The statistical tendency of an optically accessible single-cylinder direct-injection spark-ignition engine to undergo borderline/medium knocking combustion is investigated using 3D-CFD. Focus is made on the role of fuel surrogate formulation for the characterization of anti-knock quality and flame speed of the actual fuel. An in-house methodology is used to design surrogates able to emulate laminar flame speed and autoignition delay times of the injected fuel. Two different surrogates, characterized by increasing level of complexity, are compared. The most complex one (six components) improves the representation of the real fuel, highlighting the crucial role of accurate fuel kinetics to predict flame propagation and unburnt mixture reactivity. A devoted chemical mechanism including the oxidation pathways for all the species in the surrogate is also purposely developed for the current analysis. Knock is investigated using a proprietary statistical knock model (GruMo-UNIMORE Statistical Knock Model, GK-PDF), which can infer the probability of knocking events within a RANS formalism. Predicted statistical distributions are compared to measured counterparts. The proposed numerical/experimental comparison demonstrates the possibility to efficiently integrate complex-chemistry driven information in 3D-CFD combustion simulations without online solving chemical reactions: a combination of laminar flame speed correlations, ignition delay look-up tables, and a statistics-based knock model is adopted to estimate the percentage of knocking cycles in a GDI engine while limiting the computational cost of the simulations.
KalghatgiGT. Developments in internal combustion engines and implications for combustion science and future transport fuels. Proc Combust Inst2015; 35: 101–115.
AthanasopoulouLBikasHStavropoulosP. Comparative well-to-wheel emissions assessment of internal combustion engine and battery electric vehicles. Procedia CIRP2018; 78: 25–30.
4.
WooJChoiHAhnJ. Well-to-wheel analysis of greenhouse gas emissions for electric vehicles based on electricity generation mix: a global perspective. Transp Res D Transp Environ2017; 51: 340–350.
5.
RothbartM. E-Fuel production via renewables and the impact on the in-use CO2 performance. SAE technical paper 2020-01-2139, 2020. DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-2139.
6.
RossiEHummelSCupoF, et al. “Experimental and numerical investigation for improved mixture formation of an e-fuel compared to standard gasoline”. In: 15th International conference on engines and vehicles, Capri, Italy, 2021. DOI: 10.4271/2021-24-0019
7.
HeywoodJ. Internal combustion engines fundamentals. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 1998.
8.
YunliangQWangZWangJHeX. Effects of thermodynamic conditions on the end gas combustion mode associated with engine knock. Combust Flame2015; 162: 4119–4128.
9.
ZhouLLiKZhaoJZhangXWeiH. Experimental observation of end-gas autoignition and developing detonation in a confined space using gasoline fuel. Combust Flame2020; 222: 1–4.
10.
KalghatgiGT. Fuel anti-knock quality – Part I, engine studies. SAE technical paper 2001-01-3584, 2001. DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-3584
11.
KalghatgiGT. Fuel anti-knock quality – Part II, vehicle studies – how relevant is motor octane number (MON) in modern engines? SAE technical paper 2001-01-3585, 2001. DOI: 10.4271/2001-01-3585
12.
KalghatgiGT. Auto-ignition quality of practical fuels and implications for fuel requirements of future SI and HCCI engines. SAE technical paper 2005-01-0239, 2005. DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-0239
13.
MilloFMirzaeianMRolandoLBiancoAPostriotiL. A methodology for the assessment of the knock mitigation potential of a port water injection system. Fuel2021; 283: 119251.
14.
KassaMHallCPammingerMWallnerT. Knock intensity distribution and a stochastic control framework for knock control. J Dyn Syst Meas Control2019; 141(11): 111008.
15.
d’AdamoABredaSFontanesiSCantoreG. LES modelling of spark-ignition cycle-to-cycle variability on a highly downsized DISI engine. SAE Int J Engines2015; 8(5): 2029–2041.
16.
d’AdamoABredaSBerniFFontanesiS. Understanding the origin of cycle-to-cycle variation using large-eddy simulation: similarities and differences between a homogeneous low-revving speed research engine and a production DI turbocharged engine. SAE Int J Engines2019; 12: 1.
17.
FontanesiSd’AdamoAPaltrinieriS, et al. Assessment of the potential of proper orthogonal decomposition for the analysis of combustion CCV and knock tendency in a high performance engine. SAE technical paper 2013-24-0031, 2013. DOI: 10.4271/2013-24-0031.
18.
MorganNSmallboneABhaveA, et al. Mapping surrogate gasoline compositions into RON/MON space. Combust Flame2010; 157: 1122–1131.
19.
BredaSd’AdamoAFontanesiS, et al. CFD analysis of combustion and knock in an optically accessible GDI engine. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9(1): 649–664.
20.
d’AdamoABredaSBerniFFontanesiS. The potential of statistical RANS to predict knock tendency: comparison with LES and experiments on a spark-ignition engine. Appl Energy2019; 249: 126–142.
21.
AmeenMYangXKuoTSomS. Parallel methodology to capture cyclic variability in motored engines. Int J Engine Res2016; 18(4): 366–377.
22.
ProbstDWijeyakulasuriyaSPomraningEKodavasalJScarcelliRSomS. Predicting cycle-to-cycle variation with concurrent cycles in A gasoline direct injected engine with large eddy simulations. J Energy Res Tech2020; 142(4): 1–15.
23.
LafossasFCastagneMDumasJHenriotS. Development and Validation of a Knock Model in Spark Ignition Engines Using a CFD code. SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-2701, 2002. DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-2701
24.
LinseDKleemannAHasseC. Probability density function approach coupled with detailed chemical kinetics for the prediction of knock in turbocharged direct injection spark ignition engines. Combust Flame2014; 161: 997–1014.
25.
d’AdamoABredaSFontanesiSIrimescuAMerolaSSTornatoreC. A RANS knock model to predict the statistical occurrence of engine knock. Appl Energy2017; 191: 251–263.
26.
PitzWJCernanskyNPDryerF, et al. Development of an experimental database and chemical kinetic models for surrogate. Gasoline fuels. SAE technical paper 2007-01-0175, 2007. DOI: 10.4271/2007-01-0175
27.
SarathySMFarooqAKalghatgiGT. Recent progress in gasoline surrogate fuels. Prog Energy Combust Sci2018; 65: 67–108.
28.
KalghatgiGBabikerHBadraJ. A simple method to predict knock using toluene, n-heptane, and iso-octane blends (TPRF) as gasoline surrogates. SAE Int J Engines2015; 8: 505–519.
29.
SarathySMKukkadapuGMehlM, et al. Compositional effects on the ignition of FACE gasolines. Combust Flame2016; 169: 171–193.
30.
Del PecchiaMFontanesiS. A methodology to formulate multicomponent fuel surrogates to model flame propagation and ignition delay. Fuel2020; 279: 118337.
31.
LivengoodJCWuPC. Correlation of autoignition phenomena in internal combustion engines and rapid compression machines. Proceeding of combustion Institute1955; 5: 347–356.
32.
ColinOBenkenidaA. The 3-Zones Extended Coherent Flame Model (ECFM3Z) for computing premixed/diffusion combustion. Oil Gas Sci Technol – Rev IFP2004; 59(6): 593–609.
33.
KlimstraJ. The Knock severity index – a proposal for knock classification method. SAE technical paper 841335; 1984. DOI: 10.4271/841335
34.
LiYZhouCWSomersKPZhangKCurranHJ. The oxidation of 2-butene: a high pressure ignition delay, kinetic modeling study and reactivity comparison with isobutene and 1-butene. Proc Combust Inst2017; 36(1): 403–411.
35.
ZhouCWLiYO’ConnorE, et al. A comprehensive experimental and modeling study of isobutene oxidation. Combust Flame2016; 167: 353–379.
36.
LiuYDJiaMXieMZPangB. Enhancement on a skeletal kinetic model for primary reference fuel oxidation by using a semidecoupling methodology. Energy Fuels2012; 26(12): 7069–7083.
37.
AngikathShamsudheen FLiYVoiceAYooKZhaoEBadraJ. Development of a Reduced TPRF-E (Heptane/Isooctane/Toluene/Ethanol) Gasoline Surrogate Model for Computational Fluid Dynamic Applications in Engine Combustion and Sprays. SAE Technical Paper 2022-01-0407, 2022. DOI: 10.4271/2022-01-0407.
38.
YalamanchiKKAl TingasEImHGSarathyM. Screening chemical kinetic models: collision limit violations and ultra-fast time scales. In: 12th Asia-Pacific conference on combustion, ASPACC 2019, 2019.
39.
LamSHGoussisDA. Understanding complex chemical kinetics with computational singular perturbation. Symp (Int) Combust1989; 22(1): 931–941.
40.
LamSH. Using CSP to understand complex chemical kinetics. Combust Sci Technol1993; 89(5–6): 375–404.
41.
MoinPMaheshK. Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annu Rev Fluid Mech1998; 30(1): 539–578.
42.
PitschH. Large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2006; 38: 453–482.
43.
AtefN. Numerically investigating the effects of gasoline surrogate physical and chemical properties in a gasoline compression ignition (GCI) engine. PhD Thesis. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10754/628032
44.
DongSZhangKNinnemannEM, et al. A comprehensive experimental and kinetic modeling study of 1- and 2-pentene. Combust Flame2021; 223: 166–180.
45.
ZádorJTaatjesCAFernandesRX. Kinetics of elementary reactions in low-temperature autoignition chemistry. Prog Energy Combust Sci2011; 37(4): 371–421.
46.
BerniFFontanesiS. A 3D-CFD methodology to investigate boundary layers and assess the applicability of wall functions in actual industrial problems: a focus on in-cylinder simulations. Appl Therm Eng2020; 174: 115320.
47.
Del PecchiaMSparacinoSPessinaV, et al. Development of a sectional soot model based methodology for the prediction of soot engine-out emissions in GDI units. SAE technical paper 2020-01-0239, 2020, DOI: 10.4271/2020-01-0239.
48.
Del PecchiaMBredaSd’AdamoA, et al. Development of chemistry-based laminar flame speed correlation for part-load SI conditions and validation in a GDI research engine. SAE technical paper 2018-01-0174, 2018. DOI:10.4271/2018-01-0174.
49.
d’AdamoADel PecchiaMBredaS, et al. Chemistry-based laminar flame speed correlations for a wide range of engine conditions for iso-octane, n-heptane, toluene and gasoline surrogate fuels. SAE technical paper 2017-01-2190, 2017. DOI: 10.4271/2017-01-2190.
50.
FontanesiSCicaleseGCantoreGd’AdamoA. Integrated in-cylinder/CHT analysis for the prediction of abnormal combustion occurrence in gasoline engines. SAE technical paper 2014-01-1151, 2014. DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-1151
51.
FontanesiSCicaleseGd’AdamoACantoreG. A methodology to improve knock tendency prediction in high performance engines. Energy Proc2014; 45: 769–778.
52.
SparacinoSBerniFd’AdamoAKrastevVKCavicchiAPostriotiL. Impact of the primary Break-Up strategy on the morphology of GDI sprays in 3D-CFD simulations of multi-hole injectors. Energies2019; 12: 2890.
53.
BredaSD’OrricoFBerniF, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the adoption of split injection strategies to improve air-butanol mixture formation in a DISI optical engine. Fuel2019; 243: 104–124.
54.
MerolaSIrimescuAMarchittoL, et al. Flame contour analysis through UV-visible imaging during regular and abnormal combustion in a DISI engine. SAE technical paper 2015-01-0754, 2015. DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-0754.
55.
IrimescuATornatoreCMerolaS, et al. Combustion process investigation in a DISI engine fuelled with n-butanol through digital imaging and chemiluminescence. SAE techincal paper 2015-01-01887, 2015. DOI: 10.4271/2015-01-1887.
