A potentially problematic aspect of the qualitative interview is the propensity
towards tensions that emerge - ambiguities, inconsistencies, contradictions etc. -
especially when transcripts are analysed. In this article, I draw on material from
an interview in which the presence of contradictory data had surprising results,
initially producing shock, but subsequently causing me to reflect on the
‘meaning’ inherent in these lapses of coherence. In so doing, I
present a framework for analysis, based on Ernesto Laclau and Chantal
Mouffe’s discourse theory, and suggest that narratives serve to construct
the relational process of ‘identification with’ that links
individuals to discourses. This framework enables a kind of situated reliability to
emerge from the very aspects of the interview that may be held to be problematic in
terms of our being ‘unreliable narrators’.
Althusser, L.
(1971) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.
London: NLB
.
2.
Butler, J.
,
Laclau, E.
and
Zizek, S.
(2000) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality.
London: Verso
.
3.
Currie, M.
(1998) Postmodern Narrative Theory.
London: MacMillan Press
.
4.
Denzin, N.
(2001)
‘The Reflexive Interview and a Performative Social Science’
, Qualitative Research1(1):
23-46
.
5.
Derrida, J.
(1998) Monolingualism of the Other. Or the Prosthesis of
Origin.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
.
6.
Duncan, J.
(n.d.) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Strap. Or, a History of the
Scottish Tawse’, URL (consulted 5 October 2005): http://members.freespeech.org/saxon/main/nonfiction/tawse.htm
7.
Fairclough, N.
(1992) Discourse and Social Change.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
8.
Foucault, M.
(1999[1976]) History of Sexuality. Volume 1. The Will to
Knowledge.
London: Penguin
.
9.
Gardner, G.
(2001)
‘Unreliable Memories and Other Contingencies: Problems with
Biographical Knowledge’
, Qualitative Research1(2):
185-204
.
10.
Grønnerød, J. S.
(2004)
‘On the Meanings and Uses of Laughter in Research Interviews’
, Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research12(1):
31-49
.
11.
Gubrium, J. F.
and
Holstein, J. A.
(1997) The New Language of Qualitative Method.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
12.
Gubrium, J.
and
Holstein, J. A.
(2003) ‘Postmodern
Sensibilities’, in
J. F. Gubrium
and
J. A. Holstein
(eds) Postmodern Interviewing, pp. 3-18.
London: Sage
.
13.
Hinchman, L.
and
Hinchman, S.
(eds) (2001) Memory, Identity, Community. The Idea of
Narrativity in the Human Sciences.
New York: New York University Press
.
14.
Holstein, J. A.
and
Gubrium, J. F.
(1995) The Active Interview.
London: Sage
.
15.
Howarth, D.
(2000) Discourse.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
16.
Jensen, C.
and
Lauritsen, P.
(2005)
‘Qualitative Research as Partial Connection: Bypassing the
Power-Knowledge Nexus’
, Qualitative Research5(1):
59-77
.
17.
Kondo, D.
(1990) Crafting Selves. Power, Gender and Discourses of
Identity in a Japanese Workplace.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
18.
Kvale, S.
(1996) Interviews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Interviewing.
London: Sage
.
19.
Lather, P.
(1995)
‘The Validity of Angels: Interpretive and Textual Strategies in
Researching the Lives of Women with HIV/AIDS’
, Qualitative Inquiry1(1):
41-68
.
20.
Lather, P.
(2000) ‘How Research Can be Made to Mean: Feminist
Ethnography at the Limits of Representation’, URL (consulted 5
January 2005): http://www.teachlearn.org/idieri/Post-Conf_Info/Lather_Talk/lather_talk.html
21.
McCormack, C.
(2004)
‘Storying Stories: A Narrative Approach to In-depth Interview Conversations’
, International Journal of Social Research Methodology7(3):
219-236
.
22.
McLure, M.
(2003) Discourse in Educational and Social Research.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
23.
Mills, J.
(2001)
‘Self-construction through Conversation and Narrative Interviews’
, Educational Review53(3):
285-301
.
24.
Mishler, E. G.
(1999) Storylines. Craftartists Narratives of Identity.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
25.
Ochs, E.
and
Capps, L.
(2001) Living Narrative.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
26.
Power, E.
(2004)
‘Toward Understanding in Postmodern Interview Analysis:
Interpreting the Contradictory Remarks of a Research Participant’
, Qualitative Health Research14(6):
858-865
.
27.
Powney, J.
and
Watts, M.
(1987) Interviewing in Educational Research.
London: Routledge
.
28.
Qvarsebo, J.
(2004)
‘Compulsory School, Corporal Punishment and Changed Notions of
Childhood: The Swedish Political Process 1946-1958’
, Fifth European Social Science History Conference.
Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, 24-27 March.
29.
Rapley, T.
(2001)
‘The Art(fulness) of Open-ended Interviews: Some Consideration on
Analysing Interviews’
, Qualitative Research1(3):
303-323
.
30.
Ricoeur, P.
(1981) ‘Narrative Time’, in
W. J. T. Mitchell
(ed.) On Narrative, pp. 165-186.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
31.
Sands, R. G.
and
Krumer-Nevo, M.
(2005)
‘Interview Shocks and Shockwaves’
, Paper presented at the First International Congress of
Qualitative Inquiry. University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, May.
32.
Scheurich, J.
(1995)
‘A Postmodernist Critique of Research Interviewing’
, Qualitative Studies in Education8(3):
239-252
.
33.
Scott, S.
(1985) ‘Working through the Contradiction in
Researching Post-graduate Education’, in
R. Burgess
(ed.) Field Methods in the Study of Education, pp.
115-130.
London: Falmer Press
.
34.
Sinding, C.
and
Aronson, J.
(2003)
‘Exposing Failures, Unsettling Accommodations: Tensions in
Interview Practice’
, Qualitative Research3(1):
95-117
.
35.
Strathearn, M.
(2004) Partial Connections, Updated Edition.
Walnut Creek, CA: Altimira Press
.
36.
Tannen, D.
(1989) Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in
Conversational Discourse.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
37.
Torfing, J.
(1999) New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe,
Zizek.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
38.
Wolfson, N.
(1997) ‘Speech Events and Natural
Speech’, in
N. Coupland
and
A. Jaworski
(eds) Sociolinguistics, pp. 116-125.
Basingstoke: MacMillan
.
