In response to stringent automotive emission regulations, lean-burn combustion has been adopted. To overcome the ignition challenges and enhance fuel oxidation under these conditions, microwave-assisted ignition (MWI) provides an innovative strategy to enable shorter burn durations and more stable combustion in spark-ignition (SI) engines; during part-load operation, the impact of microwave-assisted ignition (MWI) is particularly significant under lean fuel conditions, enhancing both engine power output and fuel efficiency. This paper presents a numerical analysis of MWI’s impact on SI engine combustion, characterizing the essential parameters such as cylinder temperature, HC emissions, heat release rate, and power output. AVL-Fire commercial software is used to employ the K--F turbulence model, extended coherent flame model, and Metghalchi-Keck flame propagation scheme for the simulation incorporated SIMPLE algorithm. This study examines the microwave effects on flame-kernel size and growth; it uses a novel approach to calculate the engine’s performance and emissions, validating the results with previous work. It is demonstrated that the enhancement of the electromagnetic field within the cylinder enlarges the flame kernel, the phenomenon simulated with COMSOL Multiphysics software; consequently, he shape and dimensions of the kernel are compared with experimental data, showing good agreement. This research investigates the effects of MWI on engine performance relative to advanced ignition conditions (AIC), excluding the positive effects of spark timing adjustments considered in experimental work. Results indicate that MWI can increase power output by up to 3.86%, reaction rates by 25.02%, OH radical production by 35.21%, and maximum in-cylinder pressure by 16.91%. Additionally, MWI significantly reduces emissions, particularly HC by approximately 91.52% and CO by up to 14.12%. In summary, MWI demonstrates potential for developing ultra-lean combustion engines that achieve performance comparable to traditional engines.
IkedaYNishiyamaAHiroki Katano, et al. Research and development of microwave plasma combustion engine (Part II: Engine performance of plasma combustion engine). SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 2009. DOI: 10.4271/2009-01-1049.
2.
ReitzRDOgawaHPayriR, et al. IJER editorial: the future of the internal combustion engine. Int J Engine Res2019;21(1): 146808741987799.
3.
KalghatgiG.Is it the end of combustion and engine combustion research? should it be?Transp Eng2022; 10: 100142.
4.
CunananCTranMKLeeY, et al. A review of heavy-duty vehicle powertrain technologies: diesel engine vehicles, battery electric vehicles, and hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles. Clean Technol2021; 3(2): 474–489.
5.
AgarwalAKSinghAPGarcíaA, et al. Challenges and opportunities for application of reactivity-controlled compression ignition combustion in commercially viable transport engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci2022; 93: 101028.
6.
PaykaniAKakaeeAHRahnamaP, et al. Progress and recent trends in reactivity-controlled compression ignition engines. Int J Engine Res2015; 17(5): 481–524.
7.
ShirvaniSShirvaniSShamekhiAH, et al. A study of using E10 and E85 under direct dual fuel stratification (DDFS) strategy: exploring the effects of the reactivity-stratification and diffusion-limited injection on emissions and performance in an E10/diesel DDFS engine. Fuel2020; 275: 117870.
8.
PourkhesalianAMShamekhiAHSalimiF.Alternative fuel and gasoline in an SI engine: a comparative study of performance and emissions characteristics. Fuel2010; 89(5): 1056–1063.
9.
PaykaniAChehrmonavariHTsolakisA, et al. Synthesis gas as a fuel for internal combustion engines in transportation. Prog Energy Combust Sci2022; 90: 100995.
10.
Duarte Souza Alvarenga SantosNRückert RosoVTeixeira MalaquiasAC, et al. Internal combustion engines and biofuels: examining why this robust combination should not be ignored for future sustainable transportation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2021; 148: 111292.
11.
OnoratiAPayriRVagliecoB, et al. The role of hydrogen for future internal combustion engines. Int J Engine Res2022; 23(4): 529–540.
12.
BelNHeywoodJBBrombergL. Simulation of hydrogen generation from methane partial oxidation in a plasma fuel reformer. MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, 2005.
13.
TullyEJHeywoodJB. Lean-burn characteristics of a gasoline engine enriched with hydrogen plasmatron fuel reformer. SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0630, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0630.
14.
IvaničZAyalaFGoldwitzJA, et al. Effects of hydrogen enhancement on efficiency and NOx emissions of lean and EGR-diluted mixtures in a SI engine. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0253, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0253.
15.
ShiraishiTUrushiharaT. Fundamental analysis of combustion initiation characteristics of low temperature plasma ignition for internal combustion gasoline engine. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0660, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0660.
16.
HwangJKimWBaeC.Influence of plasma-assisted ignition on flame propagation and performance in a spark-ignition engine. Appl Energy Combust Sci2021; 6: 100029.
17.
HwangJKimWAgarwalAK, et al. Application of a novel microwave-assisted plasma ignition system in a direct injection gasoline engine. Appl Energy2017; 205: 562–576.
18.
DaleJDCheckelMDSmyPR.Application of high energy ignition systems to engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci1997; 23(5): 379–398.
19.
MuraseEOnoSHanadaK, et al. Plasma jet ignition in turbulent lean mixtures. SAE Tran1989; 98: 183–193.
20.
WyczalekFAFrankDLNeumanJG.Plasma jet ignition of lean mixtures. SAE Transactions1975; 84: 856–868.
21.
LeeBOhHHanS, et al. Development of high efficiency gasoline engine with thermal efficiency over 42%. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2229, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-2229.
22.
JungDIidaN. An investigation of multiple spark discharge using multi-coil ignition system for improving thermal efficiency of lean SI engine operation. Appl Energy2018; 212: 322–332.
23.
GaoHMatthewsRDHallMJ, et al. From spark plugs to railplugs – the characteristics of a new ignition system. SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-2978, 2004. https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-2978.
24.
HallMJTajimaHMatthewsRD, et al. Initial studies of a new type of ignitor: the railplug. SAE Technical Paper 912319, 1991. https://doi.org/10.4271/912319.
25.
DrukerNGoldwineGGreenbergJB, et al. Enhancement of plasma assisted ignition by multi-voltage pulse discharges: a theoretical study. Int J Engine Res2024; 25(7): 1423–1436.
26.
NagarajaSBYangVAdamovichI.Multi-scale modelling of pulsed nanosecond dielectric barrier plasma discharges in plane-to-plane geometry. J Phys D Appl Phys2013; 46(15): 155205–155205.
27.
AlgerTGingrichJMangoldB, et al. A continuous discharge ignition system for EGR limit extension in SI engines. SAE Int J Engines2011; 4(1): 677–692.
28.
CimarelloAGrimaldiCMarianiF, et al. Analysis of RF corona ignition in lean operating conditions using an optical access engine. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0673, March 2017.
29.
BurrowsJLykowskiJMixellK.Corona ignition system for highly efficient gasoline engines. MTZ Worldwide2013; 74(6): 38–41.
30.
YuSZhengM.Future gasoline engine ignition: a review on advanced concepts. Int J Engine Res2020; 22(6): 1743–1775.
31.
KuwaharaKAndoH. Role of heat accumulation by reaction loop initiated by H2O2 decomposition for thermal ignition. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0908, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0908.
32.
PadalaSNishiyamaAIkedaY.Flame size measurements of premixed propane-air mixtures ignited by microwave-enhanced plasma. Proc Combust Inst2017; 36(3): 4113–4119.
33.
SasakiKShinoharaK.Transition from equilibrium to nonequilibrium combustion of premixed burner flame by microwave irradiation. J Phys D Appl Phys2012; 45(45): 455202.
34.
StockmanEZaidiSMilesRB, et al. Measurements of combustion properties in a microwave enhanced flame. Combust Flame2009; 156(7): 1453–1461.
35.
TangQHuZTaoZ, et al. Research on the rapid combustion process of butane under microwave discharge. Sci Rep2022; 12(1): 10.
36.
GroffEGKrageMK.Microwave effects on premixed flames. Combust Flame1984; 56(3): 293–306.
37.
BalakrishnanENelsonMIChenXD.Microwave assisted ignition to achieve combustion synthesis. J Appl Math Decis Sci2001; 5(3): 151–164.
38.
JuYMacheretSMilesR, et al. Numerical study of the effect of microwave discharge on the premixed methane-air flame. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint propulsion conference and exhibit. 21 June 2004.
39.
LinkenheilKRuossHO.GrauT, et al. A novel spark-plug for improved ignition in engines with gasoline direct injection (GDI). IEEE Trans Plasma Sci2005; 33(5): 1696–1702.
40.
KettnerMNauwerckASpicherU, et al. Microwave-based ignition principle for gasoline engines with direct injection and spray guided combustion system. MTZ Worldwide2006; 67(6): 29–31.
41.
PertlFASmithJG.Electromagnetic design of a novel microwave internal combustion engine ignition source, the quarter wave coaxial cavity igniter. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Automob Eng2009; 223(11): 1405–1417.
42.
MalikopoulosAAAssanisDNPapalambrosPY.Real-time self-learning optimization of diesel engine calibration. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2008; 131(2). DOI: 131. 10.1115/1.3019331.
43.
DeFilippoASaxenaSRappV, et al. Extending the lean stability limits of gasoline using a microwave-assisted spark plug. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. April2011.
44.
NishiyamaAIkedaY. Improvement of lean limit and fuel consumption using microwave plasma ignition technology. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. April2012.
45.
MichaelJBChngTLMilesRB.Sustained propagation of ultra-lean methane/air flames with pulsed microwave energy deposition. CombustFlame2013; 160(4): 796–807.
46.
WolkBDeFilippoAChenJY, et al. Enhancement of flame development by microwave-assisted spark ignition in constant volume combustion chamber. Combust Flame2013; 160(7): 1225–1234.
47.
DeFilippoAC. Microwave-assisted ignition for improved internal combustion engine efficiency. PhD Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2013.
48.
GuXShionoHNakayaS, et al. Ignition performance of pulsed microwave-assisted sparks in lean methane/air mixture. SAE Technical Paper. September2015.
49.
HwangJBaeCParkJ, et al. Microwave-assisted plasma ignition in a constant volume combustion chamber. Combust Flame2016; 167: 86–96.
50.
LeMKNishiyamaASerizawaT, et al. Applications of a multi-point microwave discharge igniter in a multi-cylinder gasoline engine. Proc Combust Inst2019; 37(4): 5621–5628.
51.
WangZWangYZhuL, et al. Experimental study of influence on microwave plasma ignition combustion performance of pulse microwave signals. IEEE Access2019; 7: 23951–23958.
52.
ZhangXWangZWuH, et al. Experimental study of microwave assisted spark ignition on expanding C2H2-air spherical flames. Combust flame2020; 222: 111–122.
53.
ZhangXWangZWuH, et al. Propulsive effect of microwave-induced plasma jet on spark ignition of CO2-diluted CH4-air mixture. Combustflame2021; 229: 111400.
54.
IkedaY.Development of 2.45 GHz semiconductor microwave system for combustion ignition enhancement and failure analysis. Materials2022; 15(6): 2042.
55.
WuHWangZChengX, et al. Effect of microwave pulse parameters on energy coupling and enhancement of microwave assisted ignition. Proc Combust Inst2022; 39: 5531–5539.
56.
LeeYGBoehlerJT. Flame Kernel development and its effects on engine performance with various spark plug electrode configurations. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1133, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-1133.
57.
DuclosJMBruneauxGBaritaudTA. 3D modelling of combustion and pollutants in a 4-valve SI engine; effect of fuel and residuals distribution and spark location. SAE Technical Paper 961964, 1996. https://doi.org/10.4271/961964.
58.
MeneveauCPoinsotT.Stretching and quenching of flamelets in premixed turbulent combustion. Combust Flame1991; 86(4): 311–332.
59.
MetghalchiMKeckJC.Burning velocities of mixtures of air with methanol, isooctane, and indolene at high pressure and temperature. Combust Flame1982; 48: 191–210.
60.
WillemsHSierensR.Modeling the initial growth of the plasma and flame Kernel in SI engines. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2003; 125(2): 479–484.
61.
MillerRDavisGLavoieG, et al. A super-extended zel’dovich mechanism for nox modeling and engine calibration. SAE Technical Paper 980781, 1998. https://doi.org/10.4271/980781.
62.
KeeRJRupleyFMMeeksE, et al. CHEMKIN-III: A FORTRAN chemical kinetics package for the analysis of gas-phase chemical and plasma kinetics. Technical Report, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, 1996.
63.
DeFilippoAChenJY.Modeling plasma-assisted methane–air ignition using pre-calculated electron impact reaction rates. Combust Flame. 2016; 172: 38–48.
64.
GriffithsDJ.Introduction to electrodynamics. 3rd ed.San Francisco,CA: Pearson, 2008.
65.
VersteegHKMalalasekeraW. An Introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. Prentice Hall, NJ, 2007.
66.
HeCKuenneGYildarE, et al. Evaluation of the flame propagation within an SI engine using flame imaging and LES. Combust Theory Model2017; 21(6): 1080–1113.
67.
SalviBLSubramanianKA.Experimental investigation and phenomenological model development of flame kernel growth rate in a gasoline fuelled spark ignition engine. Appl Energy2015; 139: 93–103.
68.
RakshitPC.Physical chemistry. Kolkata: Sarat Book Distributors, 2001.
GuoSLiuJZhaoC, et al. Research on pre-ignition in hydrogen internal combustion engines based on characteristic parameters of hot spot. Int J Hydrogen Energy2024; 65: 548–554.
71.
ZhangXWangZWuH, et al. Microwave-induced plasma on spherical flame dynamics of spark-ignited hydrogen-air under water dilution. Fuel2024; 378: 132868
