Centrifugal compressor plays a vital role in the performance of a turbocharger. The compressor contains an impeller and housing, including the vaneless diffuser and a volute. The high-speed flow from the impeller is diffused in the diffuser and volute, before being delivered to the engine. Hence, the housing flow characteristics affect the compressor performance and operating range. Generally, housing has noticeable surface roughness, especially in the volute. This study evaluates the effect of the volute surface roughness on the compressor performance by experimental and numerical analysis. The experiments are conducted for three different volute surface roughness levels to measure the overall compressor pressure ratio and efficiency. The uncertainty in the efficiency for experimental results is within ±0.5% pts. Also, steady-state numerical simulations are performed to analyse the flow mechanisms causing pressure losses. Then, a numerical analysis is done to understand the effect of roughness of the diffuser hub and shroud walls on the compressor performance. From the experimental results, it is found that the increase in the roughness level of the volute from the smooth surface by circa 900% and 1400% shows a significant reduction in the compressor efficiency at the design speed (N) and off-design speeds (0.87 and 1.13 N). The reductions of efficiency are about 0.5%–1% pts at the near surge point, 1%–1.5% pts at the peak efficiency point and 2%–2.5% pts at the near choke flow point. The CFD analyses show significantly higher near-wall turbulence and wall shear resulting in additional pressure losses. Also, it is found that the pressure losses are more sensitive to roughness of the diffuser shroud-wall than that of the hub-wall. On the other hand, the diffuser hub-wall roughness increases the radial momentum in the diffuser passage which suppress the flow separation at low flow rates.
DentonJD. Some limitations of turbomachinery CFD. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2010: power for land, sea and air, Paper no. GT2010-22540, Glasgow, UK, 14–18June2010. ASME.
2.
KurzRMusgroveGBrunK. Experimental evaluation of compressor blade fouling. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2017; 139(3): 032601.
3.
ShaabaniK. CFD application to turbochargers of internal combustion engines. PhD Thesis, Milan Polytechnic University, Italy, 2017.
4.
KrivitzkyEYamamotoM. Eliminating engine performance degradation over time through compressor redesign. SAE Int J Engines2013; 6(2): 806–814.
5.
AbelMMartinez-BotasRFWöhrMMüllerMLeweuxJ. Three-dimensional computational loss analysis of a compressor for heavy duty truck engine turbochargers. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2020; 142(4): 041013.
6.
DentonJD. The 1993 IGTI Scholar lecture: loss mechanisms in turbomachines. J Turbomach1993; 115(4): 621–656.
KrainH. Review of centrifugal compressor’s application and development. J Turbomach2005; 127(1): 25–34.
9.
PanDWhitfieldAWilsonM. Design considerations for the volutes of centrifugal fans and compressors. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science1999; 213(4): 401–410.
10.
SteglichTKitzingerJSeumeJRVan den BraembusscheRAPrinsierJ. Improved diffuser/volute combinations for centrifugal compressors. J Turbomach2008; 130(1): 1–9.
11.
SchafflerA. Experimental and analytical investigation of the effects of Reynolds number and blade surface roughness on multistage axial flow compressors. J Eng Power1980; 102(1): 5–12.
12.
SuderKLChimaRVStrazisarAJRobertsWB. The effect of adding roughness and thickness to a transonic axial compressor rotor. J Turbomach1995; 117(4): 491–505.
13.
KangSHKangYSHanKH. Numerical study on blade roughness effect on the performance of turbomachines. In: Proceedings of the international gas turbines congress, Tokyo, Japan, 2–7 November 2003.
14.
MoriniMPinelliMSpinaRGVenturiniM. Numerical analysis of the effects of non-uniform surface roughness on compressor stage performance. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2010: power for land, sea and air, Paper no. GT2010-23291, Glasgow, UK, 14–18June2010. ASME.
15.
AldiNMoriniMPinelliMSpinaPRSumanAVenturiniM. Numerical analysis of the effects of surface roughness localization on the performance of an axial compressor stage. Energy Proc2014; 45: 1057–1066.
16.
WangMYangCLiZZhaoSZhangYLuX. Effects of surface roughness on the aerodynamic performance of a high subsonic compressor airfoil at low Reynolds number. Chin J Aeronaut2021; 34(3): 71–81.
17.
KongDJeongHSongSJ. Effects of surface roughness on evolutions of loss and deviation in a linear compressor cascade. J Mech Sci Technol2017; 31(11): 5329–5335.
18.
SeehausenHGilgePKellersmannAFriedrichsJHerbstF. Numerical study of stage roughness variations in a high pressure compressor. Int J Gas turbine Propuls Power Syst2020; 11(3): 16–25.
19.
GülichJF. Effect of Reynolds number and surface roughness on the efficiency of centrifugal pumps. J Fluid Eng2003; 125(4): 670–679.
20.
LipejAMuhičSMitruševskiD. Wall roughness influence on the efficiency characteristics of centrifugal pump. J Mech Eng2017; 63(9): 529–536.
21.
HeXZhangYWangC, et al. Influence of critical wall roughness on the performance of double-channel sewage pump. Energies2020; 13(2): 464–520.
CaseyMV. The effects of Reynolds number on the efficiency of centrifugal compressor stages. J Eng Gas Turbine Power1985; 107(2): 541–548.
24.
StrubRA. Discussion: “on the evaluation of Reynolds number and relative surface roughness effects on centrifugal compressor performance based on systematic experimental investigations” (SimonH.BulskamperA., 1984, ASME J. Eng. Gas turbines power, 106, pp. 489–498). J Eng Gas Turbine Power1984; 106(2): 499–498.
25.
JavedAKamphuesE. Evaluation of the influence of volute roughness on turbocharger compressor performance from a manufacturing perspective. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2014: turbine technical congress and exposition (volume 2D: turbomachinery), Paper No. GT2014-26949, Dusseldorf, Germany, 16–20June2014. ASME.
26.
LintzA. The effect of volute surface roughness on the performance of automotive turbocharger turbines. J Glob Power Propuls Soc2017; 1: 3FLVC0.
27.
NumakuraRKawakuboTTamakiH. Prediction of surface roughness effects on centrifugal compressor performance. Turbomachinery2009; 37(9): 554–558.
28.
TanganelliABalduzziFBianchiniA, et al. An investigation on the loss generation mechanisms inside different centrifugal compressor volutes for turbochargers. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2019; 141(2): 021004. 11.
29.
LiuCCaoYDingSZhangWCaiYLinA. Effects of blade surface roughness on compressor performance and tonal noise emission in a marine diesel engine turbocharger. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(14): 3476–3490.
30.
SorokesJM. Range versus Efficiency- striking the proper balance. In: Proceedings of 42nd turbomachinery symposium, Houston, TX, 1–3 October 2013.
31.
JansenW. Rotating stall in a radial vaneless diffuser. J Basic Eng1964; 86(4): 750–758.
32.
SenooYKinoshitaY. Influence of inlet flow condition and geometries of a centrifugal vaneless diffuser on critical flow angle for reverse flow. J Fluid Eng1977; 99(1): 98–102.
33.
SenooYKinoshitaYIshidaM. Asymmetric flow in vaneless diffusers of centrifugal blowers. J Fluid Eng1977; 99(1): 104–111.
34.
AbdelhamidAN. Control of self-excited flow oscillations in vaneless diffuser of centrifugal compression systems. In: Proceedings of the ASME 1982 international gas turbine conference and exhibit (volume 1: turbomachinery), Paper no.82-GT-188, London, 18–22 April 1982. ASME.
35.
IshidaMSakaguchiDUekiH. Suppression of rotating stall by wall roughness control in vaneless diffusers of centrifugal blowers. J Turbomach2001; 123(1): 64–72.
36.
AhmedSA. Control of stall in a radial diffuser using rough surfaces. Can Aeronaut Space J2008; 54(1): 9–15.
37.
ParoubekJCyrusVKynclJ. The influence of outlet stator part surface roughness on the performance of a very low coefficient centrifugal compressor stage. In: Proceedings of the ASME 1996 international gas turbine conference and aeroengine congress and exhibition (volume 1: turbomachinery), Paper no. 96-GT-179, 10–13 June 1996, Birmingham, UK. ASME.
38.
KhanAIrfanMNiaziUM, et al. Centrifugal compressor stall control by the application of engineered surface roughness on diffuser shroud using numerical simulations. Materials2021; 14(8): 2033.
39.
SirakovBCaseyM. Evaluation of heat transfer effects on turbocharger performance. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 turbo expo: turbine technical conference and exposition (volume 7: turbomachinery), Paper no. GT2011-45887, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–10 June 2011. ASME.
40.
GuillouE. Uncertainty and measurement sensitivity of turbocharger compressor gas stands. SAE technical paper 2013-01-0925, 2013.
41.
SunZZhengXLinghuZKawakuboTTamakiHWangB. Influence of volute design on flow field distortion and flow stability of turbocharger centrifugal compressors. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2019; 233(3): 484–494.
42.
RoachePJ. Perspective: a method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J Fluid Eng1994; 116(3): 405–413.
AdamsTGrantCWatsonH. A simple algorithm to relate measured surface roughness to equivalent sand-grain roughness. Int J Mech Eng Mechatron2012; 1(2): 66–71.
45.
BonsJP. A review of surface roughness effects in gas turbines. J Turbomach2010; 132(2): 021004.
46.
TangYXiGWangZTianY. Quantitative study on equivalent roughness conversion coefficient and roughness effect of centrifugal compressor. J Fluid Eng2020; 142((2): 021208.
47.
KadivarMTormeyDMcGranaghanG. A review on turbulent flow over rough surfaces: fundamentals and theories. Int J Thermofluids2021; 10: 100077.
48.
SunZTanCZhangD. Flow field structures of the impeller backside cavity and its influence on the centrifugal compressor. In: Proceedings of the ASME turbo expo 2009: power for land, sea and air (volume 7: turbomachinery), Paper no. GT2009-59879, Orlando, FL, 8–12June2009. ASME.
49.
HagelsteinDHillewaertKVan den BraembusscheRAEngedaAKeiperRRautenbergM. Experimental and numerical investigation of the flow in a centrifugal compressor volute. J Turbomach2000; 122(1): 22–31.
