The maritime industry is shifting from fossil fuels to alternatives to reduce pollutants and emissions. Integrating methanol steam reforming (MSR) with waste heat from internal combustion engines (ICE) optimizes combustion and efficiency. However, a comprehensive evaluation of this MSR-ICE system, especially regarding reforming capability and key performance indicators, has not been conducted. This study develops a process model of the MSR-ICE system to assess its potential for marine medium-speed engines. The effects of MSR reaction temperature, steam-to-carbon (S/C) ratio, and reforming ratio on system performance were analyzed. Results show the MSR-ICE system is thermodynamically feasible. Increasing the reforming ratio enhances efficiency, reducing fuel consumption and carbon emissions. However, the maximum reforming ratio is limited by MSR reaction temperature and S/C ratio. For instance, at 160°C with S/C = 1, the maximum reforming ratio is 0.6, while at 240°C, it drops to 0.3. Optimization strategies include low-temperature reforming, maximizing the reforming ratio, and controlling the S/C ratio.
CurranSOnoratiAPayriR, et al. The future of ship engines: renewable fuels and enabling technologies for decarbonization. Int J Engine Res2024; 25(1): 85–110.
2.
ShiJZhuYFengY, et al. A prompt decarbonization pathway for shipping: green hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol production and utilization in marine engines. Atmos2023; 14(3): 584.
3.
KanchirallaFMBrynolfSMalmgrenE, et al. Life-cycle assessment and costing of fuels and propulsion systems in future fossil-free shipping. Environ Sci Technol2022; 56(17): 12517–12531.
4.
FasihiMBreyerC.Global production potential of green methanol based on variable renewable electricity. Energy Environ Sci2024; 17(10): 3503–3522.
5.
AfanasevPAskarovaAAlekhinaT, et al. An overview of hydrogen production methods: focus on hydrocarbon feedstock. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 78: 805–828.
6.
PaloDRDagleRAHolladayJD.Methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production. Chem Rev2007; 107(10): 3992–4021.
7.
WuZXuGGeS, et al. An efficient methanol pre-reforming gas turbine combined cycle with integration of mid-temperature energy upgradation and CO2 recovery: thermodynamic and economic analysis. Appl Energy2024; 358: 122599.
8.
DemirMEÇıtakoğluF.Design and modeling of a multigeneration system driven by waste heat of a marine diesel engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2022; 47(95): 40513–40530.
9.
VerhelstSTurnerJWSileghemL, et al. Methanol as a fuel for internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci2019; 70: 43–88.
10.
PoranATartakovskyL.Performance and emissions of a direct injection internal combustion engine devised for joint operation with a high-pressure thermochemical recuperation system. Energy2017; 124: 214–226.
11.
WangYLongWTianH, et al. Research on oxidation mechanism of hydrogen/syngas-methanol and its application on engine performance prediction. Fuel2024; 365: 131211.
12.
TangYWangYLongW, et al. Analysis and enhancement of methanol reformer performance for online reforming based on waste heat recovery of methanol-diesel dual direct injection engine. Energy2023; 283: 129098.
13.
JiaHTanYChenZ, et al. Design and performance optimization of diesel engine waste heat recovery methanol reforming hydrogen generation system. Int J Chem Reactor Eng2024; 22(4): 383–400.
14.
ZhuYHeZXuanT, et al. Analysis and optimization of energy conversion for an on-board methanol reforming engine with thermochemical recuperation. Fuel2024; 378: 132767.
15.
WuHWHsuTTFanCM, et al. Reduction of smoke, PM2.5, and NOX of a diesel engine integrated with methanol steam reformer recovering waste heat and cooled EGR. Energy Convers Manag2018; 172: 567–578.
16.
YinZCaiWZhangZ, et al. Effects of hydrogen-rich products from methanol steam reforming on the performance enhancement of a medium-speed marine engine. Energy2022; 256: 124540.
17.
CaiWZhangZWangB, et al. Optimization design and performance analysis of methanol reforming reactor for exhaust waste heat recovery of marine engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 49: 1593–1604.
18.
MalmgrenEBrynolfSFridellE, et al. The environmental performance of a fossil-free ship propulsion system with onboard carbon capture – a life cycle assessment of the HyMethShip concept. Sustain Energy Fuels2021; 5: 2753–2770.
19.
RuoccoCMeloniEMuccioliO, et al. Intensified methanol steam reforming over active and stable CeO2-Al2O3 supported catalysts. Fuel Process Technol2025; 272: 108212.
20.
JangWJJeongDWShimJO, et al. Combined steam and carbon dioxide reforming of methane and side reactions: thermodynamic equilibrium analysis and experimental application. Appl Energy2016; 173: 80–91.
21.
ChristiansenJA.A reaction between methyl alcohol and water and some related reactions. J Am Chem Soc1921; 43(7): 1670–1672.
22.
LiuXWangLLiL, et al. Research on Cu-based and Pt-based catalysts for hydrogen production through methanol steam reforming. Acta Phys Chim Sin2025; 41: 100049.
23.
FajínJLCCordeiroMNDS. Insights into the mechanism of methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production over Ni–Cu-based catalysts. ACS Catal2022; 12(1): 512–526.
24.
TuoYZhaoHChenX, et al. Advances in Cu-based catalysts for methanol steam reforming: mechanistic insights and atomic-level design. J Energy Chem2026; 112: 64–89.
25.
BagherzadehSBHaghighiM.Texture-evolution of copper-based nanocatalyst via hybrid glow discharge plasma-oxalate-precipitation method for hydrogen production from CH3OH/H2O mixture. Appl Catal A Gen2020; 591: 117402.
26.
BagherzadehSBHaghighiMRahemiN.Novel oxalate gel coprecipitation synthesis of ZrO2-CeO2 -promoted CuO-ZnO-Al2O3 nanocatalyst for fuel cell-grade hydrogen production from methanol: influence of ceria-zirconia loading. Energy Convers Manag2017; 134: 88–102.
27.
KuoMTChenYYHungWY, et al. Synthesis of mesoporous Cu Fe/silicates catalyst for methanol steam reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy2019; 44(28): 14416–14423.
28.
GaoLSunGKawiS.A study on methanol steam reforming to CO2 and H2 over the La2CuO4 nanofiber catalyst. J Solid State Chem2008; 181(1): 7–13.
29.
BorgohainPTiwariPUpadhyayRK.Optimization of Cu/Zn/Al2O3 and Cu-Ga/Zn/Al2O3 catalysts using response surface methodology for methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production. J Energy Inst2025; 121: 102155.
30.
ToyirJRamírez de la PiscinaPHomsN.Ga-promoted copper-based catalysts highly selective for methanol steam reforming to hydrogen; relation with the hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Int J Hydrogen Energy2015; 40(34): 11261–11266.
31.
GülerEErginS.An investigation on the solvent based carbon capture and storage system by process modeling and comparisons with another carbon control methods for different ships. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2021; 110: 103438.
32.
XingSZhaoCBanS, et al. Thermodynamic performance analysis of the influence of multi-factor coupling on the methanol steam reforming reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45(11): 7015–7024.
33.
ChengKWangJShaoY, et al. Techno-economic assessment and multi-objective optimization of a hybrid methanol-reforming proton exchange membrane fuel cell system with cascading energy utilization. Energy2024; 313: 133856.
34.
GalloniEMinutilloM.Performance of a spark ignition engine fuelled with reformate gas produced on-board vehicle. Int J Hydrogen Energy2007; 32(13): 2532–2538.
35.
PashchenkoD.Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of combined dry and steam reforming of propane for thermochemical waste-heat recuperation. Int J Hydrogen Energy2017; 42(22): 14926–14935.
36.
BiswasANXieZChenJG.Can CO2-assisted alkane dehydrogenation lead to negative CO2 emissions?Joule2022; 6(2): 269–273.
37.
LuoXWangM.Study of solvent-based carbon capture for cargo ships through process modelling and simulation. Appl Energy2017; 195: 402–413.
AchomoMAMuthukumarPPeelaNR.Thermodynamic, energy and exergy analysis of steam reforming of methanol for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy2025; 149: 150040.
