The piston ring/cylinder liner conjunction can experience various regimes of lubrication during piston strokes inside the engine cylinder. In the current engines, the nature of lubrication usually remains hydrodynamic at mid-stroke, while a mixed regime of lubrication may be experienced at and near reversals. The direct contact between the tips of some of the asperities of opposing surfaces leads to mixed (partial) regime of lubrication. A model proposed by Greenwood and Tripp can be used to predict asperity-level contribution to the total piston friction. At the same time, Reynolds equation can be employed to predict the portion of load carried by the lubricant trapped between the asperities. Friction between the asperity tips is usually proportional to the load that they support, stated in terms of a proportionality factor, that is, coefficient of friction. The surfaces are usually furnished with hard wear-resistant coatings and in parts by solid lubricants. Both the piston rings and cylinder liner surfaces are usually coated. These coatings change the friction characteristics of the counterfaces because of their surface topography as well as material mechanical properties. Atomic force microscope is used to obtain surface topographical parameters in contact tapping mode. The corresponding surface topographical parameters are obtained from representative regional areas of the contacting solid surfaces, using a Talysurf. The combination of topography and coating characteristics are used to develop the necessary parameters for a boundary friction model. A numerical model of the top compression ring to cylinder liner is developed based on mixed-hydrodynamic regime of lubrication. The results for friction and the effect of coating on the power loss and wear of the conjunction are discussed in this article.
FitzsimonsB. Introduction to the importance of fuel efficiency and role of the Encyclopaedic research project. In: Proceedings of IMechE seminar on a drive for fuel efficiency, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK, 21 September 2011.
2.
FuruhamaS. A dynamic theory of piston-ring lubrication, 1st report-calculation. Bull JSME1959; 2(7): 423–428.
3.
DowsonDRuddyBLEconomouPL. The elastohydrodynamic lubrication of piston rings. Proc R Soc Lon Ser: A1983; 386(1791): 409–430.
4.
MaM-TSherringtonISmithEH. Analysis of lubrication and friction for a complete piston-ring pack with an improved oil availability model – Part 1: circumferentially uniform film. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology1997; 211: 1–15.
5.
AkalinONewazGM. Piston ring-cylinder bore friction modeling in mixed lubrication regime, Part I – analytical results. J Tribol: T ASME2001; 123: 211–218.
6.
BolanderNWSteenwykBDSadeghiFGerberGR. Lubrication regime transitions at the piston ring-cylinder liner interface. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2005; 219: 19–31.
7.
MishraPCBalakrishnanSRahnejatH. Tribology of compression ring-to-cylinder contact at reversal. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2008; 222: 815–826.
8.
MishraPCRahnejatHKingPD. Tribology of the ring-bore conjunction subject to a mixed regime of lubrication. Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Engineering Science2009; 223(4): 987–998.
9.
D’AgostinoVSenatoreA. Fundamentals of lubrication and friction of piston ring contact. In: RahnejatH (ed.) Tribology and dynamics of engine and powertrain: fundamentals, applications and future trends. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2010, pp.343–385.
10.
FuruhamaSSasakiS. New device for the measurement of piston frictional forces in small engines. SAE paper no. 831284, 1983.
11.
RahmaniRTheodossiadesSRahnejatHFitzsimonsB. Transient elastohydrodynamic lubrication of rough new or worn piston compression ring conjunction with an out-of-round cylinder bore. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2012; 226(4): 284–305.
12.
AkalinONewazGM. Piston ring-cylinder bore friction modeling in mixed lubrication regime, Part II – correlation with bench test data. J Tribol: T ASME2001; 123: 219–223.
13.
Abd Al-SamiehMFRahnejatH. Ultra-thin lubricating films under transient conditions. J Phys D Appl Phys2001; 34: 2610–2621.
14.
ChongWWFTeodorescuMRahnejatH. Effect of lubricant molecular rheology on formation and shear of ultra-thin surface films. J Phys D Appl Phys2011; 44(16): 165302.
15.
GreenwoodJATrippJH. The contact of two nominally flat rough surfaces. Proc Instn Mech Engrs1971; 185: 625–634.
16.
ErdemirA. Review of engineered tribological interfaces for improved boundary lubrication. Tribol Int2005; 38: 249–256.
17.
ChongWWFTeodorescuMRahnejatH. Physio-chemical hydrodynamic mechanism underlying the formation of thin adsorbed boundary films. Faraday Discuss2012; 156: 123–136.
18.
BalakrishnanSRahnejatH. Isothermal transient analysis of piston skirt-to-cylinder wall contacts under combined axial, lateral and tilting motion. J Phys D Appl Phys2005; 38: 787.
19.
KushwahaMRahnejatHJinZM. Valve-train dynamics: a simplified tribo-elasto-multi-body analysis. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2000; 214(2): 95–110.
20.
KiuruMAlakoskiE. Low sliding angles in hydrophobic and oleophobic coatings prepared with plasma discharge method. Mater Lett2004; 58(160): 2213–2216.
21.
Howell-SmithSJ. Tribological optimisation of the internal combustion engine piston to bore conjunction through surface modification. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, 2010.
22.
MorrisNRahmaniRRahnejatHKingPDFitzsimonsB. The influence of piston ring geometry and topography on friction. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2013; 227(2): 141–153.
23.
GoharRRahnejatH. Fundamentals of tribology. London: Imperial College Press, 2008.
24.
FullerKNGTaborD. The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. P Roy Soc Lond A1975; 345: 327–342.
25.
ProkopovichPTheodossiadesSRahnejatHHodsonD. Friction in ultra-thin conjunction of valve seals of pressurised metered dose inhalers. Wear2010; 268: 845–852.
26.
ArcoumanisCOstovarPMortimerR. Mixed lubrication modelling of Newtonian and shear thinning liquids in a piston-ring configuration. SAE paper no. 972924, 1997.
27.
MateCM. Atomic-scale friction of a tungsten tip on a graphite surface. Phys Rev Lett1987; 59(17): 1942–1946.
28.
KanekoRMiyamotoT. Friction and adhesion forces on magnetic disk surfaces. IEEE T Magn1988; 24(6): 2641–2643.
29.
LandmanULuedtkeWDNitzanA. Dynamics of tip-substrate interactions in atomic force microscopy. Surf Sci1989; 210: L177–L184.
30.
MeyerEHeinzelmannHGruttePJungTHHidberH-RRudinHGuntherodtH-J. Atomic force microscopy for the study of tribology and adhesion. Thin Solid Films1989; 181: 527–544.
31.
MeyerGAmerNM. Simultaneous measurement of lateral and normal forces with an optical beam deflection atomic force microscope. Appl Phys Lett1990; 57: 2089–2091.
32.
TomanekD. Calculation of an atomically modulated friction force in atomic-force microscopy. Europhys Lett1991; 15(8): 887–892.
33.
RuanJ-ABhushanB. Atomic-scale friction measurements using friction force microscopy: Part I – General: principles and new measurement techniques. J Tribol: T ASME1994; 116(2): 378–388.
34.
WarmackRJZhengXYAllisonDP. Friction effects in the deflection of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum1996; 65(2): 394–399.
35.
OgletreeDFCarpickRWSalermonM. Calibration of frictional forces in atomic force microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum1996; 67(9): 3298–3306.
36.
BuenviajeCKGeS-RRafaillovichMHOverneyRM. Atomic force microscopy calibration methods for lateral force, elasticity, and viscosity. Mat Res Soc Symp P1998; 522: 187–192.
37.
BakerCETheodossiadesSRahnejatHFitzsimonsB. Influence of in-plane dynamics of thin compression rings on friction in internal combustion engines. J Eng Gas Turb Power2012; 134: 092801 (11 pp.).
38.
TeodorescuMTarazaDHeneinNABryzikW. Simplified elasto-hydrodynamic friction model of the cam-tappet contact. SAE paper no. 2003-01-0985, 2003.
39.
BriscoeBJEvansDCB. The shear properties of Langmuir-Blodgett layers. P Roy Soc Lond A Mat1982; 380(1779): 389–407.
40.
BowdenFPTaborD. The friction and lubrication of solids. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.
41.
JohnsonKLKendallKRobertsAD. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. P Roy Soc Lond A Mat1975; 345: 327–342.
42.
TeodorescuMRahnejatH. Dry and wet nano-scale impact dynamics of rough surfaces with or without a self-assembled mono-layer. Proc IMechE, Part N: J Nanoengineering and Nanosystems2008; 221: 49–58.
43.
ChongWWFTeodorescuMRahnejatH. Nanoscale elastoplastic adhesion of wet asperities. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2013; 227: 996–1010.
44.
RahnejatH. Multi-body dynamics: vehicles, machines and mechanisms. Bury St Edmunds; Warrendale, PA: Professional Engineering Publishing (IMechE); SAE, 1998.
45.
YangPCuiJJinZMDowsonD. Transient elastohydrodynamic analysis of elliptical contacts. Part 2: thermal and Newtonian lubricant solution. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2005; 219: 187–200.
46.
HoupertL. New results of traction force calculations in elastohydrodynamic contacts. J Tribol: T ASME1985; 107: 241–248.
47.
HuYChengHSAraiTKobayashiYAoyamaS. Numerical simulation of piston ring in mixed lubrication – a non-axisymmetrical analysis. J Trib: T ASME1994; 116: 470–478.
48.
HoffmannKAChiangST. Computational fluid dynamics for engineers, vol. I. Wichita, KS: A Publication of Engineering Education System, 1993.
49.
RahnejatHBalakrishnanSKingPDHowell-SmithS. In-cylinder friction reduction using a surface finish optimization technique. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2006; 220(9): 1309–1318.
MorrisNRahmaniRRahnejatHKingPDFitzsimonsB. Tribology of piston compression ring conjunction under transient thermal mixed regime of lubrication. Tribol Int2013; 59(March): 248–258.
52.
AhimouFSemmensMJNovakPJHaugstadG. Biofilm cohesiveness measurement using a novel atomic force microscopy methodology. Appl Environ Microb2007; 73(9): 2897–2904.
