Cartoons are a ubiquitous form of visual communication. Yet they are often overlooked in methodological debates about dissemination. In this article, the potential of cartoons as a vehicle for processing and transmitting qualitative research findings is explored and some methodological advantages and concerns of using cartoons in this way are outlined. Discussion stems from a small-scale, experimental ‘knowledge transfer’ project located within a larger qualitative study about higher functioning men and women with dementia who campaign for social change. It concludes that cartooning can bring to life in a playful way serious issues, but as form of visual communication, cartoons are not for everyone, and must therefore be used judiciously to disseminate research findings.
BartlettR (in press) Modifying the diary interview method to research the lives of people with dementia. Qualitative Health Research.
3.
BartlettR (forthcoming) The emergent modes of dementia activism.
4.
BurkeH (2008) Toolkit 2: Putting on an exhibition about your research. Real Life Methods: 1–8.
5.
BurnsL (2006) Seriously are you really an artist? Humour and integrity in a community mural project. In: BarndtD (ed.) Wild Fire: Art as Activism. Toronto, ON, Canada: Sumach Press.
6.
ChambersRBoathERogersD (2007) Clinical Effectiveness and Clinical Governance Made Easy. 4th ed.Abingdon: Radcliffe Press Ltd.
7.
CornerLBondJ (2004) Being at risk of dementia: fears and anxieties of older adults. Journal of Aging Studies4: 143–155.
8.
DaviesK (2010) Qualitative research and creative approaches to public engagement (Video). Available at: www.manchester.ac.uk/realities
9.
DeanC (2009) Am I Making Myself Clear? A Scientist’s Guide to Talking to the Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dines-LevyGSmithG (1988) Representations of women and men in playboy sex cartoons. In: PowellCPatonG (eds) Humour in Society: Resistance and Control. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd, pp. 234–259.
12.
Economic and Social Research Council (2010) Framework for Research Ethic. Swindon: ESRC.
13.
FalkJDierkingL (2000) Learning from Museums: Visitor Experience and the Making of Meaning. Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
14.
GauntletD (2007) Creative Explorations: New Approaches to Identities and Audiences. London: Routledge.
15.
GouinR (2004) What’s so funny? Humour in women’s accounts of their involvement in social action. Qualitative Research4(1): 25–44.
16.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (2007) Ethnography: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed.London: Routledge.
17.
HillerH (1983) Humour and hostility: a neglected aspect of social movement analysis. Qualitative Sociology6(3): 225–265.
18.
KontosPNaglieG (2006) Expressions of personhood in Alzheimer’: moving from ethnographic text to performing ethnography. Qualitative Research6(3): 301–317.
19.
LeaT (2010) Using visual methods to explore policy controversies from within organisations: some preliminary ideas on cartoons as a means of opening closed spaces. Paper presented at the 2nd international and interdisciplinary conference. ‘Vital signs: engaging research imaginations’. University of Manchester.
20.
LockyerSPickeringM (2009) Beyond a Joke: The Limits of Humour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
McCloudS (1993) Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: Harper Perennial.
22.
OlesenT (2009) The Muhammad cartoons conflict and transnational activism. Ethnicities9(3): 409–426.
23.
PauwelsL (2010) Visual sociology reframed: an analytical synthesis of visual methods in cultural and social research. Sociological Methods & Research38: 545–581.
24.
PetersonIMasonABhanaA. (2006) Mediating social representations using a cartoon narrative in the context of HIV/AIDS. Journal of Health Psychology11(2): 197–208.
ProsserJ (1998) The visual representation of school culture. Communication & Cognition31(2/3): 243–264.
27.
RichardsonL (1990) Writing Strategies: Reaching Diverse Audiences. Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage.
28.
RichardsonL (2003) Writing: a method of inquiry. In: DenzinNLincolnY (eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 499–542.
29.
RowntreeD (1999) Teaching Through Self-Instruction: How to Develop Open Learning Materials. London: Kogan Page.
30.
Scottish Dementia Working Group (2010) Why Am I Laughing? A Classic Collection of Short Jokes and One Liners for All the Family. Kilmarnock: Waverley Books Ltd.
31.
ShakespeareT (1994) Cultural representation of disabled people: dustbins for disavowal. Disability & Society9(3): 283–299.
32.
SimpsonK (2007) Hearing voices? Negotiating multiple ethical commitments in development research. In: SmithM (ed.) Negotiating Boundaries and Borders: Qualitative Methodology and Development Research. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 155–176.
33.
WeaverS (2010) The ‘Other’ laughs back: humour and resistance in anti-racist comedy. Sociology44(1): 31–48.
34.
WhitfieldKWismerS (2006) Inclusivity and dementia: health service planning with individuals with dementia. Healthcare Policy1(2): 120–134.
