The policy transfer/learning framework provides clues about the ideational sources of new institutional components such as the new unemployment insurance (UI) programme in Turkey. Yet it is not clear how ideas produced by transnational actors within different networks are conveyed to the national political landscape by transnational and/or domestic actors, and how these ‘travelling ideas’ are then operationalized at the national level. How do international organizations (IOs) get involved in the translation of travelling ideas, such as those which informed the design of Turkey’s UI scheme, into the national landscape? How did the domestic actors articulate and modify the ideas of IOs during the institutionalization process of Turkey’s UI programme? This article suggests that the ‘translation’ concept can provide further insights into better understanding the interaction between IOs and domestic actors that occurred during the introduction process of the UI scheme in Turkey.
AybarsITsarouhasD (2010) Straddling two continents: Social policy and welfare politics in Turkey. Social Policy and Administration44(6): 746–763.
3.
BaydurR (2004) İş Güvencesi. İstanbul: Doğan Yayıncılık.
4.
BélandD (2009) Ideas, institutions and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy16(5): 701–718.
5.
BislevSSalskov-IversenDHansenHK (2002) The global diffusion of managerialism: Transnational discourse communities at work. Global Society16(2): 199–212.
6.
CampbellJL (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
CzarniawskaBJoergesB (1996) Travel of ideas. In: CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 13–49.
8.
CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) (1996) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter.
9.
DeaconBHulseM (1997) The making of post-communist social policy: The role of international agencies. Journal of Social Policy26(1): 43–62.
10.
DeaconBHulsePStubbsM (1997) Global Social Policy. London: Sage.
11.
DervişKSelowskyMWallichCI (1995) The World Bank in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies5(2): 101–127.
12.
DjelicM (2008) Sociological studies of diffusion: Is history relevant?Socio-Economic Review6(3): 538–557.
13.
DjelicMLSahlin-AnderssonK (2006) A world of governance: The rise of transnational regulation. In: DjelicMLSahlin-AnderssonK (eds) Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–28.
14.
DolowitzDPMarshD (1996) Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies44(2): 343–357.
15.
DolowitzDPMarshD (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making. Governance13(1): 5–23.
16.
DostalJM (2004) Campaigning on expertise: How the OECD framed European Union welfare and labour market policies and why success could trigger failure. Journal of European Public Policy11(3): 440–460.
17.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Esping-AndersenG (1999) Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GrayV (1973) Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review67(4): 1141–1185.
21.
GrinvaldsH (2008) Lost in translation? OECD ideas and Danish labour market policy. In: MahonRMcBrideS (eds) The OECD and Transnational Governance. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 188–205.
22.
HaasPM (1992) Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization46(1): 1–36.
23.
HallP (1989) The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
HallP (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning and the state. Comparative Politics25(3): 275–296.
25.
HeperMSancarMS (1998) Is legal-rational bureaucracy a prerequisite for a rational- productive bureaucracy? The case of Turkey. Administration and Society30(2): 143–166.
26.
İİBK (1993) İstihdam ve Eğitim Projesi. Ankara: İş ve İşçi Bulma Kurumu Genel Müdürlüğü.
27.
ILO (1999) Decent Work Agenda. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
28.
JacobssonKNoakssonN (2010) From deregulation to flexicurity? The makeover of the OECD Job Strategy. In: MartensKJakobiAP (eds) Mechanisms of OECD Governance: International Incentives for National Policy Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–138.
29.
JacobyW (2007) Inspiration, coalition, and substitution: External influences on postcommunist transformations. World Politics58(4): 623–651.
30.
KeckMSikkinkK (1998) Activists beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
KerberWEckardtM (2007) Policy learning in Europe: The open method of co-ordination and laboratory federalism. Journal of European Public Policy14(2): 227–247.
32.
KogutBMacphersonJM (2008) The decision to privatize: Economists and the construction of ideas and policies. In: SimmonsBADobbinFGarrettG (eds) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 104–140.
33.
KorpiWPalmeJ (1998) The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review63(5): 661–687.
34.
LadiS (2005) Globalisation, Policy Transfer and Policy Research Institutes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
35.
McCrackenP (1977) Towards Full Employment and Price Stability. Paris: OECD.
36.
MahonR (2010) The OECD and transnational governance in action: The Jobs Strategy. Paper prepared for special issue of RIPE on the OECD. Draft March2010.
37.
Ministry of Labour (1992) İşsizlik Sigortası Tasarısı. Ankara: Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.
38.
Ministry of Labour (1995a) Sosyal Sigortalar Kanun Tasarısı. Ankara: Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.
39.
Ministry of Labour (1995b) İşsizlik Sigortası Tasarısı. Ankara: Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.
40.
Ministry of Labour (1996) İşsizlik Sigortası Tasarısı. Ankara: Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.
41.
Ministry of Labour (1999) İşsizlik Sigortası Tasarısı. Ankara: Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.
42.
MoğultayM (1992) Yeni Yasama Dönemi Sosyal Paketi. Ankara: Çalışma ve Sosyal Güvenlik Bakanlığı.
43.
NoakssonNJacobssonK (2003) The production of ideas and expert knowledge in OECD: The case of the OECD Jobs Strategy in contrast with the EU Employment Strategy. Score Research Report 7, Stockholm.
44.
OECD (1981) The Welfare State in Crisis: An Account of the Conference on Social Policies in the 1980s. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
45.
OECD (1993) Economic Surveys 1992–1993: Turkey. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
46.
OECD (1994) The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
47.
OECD (1996) Economic Surveys 1995–1996: Turkey. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
48.
OECD (2010) Benefits and Wages: OECD Indicators: Unemployment Benefits, Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
49.
ÖnişZ (1991) The evolution of privatization in Turkey: The institutional context of public enterprise reform. Journal of Middle East Studies23(2): 163–176.
50.
ÖnişZ (2004) Turgut Özal and his economic legacy: Turkish neo-liberalism in critical perspective. Middle Eastern Studies40(4): 113–134.
51.
PiersonP (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review94(2): 251–267.
52.
RadaelliCM (2003) The Europeanisation of public policy. In: FeatherstoneKRadaelliCM (eds) The Politics of Europeanisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–56.
53.
RoseR (1991) What is lesson-drawing?Journal of Public Policy10(1): 3–30.
54.
SabatierPA (1988) An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences21(2/3): 129–168.
55.
ŞensesF (1994) Labour market response to structural adjustment and institutional pressures: The Turkish case. METU Studies in Development21: 405–448.
56.
SPO (1990a) Beşeri Kaynakları ve İstihdamı Geliştirme Sistemleri Politika Dökümanı. Preliminary Draft, April1990. Ankara: DPT.
57.
SPO (1990b) Beşeri Kaynakları ve İstihdamı Geliştirme Sistemleri Politika Dökümanı: Strateji Analizi ve Aksiyon Planı. Ankara: DPT.
58.
StoneD (2000a) Learning Lessons, Policy Transfer and the International Diffusion of Policy Ideas. Warwick: Centre for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization.
59.
StoneD (2000b) Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes. Governance13(1): 45–70.
60.
StoneD (2004) Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy11(3): 545–566.
61.
TolbertPZuckerL (1983) Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly28(1): 22–39.
62.
VodopivecMWörgötterARajuD (2003) Unemployment Benefit Systems in Central and Eastern Europe: A Review of the 1990s. Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0310. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
63.
WalkerJL (1969) The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review63(3): 880–899.
64.
WeylandK (2007) Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
World Bank (1990) World Bank Development Report: Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
World Bank (1992) Staff Appraisal Report: Republic of Turkey Employment Project. Turkey: Turkey Country Department, Europe and Central Asia Region.
67.
World Bank (1993) Employment and Training Project-Loan Agreement. Turkey: Turkey Country Department, Europe and Central Asia Region.
68.
World Bank (1994) Staff Appraisal Report: Privatization Implementation Assistance and Social Safety Net Project. Turkey: Turkey Country Department, Europe and Central Asia Region.
69.
World Bank (1995) World Bank Development Report: Workers in an Integrating World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70.
World Bank (2006) Turkey Labour Market Study. Europe and Central Asia Region, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Unit.
