: Zed Books.

58.

Pengalese

(2008) The bastard child of the dictatorship: the Comando Vermelho and the birth of ‘narco-culture’ in Rio de Janeiro. Luso-Brazilian Review 45(1): 118–145.

59.

Peritore

(1990) Reflections on dangerous fieldwork. The American Sociologist 21(4): 359–372.

60.

Peterson

(2000) Sheer foolishness: shifting definitions of danger in conducting and teaching ethnographic field research. In: Lee-Treneek

Linkogle

(eds) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. London: Routledge, 181–196.

61.

Ramírez

(2014) The Familiar and the Foreign: Local and Visiting Researchers In Highly Violent Areas. DSD Working Papers on Research Security: New York.

62.

Reddock

(1989) Tribute to Ken Pryce. Social Justice 16(4)(38): 10–12.

63.

Robben

ACGM

(1995) The politics of truth and emotion among victims and perpetrators of violence. In: Nordstrom

Robben

ACGM

(eds) Fieldwork under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. Berkeley: University of California Press, 81–104.

64.

Rodgers

(2007) Joining the gang and becoming a ‘broder’: the violence of ethnography in contemporary Nicaragua. Bulletin of Latin American Research 27(4): 444–461.

65.

Rodgers

Baird

(2015) Understanding gangs in contemporary Latin America. In: Decker

Pyrooz

(eds) The Handbook of Gangs. New York: Wiley.

66.

Rodgers

Rocha

(2013) Turning points: gang evolution in Nicaragua. In: Small Arms Survey 2013. Everyday Dangers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

67.

Ross

(2009) Impact on research of security-seeking behaviour. In: Sriram

King

Mertus

Martin-Ortega

Herman

(eds) Surviving Field Research: Working in Violent and Difficult Situations. London: Routledge.

68.

Ross

(2014) ‘No Sir, she was not a fool in the field’: gendered risks and sexual violence in immersed cross-cultural fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 67(2): 180–186.

69.

Sartre

J-P

(1948) Les Mains Sales. Paris: Gallimard.

70.

Scheper-Hughes

(1993) Death Without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkley: University of California Press.

71.

Sluka

(1990) Participant observation in violent social contexts. Human Organization 49(2): 114–126.

72.

Smyth

Robinson

(2001) Researching violently divided societies: ethical and methodological issues. London: Pluto Press.

73.

Smyth

(2005) Insider–outsider issues in researching violent and divided societies. In: Porter

Robinson

Smyth

Schnabel

Osaghae

(eds) Researching Conflict in Africa: Insights and Experiences. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

74.

Stanko

(1992) Intimidating education: sexual harassment in criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 3(2): 331–340.

75.

Taussig

(2003) Law in a Lawless Land: Diary of a Limpieza in Colombia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

76.

Theidon

(2014) ‘How Was your Trip?’: Self-care For Researchers Working and Writing on Violence. DSD Working Papers on Research Security: New York.

77.

UNDP (2014) Citizen Security with a Human Face: Evidence and Proposals for Latin America.

78.

UNODC (2014) Global Study on Homicide 2013.

79.

Vélez Saldarriaga

(1999) Los Hijos de la Gran Diosa: Psicología analítica, mito y violencia. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.

80.

Wolf

(2015) ¿Hay terroristas en El Salvador?. Distintas Latitudes. Available from: http://www.distintaslatitudes.net/hay-terroristas-en-el-salvador.

81.

Wood

(2006) The ethical challenges of field research in conflict zones. Qualitative Sociology 29(3): 373–386.