This article takes two examples of trying to collect fieldwork data in dangerous or difficult circumstances in Bali and uses them to explore some issues central to qualitative research. These issues include shifting researcher subject positions in qualitative sociology approaches, and the coherence and usefulness of data collected in chaotic or risky circumstances. Methodological practices such as reflexivity are considered, as well as the task of writing research accounts up from messy and chaotic data sets. It is concluded that data collected at moments of fieldwork crisis may not be particularly useful, except as a cultural reminder of the insider/outsider status of the researcher, and to inform more productive factual data collected after the event.
Alcoff, L. (1991) ‘The Problem of Speaking for Others’, Cultural Critique20(1): 5-32.
2.
Anderson, G. (1989) ‘Critical Ethnography in Education: Origins, Current Status, and New Directions’, Review of Educational Research59(3): 249-270.
3.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A. and Delamont, S. (2001) Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.
4.
Bagus, M.I. (1997) ‘Sows on Heat and Disoriented Boars - Straight Sex from Bali to Melbourne’, Melbourne Journal of Politics24: 69-93.
5.
Bali Post, (1999a) ‘Meningkat drastis penderita narkoba di Bali’, 9/11/99, p. 3.
6.
Bali Post, (1999b) ‘Kafe di Buleleng dijadikan ajang bisnis seks’, 14/10/99, p. 3.
7.
Blackwood, E. (1995) ‘Falling in Love with an-Other Lesbian’, pp. 30-51 in D. Kulick and M. Wilson (eds) Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London & New York: Routledge.
8.
Carspecken, P.F. (1996) Critical Ethnography in Educational Research. New York & London: Routledge.
9.
Davies, B. (1997) ‘The Subject of Poststructuralism: A Reply to Alison Jones’, Gender and Education9(3): 271-283.
10.
De Laine, M. (2000) Fieldwork Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
11.
Denzin, N. (1997) Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practice for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
12.
Eriksen, T.H. (1995) Small Places, Large Issues. London: Pluto Press.
13.
Fajans, P., Ford, K. and Wirawan, D.W. (1995) ‘AIDS Knowledge and Risk Behaviours of Domestic Clients of Sex Workers in Bali, Indonesia’, Social Science and Medicine41(3): 409-417.
14.
Gayatri, B.J.D (1993) ‘Coming Out But Remaining Hidden: A Portrait of Lesbians in Java’. Paper presented at the International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Mexico City, Mexico.
15.
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Geertz, C. (1983) Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Goodman, J. (1998) ‘Ideology and Critical Ethnography’, pp. 50-66 in G. Shacklock and J. Smyth (eds) Being Reflexive in Critical Educational and Social Research. London: Falmer Press.
18.
Hammersley, M. (1998) Reading Ethnographic Research: A Critical Guide (2nd edition). London & New York: Longman.
19.
Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London & New York: Routledge.
20.
Herzfeld, M. (2001) ‘Performing Comparisons: Ethnography, Globetrotting and the Spaces of Social Knowledge’, Journal of Anthropological Research57(3): 259-276.
21.
Honan, E., Knobel, M., Baker, C. and Davies, B. (2000) ‘Producing Possible Hannahs: Theory and the Subject of Research’, Qualitative Inquiry6(1): 9-32.
22.
Humphreys, L. (1970) Tearoom Trade: A Study of Homosexual Encounters in Public Places. London: Duckworth.
23.
Hunt, J.C. (1989) Psychoanalytic Aspects of Fieldwork. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Inciardi, J. (1993) ‘Some Considerations on the Methods, Dangers and Ethics of Crack-House Research’, pp. 153-172 in J. Inciardi, D. Lockwood and A.E. Pottinger (eds) Women and Crack-Cocaine. New York: Macmillan.
25.
Jennaway, M. (1996) ‘Sweet Breath and Bitter Honey: HIV/AIDS and the Embodiment of Desire Among North Balinese Women’, unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Australia.
26.
Kelsky, K. (2001) ‘Who Sleeps With Whom, or How (Not) to Want the West in Japan’, Qualitative Inquiry7(4): 418-435.
27.
Kulick, D. (1995) ‘The Sexual Life of Anthropologists: Erotic Subjectivity and Ethnographic Work’, pp. 1-28 in D. Kulick and M. Wilson (eds) Taboo: Sex, Identity, and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London & New York: Routledge.
28.
Kumar, N. (1992) Friends, Brothers and Informants: Fieldwork Memoirs of Banaras. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Lather, P. (1993) ‘Fertile Obsession: Validity After Poststructuralism’, The Sociological Quarterly34(4): 673-693.
30.
Lee, R.M. (1995) Dangerous Fieldwork. Qualitative Research Methods Series 34. London: Sage Publications.
31.
Lerum, K. (2001) ‘Subjects of Desire: Academic Armor, Intimate Ethnography, and the Production of Critical Knowledge’, Qualitative Inquiry7(4): 466-483.
32.
Lette, H. (1996) ‘“Changing My Thinking With a Western Woman”: Javanese Youths’ Construction of Masculinity’, Asia-Pacific Viewpoint37(2): 195-207.
33.
Madjar, I. and Higgins, I. (1996) ‘Of Ethics Committees, Protocols and Behaving Ethically in the Field: A Case Study of Research With Elderly Residents in a Nursing Home’, Nursing Enquiry3(3): 130-137.
34.
Malinowski, B. (1961) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Dutton Press.
35.
Marcus, G.E. (2001) ‘From Rapport Under Erasure to Theaters of Complicit Reflexivity’, Qualitative Enquiry7(4): 519-528.
36.
Murray, A. (1995) ‘Where Are the Indonesian Lesbians?’, Inside Indonesia42(1): 22-23.
37.
Nilan, P. (2001) ‘Young People as Embodied Subjects in Bali: Ritual, Politics and Risk/Profit’, Working Papers: Centre for Asia-Pacific Social Transformation (CAPSTRANS), http://www.uow.edu.au/research/centres/capstans. University of Wollongong and University of Newcastle, Australia.
38.
Nusa Tenggara, (1999) Amuk massa itu seperti orang ngunying. 28/10/99: 1-3.
39.
Oetomo, D. (1996) ‘Gender and Sexual Orientation in Indonesia’, pp. 259-269 in L.J. Sears (ed.) Fantasizing the Feminine in Indonesia. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
40.
Parameswaran, R. (2001) ‘Feminist Media Ethnography in India: Exploring Power, Gender and Culture in the Field’, Qualitative Inquiry7(1): 69-103.
41.
Popkewitz, T. (1984) Paradigm and Ideology in Educational Research. New York: Falmer Press.
42.
Probyn, E. (1993) Sexing the Self: Gendered Positions in Cultural Studies. London & New York: Routledge.
43.
Sherif, B. (2001) ‘The Ambiguity of Boundaries in the Fieldwork Experience: Establishing Rapport and Negotiating Insider/Outsider Status’, Qualitative Inquiry7(4): 437-447.
44.
Street, A. (2001) ‘Critical Ethnography’, Paper distributed at Critical Ethnography Workshop, University of Newcastle: 21-22 September.
45.
Surya, I.M. (1999) Bali election results, 19/6/99.
46.
Van Maanen, J. (1988) Tales of the Field. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
47.
Venkateswar, S. (2001) ‘Strategies of Power: An Analysis of an Encounter in the Andaman Islands’, Qualitative Inquiry7(4): 448-465.
48.
Warren, C.A.B. (1988) Gender Issues in Field Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Willson, M. (1995) ‘Perspective and Difference: Sexualization, the Field and the Ethnographer’, pp. 251-275 in D. Kulick and M. Wilson (eds) Taboo: Sex, Identity, and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork. London & New York: Routledge.
50.
Wolf, D.L. (1996) ‘Situating Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork’, pp. 1-55 in D.L. Wolf (ed.) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Boulder Colorado: Westview Press.
