Diesel engines become more and more complex systems, especially due to increasingly restrictive emission laws. The selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is a promising way to lower nitrogen oxide emissions. The slow dynamics of the catalyst, however, have to be compensated by the engine, for example to comply with emission laws during transients. This work presents a bi-level nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) concept for a diesel engine with an upper MPC layer to account for the SCR catalyst and a lower MPC layer to control the engine. The resulting hierarchical MPC structure is able to solve the overall control problem in real-time on ECU level using suitable MPC formulations as well as interconnecting variables. The numerical solution is based on an augmented Lagrangian MPC algorithm and control-oriented models. Simulation results against a detailed reference model of the overall system demonstrate the high performance of the hierarchical MPC concept.
NovaITronconiE.Urea-SCR technology for deNOx after treatment of diesel exhausts. 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2014.
5.
KampelmühlerFPaulitschRGschweitlK. Automatic ECU-calibration - an alternative to conventional methods. SAE technical paper 930395, 1993.
6.
HafnerMSchülerMNellesOIsermannR. Fast neural networks for diesel engine control design. Control Eng Pract2000; 8(11): 1211–1221.
7.
NaumannT.Wissensbasierte Optimierungsstrategien für elektronische Steuergeräte an Common-Rail-Dieselmotoren. PhD Thesis, Technical University of Berlin, 2002.
8.
SequenzH.Emission modelling and model-based optimisation of the engine control, VDI Fortschrittsberichte. Düsseldorf: VDI Verlag, 2013.
9.
ZaglauerS.Methode zur multikriteriellen Optimierung des Motorverhaltens anhand physikalisch motivierter Modelle. PhD Thesis, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 2014.
10.
YamasakiYIkemuraRTakahashiMKanekoSUemichiA. Multiple-input multiple-output control of diesel combustion using a control-oriented model. Int J Engine Res2019; 20(10): 1005–1016.
11.
FusseyPLimebeerD. Model predictive combustion control implementation using parallel computation on an FPGA. SAE Int JEngines2016; 9: 1163–1169.
12.
OrtnerPdel ReL. Predictive control of a diesel engine air path. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2007; 15(3): 449–456.
13.
DrewsPHoffmannKBeckR, et al. Fast model predictive control for the air path of a turbocharged diesel engine. In: Proceedings of the 2009 European control conference (ECC), Budapest, Hungary, 23–26 August 2009, pp. 3377–3382. New York, NY: IEEE.
14.
HuangMNakadaHButtsKKolmanovskyI. Nonlinear model predictive control of a diesel engine air path: a comparison of constraint handling and computational strategies. IFAC-PapersOnLine2015; 48: 372–379.
15.
HercegMRaffTFindeisenR, et al. Nonlinear model predictive control of a turbocharged diesel engine. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE conference on control applications (CCA), Munich, Germany, 4–6 October 2006, pp. 2766–2771. New York, NY: IEEE.
16.
FerreauHJOrtnerPLangthalerPReLDDiehlM. Predictive control of a real-world diesel engine using an extended online active set strategy. Annu Rev Control2007; 31(2): 293–301.
17.
SowmanJLailaDSFusseyPTruscottACrudenAJ. Nonlinear model predictive control applied to multivariable thermal and chemical control of selective catalytic reduction aftertreatment. Int J Engine Res2019; 20(10): 1017–1024.
18.
EricsonC.Model based optimization of a complete diesel engine/SCR system. PhD Thesis, Lund University, 2009.
19.
DonkersMCSchijndelJVHeemelsWPWillemsFP. Optimal control for integrated emission management in diesel engines. Control Eng Pract2017; 61: 206–216.
20.
van SchijndelJDonkersMCWillemsFPHeemelsWP. Dynamic programming for integrated emission management in diesel engines. IFAC Proceedings Volumes2014; 47: 11860–11865.
21.
BirginEMartínezJ.Practical augmented Lagrangian methods for constrained optimization. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2014.
ConnAGouldNTointP.LANCELOT: a Fortran package for large-scale nonlinear optimization. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1992.
24.
KäpernickBGraichenK. The gradient based nonlinear model predictive control software GRAMPC. In: Proceedings of the 13th European control conference (ECC), Strasbourg, France, 24–27 June 2014, pp. 1170–1175. New York, NY: IEEE.
25.
HarderKBuchholzMNiemeyerJ, et al. A real-time nonlinear MPC scheme with emission constraints for heavy-duty diesel engines. In Proceedings of the 2017 American control conference (ACC), Seattle, WA, USA, 24–26 May 2017, pp. 240–245. New York, NY: IEEE.
26.
HarderKBuchholzMNiemeyerJ, et al. Nonlinear MPC with emission control for a real-world off-highway diesel engine. In: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics (AIM), Munich, Germany, 3–7 July 2017, pp. 1768–1773. New York, NY: IEEE.
27.
HarderK.Hierarchische modellprädiktive Regelung eines Großdieselmotors mit Abgasnachbehandlung. PhD Thesis, Ulm University, 2019.
28.
ScattoliniR. Architectures for distributed and hierarchical model predictive control – a review. J Process Control2009; 19(5): 723–731.
29.
PicassoBRomaniCScattoliniR. On the design of hierarchical control systems with MPC. In: Proceedings of the 2009 European control conference (ECC), Budapest, Hungary, 23–26 August 2009, pp. 731–736. New York, NY: IEEE.
30.
BrdysMAGrochowskiMGminskiTKonarczakKDrewaM. Hierarchical predictive control of integrated wastewater treatment systems. Control Eng Pract2008; 16(6): 751–767 (Special Section on Large Scale Systems).
31.
KokotovicPVO’MalleyRESannutiP. Singular perturbations and order reduction in control theory — an overview. Automatica1976; 12(2): 123–132.
IshiharaKMorimotoJ. Real-time model predictive control with two-step optimization based on singularly perturbed system. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids), Seoul, South Korea, 3–5 November 2015, pp.173–180. New York, NY: IEEE.
34.
Van HentenEJBontsemaJ. Time-scale decomposition of an optimal control problem in greenhouse climate management. Control Eng Pract2009; 17(1): 88–96.
35.
WogrinMGlielmoL. An MPC scheme with guaranteed stability for linear singularly perturbed systems. In: Proceedings of the 49th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 5289–5295. New York, NY: IEEE.
36.
TarrafDAsadaH. Decentralized hierarchical control of multiple time scale systems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 American control conference (ACC), Anchorage, AK, USA, 8–10 May 2002, pp. 1121–1122. New York, NY: IEEE.
37.
van WingerdenJWVerhaegenM. Subspace identification of bilinear and LPV systems for open- and closed-loop data. Automatica2009; 45(2): 372–381.
38.
BuchholzMWernerS. Recursive subspace identification of linear parameter-varying systems. In: Proceedings of the 2012 American control conference (ACC), Montréal, Canada, 27–29 June 2012, pp.3408–3414. New York, NY: IEEE.
39.
WingerdenJ.Control of wind turbines with ‘smart’ rotors: proof of concept & LPV subspace identification. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2008.
40.
MercèreGBakoLLecœucheS. Propagator-based methods for recursive subspace model identification. Signal Process2008; 88(3): 468–491.
41.
HoutzagerIvan WingerdenJVerhaegenM. Fast-array recursive closed-loop subspace model identification. In: Proceedings of the 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Saint-Malo, France, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 6–8 July 2009, pp. 96–101.
42.
ScharCMOnderCHGeeringHP. Control of an SCR catalytic converter system for a mobile heavy-duty application. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2006; 14(4): 641–653.
43.
LeithDJLeitheadWE. Survey of gain-scheduling analysis and design. Int J Control2000; 73(11): 1001–1025.
44.
WillemsFKupperFRascanuGFeruE. Integrated energy and emission management for diesel engines with waste heat recovery using dynamic models. Oil Gas Sci Technol2015; 70(1): 143–158.
45.
BoydSVandenbergheL.Convex optimization. 7th ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
46.
HarderKBuchholzMSpaderTGraichenK. A real-time nonlinear air path observer for off-highway diesel engines. In: Proceedings of the 2018 European control conference (ECC), Limassol, Cyprus, 12–15 June 2018, pp.237–242. New York, NY: IEEE.
47.
SchärM.Control of a selective catalytic reduction process. PhD Thesis, ETH Zurich, 2003.
