The negative impacts of climate change and worsening air quality, driven by anthropogenic emissions from activities like construction, industrial production, energy generation and transportation, are well-documented. To reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road transport, automakers are downsizing engine displacement to increase brake thermal efficiency, thereby improving fuel economy and reducing CO2 emissions. However, downsized gasoline direct injection (GDI) engines are prone to knocking and emit higher levels of NOx and particulate matter (PM) compared to port-injected gasoline engines. This study investigates the effects of port-water injection (PWI) on the combustion and emission characteristics of a naturally aspirated GDI engine fuelled with gasohol E20 under steady-state conditions. Injecting up to 30% water (relative to fuel mass) with optimised ignition timing resulted in an 80% reduction in NOx, decreased PM diameter and mass and complete knock suppression. PM morphology analysis showed enhanced reactivity due to the generation of smaller particles with increased surface area. Adverse effects on engine performance and emissions from water injection were mitigated by advancing spark ignition timing. Optimal ignition timing for maximum thermal efficiency did not align with the Knock Limiting Spark Angle (KLSA), but a slightly lower advance favoured NOx reduction. Our findings suggest that automakers can produce GDI engines with minimal NOx and PM emissions without relying on precious metal-based catalysts, promoting sustainability in the transportation sector.
HeywoodJB.Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
5.
JiangCXuHSrivastavaD, et al. Effect of fuel injector deposit on spray characteristics, gaseous emissions and particulate matter in a gasoline direct injection engine. Appl Energy2017; 203: 390–402.
6.
HerguetaCBogarraMTsolakisAEssaKHerrerosJM.Butanol-gasoline blend and exhaust gas recirculation, impact on GDI engine emissions. Fuel2017; 208: 662–672.
7.
WangCXuHHerrerosJMLattimoreTShuaiS.Fuel effect on particulate matter composition and soot oxidation in a direct-injection spark ignition (DISI) engine. Energy Fuels2014; 28(3): 2003–2012.
ShiYCaiYFanR, et al. Characterization of soot inside a diesel particulate filter during a nonthermal plasma promoted regeneration step. Appl Therm Eng2019; 150: 612–619.
12.
LiYLiangJWangYWeiHZhouL. Effect of injection strategy on the combustion and knock in a downsized gasoline engine with large eddy simulation. SAE technical paper 2020-01-0244, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0244.
13.
XiaFGriefnowPTidauF, et al. Electric torque assist and supercharging of a downsized gasoline engine in a 48V mild hybrid powertrain. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 235(5): 1245–1255.
14.
GalloniE.Dynamic knock detection and quantification in a spark ignition engine by means of a pressure based method. Energy Convers Manag2012; 64: 256–262.
15.
HosseiniMChitsazI.Knock probability determination in a turbocharged gasoline engine through exhaust gas temperature and artificial neural network. Appl Therm Eng2023; 225: 120217.
16.
ZhenXWangYXuS, et al. The engine knock analysis – an overview. Appl Energy2012; 92: 628–636.
17.
SahooSSrivastavaDK.Effect of compression ratio on engine knock, performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a bi-fuel CNG engine. Energy2021; 233: 121144.
18.
MartyrAJRogersDR.Chapter 16 - The combustion process and combustion analysis. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2021, pp.537–597.
19.
LiTYinTWangB.A phenomenological model of knock intensity in spark-ignition engines. Energy Convers Manag2017; 148: 1233–1247.
20.
SunJZhangXTangQWangYLiY.Knock recognition of knock sensor signal based on wavelet transform and variational mode decomposition algorithm. Energy Convers Manag2023; 287: 117062.
21.
ZhangQHuangZWangLLinGPanJ.Experimental study of port water injection on GDI engine fuel economics and emissions. ACS Omega2024; 9(8): 8893–8903.
22.
GolzariRZhaoHHallJ, et al. Impact of intake port injection of water on boosted downsized gasoline direct injection engine combustion, efficiency and emissions. Int J Engine Res2019; 22(1): 295–315.
PandeyAKNandgaonkarMSureshS.Comparison and evaluation of engine wear, performance, NOx reduction and nano particle emission of diesel, karanja and jatropha oil methyl ester biodiesel in a military720 kW, heavy duty CIDI engine applying EGR with turbo charging. SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0618, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0618.
28.
SinghSKAgarwalAKSharmaM.Experimental investigations of heavy metal addition in lubricating oil and soot deposition in an EGR operated engine. Appl Therm Eng2006; 26(2): 259–266.
29.
AldajahSAjayiOOFenskeGRGoldblattIL.Effect of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) contamination of diesel engine oil on wear. Wear2007; 263(1): 93–98.
30.
ZhuangYSunYHuangY, et al. Investigation of water injection benefits on downsized boosted direct injection spark ignition engine. Fuel2020; 264: 116765.
31.
WanJZhuangYHuangYQianYQianL.A review of water injection application on spark-ignition engines. Fuel Process Technol2021; 221: 106956.
32.
LiusASjöbergMCronhjortAOlofssonU.Experimental and chemical-kinetic evaluation of a heavy-duty methanol PFI engine with direct water injection. Fuel2024; 359: 130326.
33.
KimWChungJKimJ, et al. The effect of water injection on a naturally aspirated spark-ignited engine. Int J Adv Automot Technol2024; 25(4): 755–764.
34.
ZhangQPeiYAnY, et al. Study of water direct injection on knock control and combustion process of a high compression ratio GDI engine. Fuel2021; 306: 121631.
35.
QianLWanJQianYSunYZhuangY.Experimental investigation of water injection and spark timing effects on combustion and emissions of a hybrid hydrogen-gasoline engine. Fuel2022; 322: 124051.
36.
FanYWuTXiaoD, et al. Effect of port water injection on the characteristics of combustion and emissions in a spark ignition direct injection engine. Fuel2021; 283: 119271.
De SimioLGambinoMIannacconeS. Effect of ethanol content on thermal efficiency of a spark-ignition light-duty engine. ISRN Renew Energy2012; 2012: 1–8.
40.
DuanXZhangSLiuY, et al. Numerical investigation the effects of the twin-spark plugs coupled with EGR on the combustion process and emissions characteristics in a lean burn natural gas SI engine. Energy2020; 206: 118181.
41.
BrettschneiderJ.Extension of the equation for calculation of the air-fuel equivalence ratio. SAE technical paper, 1997.
42.
GillSSTsolakisAHerrerosJMYorkAPE. Diesel emissions improvements through the use of biodiesel or oxygenated blending components. Fuel2012; 95: 578–586.
43.
WangCChanQNZhangR, et al. Automated determination of size and morphology information from soot transmission electron microscope (TEM)-generated images. J Nanopart R:es2016; 18(5): 1–15.
44.
GaulandrisFSimonsenSBWagnerJB, et al. Methods for calibration of specimen temperature during in situ transmission electron microscopy experiments. Microsc Microanal2020; 26(1): 3–17.
45.
ZaeffererS.A critical review of orientation microscopy in SEM and tem. Cryst Res Technol2011; 46(6): 607–628.
46.
AminHMFBennettARobertsWL.Determining fractal properties of soot aggregates and primary particle size distribution in counterflow flames up to 10 atm. Proc Combust Inst2019; 37(1): 1161–1168.
47.
SipkensTAFreiMBaldelliA, et al. Characterizing soot in TEM images using a convolutional neural network. Powder Technol2021; 387: 313–324.
48.
DobbinsRAMegaridisCM.Morphology of flame-generated soot as determined by thermophoretic sampling. Langmuir1987; 3(2): 254–259.
49.
CollinsTJ.ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques2007; 43(S1): 25–S30.
50.
LintusaariHKuuluvainenHVanhanenJ, et al. Sub-23 nm particles dominate non-volatile particle number emissions of road traffic. Environ Sci Technol2023; 57(29): 10763–10772.
51.
SwansonJJFranklinLMBikaASKittelsonDB.Size and volatility of particle emissions from an ethanol-fueled HCCI engine. Aerosol Sci Technol2017; 51(5): 614–625.
52.
WangXGroseMAAvenidoA, et al. Improvement of engine exhaust particle sizer (EEPS) size distribution measurement – I. Algorithm and applications to compact-shape particles. J Aerosol Sci2016; 92: 95–108.
53.
ErikssonL.Spark advance modeling and control. Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University, 1999.
54.
KhatriJSharmaNDahlanderPKoopmansL.Effect of relative humidity on water injection technique in downsized spark ignition engines. Int J Engine Res2020; 22(7): 2119–2130.
55.
KimJParkHBaeCChoiMKwakY.Effects of water direct injection on the torque enhancement and fuel consumption reduction of a gasoline engine under high-load conditions. Int J Engine Res2015; 17(7): 795–808.
56.
JamrozikATutakWGrab-RogalińskiK.Combustion stability, performance and emission characteristics of a CI engine fueled with diesel/n-butanol blends, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/en14102817.
57.
JeanMGranierPLeroyT.Combustion stability control based on cylinder pressure for high efficiency gasoline engines. Energies2022; 15(7): 2530.
58.
ZeldovichYB.Parity nonconservation in electron scattering and in other effects in the first order of the weak interaction coupling constant. Zh Eksp Teor Fiz1959; 36: 964.
59.
ZhuSHuBAkehurstS, et al. A review of water injection applied on the internal combustion engine. Energy Convers Manag2019; 184: 139–158.
60.
ZhaoLQiWWangXSuX.Potentials of EGR and lean mixture for improving fuel consumption and reducing the emissions of high-proportion butanol-gasoline engines at light load. Fuel2020; 266: 116959.
61.
EastwoodP.Particulate emissions from vehicles. Chichester: John Wiley Sons, 2008.
62.
ZhangJYuXGuoZ, et al. Effect of exhaust gas recirculation and spark timing on combustion and emission performance of an oxygen-enriched gasoline engine. ACS Omega2022; 7(46): 42208–42220.
63.
HeXRatcliffMAZiglerBT.Effects of gasoline direct injection engine operating parameters on particle number emissions. Energy Fuels2012; 26(4): 2014–2027.
64.
ChanJHTsolakisAHerrerosJM, et al. Combustion, gaseous emissions and PM characteristics of Di-Methyl carbonate (DMC)-gasoline blend on gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. Fuel2020; 263: 116742.
65.
BoontekNTheinnoiKSittichompooS.The effects of combustion phasing induced by water injection on deNOx performance of GDI engine at MBT ignition timing. Appl Chem Eng2023; 6(2): 2366.
