This study presents a computational fluid dynamics analysis of a new two-stroke engine design aimed at addressing the traditional shortcomings of crankcase-scavenged designs. The proposed concept incorporates a supercharged, uniflow, two-stroke configuration with a dedicated crankcase lubrication system, effectively decoupling the oiling mechanism from the intake charge. This offers significant scope for reducing unburned hydrocarbon emissions. The design incorporates an overhead rotary intake valve and piston-controlled exhaust ports in the cylinder. The port timing has been tuned to minimize short-circuiting losses, resulting in a scavenging efficiency of 62% without loss of fresh charge to the exhaust. A new combustion chamber geometry has also been developed to enhance the tumble flow intensity near the spark plug region. This enhanced flame propagation and improved stability. Additionally, the implementation of a pre-chamber ignition system has been investigated, including multiple active fueling configurations, and is evaluated based on combustion duration. The simulation results indicate a 33% reduction in combustion duration, demonstrating the potential of the proposed design in improving the overall combustion performance.
KumarDKalghatgiGAgarwalAK, et al. Comparison of economic viability of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles based on total cost of ownership analysis. In: UpadhyayRKSharmaSKKumarV (eds) Transportation systems technology and integrated management. Springer, 2023, pp. 455–489.
2.
ShahRKhanMMittalV.Usage of 2-stroke engines for hybrid vehicles. SAE Int J Sust Trans, Energy, Env, & Policy2022; 3: 129–138.
3.
NietoPDVijayagopalRCostanzoV.Trade-offs and opportunities to improve hybrid vehicle performance, cost and fuel economy through better component technology and sizing. SAE paper 2023-01-0477, 2023.
4.
MittalVShahR.Modeling and comparing the total cost of ownership of passenger automobiles with conventional, electric, and hybrid powertrains. SAE Int J Sust Trans, Energy, Env, & Policy2024; 05: 179–192.
5.
MattarelliERinaldiniCACantoreG, et al. Comparison between 2 and 4-stroke engines for a 30 kW range extender. SAE Int J Altern Powertrains2014; 04: 67–87.
6.
BorghiMMattarelliEMuscoloniJ, et al. Design and experimental development of a compact and efficient range extender engine. Appl Energy2017; 202: 507–526.
7.
De CesareMCavinaNPaianoL. Technology comparison for spark ignition engines of new generation. SAE Int J Engines2017; 10: 2513–2534.
8.
IkeyaKTakazawaMYamadaT, et al. Thermal efficiency enhancement of a gasoline engine. SAE Int J Engines2015; 08: 1579–1586.
9.
RibeiroBMartinsJ.Direct comparison of an engine working under Otto, Miller and Diesel cycles: thermodynamic analysis and real engine performance. SAE paper 2007-01-0261, 2007.
10.
KormanMHirzMKirchbergerR, et al. Exhaust emission reduction in small capacity two- and four-stroke engine technologies. SAE paper 2006-32-0091, 2006.
11.
ShanmugamPKathiresanTSenthilnathanN, et al. Strategies and solutions to control and reduce the NOx, HC and CO levels in gasoline/alternate fueled engines. SAE paper 2010-32-0046, 2010.
12.
BorettiAScalzoJ.Design of 65 degree V4 moto GP engines with pneumatic poppet valves or rotary valves. SAE paper 2015-26-0176, 2015.
13.
RobinsonACGarrettNHVaseleniuckD, et al. A computational fluid dynamics investigation comparing the performance of an alternative valvetrain design against a traditional poppet valvetrain. ASME Open J Eng2022; 1: 011028.
14.
GarrettNHUddinMBergmanM, et al. Development of a rotary valve engine for handheld equipment. SAE paper 2022-32-0028, 2022.
15.
GaineyBVaseleniuckDCordierD, et al. Experimental comparison of a rotary valvetrain on the performance and emissions of a light duty spark ignition engine. SAE paper 2023-01-1613, 2023.
16.
NilsenCWBilesDEYraguenBF, et al. Ducted fuel injection versus conventional diesel combustion: an operating-parameter sensitivity study conducted in an optical engine with a four-orifice fuel injector. SAE Int J Engines2020; 13: 345–362.
17.
MilloFPianoAPeiretti ParadisiB, et al. Ducted fuel injection: a numerical soot-targeted duct geometry optimization. SAE Int J Engines2021; 15: 297–317.
18.
WangXMaJZhaoH.Analysis of mixture formation process in a two-stroke boosted uniflow scavenged direct injection gasoline engine. Int J Engine Res2018; 19: 927–940.
19.
LiZHeBQZhaoH.Influences of intake ports and pent-roof structures on the flow characteristics of a poppet-valved two-stroke gasoline engine. Int J Engine Res2016; 17: 1077–1091.
20.
LiXHeBQZhaoH.Numerical study of the effect of split direct injection on the lean-burn combustion characteristics in a poppet-valve two-stroke gasoline engine at high loads. Int J Engine Res2021; 22: 1776–1793.
21.
WangXZhaoH.Effect of piston shape design on the scavenging performance and mixture preparation in a two-stroke boosted uniflow scavenged direct injection gasoline engine. Int J Engine Res2021; 22: 1484–1499.
22.
BermúdezVRuizSNovellaR, et al. Assessment of air management strategies on particulate number and size distributions from a 2-stroke compression-ignition engine operating with gasoline partially premixed combustion concept. Int J Engine Res2020; 21: 448–469.
23.
MattarelliERinaldiniCA.Two-stroke gasoline engines for small-medium passenger cars. SAE paper 2015-01–1284, 2015.
24.
CrossME.The rotary valve as an alternative. SAE paper 800888, 1980.
25.
CoatesGJ.Rotary valve and valve seal assembly for rotary valve engine having hemispherical combustion chambers. Patent 6789516B2, US, 2003.
26.
BishopAE.Rotary valve for internal combustion engines. Patent 4852532, US, 1989.
27.
AyyanarKNayekSAnandTNC, et al. The effect of different throttle openings on multi-plane analysis of in-cylinder flow fields in a small-bore spark-ignition engine. Flow Turbul Combust2025; 114: 1233–1267.
28.
IssaRI.Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J Comput Phys1986; 62: 40–65.
SenecalPKPomraningERichardsKJ, et al. Multi-dimensional modeling of direct-injection diesel spray liquid length and flame lift-off length using CFD and parallel detailed chemistry. SAE paper 2003-01-1043, 2003.
31.
HanZReitzRD.Turbulence modeling of internal combustion engines using RNG κ-ε models. Comb Sci Tech1995; 106: 267–295.
32.
BealeJCReitzRD.Modeling spray atomization with the Kelvin-Helmholtz/Rayleigh-Taylor hybrid model. Atomization and Sprays1999; 9: 623–650.
33.
GholamisheeriMGivlerSToulsonE.RANS and LES of a turbulent jet ignition system fueled with iso-octane. Flow Turbul Combust2020; 104: 209–231.
34.
ChinnathambiPBunceMCruffL.RANS based multidimensional modeling of an ultra-lean burn pre-chamber combustion system with auxiliary liquid gasoline injection. SAE paper 2015-01-0386, 2015.
35.
PradeepVVarunJNBakshiS, et al. Boost port injection of LPG in a two - stroke SI engine for reduction in HC emissions. SAE paper 2013-01-0584, 2013.
36.
TitoNKeerthiGBalasubramanianN, et al. New concept PFI-atomizer fueling system in a small single cylinder SI engine. SAE paper 2020-01-2233, 2020.
37.
MohammadebrahimAShafiiMBHannaniSK.The effect of various test parameters on the steady flow test results of a four-valve spark ignition engine: a tentative approach toward standardization. Adv Mech Eng2013; 5: 482317.
38.
BlairGPDrouinFMM. Relationship between discharge coefficients and accuracy of engine simulation. SAE paper 962527, 1996.
ToulsonESchockHJAttardWP. A review of pre-chamber initiated jet ignition combustion systems. SAE 2010-01-2263, 2010.
41.
GandhiAHMeinhartM.Fuel injector flow rate analysis for the Duratec 35 EcoBoost Engine. SAE paper 2009-01-1505, 2009.
42.
MuddapurAJoseJVSahuS, et al. Spray dynamics and evaporation in a multihole GDI injector for pulsatile and split injection at elevated ambient pressure and temperature conditions. Fuel2020; 279: 118057.
43.
BalasubramanianNBakshiSAnandTNC. Fuel injection rate measurement of gasoline direct injection injectors. In: 13th triennial international conference on liquid atomization and spray systems, ICLASS-2015, Taiwan, 2015.
44.
ŞenerRNyrenstedtGBaumgardKJ, et al. Determining tolerance requirements for spray-duct alignment in ducted fuel injection. Int J Engine Res2025; 26: 204–217.
45.
GuoJBrouzetDChungWT, et al. Analysis of ducted fuel injection at high-pressure transcritical conditions using large-eddy simulations. Int J Engine Res2024; 25: 305–319.
46.
DoubianiNOevermannMLucchiniT, et al. Numerical investigation of ducted fuel injection using multiple representative interactive linear eddy model. Int J Engine Res2025; 26: 826–838.
47.
RusswurmTPeterAStraußL, et al. Investigations on an active pre-chamber ignition system in a combustion chamber. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 2422–2436.
48.
Vera-TudelaWBarroCBoulouchosK.Investigations on spark pre-chamber ignition and subsequent turbulent jet main chamber ignition in a novel optically accessible test rig. Int J Engine Res2022; 23: 1543–1555.
49.
WangLHuangZTaoW, et al. Economy and emission characteristics of the optimal dilution strategy in lean combustion based on GDI gasoline engine equipped with prechamber. Adv Mech Eng2021; 13: 12.
50.
ZhuZLiYXieY, et al. Combustion system optimization and knock characteristics of a two-stroke rod-less opposed-piston engine. Int J Engine Res2025; 26: 1058–1069.
51.
LiuJYamazakiYOtakiY, et al. Effect of ignition condition and fuel octane number on knock intensity in a small 2-stroke engine. SAE paper 2025-01–0211, 2025.
52.
MelaikaMHerbillonGDahlanderP.Spark ignition engine performance, standard emissions and particulates using GDI, PFI-CNG and DI-CNG systems. Fuel2021; 293: 120454.
