This article applies a history of knowledge perspective to interwar International Labour Organization (ILO) efforts to produce generalized international instruments for governing migrant labor. The historical analysis explores what it meant in the interwar context to devise ‘an international common law of the emigrant’. It focuses particular attention on the process through which juridical techniques formalized a distinction between ‘migration for employment’ and ‘migratory movements of indigenous workers’. Foregrounding the constructed nature of these categories highlights the underlying race-based notions that informed interwar ILO standard-setting frameworks. More broadly, tracing the knowledge-making processes through which seemingly objective categorical distinctions have been constructed and reconstructed opens space for questioning and potentially rethinking the functionally differentiated normative frameworks through which global policymaking approaches human mobility today.
AleinikoffTA (2007) International legal norms on migration: Substance without architecture. In: CholewinskiRPerruchoudRMacDonaldE (eds) International Migration Law: Developing Paradigms and Challenges. Cham: TMC Asser Press, pp. 467–480.
2.
Amaya-CastroJM (2012) Migration and the world of work: Discursive constructions of the global in ILO narratives about migration. In: GeigerMPecoudA (eds) The New Politics of International Mobility. Osnabrück: Institute for Migration Research and Intercultural Studies, pp. 33–48.
BohningR (1991) The ILO and the New UN convention on migrant workers. International Migration Review25(4): 698–709.
5.
BonnetJ-C (1976) Les Pouvoirs Publics Français et l’Immigration dans l’Entre-Deux-Guerres. Lyon: Centre d’Histoire économique et sociale de la Région lyonnaise.
6.
ChetailV (2017) The architecture of international migration law. AJIL Unbound111: 18–23.
7.
CooperF (2000) Conditions analogous to slavery. In: CooperFHoltTCScottRJ (eds) Beyond Slavery. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 107–149.
8.
CrossGS (1983) Immigrant Workers in Industrial France. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
9.
DaughtonJP (2011) Behind the imperial curtain: International humanitarian efforts and the critique of french colonialism in the interwar years. French Historical Studies34(3): 503–528.
10.
DehmS (2015) Framing international migration. London Review of International Law3(1): 133–168.
11.
FreitasR (2013) The global human mobility architecture. In: ReinaldaB (ed.) Routledge Handbook of International Organization. London: Routledge, pp. 473–485.
12.
GamlenA (2010) The new migration and development optimism. Global Governance16: 415–422.
13.
GeigerM (2013) The transformation of migration politics: From migration control to disciplining mobility. In: GeigerM (ed.) International Organisations and Migration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–40.
14.
GeigerMPecoudA (2014) International organisations and the politics of migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies40(6): 865–867.
15.
GrantK (2005) A Civilized Savagery: Britain and the New Slaveries in Africa, 1884-1926. London: Routledge
16.
GuptaPS (1975) Imperialism and the British Labour Movement, 1914–1964. New York: Holmes & Meier.
17.
HasenauM (1991) ILO standards on migrant workers. International Migration Review25(4): 687–697.
18.
HorneJ (1985) Immigrant workers in France during World War I. French Historical Studies14(1): 57–88.
19.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1919a) The first session of the international labour conference (Washington, 1919). ILO Official Bulletin1: 408–450.
20.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1919b) ILO Unemployment Convention, 1919, (No.2). Geneva: ILO.
21.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1919c) ILO Unemployment Recommendation, 1919 (No.1). Geneva: ILO.
22.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1921) The international emigration commission. International Labour Review4(3): 537–562.
23.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1922) Migration notes. International Labour Review6(6): 965–977.
24.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1924) Minutes of the 24th Session of the ILO Governing Body (October 1924). Geneva: ILO.
25.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1926) Record of Proceedings of the Eighth Session of the International Labour Conference 1926. Geneva: ILO.
26.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1928) Minutes of the 42nd Session of the ILO Governing Body (October 1928). Geneva: ILO.
27.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1933) Minutes of the 64th Session of the ILO Governing Body (October 1933). Geneva: ILO.
28.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1935a) The recruiting of labour in colonies and in other territories with analogous labour conditions. Report prepared for the Nineteenth Session of the International Labour Conference, ILO, Geneva.
29.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1935b) Record of Proceedings of the Nineteenth Session of the International Labour Conference 1935. Geneva: ILO.
30.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1936) The regulation of certain special systems of recruiting workers. Report prepared for the Twentieth Session of the International Labour Conference. ILO, Geneva.
31.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1938) Record of Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Session of the International Labour Conference 1938. Geneva: ILO.
32.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1941) The International Labour Code, 1939. Montreal, QC, Canada: ILO.
33.
International Labour Organization (ILO) (1949) Migration for employment. Report prepared for the Thirty-Second Session of the International Labour Conference, ILO, Geneva.
34.
International Law Commission, UN (2006) Fragmentation of international law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. UN doc. A/CN.4/L.682, 13April. New York: United Nations.
35.
IpsenC (1996) Dictating Demography: The Problem of Population in Fascist Italy. Cambridge University Press.
36.
JeevesA (1986) Migrant Labour and South African Expansion, 1920-1950. South African Historical Journal18(1): 73–92.
37.
KaintzLBanulescu-BogdanNNewlandK (2020) The Divergent Trajectories of the Global Migration and Refugee Compacts. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
38.
KainzLBettsA (2020) Power and proliferation: Explaining the fragmentation of global migration governance. Migration Studies9(1): 65–89.
39.
KennedyD (1988) Empire migration in post-war reconstruction: The role of the Oversea Settlement Committee. Albion20(3): 403–419.
40.
KevonianD (2005) Enjeux de catégorisations et migrations internationales: Le Bureau International du Travail et les réfugiés. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales21(3): 1–26.
41.
KlaarenJ (2017) From Prohibited Immigrants to Citizens: The Origins of Citizenship and Nationality in South Africa. Cape Town, South Africa: University of Cape Town Press.
42.
KottS (2012) The forced labor issue between human and social rights. Humanity3(3): 321–335.
43.
LakeMReynoldsH (2008) Drawing the Global Colour Line: White Men’s Countries and the International Challenge of Racial Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
McKeownA (2008) Melancholy Order: Asian Migration and the Globalization of Borders. New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
MaulDR (2007) The International Labour Organization and the struggle against forced labour from 1919 to the present. Labor History48(4): 477–500.
46.
MégretF (2021) The contingency of international migration law. In: VenzkeIHellerKJ (eds) Contingency in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 179–198.
47.
MongiaR (2018) Indian Migration and Empire: A Colonial Genealogy of the Modern State. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
NgaiMM (2015) Chinese gold miners and the ‘Chinese question’ in nineteenth-century California and Victoria. Journal of African History101(4): 1082–1105.
49.
PiperNWithersM (2018) Forced transnationalism and temporary labour migration. Identities25(5): 558–575.
50.
Ramji-NogalesJ (2017) Moving beyond the refugee law paradigm. AJIL Unbound111: 8–12.
51.
RodgersDT (2009) Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Rodriguez-PineroL (2005) Indigenous Peoples, Postcolonialism, and International Law: The ILO Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
RosentalP-A (2011) Migrations, Souveraineté, Droits Sociaux. Protéger et expulser les étrangers en Europe du XIXe siècle à nos jours. Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales2: 353–373.
54.
SauthierIL (2013) Modern unemployment: From the creation of the concept to the International Labour Office’s first standards. In: KottSDrouxJ (eds) Globalizing Social Rights. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 67–84.
55.
ShotwellJT (1934) The Origins of the International Labor Organization. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
SpiroPJ (2017) The possibilities of global migration law. AJIL Unbound111: 3–7.
57.
StrickerY (2019) ‘International migration’ between empire and nation. The statistical construction of an ambiguous global category in the International Labour Office in the 1920s. Ethnicities19(3): 469–485.
58.
SupiotA (2010) L’esprit de Philadelphie. Paris: Seuil.
59.
SzablaC (2021) Entrenching hierarchies in the global periphery: Migration, development and the ‘native’ in ILO legal reform efforts. Melbourne Journal of International Law21(2): 1–39.
60.
TaitDC (1927) International aspects of migration. Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs1: 25–46.
61.
ThomasA (1927) International migration and its control. In: SangerM (ed.) World Population Conference. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 256–265.
62.
ThomasC (2011) Convergences and divergences in international legal norms on migrant labor. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal32: 405–441.
63.
TopalovC (1994) Naissance du Chômeur: 1880–1910. Paris: Albin Michel.
64.
TosstorffR (2005) The international trade-union movement and the founding of the International Labour Organization. International Review of Social History50: 339–433.
65.
Van DaeleJ (2005) Engineering social peace: Networks, ideas, and the founding of the International Labour Organization. International Review of Social History50: 435–466.
66.
VarlezL (1922) Continental emigration and its regulation. Foreign Born3(7): 195–200.
67.
VarlezL (1923) Les Problèmes Internationaux de l’Émigration et de l’Immigration. Revue Économique Internationale3(1): 415–456.
68.
VarlezL (1927) Les migrations internationales et leur réglementation (Volume 020) (Collected courses of the Hague Academy of International Law). Boston, MA: Brill.
69.
VarlezL (1929a) General principles of an international convention on the conditions and contracts of employment of foreign workers: II. International Labour Review19(4): 467–482.
70.
VarlezL (1929b) General principles of an international convention on the conditions and contracts of employment of foreign workers: III. International Labour Review19(5): 647–665.
71.
VarlezL (1929c) Migration problems at the Havana conference of 1928. International Labour Review19(1): 1–19.
72.
VoskoLF (2014) Out of the shadows? The non-binding multilateral framework on migration (2006) and prospects for using international labour regulation to forge global labour market membership. In: DavidovGLangilleB (eds) The Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 365–384.
73.
WheatleyN (2017) New subjects in international law and order. In: SlugaGClavinP (eds) Internationalisms: A Twentieth-Century History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–286.
74.
WobbeTRenardL (2017) The category of ‘family workers’ in International Labour Organization statistics (1930s–1980s): A contribution to the study of globalized gendered boundaries between household and market. Journal of Global History12: 340–360.
75.
YanowD (2002) Constructing Race and Ethnicity in America. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
76.
ZimmermannS (2016) Night work for White women and bonded labour for ‘native’ women? Contentious traditions and the globalization of gender-specific labour protection and legal equality politics, 1926 to 1939. In: KimbleSLRowekampM (eds) New Perspectives on European Women’s Legal History. London: Routledge, pp. 394–427.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
