This study examines the mobilization of platform workers in Georgia and the role of mainstream unions in their struggle for labor and social rights. While existing literature explores the varied outcomes of cooperation between mainstream and grassroots unions in shaping the labor movement, less attention has been given to the implications of such cooperation for platform workers’ social security. Findings suggest that mainstream unions have played a pivotal role in organizing platform workers. However, their strategic focus on legal enactment has proven less effective in Georgia’s context, where fundamental social safety nets are lacking. Despite the emergence of platform unionism, this narrow legalistic approach has failed to deliver substantive improvements in platform workers’ social security. The findings suggest that meaningful progress requires both mainstream and grassroots unions to expand their advocacy beyond legal reclassification. A more comprehensive approach – incorporating broader social policy reforms – is essential to ensuring social security for platform workers.
AckersP (2015) Trade unions as professional associations. In: JohnstoneSAckersP (eds) Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–47.
2.
AnwarMAGrahamM (2021) Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change25(2): 237–258.
3.
BeerepootNLambregtsB (2014) Competition in online job marketplaces: Towards a global labour market for outsourcing services. Global Networks15(2): 236–255.
4.
BehrendtCAnhQRaniU (2019) Social protection systems and the future of work: Ensuring social security for digital platform workers. International Social Security Review72(3): 17–41.
5.
BeltadzeP (2020) Social Dialogue in Georgia. Tbilisi: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
6.
Bergvall-KarebornBHowcroftD (2014) Amazon Mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. New Technology, Work and Employment29(3): 213–223.
7.
BessaIJoyceSNeumannD, et al. (2022) A Global Analysis of Worker Protest in Digital Labour Platforms. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
8.
BinghamAJWitkowskyP (2022) A five-phase process for qualitative data analysis: From coding to interpretation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods21: 1–10.
9.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
10.
CantCWoodcockJ (2020) Fast food shutdown: From disorganisation to action in the service sector. Capital & Class44(4): 513–521.
11.
ChesalinaO (2018) Access to social security for digital platform workers in Germany and in Russia: A comparative study. Spanish Labour Law and Employment Relations Journal7(1–2): 17–28.
12.
ChestaREZamponiL (2019) Unions’ strategies against precarity: Counter-mobilisations against labour reforms in Italy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research25(2): 183–198.
13.
ChestaREZamponiLCaciagliC (2019) Labour activism and social movement unionism in the gig economy: Food delivery workers’ struggles in Italy. Partecipazione e Conflitto12(3): 819–844.
14.
CiniL (2023) Resisting algorithmic control: Understanding the rise and variety of platform worker mobilisations. New Technology, Work and Employment38(1): 125–144.
15.
DavletgildeevRSKlimovskayaLR (2019) Legal status of platform workers in Russia: Right on unemployment and social assistance. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews7(6): 639–643.
16.
D’CruzPNorohnaE (2016) Positives outweighing negatives: The experiences of Indian crowdsourced workers. Work Organization, Labour & Globalisation10(1): 44–63.
17.
De StefanoV (2016) The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowdwork, and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’. Geneva: International Labour Office.
18.
DiakonidzeA (2023) Internalising precariousness: Experiences of Georgian platform workers. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research29(4): 439–455.
19.
DiakonidzeAHolubováBKahancováM (2020) Trade unions and professional associations as civil society actors working on the issues of labour rights and social dialogue in Georgia. CELSI Research Report No. 37. Bratislava: Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI). Available at: https://celsi.sk/media/research_reports/RR37_new.pdf (accessed 23 August 2025).
20.
DolenecDŠirinićDBalkovićA (2021) Resisting the Great Recession: Social movement unionism in Croatia and Serbia. European Journal of Industrial Relations27(1): 1–17.
21.
EisenmeierS (2018) Ride-sharing platforms in developing countries: Effects and implications in Mexico City. Pathways for Prosperity Commission, Background Paper Series, No. 3. Oxford: Pathways for Prosperity Commission.
22.
European Training Foundation (ETF) (2021) The Future of Work: New Forms of Employment in the Eastern Partnership Countries—Platform Work. Turin: ETF.
23.
European Training Foundation (ETF) (2024) New Forms of Work and Platform Work in Central Asia. Turin: ETF.
24.
FregeCKellyJ (2003) Union revitalization strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1): 7–24.
25.
Georgian Trade Union Confederation (2025). Available at: https://gtuc.ge/. . . (accessed 23 August 2025).
26.
GrahamMLehdonvirtaVWoodA, et al. (2017) The Risks and Rewards of Online Gig Work at the Global Margins. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
27.
Gumbrell-McCormickRHymanR (2013) Trade Unions in Western Europe: Hard Times, Hard Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
InsebayevaSBeyssembayevS (2023) Digital platform employment in Kazakhstan: Can new technologies solve old problems in the labor market?International Labor and Working-Class History103: 62–80.
JoyceSStuartMFordeC (2022) Theorising labour unrest and trade unionism in the platform economy. New Technology, Work and Employment38(1): 21–40.
31.
KelloggKCValentineMAChristinA (2020) Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals14(1): 366–410.
32.
ĶešāneISpurinaM (2024) Sociological types of precarity among gig workers: Lived experiences of food delivery workers in Riga. Social Inclusion12: 7696.
33.
LanchavaG (2021) Labour protection in Georgia—Legal review. In: ChubabriaT (ed.) Informal and Nonstandard Labour in Georgia. Tbilisi: Social Justice Centre, pp. 46–63.
34.
MuskhelishviliM (2011) Social Dialogue in Georgia. Tbilisi: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
PalierB (2019) Work, social protection and the middle classes: What future in the digital age?International Social Security Review72(3): 113–133.
37.
PiasnaAZwysenW (2022) New wine in old bottles: Organizing and collective bargaining in the platform economy. International Journal of Labour Research11(1–2): 36–41.
38.
PulignanoVDoerflingerNDe FranceschiF (2015) Flexibility and security within European labor markets: The role of local bargaining and the ‘trade-off’ between flexibility and security. European Journal of Industrial Relations21(4): 375–390.
39.
RichardsonEBerdzuliN (2017) Georgia: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition19(4): 1–90.
40.
RymkevichOBrownRC (2021) New challenges for the collective representation of platform workers in Russia and China, In: AddabboTAlesECurziY, et al. (eds) The Collective Dimensions of Employment Relations. Cham: Springer, pp. 281–297.
41.
SchmalzSBasualdoVSerranoM, et al. (2023) Varieties of platform unionism: A view from the Global South on workers’ power in the digital economy. Work in the Global Economy3(2): 201–224.
42.
SurieAKodugantiJ (2016) The emerging nature of work in platform economy companies in Bengaluru, India: The case of Uber and Ola cab drivers. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies5(3): 224. Available at: https://ejcls.adapt.it/index.php/ejcls_adapt/article/view/224
43.
TassinariAMaccarroneV (2020) Riders on the storm. Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society34(1): 35–54.
VandaeleK (2018) Will trade unions survive in the platform economy? Emerging patterns of platform workers’ collective voice and representation in Europe. European Trade Union Institute Working Paper 2018.05. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3198546
46.
VandenbergA (2006) Social-movement unionism in theory and in Sweden. Social Movement Studies5(2): 171–191.
47.
VisserJ (2019) Trade Unions in the Balance. Geneva: International Labour Organization (ILO) ACTRAV. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/actrav
48.
WaldkirchMBucherEKalumP, et al. (2021) Controlled by the algorithm, coached by the crowd—How HRM activities take shape on digital work platforms in the gig economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management32(12): 2643–2682.
49.
WebsterELudwigCMasikaneF, et al. (2021) Beyond traditional trade unionism: Innovative worker responses in three African cities. Globalizations18(8): 1363–1376.
50.
WoodAJGrahamMLehdonvirtaV, et al. (2019) Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society33(1): 56–75.
51.
WoodcockJ (2021) The Fight Against Platform Capitalism, An Inquiry into the Global Struggles of the Gig Economy. London: University of Westminster Press.
