GleesonDFrielS (2013) Emerging threats to public health from regional trade agreements. The Lancet381(9876): 1507–1509.
2.
GleesonDLexchinJLopertRet al. (2018) The Trans Pacific partnership agreement, intellectual property and medicines: Differential outcomes for developed and developing countries. Global Social Policy18(1): 7–27.
3.
HallPA (1997) The role of interests, institutions, and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrialized nations. In: LichbachMIZuckermanAS (eds) Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 174–207.
4.
HoldenCHawkinsB (2017) Law, market building and public health in the European Union. Global Social Policy18(1): 45–61.
5.
HuijtsTMcNamaraC (2018) Trade agreements, public policy and social inequalities in health. Global Social Policy18(1): 88–93.
6.
KoivusaloM (2014) Policy space for health and trade and investment agreements. Health Promotion International29(suppl. 1): i29–i47.
7.
KoivusaloMSchreckerTLabontéR (2009) Globalization and policy space for health and social determinants of health. In: LabontéRSchreckerTPackerCetal. (eds) Globalization and Health: Pathways, Evidence and Policy. New York: Routledge, pp. 105–130.
8.
LabontéRRuckertASchramA (2018) Trade, investment and the global economy: Are we entering a new era for health?Global Social Policy18(1): 28–44.
9.
McNamaraC (2018) Is trade policy the missing piece to a public health puzzle?Global Social Policy18(1): 81–87.
10.
SchramA (2017) When evidence isn’t enough: Ideological, institutional, and interest-based constraints on achieving trade and health policy coherence. Global Social Policy18(1): 62–80.
11.
WallsHBakerPParkhurstJ (2018) Addressing trade policy as a macro-structural determinant of health: The role of institutions and ideas. Global Social Policy18(1): 94–101.