Ethnographic filmmakers have long considered and debated the role of ethnographic films as tools for public scholarship. Perhaps because of their presumed accessibility, ethnographic films have been seen, on the one hand, as ideal media to convey anthropological material to the general public. On the other hand, they have been seen as specialized films that should not conform to mass media conventions or audience preferences. In my research on community-based rural development in the southeastern United States, I collaboratively create films to share my research with wider yet specific audiences including the participating and surrounding communities, development organizations and nonprofits, and extension agents and local government officials. This article will explore the process of engaging specific public audiences as a tool for both ethnographic research and an effective means to insert my research into relevant conversations about issues of rural development.
AschT (1975) Using film in teaching anthropology: one pedagogical approach. In: HockingsP (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. The Hague; Paris: Mouton Publishers, 385–412.
2.
BarnouwE (1993) Documentary: A History of the Non-Fiction Film. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BiellaPChangonNSeamanG (1997) Yanomamö Interactive: The Ax Fight (Book and CD-ROM). Wadsworth, OH: Thomson Learning.
4.
BirdSEGodwinJP (2006) Film in the undergraduate anthropology classroom: applying audience response research in pedagogical practice. Anthropology & Education Quarterly37(3): 285–299.
5.
BurawoyM (2005) 2004 presidential address: for public sociology. American Sociological Review70(February): 4–28.
6.
CookeBKothariU (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?London: Zed Books.
7.
CooverR (2003) Cultures in Webs CD-ROM. Watertown, MA: Eastgate Systems.
8.
CooverR (2007) Filmmaker to filmmaker: Robert Gardner and the cinematic process. American Anthropologist109(3): 537–541.
9.
ElderS (1995) Collaborative filmmaking: an open space for making meaning, a moral ground for ethnographic film. Visual Anthropology Review11(2): 94–101.
10.
EnglehartL (2003) Media activism in the screening room: the significance of viewing locations, facilitation and audience dynamics in the reception of HIV/AIDS films in South Africa. Visual Anthropology Review19(1–2): 73–78.
11.
Federation of Southern Cooperatives/Land Assistance Fund (FSC/LAF) (2011) History/Mission (modified). Available at: www.federationsoutherncoop.com/mission.htm (accessed 10 May 2012).
12.
FloresCY (2004) Indigenous video, development, and shared anthropology: a collaborative experience with Maya Q‘eqchi’ filmmakers in Postwar Guatemala. Visual Anthropology Review20(1): 31–44.
13.
GansHJ (2010) Public ethnography; ethnography as public sociology. Qualitative Sociology33(1): 97–104.
14.
GinsburgF (1994) Culture/media: a (mild) polemic. Anthropology Today10: 5–15.
15.
GrimshawARavetzA (2009) Observational Cinema: Anthropology, Film, and the Exploration of Social Life. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
16.
HallS (1980) Encoding/decoding. In: HallSHobsonDLoweA. (eds) Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–1979. London: Hutchinson, 128–138.
17.
HeiderKG (2006) Ethnographic Film. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
18.
HighCSinghNPetheramL. (2012) Defining participatory video from practice. In: MilneEJMitchelCdeLangeN (eds) Handbook of Participatory Video. Plymouth: AltaMira Press, 35–48.
19.
HughesSP (2011) Anthropology and the problem of audience reception. In: BanksMRubyJ (eds) Made to Be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 288–312.
20.
KarpI (2012) Public scholarship as vocation. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education11(3): 285–299.
21.
LassiterLE (2008) Moving past public anthropology and doing collaborative research. NAPA Bulletin29(1): 70–86.
22.
LoizosP (1980) Television production. Granada Television’s Disappearing World series: an appraisal. American Anthropologist82(3): 573–594.
23.
LunchNLunchC (2006) Insights into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field. Oxford: InsightShare.
24.
LydallJ (1992) Filming the women who smile. In: CrawfordPISimonsenJK (eds) Ethnographic Film Aesthetics and Narrative Traditions. Aarhus: Intervention Press, 141–158.
MacDougallD (1991) Whose story is it?Visual Anthropology Review7(2): 2–10.
27.
MacDougallD (2001) Renewing ethnographic film: is digital video changing the genre?Anthropology Today17(3): 15–21.
28.
MacDougallD (2006) The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
MartinezW (1992) Who constructs anthropological knowledge? Toward a theory of ethnographic film spectatorship. In: CrawfordPITurtonD (eds) Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 131–161.
30.
MilneEJ (2012) Saying ‘No’ to participatory video: unraveling the complexities of (non)participation. In: MilneEJMitchelCdeLangeN (eds) Handbook of Participatory Video. Plymouth: AltaMira Press, 257–268.
31.
MoserB (1988) Foreword. In: SingerAWoodheadL (eds) Disappearing World: Television and Anthropology. London: Boxtree, 9–14.
32.
NemesGHighCShaferN. (2007) Using participatory video to evaluate community development. In: XXII European Congress of Rural Sociology, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 20–24 August.
33.
PinkS (2006) The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the Senses. London: Routledge.
34.
PinkS (2011) Digital visual anthropology: potentials and challenges. In: BanksMRubyJ (eds) Made to Be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 209–233.
35.
RisseeuwC (2006) Filming that which has no words and the issue of the public. In: PostmaMCrawfordPI (eds) Reflecting Visual Ethnography: Using the Camera in Anthropological Research. Leiden: CNWS Publications, 172–183.
36.
RouchJ (2003) The camera and man. In: RouchJFeldS (eds and trans.) Ciné-Ethnography. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 29–46.
37.
RubyJ (1975) Is an ethnographic film a filmic ethnography?Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication2(2): 104–111.
38.
RubyJ (2000) Picturing Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
RubyJ (2008) Towards an anthropological cinema. In: 2008 Nordic Anthropological Film Association meetings (Media Anthropology Network working papers), Ísafjörur, Iceland, 6 June.
40.
ShawJRobertsonC (1997) Participatory Video: A Practical Guide to Using Video Creatively in Group Development Work. London: Routledge.
41.
SingerA (1992) Anthropology in broadcasting. In: CrawfordPITurtonD (eds) Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 264–273.
42.
TurnerT (1992) The Kayapo on television: an anthropological viewing. Visual Anthropology Review8(1): 107–112.
43.
TurtonD (1992) Anthropology on television: what next? In: CrawfordPITurtonD (eds) Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 283–299.
44.
WickettE (2007) Visual anthropology and development: video as critique, praxis and process. Visual Anthropology Review23(1): 69–75.
45.
WoodheadL (1987) Putting anthropology on television—filming ‘Disappearing World’. SVA Newsletter2(4): 6–7.
46.
WoodheadL (1992) Collaborating with anthropology through television. Visual Anthropology Review8(1): 118–121.
47.
WorthSGrossL (1982) Symbolic Strategies. Studying Visual Communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
48.
WrightT (1992) Television narrative and ethnographic film. In: CrawfordPITurtonD (eds) Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 274–282.
49.
YangKH (2012) Reflexivity, participation, and video. In: MilneEJMitchelCdeLangeN (eds) Handbook of Participatory Video. Plymouth: AltaMira Press, 100–114.
50.
YoungC (1995) Observational cinema. In: HockingsP (ed.) Principles of Visual Anthropology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 65–80.
