Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) engines have become a cornerstone of modern automotive technology due to their significant advancements in fuel efficiency, emissions reduction, and combustion optimization. However, challenges remain in managing particulate emissions, improving engine performance, and addressing knocking phenomena. This review explores the latest developments in GDI engine technologies, focusing on pathways for enhancing combustion stability, reducing emissions, and optimizing engine performance across various operating conditions. Key technologies such as Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR), Gasoline Particulate Filters (GPFs), have been instrumental in addressing the emission challenges. Moreover, alternative fuels like ethanol, methanol, and hydrogen have been explored for their potential to improve combustion efficiency and reduce emissions. The review also discusses various injection strategies, including single, double, dual-fuel, and water injection, as well as the promising role of flash boiling in improving fuel atomization and mixture homogeneity. Despite these advancements, the review identifies several ongoing research gaps, particularly in optimizing injection systems and improving the fuel blends. The paper concludes by highlighting the need for continued research into hybrid systems and advanced modeling techniques to further improve GDI engine performance while meeting increasingly stringent emissions regulations.
BaranescuGS.Some characteristics of spark assisted direct injection engine. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 1983.
2.
DuggalVKuoTWLuxF.Review of multi-fuel engine concepts and numerical modeling of in-cylinder flow processes in direct injection engines. SAE Transactions1984; 93: 33–59.
KaravalakisGShortDVuD, et al. The impact of ethanol and iso-butanol blends on gaseous and particulate emissions from two passenger cars equipped with spray-guided and wall-guided direct injection SI (spark ignition) engines. Energy2015; 82: 168–179.
6.
ChenLLiangZZhangX, et al. Characterizing particulate matter emissions from GDI and PFI vehicles under transient and cold start conditions. Fuel2017; 189: 131–140.
7.
HeXRatcliffMAZiglerBT.Effects of gasoline direct injection engine operating parameters on particle number emissions. Energy Fuels2012; 26(4): 2014–2027.
8.
RazaMChenLLeachF, et al. A review of particulate number (PN) emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) engines and their control techniques. Energies2018; 11(6): 1417.
9.
LeeZKimTParkS, et al. Review on spray, combustion, and emission characteristics of recent developed direct-injection spark ignition (DISI) engine system with multi-hole type injector. Fuel2020; 259: 116209.
10.
DrakeMCFanslerTDSolomonAS, et al. Piston fuel films as a source of smoke and hydrocarbon emissions from a wall-controlled spark-ignited direct-injection engine. SAE Transactions2003; 112: 762–783.
11.
SjöbergMReussD.NOx-reduction by injection-timing retard in a stratified-charge DISI engine using gasoline and E85. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2012; 5: 1096–1113.
12.
SalibaGSalehRZhaoY, et al. Comparison of gasoline direct-injection (GDI) and port fuel injection (PFI) vehicle emissions: emission certification standards, cold-start, secondary organic aerosol formation potential, and potential climate impacts. Environ Sci Technol2017; 51: 6542–6552.
13.
Abd-AllaGH.Using exhaust gas recirculation in internal combustion engines: a review. Energy Convers Manag2002; 43(8): 1027–1042.
14.
GuanBZhanRLinH, et al. Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines. J Environ Manag2015; 154: 225–258.
15.
MaricqMMSzenteJJJahrK.The impact of ethanol fuel blends on PM emissions from a light-duty GDI vehicle. Aerosol Sci Technol2012; 46(5): 576–583.
16.
DuronioFDe VitaAMontanaroA, et al. Gasoline direct injection engines – a review of latest technologies and trends. Part 2. Fuel2020; 265: 116947.
17.
AwadOIMaXKamilM, et al. Particulate emissions from gasoline direct injection engines: A review of how current emission regulations are being met by automobile manufacturers. Sci Total Environ2020; 718: 137302.
18.
AwadOXiaoMKamilM, et al. A review of the effects of gasoline detergent additives on the formation of combustion chamber deposits of gasoline direct injection engines. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr2021; 14: 13–26.
19.
WooldridgeMSSinghRGutierrezLG, et al. Survey of strategies to reduce cold-start particulate, CO, NOx, and hydrocarbon emissions from direct-injection spark-ignition engines. Int J Engine Res2023; 24: 456–480.
20.
KalghatgiG.Knock onset, knock intensity, superknock and preignition in spark ignition engines. Int J Engine Res2018; 19: 7–20.
21.
SchweizerTZöbingerNKubachH, et al. Experimental and numerical low-speed pre-ignition analysis and mechanism synthesis on a turbocharged gasoline engine with direct injection. SAE Int J Engines2022; 16: 305–334.
22.
RönnKSwartsAKalaskarV, et al. Low-speed pre-ignition and super-knock in boosted spark-ignition engines: A review. Prog Energy Combust Sci2023; 95: 101064.
23.
PeiTChenFQiuS, et al. Research on the intake port of a uniflow scavenging GDI opposed-piston Two-Stroke engine. Energies2022; 15(6): 2148.
24.
ShinJKimDSonY, et al. Effect of intake manifold geometry on cylinder-to-cylinder variation and tumble enhancement in gasoline direct injection engine. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 19862.
25.
FanQLiuSQiY, et al. Investigation into ethanol effects on combustion and particle number emissions in a spark-ignition to compression-ignition (SICI) engine. Energy2021; 233: 121170.
26.
YuXGuoZSunP, et al. Investigation of combustion and emissions of an SI engine with ethanol port injection and gasoline direct injection under lean burn conditions. Energy2019; 189: 116231.
27.
DuanXLiuJYuanZ, et al. Experimental investigation of the effects of injection strategies on cycle-to-cycle variations of a DISI engine fueled with ethanol and gasoline blend. Energy2018; 165: 455–470.
28.
ZhuangYZhuGGongZ, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of performance of an ethanol-gasoline dual-injection engine. Energy2019; 186: 115835.
29.
CatapanoFDi IorioSMagnoA, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the effect of ethanol, methane and methane-hydrogen blend on the combustion process in a PFI (port fuel injection) engine. Energy2015; 88: 101–110.
30.
ChansauriaPMandloiRK.Effects of ethanol blends on performance of spark ignition engine-a review. Mater Today Proc2018; 5(2): 4066–4077.
31.
SharmaNAgarwalRAAgarwalAK.Particulate bound trace metals and soot morphology of gasohol fueled gasoline direct injection engine. J Energy Resour Technol2019; 141(2): 022201.
32.
SharmaNAgarwalAK.Effect of the fuel injection pressure on particulate emissions from a gasohol (E15 and M15)-fueled gasoline direct injection engine. Energy Fuels2017; 31(4): 4155–4164.
33.
MardiK MKhalilaryaSNematiA.A numerical investigation on the influence of EGR in a supercharged SI engine fueled with gasoline and alternative fuels. Energy Convers Manag2014; 83: 260–269.
34.
SharmaNPatelCTiwariN, et al. Experimental investigations of noise and vibration characteristics of gasoline-methanol blend fuelled gasoline direct injection engine and their relationship with combustion characteristics. Appl Therm Eng2019; 158: 113754.
35.
KimYIl KimWMinB, et al. Experimental investigation of combustion characteristics of ethanol–gasoline blended fuel in a T-GDI engine. Appl Therm Eng2022; 208: 118168.
36.
HanDFanYSunZ, et al. Combustion and emissions of isomeric butanol/gasoline surrogates blends on an optical GDI engine. Fuel2020; 272: 117690.
37.
SzpicaDWarakomskiJAshokB.Evaluation of the functional parameters of the low-pressure gas-phase injectors in different exploitative condition. Renew Energy2024; 237: 121755.
38.
MelaikaMHerbillonGDahlanderP.Spark ignition engine performance, standard emissions and particulates using GDI, PFI-CNG and DI-CNG systems. Fuel2021; 293: 120454.
39.
TangYYuanWPanM, et al. Experimental investigation on the dynamic performance of a hybrid PEM fuel cell/battery system for lightweight electric vehicle application. Appl Energy2011; 88(1): 68–76.
40.
EttihirKBoulonLAgbossouK.Optimization-based energy management strategy for a fuel cell/battery hybrid power system. Appl Energy2016; 163: 142–153.
Di SarliVBenedettoAD. Laminar burning velocity of hydrogen–methane/air premixed flames. Int J Hydrogen Energy2007; 32(5): 637–646.
43.
Di SarliVDi BenedettoALongEJ, et al. Time-resolved particle image velocimetry of dynamic interactions between hydrogen-enriched methane/air premixed flames and toroidal vortex structures. Int J Hydrogen Energy2012; 37(21): 16201–16213.
44.
Di SarliVDi BenedettoA. Effects of non-equidiffusion on unsteady propagation of hydrogen-enriched methane/air premixed flames. Int J Hydrogen Energy2013; 38(18): 7510–7518.
45.
KahramanECihangir OzcanlıSOzerdemB.An experimental study on performance and emission characteristics of a hydrogen fuelled spark ignition engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2007; 32(12): 2066–2072.
WangSJiCZhangB, et al. Lean burn performance of a hydrogen-blended gasoline engine at the wide open throttle condition. Appl Energy2014; 136: 43–50.
48.
JiCWangS.Effect of hydrogen addition on the idle performance of a spark ignited gasoline engine at stoichiometric condition. Int J Hydrogen Energy2009; 34(8): 3546–3556.
49.
JiCWangS.Effect of hydrogen addition on combustion and emissions performance of a spark ignition gasoline engine at lean conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy2009; 34(18): 7823–7834.
50.
JiCWangSZhangB.Performance of a hybrid hydrogen–gasoline engine under various operating conditions. Appl Energy2012; 97: 584–589.
51.
PurayilSTPAl-OmariSABElnajjarE. Effect of hydrogen blending on the combustion performance, emission, and cycle-to-cycle variation characteristics of a single-cylinder GDI spark ignition dual-fuel engine. International Journal of Thermofluids2023; 20: 100403.
52.
HeFLiSYuX, et al. Comparison study and synthetic evaluation of combined injection in a spark ignition engine with hydrogen-blended at lean burn condition. Energy2018; 157: 1053–1062.
53.
GongZFengLWangZ.Experimental and numerical study of the effect of injection strategy and intake valve lift on super-knock and engine performance in a boosted GDI engine. Fuel2019; 249: 309–325.
54.
SinghEMorgantiKDibbleR.Optimizing split fuel injection strategies to avoid pre-ignition and super-knock in turbocharged engines. Int J Engine Res2021; 22: 199–221.
55.
LiYDuanXLiuY, et al. Experimental investigation the impacts of injection strategies coupled with gasoline/ethanol blend on combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of a GDI spark-ignition engine. Fuel2019; 256: 115910.
56.
LouDWangTFangL, et al. Investigation of the combustion and particle emission characteristics of a GDI engine with a 50 MPa injection system. Fuel2022; 315: 123079.
57.
ThewesMHoppeFBaumgartenH, et al. Water injection for gasoline combustion systems. MTZ Worldw2015; 76(2): 10–15.
58.
HoppeFThewesMSeibelJ, et al. Evaluation of the potential of water injection for gasoline engines. SAE Int J Engines2017; 10(5): 2500–2512.
59.
IacobacciAMarchittoLValentinoG.Water injection to enhance performance and emissions of a turbocharged gasoline engine under high load condition. SAE Int J Engines2017; 10(3): 928–937.
60.
BozzaFDe BellisVTeodosioL.Potentials of cooled EGR and water injection for knock resistance and fuel consumption improvements of gasoline engines. Appl Energy2016; 169: 112–125.
61.
PauerTFrohnmaierMWaltherJ, et al. Optimization of gasoline engines by water injection. 37th International Vienna Motor Symposium2016; 91: 92.
62.
ThewesMBaumgartenHScharfJ, et al. Water injection-high power and high efficiency combined. In 25th Aachen Colloquium Automobile, 2016, pp. 345–380.
63.
PostriotiLBriziGFinoriGM.Experimental analysis of water pressure and temperature influence on atomization and evolution of a port water injection spray. Appl Sci2021; 11(13): 5980.
64.
CazzoliGFalfariSBianchiGM, et al. Development of a chemical-kinetic database for the laminar flame speed under GDI and water injection engine conditions. Energy Proc2018; 148: 154–161.
65.
LiAZhengZPengT.Effect of water injection on the knock, combustion, and emissions of a direct injection gasoline engine. Fuel2020; 268: 117376.
66.
ZembiJBattistoniMRanuzziF, et al. CFD analysis of port water injection in a GDI engine under incipient knock conditions. Energies2019; 12(18): 3409.
67.
ZhuangYSunYHuangY, et al. Investigation of water injection benefits on downsized boosted direct injection spark ignition engine. Fuel2020; 264: 116765.
68.
ZhuangYChiHHuangY, et al. Investigation of water spray evolution process of port water injection and its effect on engine performance. Fuel2020; 282: 118839.
69.
WangJYanFYanD, et al. Effects of water injection on combustion emission and knock characteristics of turbocharged direct injection gasoline engine. Int J Autom Technol2022; 23(4): 899–912.
70.
SinghEHlaingPShiH, et al. Effect of different fluids on injection strategies to suppress pre-ignition. SAE Tech. Pap 2019; 2019-01-0257. https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0257.
71.
ShenXShenKZhangZ.Experimental study on the effect of high-pressure and low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation on gasoline engine and turbocharger. Adv Mech Eng2018; 10: 1687814018809607.
72.
LuoKHuangYLiY, et al. Effects of high pressure and high-low pressure EGR strategies on the knock tendency, combustion, and performance of a stoichiometric operation natural gas engine. Fuel2023; 348: 128530.
73.
FanslerTDTrujilloMFCurtisEW.Spray-wall interactions in direct-injection engines: an introductory overview. Int J Engine Res2020; 21: 241–247.
74.
RodriguezJFChengWK.Reduction of cold-start emissions through valve timing in a GDI engine. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9: 1220–1229.
75.
GuintherGSmithS.Formation of intake valve deposits in gasoline direct injection engines. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2016; 9: 558–566.
76.
ChenYZhangYChengWK.Effects of ethanol evaporative cooling on particulate number emissions in GDI engines. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0360
77.
LeachFCPStoneRRichardsonD, et al. The effect of oxygenate fuels on PN emissions from a highly boosted GDI engine. Fuel2018; 225: 277–286.
78.
MasumBMKalamMAMasjukiHH, et al. Performance and emission analysis of a multi cylinder gasoline engine operating at different alcohol–gasoline blends. RSC Adv2014; 4(53): 27898–27904.
79.
HerguetaCTsolakisAHerrerosJM, et al. Impact of bio-alcohol fuels combustion on particulate matter morphology from efficient gasoline direct injection engines. Appl Energy2018; 230: 794–802.
80.
YangJRothPDurbinTD, et al. Emissions from a flex fuel GDI vehicle operating on ethanol fuels show marked contrasts in chemical, physical and toxicological characteristics as a function of ethanol content. Sci Total Environ2019; 683: 749–761.
81.
YangJRothPDurbinT, et al. Impacts of gasoline aromatic and ethanol levels on the emissions from GDI vehicles: Part 1. Influence on regulated and gaseous toxic pollutants. Fuel2019; 252: 799–811.
82.
YangJRothPZhuH, et al. Impacts of gasoline aromatic and ethanol levels on the emissions from GDI vehicles: Part 2. Influence on particulate matter, black carbon, and nanoparticle emissions. Fuel2019; 252: 812–820.
83.
ZhangMGeYWangX, et al. Particulate emissions from direct-injection and combined-injection vehicles fueled with gasoline/ethanol match-blends – effects of ethanol and aromatic compositions. Fuel2021; 302: 121010.
84.
WuXZhangSGuoX, et al. Assessment of ethanol blended fuels for gasoline vehicles in China: fuel economy, regulated gaseous pollutants and particulate matter. Environ Pollut2019; 253: 731–740.
85.
CatapanoFDi IorioSMagnoA, et al. Effect of ethanol blends, E10, E25 and E85 on sub-23 nm particle emissions and their volatile fraction at exhaust of a high-performance GDI engine over the WLTC. Fuel2022; 327: 125184.
86.
CatapanoFDi IorioSMagnoA, et al. Effect of fuel quality on combustion evolution and particle emissions from PFI and GDI engines fueled with gasoline, ethanol and blend, with focus on 10–23 nm particles. Energy2022; 239: 122198.
87.
KimTMoonJJeonJ.Characterization of in-cylinder spatiotemporal flame and solid particle emissions for ethanol-gasoline blended in gasoline direct injection engines. Energy2023; 283: 128492.
88.
LiuHWangXZhangD, et al. Investigation on blending effects of gasoline fuel with n-butanol, DMF, and ethanol on the fuel consumption and harmful emissions in a GDI vehicle. Energies2019; 12(10): 1845.
89.
LiuZSunPDuY, et al. Improvement of combustion and emission by combined combustion of ethanol premix and gasoline direct injection in SI engine. Fuel2021; 292: 120403.
90.
KalwarASinghAPAgarwalAK, et al. Utilization of primary alcohols in dual-fuel injection mode in a gasoline direct injection engine. Fuel2020; 276: 118068.
91.
JiangCLiZQianY, et al. Influences of fuel injection strategies on combustion performance and regular/irregular emissions in a turbocharged gasoline direct injection engine: commercial gasoline versus multi-components gasoline surrogates. Energy2018; 157: 173–187.
92.
QadiriUPashaAAKadaB.Numerical one-dimensional investigation on GDI engine using LPG,water-ethanol-gasoline micro-emulsion fuel and hydrogen, for net zero carbon emissions. Fuel2025; 382: 133706.
93.
SittichompooSNozariHHerrerosJM, et al. Exhaust energy recovery via catalytic ammonia decomposition to hydrogen for low carbon clean vehicles. Fuel2021; 285: 119111.
94.
ShangZSunYYuX, et al. Effect of hydrogen-rich syngas direct injection on combustion and emissions in a combined fuel injection—spark-ignition engine. Sustainability2023; 15(11): 8448.
95.
KimJChunKMSongS, et al. Improving the thermal efficiency of a T-GDI engine using hydrogen from combined steam and partial oxidation exhaust gas reforming of gasoline under low-load stoichiometric conditions. Fuel2020; 273: 117754.
96.
WangLLiHHuangZ, et al. Impact of hydrogen direct injection on engine combustion and emissions in a GDI engine. Adv Mech Eng2023; 15(9): 16878132231189117.
97.
YuXLiDSunP, et al. Energy and exergy analysis of a combined injection engine using gasoline port injection coupled with gasoline or hydrogen direct injection under lean-burn conditions. Int J Hydrogen Energy2021; 46(11): 8253–8268.
98.
KumarMSMuniyappanMSelvanSA.Experimental and CFD analysis on the impact of hydrogen as fuel on the behavior of a passenger car gasoline direct injection engine. J Energy Inst2024; 113: 101487.
99.
LiangZChenZAwadOI, et al. Numerical investigation on spray, combustion and emission characteristics of marine engine for polyol solution-heavy fuel oil blend fuels. Case Stud Therm Eng2024; 53: 103814.
100.
GrögerKKawaharadaNKlippensteinA, et al. Velocity measurement of high-pressure gasoline direct injections in the primary atomization region on flash boiling conditions. In: Proceedings of the 29th ILASS Europe, Paris, France, pp. 2–4, 2019.
101.
YamaguchiAKoopmansLHelmantelA, et al. Spray characterization of gasoline direct injection sprays under fuel injection pressures up to 150 mpa with different nozzle geometries. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0063
102.
WangCXuHHerrerosJM, et al. Impact of fuel and injection system on particle emissions from a GDI engine. Appl Energy2014; 132: 178–191.
103.
VardeKSPopaDM.Diesel fuel spray penetration at high injection pressures. SAE Transactions1983; 92: 265–278. https://doi.org/10.4271/830448
104.
LeeCSChonMSKimDS.Spray structure and characteristics of high-pressure gasoline injectors for direct-injection engine applications. Atomization Sprays2001; 11(1): 35–48.
105.
OrtmannRArndtSRaimannJ, et al. Methods and analysis of fuel injection, mixture preparation and charge stratification in different direct injected SI engines. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2001. https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0970
106.
LippertAM, et al. Development and optimization of a small-displacement spark-ignition direct-injection engine-stratified operation. SAE Transactions2004; 42–66. https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0034
107.
PontoppidanMGavianiGBellaG, et al. Optimization by CFD simulation of spray formation parameters to adapt direct injection high-pressure fuel injectors to high-speed SI-engines. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0539
108.
LeachFStoneRFennellD, et al. Predicting the particulate matter emissions from spray-guided gasoline direct-injection spark ignition engines. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automobile Eng2017; 231: 717–730.
109.
ChinaPRivereJP.Development of a direct injection spark ignition engine test for injector fouling. SAE Transactions2003; 112: 1927–1934. https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-2006
110.
HenkelSHardalupasYTaylorA, et al. Injector fouling and its impact on engine emissions and spray characteristics in gasoline direct injection engines. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2017; 10(2): 287–295.
111.
QianYLiZYuL, et al. Review of the state-of-the-art of particulate matter emissions from modern gasoline fueled engines. Appl Energy2019; 238: 1269–1298.
112.
XuHWangCMaX, et al. Fuel injector deposits in direct-injection spark-ignition engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci2015; 50: 63–80.
113.
LiuHWangCYuY, et al. An experimental study on particle evolution in the exhaust gas of a direct injection SI engine. Appl Energy2020; 260: 114220.
114.
ZhangWZhangZMaX, et al. Impact of injector tip deposits on gasoline direct injection engine combustion, fuel economy and emissions. Appl Energy2020; 262: 114538.
115.
HuangYSurawskiNCZhuangY, et al. Dual injection: an effective and efficient technology to use renewable fuels in spark ignition engines. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2021; 143: 110921.
116.
DuanXLiYLiuY, et al. Quantitative investigation the influences of the injection timing under single and double injection strategies on performance, combustion and emissions characteristics of a GDI SI engine fueled with gasoline/ethanol blend. Fuel2020; 260: 116363.
117.
YangSFengJSunP, et al. Combustion and emissions characteristics of methanol/gasoline CISI engines under different injection modes. Fuel2023; 333: 126506.
118.
LvZPengJZhangJ, et al. Particulate emissions from gasoline vehicles using three different fuel injection technologies. J Clean Prod2023; 418: 138123.
119.
ChangMLeeZParkS, et al. Characteristics of flash boiling and its effects on spray behavior in gasoline direct injection injectors: a review. Fuel2020; 271: 117600.
120.
YangSMaZLiX, et al. A review on the experimental non-intrusive investigation of fuel injector phase changing flow. Fuel2020; 259: 116188.
121.
WangZWangBJiangC, et al. Microscopic characterization of isooctane spray in the near field under flash boiling condition. Appl Energy2016; 180: 598–606.
122.
XuMZhangYZengW, et al. Flash boiling: easy and better way to generate ideal sprays than the high injection pressure. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2013; 6(1): 137–148.
123.
GuoHMaXLiY, et al. Effect of flash boiling on microscopic and macroscopic spray characteristics in optical GDI engine. Fuel2017; 190: 79–89.
124.
DongXYangJHungDLS, et al. Effects of flash boiling injection on in-cylinder spray, mixing and combustion of a spark-ignition direct-injection engine. Proc Combust Inst2019; 37(4): 4921–4928.
125.
YangJXuMHungDLS, et al. Influence of swirl ratio on fuel distribution and cyclic variation under flash boiling conditions in a spark ignition direct injection gasoline engine. Energy Convers Manag2017; 138: 565–576.
126.
LiYGuoHFeiS, et al. An exploration on collapse mechanism of multi-jet flash-boiling sprays. Appl Therm Eng2018; 134: 20–28.
127.
LiYGuoHZhouZ, et al. Spray morphology transformation of propane, n-hexane and iso-octane under flash-boiling conditions. Fuel2019; 236: 677–685.
128.
JiangCParkerMCHelieJ, et al. Impact of gasoline direct injection fuel injector hole geometry on spray characteristics under flash boiling and ambient conditions. Fuel2019; 241: 71–82.
129.
DuronioFRanieriSMontanaroA, et al. ECN spray G injector: numerical modelling of flash-boiling breakup and spray collapse. Int J Multiphase Flow2021; 145: 103817.
130.
SunZCuiMYeC, et al. Split injection flash boiling spray for high efficiency and low emissions in a GDI engine under lean combustion condition. Proc Combust Inst2021; 38(4): 5769–5779.
131.
HuangWGongHMoonS, et al. Nozzle tip wetting in GDI injector at flash-boiling conditions. Int J Heat Mass Transf2021; 169: 120935.
132.
LiXSunZYangS, et al. Flash boiling combustion of isomeric butanol and gasoline surrogate blends using constant volume spray chamber and GDI optical engine. Fuel2021; 286: 119328.
133.
ZhangJLiYXuH, et al. Investigation into shock-to-shock interactions induced by flash boiling and the impact on spray behaviors. Fuel2023; 337: 127120.
134.
TsaiW-CZhanT-S.An experimental characterization for injection quantity of a high-pressure injector in GDI engines. J Low Power Electron Appl2018; 8: 36.
135.
AsefAMohammadiAKhorramiradV, et al. Study of GDI injector in constant volume chamber by optical measurements and CFD-Simulation. J Eng Res2022; 69: 39–48.
136.
HustedHSpegarTDSpakowskiJ.The effects of GDI fuel pressure on fuel economy. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2014.
137.
MigliaccioMMontanaroALucchiniT, et al. Numerical investigation on GDI spray under high injection pressure up to 100 MPa. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2020.
138.
LuYMorrisSKookS.Effects of injection pressure on the flame front growth in an optical direct injection spark ignition engine. Appl Therm Eng2022; 214: 118848.
139.
CostaMAlloccaLMontanaroA, et al. Multiple injection in a mixed mode GDI boosted engine. SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191, 2010.
140.
SongJLeeZSongJ, et al. Effects of injection strategy and coolant temperature on hydrocarbon and particulate emissions from a gasoline direct injection engine with high pressure injection up to 50MPa. Energy2018; 164: 512–522.
141.
SahuSKumarPDharA.Effect of injection timing on combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of methanol fuelled DISI engine: a numerical study. Fuel2022; 322: 124167.
142.
SharmaNBachaloWDAgarwalAK.Spray droplet size distribution and droplet velocity measurements in a firing optical engine. Phys Fluids2020; 32(2): 2.
143.
GuoHWangBLiY, et al. Characterizing external flashing jet from single-hole GDI injector. Int J Heat Mass Transf2018; 121: 924–932.
144.
GuoHLiYLuX, et al. Radial expansion of flash boiling jet and its relationship with spray collapse in gasoline direct injection engine. Appl Therm Eng2019; 146: 515–525.
145.
WuHWangLWuY, et al. Spray performance of air-assisted kerosene injection in a constant volume chamber under various in-cylinder GDI engine conditions. Appl Therm Eng2019; 150: 762–769.
146.
HuangWHendra PratamaROgumaM, et al. Spray dynamics of synthetic dimethyl carbonate and its blends with gasoline. Fuel2023; 341: 127696.
147.
MoonSFaruk AtacOBaeG, et al. Comprehensive investigation on ballistic injection characteristics of GDI injector: a particular focus on injection pressure and fuel effects. Fuel2023; 335: 127039.
148.
RautAAMallikarjunaJM.Effect of in-cylinder air-water interaction on water evaporation and performance characteristics of a direct water injected GDI engine. Eng Sci Technol Int J2021; 24(2): 480–492.
149.
PeiYZhangQPengZ, et al. Thermal efficiency improvement of lean burn high compression ratio engine coupled with water direct injection. Energy Convers Manag2022; 251: 114969.
150.
ZhangQPeiYAnY, et al. Study of water direct injection on knock control and combustion process of a high compression ratio GDI engine. Fuel2021; 306: 121631.
151.
QianLWanJQianY, et al. Experimental investigation of water injection and spark timing effects on combustion and emissions of a hybrid hydrogen-gasoline engine. Fuel2022; 322: 124051.
152.
LiAZhengZSongY.A simulation study of water injection position and pressure on the knock, combustion, and emissions of a direct injection gasoline engine. ACS Omega2021; 6(28): 18033–18053.
153.
SuJXuMLiT, et al. Combined effects of cooled EGR and a higher geometric compression ratio on thermal efficiency improvement of a downsized boosted spark-ignition direct-injection engine. Energy Convers Manag2014; 78: 65–73.
154.
WeiHFengDPanJ, et al. Knock characteristics of SI engine fueled with n-butanol in combination with different EGR rate. Energy2017; 118: 190–196.
155.
HedgeMWeberPGingrichJ, et al. Effect of EGR on particle emissions from a GDI engine. SAE Int J Engines2011; 4(1): 650–666.
156.
KimTYParkCOhS, et al. The effects of stratified lean combustion and exhaust gas recirculation on combustion and emission characteristics of an LPG direct injection engine. Energy2016; 115: 386–396.
157.
FontanaGGalloniE.Experimental analysis of a spark-ignition engine using exhaust gas recycle at WOT operation. Appl Energy2010; 87(7): 2187–2193.
158.
AgarwalDSinghSKAgarwalAK.Effect of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) on performance, emissions, deposits and durability of a constant speed compression ignition engine. Appl Energy2011; 88(8): 2900–2907.
159.
KishiH.TNGA Powertrains, Toyota Technical Review. Toyota; 2018.
160.
ShangWYuXShiW, et al. Effect of exhaust gas recirculation and hydrogen direct injection on combustion and emission characteristics of a n-butanol SI engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45(35): 17961–17974.
161.
GongCSiXLiuF.Combined effects of excess air ratio and EGR rate on combustion and emissions behaviors of a GDI engine with CO2 as simulated EGR (CO2) at low load. Fuel2021; 293: 120442.
162.
GongCSiXWangY, et al. Effect of CO2 dilution on combustion and emissions of a GDI engine under the peak NOX generation mixture. Fuel2021; 295: 120613.
163.
GongCSiXLiuF.Effects of injection timing and CO2 dilution on combustion and emissions behaviors of a stoichiometric GDI engine under medium load conditions. Fuel2021; 303: 121262.
164.
ShenKXuZChenH, et al. Investigation on the EGR effect to further improve fuel economy and emissions effect of Miller cycle turbocharged engine. Energy2021; 215: 119116.
165.
ZhaoZHuangYYuX, et al. Effect of brown gas (HHO) addition on combustion and emission in gasoline engine with exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and gasoline direct injection. J Clean Prod2022; 360: 132078.
166.
ZhaoLQiWWangX, et al. Potentials of EGR and lean mixture for improving fuel consumption and reducing the emissions of high-proportion butanol-gasoline engines at light load. Fuel2020; 266: 116959.
167.
WangYWangJHaoC, et al. Characteristics of instantaneous particle number (PN) emissions from hybrid electric vehicles under the real-world driving conditions. Fuel2021; 286: 119466.
168.
LiuHLiZZhangM, et al. Exhaust non-volatile particle filtration characteristics of three-way catalyst and influencing factors in a gasoline direct injection engine compared to gasoline particulate filter. Fuel2021; 290: 120065.
169.
WuYWangPMuhammad FarhanS, et al. Effect of post-injection on combustion and exhaust emissions in DI diesel engine. Fuel2019; 258: 116131.
170.
XieYZuoQWangM, et al. Effects analysis on soot combustion performance enhancement of an improved catalytic gasoline particulate filter regeneration system with electric heating. Fuel2021; 290: 119975.
171.
JiaqiangEZhengPHanD, et al. Effects analysis on soot combustion performance enhancement in a rotary diesel particulate filter unit during continuous microwave heating. Fuel2020; 276: 118043.
172.
YangJRothPDurbinTD, et al. Gasoline particulate filters as an effective tool to reduce particulate and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicles: a case study with two GDI vehicles. Environ Sci Technol2018; 52(5): 3275–3284.
173.
GuoDGeYWangX, et al. Evaluating the filtration efficiency of close-coupled catalyzed gasoline particulate filter (cGPF) over the WLTC and simulated RDE cycles. Chemosphere2022; 301: 134717.
174.
HuZWangZZhangH, et al. Effect of working conditions on oxidation activity and surface functional group of particulate matter emitted from China GDI engine. Fuel2022; 318: 123581.
175.
PieberSMKumarNKKleinF, et al. Gas-phase composition and secondary organic aerosol formation from standard and particle filter-retrofitted gasoline direct injection vehicles investigated in a batch and flow reactor. Atmos Chem Phys2018; 18(13): 9929–9954.
176.
JangJLeeJChoiY, et al. Reduction of particle emissions from gasoline vehicles with direct fuel injection systems using a gasoline particulate filter. Sci Total Environ2018; 644: 1418–1428.
177.
MuñozMHaagRZeyerK, et al. Effects of four prototype gasoline particle filters (GPFs) on nanoparticle and genotoxic PAH emissions of a gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicle. Environ Sci Technol2018; 52(18): 10709–10718.
178.
RothPYangJFofieE, et al. Catalyzed gasoline particulate filters reduce secondary organic aerosol production from gasoline direct injection vehicles. Environ Sci Technol2019; 53(6): 3037–3047.
179.
McCafferyCZhuHLiC, et al. On-road gaseous and particulate emissions from GDI vehicles with and without gasoline particulate filters (GPFs) using portable emissions measurement systems (PEMS). Sci Total Environ2020; 710: 136366.
180.
WinklerAFerriDHauertR.Influence of aging effects on the conversion efficiency of automotive exhaust gas catalysts. Catal Today2010; 155(1–2): 140–146.
181.
AlikinEADenisovSPVedyaginAA.Partial regeneration of model TWC after high-temperature aging on engine bench. Top Catal2019; 62(1–4): 324–330.
182.
ZhangBLiXZuoQ, et al. Effects analysis on hydrocarbon light-off performance of a catalytic gasoline particulate filter during cold start. Environ Sci Pollut Res2022; 29(51): 76890–76906.
183.
ZhangBLiXWanQ, et al. Hydrocarbon emission control of an adsorptive catalytic gasoline particulate filter during cold-start period of the gasoline engine. Energy2023; 262: 125445.
