This article briefly investigates the role that ethno-methodology has played in sociological analyses of language and interaction. The work of Harvey Sacks is investigated in relation to membership categorization and the analysis of talk-in-interaction. More specifically, the authors focus on how this strand of work has been developed in recent years and now represents a powerful apparatus for conducting sociological analyses of interaction in a diverse range of settings in a way that is sensitive to issues related to social organization, normativity, identity, macro-micro synthesis, knowledge and developments in social theory.
Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D.H. (eds) (1991) Talk and Social Structure. Oxford: Polity Press.
2.
Coulter, J. (1979) ‘Beliefs and Practical Understanding’, in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language. New York: Irvington Press.
3.
Coulter, J. (1983) ‘Contingent and A PrioriStructures in Sequential Analysis’, Human Studies6(4): 361-376.
4.
Coulthard, M. (1977) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
5.
Drew, P. (1978) ‘Accusations: The Occasioned Use of Members’ Knowledge of “Religious Geography” in Describing Events’, Sociology12(1): 1-22.
6.
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Fevre, R. and Thompson, A. (eds) (1999) Nation, Identity and Social Theory: Perspectives from Wales. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
8.
Halkowski, T. (1990) ‘“Role” as an Interactional Device’, Social Problems37: 564-577.
9.
[Special Issue title: ‘L’enquête sur les catégories: De Durkheim à Sacks’, ed. B. Fradin, L. Quéré and J. Widmer. Paris: Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes en Sciences Sociales.]
10.
Hester, S. and Eglin, P. (1997) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
11.
Hester, S. and Francis, D. (2001) ‘Institutional Talk Institutionalised?’, TEXT20(3): 391-413.
12.
Hester, S. and Housley, W. (2002) Language, Interaction and National Identity. Aldershot: Ashgate.
13.
Housley, W. (1999) ‘Role as an Interactional Resource and Device within Multidisciplinary Team Meetings’, Sociological Research Online4(3). [http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/housley.html]
14.
Housley, W. (2000a) ‘Category Work and Knowledgeability within Multidisciplinary Team Meetings’, TEXT20(1): 83-107.
15.
Housley, W. (2000b) ‘Story, Narrative and Teamwork’, Sociological Review48(3): 425-443.
16.
Jayussi, L. (1984) Categorization and Moral Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17.
Jayussi, L. (1991) ‘Values and Moral Judgement’, in Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Levinson, P. (1997) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Lynch, M. (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Lynch, M. (2000) ‘The Ethnomethodological Foundation of Conversation Analysis’, TEXT20(4): 517-532.
21.
Lynch, M. and Bogen. D. (1994) ‘Harvey Sacks’s Primitive Natural Science’, Theory, Culture and Society11(1): 65-104.
22.
Lynch, M. and Bogen, D. (1996) The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
McHoul, A. and Watson, D.R. (1984) ‘Two Axes for the Analysis of “Commonsense” and “Formal” Geographical Knowledge in Classroom Talk’, British Journal of the Sociology of Education5(3): 281-302.
24.
Pomerantz, A.M. (1978) ‘Attributions of Responsibility: Blamings’, Sociology12: 115-121.
25.
Sacks, H. (1992a) Lectures on Conversation, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
26.
Sacks, H. (1992b) Lectures on Conversation, Vol. II. Oxford: Blackwell.
27.
Schegloff, E.A. (1992) ‘Introduction’, in H. Sacks (ed.) Lectures in Conversation, Vol. I, pp. ix-lxii. Oxford: Blackwell.
28.
Sharrock, W.W. (1974) ‘On Owning Knowledge’, in R. Turner (ed.) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
29.
Silverman, D. (1998) ‘Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity Press.
30.
Tucker, K.H. (1998) Anthony Giddens and Modern Social Theory. Oxford: Polity Press.
31.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1997) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
32.
Watson, D.R. (1978) Categorizations, Authorization and Blame-Negotiation in Conversation’, Sociology12(1): 105-113.
33.
Watson, D.R. (1994) ‘Harvey Sacks’ Sociology of Mind in Action’, Theory, Culture and Society11: 169-186.
34.
Watson, R. (1983) ‘The Presentation of “Victim” and “Motive” in Discourse: The Case of Police Interrogations and Interviews’, Victimology8(1/2): 31-52,
35.
Watson, R. (1997) ‘Some General Reflections on “Categorisation” and “Sequence” in the Analysis of Conversation’, in S. Hester and P. Eglin (eds) Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
36.
Watson, R. (2001) ‘The Character of “Institutional Talk”: A Reply to Hester and Francis’, TEXT20(3): 377-391.
