Based on a review of the literature and the author’s own experiences, this article develops a framework for understanding the hidden dilemmas of being an insider participant observer. A common assumption made about participant observation is that being an insider offers a distinct advantage in terms of accessing and understanding the culture. However, these advantages are not absolute and the insider must be aware of ethical and methodological dilemmas associated with entering the field, positioning and disclosure, shared relationships and disengagement. The article discusses these dilemmas and identifies issues that need more careful evaluation and analysis within the field of qualitative inquiry. The assumption that insiderness provides the researcher with greater access and deeper understanding is often true, but the degree of achieved insiderness is related to a number of critical factors that are determined by the circumstances of the moment.
Acker, J.
, Barry, K. and Esseveld, J. (1991) ‘Objectivity and Truth: Problems in Doing Feminist Research’, in Mary Margaret Fonow and Judith A. Cook (eds) Beyond Methodology: Feminist Scholarship as Lived Research, pp. 133-153. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
2.
Allum, Keith F.
(1991) ‘On Conducting Educational Research in the Field: The Evolution of an Ethnographic Experience from Passive to Active Participant Observer’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, 5 April (ERIC Document ED334224).
3.
Angrosino, Michael V.
and Mays de Perez, Kimberly A. (2000) ‘Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’, in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 673-702. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Arnold, Fiona
(1994) ‘Bullying, a Tale of Everyday Life: Reflections on Insider Research’, Educational Action Research2: 183-193.
5.
Beoku-Betts, Josephine
(1994) ‘When Black Is Not Enough: Doing Field Research among Gullah Women’, NWSA Journal6 (Fall): 413-433.
6.
Blauner, Robert
(1987) ‘Problems of Editing “First Person” Sociology’, Qualitative Sociology10: 46-64.
7.
Bogdan, Robert C.
and Taylor, Steven J. (1984[1975]) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meanings, 2nd edn.New York: Wiley.
8.
Bolman, Lee G.
and Deal, Terrence E. (1997) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, 2nd edn.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Brekhus, W.
(1998) ‘Sociology of the Unmarked: Redirecting our Focus’, Sociological Theory16 (March): 34-51.
10.
Brewer, Rose M.
(1986) ‘Research for Whom and by Whom: A Reconsideration of the Black Social Scientist as Insider’, Wisconsin Sociologist23 (Winter): 19-28.
11.
Bulmer, Martin
(1982) ‘When Is Disguise Justified? Alternatives to Covert Participant Observation’, Qualitative Sociology5 (Summer): 251-264.
12.
Burke, Joan E.
(1989) ‘Becoming an “Inside-Outsider”’, JASO: Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford20: 219-227.
13.
Cerroni-Long, E.L.
(1994) ‘Insider and Outsider Perspectives in the Study of Ethnicity: The Case of the Italian-American’, Ethnic Forum14 (Spring): 121-138.
14.
Christensen, Donna Hendrickson
and Dahl, Carla M. (1997) ‘Rethinking Research Dichotomies’, Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal25 (March): 269-285.
15.
Clark, G.
(1998) ‘Stylized Facts and Close Dialogue: Methodology in Economic Geography’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers88: 73-87.
16.
Coffey, Amanda
(1999) The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Crick, M.
(1992) ‘Ali and Me: An Essay in Street-Corner Anthropology’, in Judith Okely and Helen Callaway (eds) Anthropology and Autobiography,pp. 175-192. London: Routledge.
18.
Daly, Kerry
(1992) ‘Parenthood as Problematic: Insider Interviews with Couples Seeking to Adopt’, in Jane F. Gilgun, Kerry Daly and Gerald Handel (eds) Qualitative Methods in Family Research, pp. 103-125. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
De Andrade
, Lelia Lomba (2000) ‘Negotiating from the Insider: Constructing Racial and Ethnic Identity in Qualitative Research’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography29 (June): 268-290.
20.
Deutsch, Cynthia P.
(1981) ‘The Behavioral Scientists: Insider and Outsider’, Journal of Social Issues37: 172-191.
21.
DeVault, Marjorie L.
(1990) ‘Talking and Listening from Women’s Standpoint: Feminist Strategies for Interviewing and Analysis’, Social Problems37 (February): 96-116.
22.
DeVault, Marjorie L.
(1996) ‘Talking Back to Sociology: Distinctive Contributions of Feminist Methodology’, Annual Review of Sociology22: 29-50.
23.
El-Or, Tamar
(1997) ‘Do You Really Know How They Make Love? The Limits on Intimacy with Ethnographic Informants’, in Rosanna Hertz (ed.) Reflexivity and Voice: Reports and Interpretations, pp. 169-189. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
England, K.
(1994) ‘Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research’, Professional Geographer46: 80-89.
25.
Farnsworth, Elizabeth B.
(1996) ‘Reflexivity and Qualitative Family Research: Insider’s Perspectives in Bereaving the Loss of a Child’, Marriage and Family Review24: 399-415.
26.
Fine, Michelle
(1994) ‘Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research’, in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 70-82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Gellner, David N.
and Hirsch, Eric (eds) (2001) Inside Organizations: Anthropologists at Work. Oxford: Berg.
28.
Griffith, Alison I.
(1998) ‘Insider/Outsider: Epistemological Privilege and Mothering Work’, Human Studies21: 361-376.
29.
Haniff, Nesha Z.
(1985) ‘Toward a Native Anthropology: Methodological Notes on a Study of Successful Caribbean Women by an Insider’, Anthropology and Humanism Quarterly10: 107-113.
30.
Hawkesworth, Mary E.
(1989) ‘Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (Spring): 533-557.
31.
Headland, Thomas N.
, Pike, Kenneth L. and Harris, Marvin (eds) (1990) Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Frontiers of Anthropology, Vol. 7. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32.
Hendry, Joy
(1992) ‘The Paradox of Friendship in the Field: Analysis of a Long-term Anglo-Japanese Relationship’, in Judith Okely and Helen Callaway (eds) Anthropology and Autobiography, pp. 163-174. London: Routledge.
33.
Herndon, Sandra L.
and Kreps, Gary L. (eds) (2001) Qualitative Research: Applications in Organizational Communication, 2nd edn.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
34.
Hsiung, Ping-Chen
(1996) ‘Between Bosses and Workers: The Dilemmas of a Keen Observer and a Vocal Feminist’, in Diane L. Wolf (ed.) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork, pp. 122-137. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
35.
Jones, Delmos J.
(1970) ‘Toward a Native Anthropology’, Human Organization: A Scientific Quarterly for the Study of Development Change29 (Winter): 251-259.
36.
Kanuha, Valli Kalei
(2000) ‘“Being” Native versus “Going Native”: Conducting Social Work Research as an Insider’, Social Work45 (October): 439-447.
37.
Kauffman, Karen S.
(1994) ‘The Insider/Outsider Dilemma: Field Experience of a White Researcher “Getting In” a Poor Black Community’, Nursing Research43 (May-June): 179-183.
38.
Kondo, Dorinne K.
(1986) ‘Dissolution and Reconstitution of Self: Implications for Anthropological Epistemology’, Cultural Anthropology1: 74-88.
39.
MacDonald, Frederick F.
(1990) ‘A Case Study of Insider-Outsider Dynamics in Rural Community Development’, Human Services in the Rural Environment14 (Summer): 15-20.
40.
Maines, David R.
, Shaffir, William and Turowetz, Allan (1980) ‘Leaving the Field in Ethnographic Research: Reflections on the Entrance-Exit Hypothesis’, in William Shaffir, Robert A. Stebbins and Allan Turowetz (eds) Fieldwork Experience: Qualitative Approaches to Social Research, pp. 261-281. New York: St Martin’s Press.
41.
Malinowski, Bronislaw
(1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
42.
Maynard, M.
and Purvis, J. (eds) (1994) Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective. London: Taylor and Francis.
43.
McCormick, Richard A.
(1973) Ambiguity and Moral Choice. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
44.
McCormick, Richard A.
and Ramsey, Paul (1978) Doing Evil to Achieve Good. Chicago: Loyola University Press.
45.
Merton, Robert
(1972) ‘Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge’, American Journal of Sociology78 (July): 9-47.
46.
Miller, Kim
(1997) ‘All in the Family: Family Folklore, Objectivity, and Self-Censorship’, Western Folklore56 (Summer): 331-346.
47.
Mullings, Beverly
(1999) ‘Insider or Outsider, Both or Neither: Some Dilemmas of Interviewing in a Cross-Cultural Setting’, GeoForum30: 337-350.
48.
Munro, Doug
(1994) ‘Who “Owns” Pacific History? Reflections on the Insider/Outsider Dichotomy’, The Journal of Pacific History29 (December): 232-237.
49.
Naples, Nancy A.
(1996) ‘A Feminist Revisiting of the Insider/Outsider Debate: The “Outsider Phenomenon” in Rural Iowa’, Qualitative Sociology19: 83-106.
50.
Narayan, Kirin
(1993) ‘How Native is the “Native” Anthropologist?’, American Anthropologist95 (1993): 671-686.
51.
Oakley, Ann
(1981) ‘Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’, in Helen Roberts (ed.) Doing Feminist Research, pp. 30-61. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
52.
Ohnuki-Tierney, Emiko
(1984) ‘“Native” Anthropologists’, American Ethnologist11: 584-586.
53.
Okely, Judith
and Callaway, Helen (eds) (1992) Anthropology and Autobiography. London: Routledge.
54.
Olson, David H.
(1977) ‘Insiders’ and Outsiders’ Views of Relationships: Research Studies’, in George Levinger and Harold L. Raush (eds) Close Relationships: Perspectives on the Meaning of Intimacy, pp. 115-135. Amhurst: University of Massachusetts Press.
55.
Parades, Americo
(1977) ‘On Ethnographic Work Among Minority Groups: A Folklorist’s Perspective’, New Scholar6: 1-53.
56.
Reay, Diane
(1995) ‘Feminist Research: The Fallacy of Easy Access’, Women’s Studies International Forum18 (March-April): 205-213.
57.
Reay, Diane
(1996) ‘Insider Perspectives or Stealing the Words out of Women’s Mouths: Interpretation in the Research Process’, Feminist Review53 (Summer): 57-73.
58.
Riessman, Catherine K.
(1987) ‘When Gender Is Not Enough: Women Interviewing Women’, Gender and Society1 (June): 172-207.
59.
Rose, G.
(1997) ‘Situated Knowledge: Positionality Reflexivities and Other Tactics’, Progress in Human Geography21: 305-320.
60.
Scheiberg, Susan L.
(1990) ‘A Folklorist in the Family: On the Process of Fieldwork Among Intimates’, Western Folklore49: 208-214.
61.
Sherman, Sharon
(1986) ‘That’s How the Seder Looks: A Fieldwork Account of Videotaping Family Folklore’, Journal of Folklore Research23: 53-70.
62.
Smith, Dorothy
(1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
63.
Snow, David A.
(1980) ‘The Disengagement Process: A Neglected Problem in Participant Observation Research’, Qualitative Sociology3 (Summer): 100-122.
64.
Sparkes, Andrew C.
(1995) ‘Writing People: Reflections on the Dual Crisis of Representation and Legitimation in Qualitative Inquiry’, Quest47 (March): 158-195.
65.
Styles, Joseph
(1979) ‘Outsider/Insider: Researching Gay Baths’, Urban Life: A Journal of Ethnographic Research8 (July): 135-152.
66.
Surra, Catherine A.
and Ridley, Carl A. (1991) ‘Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Participants, Peers, and Observers’, in Barbara M. Montgomery and Steve Duck (eds) Studying Interpersonal Interaction, pp. 25-55. New York: Guilford Press.
67.
Symon, Gillian
and Cassell, Catherine (eds) (1998) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
Thorne, Sally E.
and Paterson, Barbara L. (2000) ‘Two Decades of Insider Research: What We Know and Don’t Know About Chronic Illness Experience’, Annual Review of Nursing Research18: 3-25.
69.
Tierney, William G.
and Lincoln, Yvonna S. (eds) (1997) Representation and the Text: Reframing the Narrative Voice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
70.
Wilson, William J.
(1974) ‘The New Black Sociology: Reflections on the “Insiders” and “Outsiders” Controversy’, in James E. Blackwell and Morris Janowitz (eds) Black Sociologists: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, pp. 322-338. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71.
Wolf, Diane L.
(ed.) (1996) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
72.
Yocum, Margaret S. (1980) ‘Fieldwork in Family Folklore and Oral History: A Study in Methodology’, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
73.
Zavella, Patricia
(1993) ‘Feminist Insider Dilemmas: Constructing Ethnic Identity with “Chicana”’, Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies13: 53-79.
74.
Zinn, Maxine Baca
(1979) ‘Field Research in Minority Communities: Ethical, Methodological and Political Observations by an Insider’, Social Problems27 (December): 209-219.
