This article provides a brief comparison of the politics of old-age pension reform in two post-communist countries, Latvia and the Russian Federation. As Soviet successor states, both countries inherited similar pension systems from the former Communist system, a system which although comprehensive, proved to be costly and inefficient in the 1990s. In addition, pension reform proved to be politically unpopular in both countries. Yet Latvia has succeeded in adopting a relatively rapid and thorough pension reform, while in Russia efforts at pension reform were more contentious. The article examines the political factors that influenced the dynamics of reform in the two countries. In particular, Latvia's greater international orientation was important in influencing its government's commitment to pursue pension reform; Latvia's elites saw long-term benefits for sovereignty and national identity from pursuing reforms inspired by international influences, whereas Russian leaders tended to perceive few advantages from western-oriented reforms.
Andrew, C. (1984) ‘Women and the Welfare State’, Canadian Journal of Political Science17(4): 667–683.
2.
Austrian Central Statistical Office (1989) ‘Comparative Analysis of Social Expenditure and its Finance, Austria, Poland and USSR’, Moscow Central Laboratory of Social and Economic Measurement, Warsaw Research Centre for Statistical and Economic Analysis.
3.
Barrientos, A. (1995) ‘Pension Reform in Latin America’, Aging and Society15(3): 407–414.
4.
Baskakov, V. N. and Baskakova, M. E. (1998) O pensiiakh dlia muzhchin i zhenshchin [On Pensions for Men and Women]. Moscow: Moskovskii filosovskii fond.
5.
Baskakov, V. N. and Orlov, A. S. (1999) Pensionnaia reforma v Rossii: otsenka spetsialistov [Pension Reform in Russia: Evaluation of Specialists]. Moscow: Pensiia.
6.
Batygin, K. S. (1973) Sotsial'noe strakhovanie v SSSR [Social Insurance in the USSR]. Moscow: Profizdat.
7.
Berzinia, A. (1995) ‘Trekhstoronnyi konsul’tatsionnyi soviet: za podderzhku pensionnoi reformy’ [Trilateral Consultative Council in Support of Pension Reform], Diena (28 February): 1-1.
8.
Boreham, P., Hall, R. and Leet, M. (1996) ‘Labour and Citizenship: the Development of Welfare State Regimes’, Journal of Public Policy16(2): 203–227.
9.
Braun, A. (1999) ‘Pensionnyi vozrast uvelichat skoree’ [The Pension Age Will Soon Be Raised], Diena (6 August): 1–3.
10.
Callaghy, T. M. (1997) ‘Globalization and Marginalizations: Debt and the International Underclass’, Current History96(10): 392–396.
11.
Chandler, A. (1999) ‘The Origins of Post-Communist Russia's Pension Crisis, 1990–1993’, paper presented to the 31st National Convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies, St Louis, Missouri, 21 November.
12.
Charlton, R., McKinnon, R. and Konopielko, L. (1998) ‘Pensions Reform, Privatization and Restructuring in the Transition: Unfinished Business or Inappropriate Agendas’, Europe–Asia Studies50(8): 1413–1446.
13.
Chernykhovsky, S. (1999) ‘The Communist Party of the Russian Federation’, in M. Michael McFaul, N. Petrov and A. Ryabov with E. Reisch (eds) Primer on Russia's 1999 Duma Elections. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
14.
Commander, S. and Frye, T. (1999) ‘The Politics of Economic Reform’, in S. Fries, S. Commander, J. Hellman, M. Raiser, N. Stern and R. Lager (eds) Transition Report 1999: Ten Years of Transition.London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).
15.
Cook, L. J. (1993) The Soviet Social Contract and Why it Failed: Welfare Policy and Workers' Politics from Brezhnev to Yeltsin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Cook, L. J. and Orenstein, M. (1999) ‘The Return of the Left and its Impact on the Welfare State in Poland, Hungary and Russia’, in L. Cook, M. Orenstein and M. Rueschemeyer (eds) Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Csontos, L., Kornai, J. and Toth, I. G. (1998) ‘Tax Awareness and Reform of the Welfare State: Hungarian Survey Results', Economics of Transition6(2): 287–312.
18.
Deacon, B. (2000) ‘Eastern European Welfare States: the Impact of the Politics of Globalization’, Journal of European Social Policy10(2): 146–161.
19.
Deacon, B. and Hulse, M. (1997) ‘The Making of Postcommunist Social Policy: the Role of International Agencies', Journal of Social Policy26(2): 43–62.
20.
Deacon, B. with Hulse, M. and Stubbs, P. (1997) Global Social Policy: International Organizations and the Future of Welfare. London: Sage.
21.
De Castello Branco, M. (1998) ‘Pension Reform in the Baltics, Russia and other Countries of the former Soviet Union (BRO)’, Working Paper WP/98/11, International Monetary Fund.
22.
Dmitriev, M. (1996) ‘Sotsial’nye reformy i biudzhetnyi krizis v Rossiiskoi Federatsii’ [Social Reform and Budgetary Crisis in the Russian Federation], in A. Aslund and M. Dmitriev (eds) Sotsial’naia politika v period perekhoda k rynku: problemy i resheniia [Social Policy in the Transition to the Market: Problems and Solutions]. Moscow: Carnegie Center.
23.
Dmitriev, M. and Travina, D. Ia. (1998) Pensionnaia reforma v Rossii: prichiny, soderzhanie, perspektivy [Pension Reform in Russia: Reasons, Context, Future]. St Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo ‘Norma’.
24.
Dreifelds, J. (1996) Latvia in Transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Economist, The (2000) ‘Presidential Bets’, (22 April): 43.
26.
Egle, I. (1999) ‘Plany pravitel'stva sviazany s bol'shimi reformami’ [Government's Plan Linked to Major Reforms], Diena (15 July): 1–3.
27.
Elster, J., Offe, C. and Preuss, U. K. (1998) Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Erdmann, Y. (1998) ‘The Development of Social Benefits in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic since the System Transformation’, East European Quarterly32(3): 301–314.
29.
Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) (1996) Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. London: Sage.
30.
European Union PHARE Consensus Programme (1998) ‘Law on State Pensions’, 20 November, English translation. Latvia: Riga.
31.
Fazio, H. and Riesco, M. (1997) ‘The Chilean Pension Fund Associations’, New Left Review223: 90–101.
32.
Finnegan, W. (2000) ‘After Seattle: Anarchists get Organized’, New Yorker (17 April): 40–51.
33.
Fox, L. (1994) ‘Old Age Security in Transition Economies’, Policy Research Working Paper no. 1257, World Bank.
34.
Fox, L. and Palmer, E. (1999) ‘Latvian Pension Reform’, Social Policy Discussion Paper No. 9922, World Bank.
35.
Fronin, V. A. (2001) Vasha pensiia segodniia i v perspektive [Your Pension Today and in the Future], Bibliotechka Rossiiskaia gazeta 10.
36.
Frye, T. (1997) ‘A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies’, Comparative Political Studies30(5): 523–552.
37.
Gaivoronskii, K. (2000) ‘Slaby li prem’ery LR?’ [Are Latvia's Premiers Weak?], Kommersant Baltic1: 7-7.
38.
Gee, E. M. and McDaniel, S. A. (1991) ‘Pension Politics and Challenges: Retirement Policy Implications', Canadian Public Policy17(4): 456–472.
39.
Golovachov, V. (1998) ‘Juggling the Figures’, Trud (16 January): 2, translated in Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press 50(3): 15–16.
40.
Gomez, D. M. (ed.) (1999) Transnational Social Policies: the New Development Challenges of Globalization. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.
41.
Gotting, U. (1994) ‘Destruction, Adjustment and Innovation: Social Policy Transformation in Eastern and Central Europe’, 4(3): 181–200.
42.
Griffin Cohen, M. (1997) ‘From the Welfare State to Vampire Capitalism’, in P. M. Evans and G. R. Wekerle (eds) Women and the Canadian Welfare State: Challenges and Change. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
43.
Hardiman, M. and Midgley, J. (1989) The Social Dimensions of Development. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
44.
Hellman, J. S. (1998) ‘Winners Take All: The Politics of Reform in Postcommunist Transitions’, World Politics50(2): 203–234.
45.
Holzmann, R. (1989) ‘Pension Policies of OECD Countries: Background, Trends and Implications’, Journal of Public Policy9(4): 467–491.
46.
International Monetary Fund (1999) ‘Facts about IMF Lending to Russia’, accessed 12 July 2001, copy on file: http://www.imf.org/external/npluc/1999/091399.htm
47.
Ishiyama, J. T. (1997) ‘The Sickle or the Rose: Previous Regime Types and the Evolution of Ex-Communist Parties in Post-Communist Politics', Comparative Political Studies30(3): 299–330.
48.
Izmailov, P. (1999) ‘Profsoyuzy Daugavilsa: protiv uvelicheniia pensionnogo vozrasta’ [Trade Unions of Daugavpils: Against the Increase in Pension Age], Latgales Laiks (13 August): 1-1.
49.
Jacoby, W. (1999) ‘Priest or Penitent: the European Union as a Force in the Domestic Politics of Eastern Europe’, East European Constitutional Review8(1/2): 62–67.
50.
Johnson, S.C. (1999) ‘It's Referendum Time in Latvia, Again’, Baltic Times (October 7–13): 1–7.
51.
Koshkareva, T. and Narzikulov, R. (1997) ‘Zachem Rossii sobstvennoe pravitel'stvo?’ [Why Does Russia Need Its Own Government?], Nezavisimaia gazeta (18 December): 1–2.
52.
Kotov, G., Buzayev, V., Raihman, R. and Latvian Committee for Human Rights (1998) ‘Human Rights in Latvia in 1996’, Latvian Human Rights Quarterly (3/4): 48–53.
53.
Kuvshinov, V. and Nevskii, A. (1999) ‘Sotsial’noe strakhovanie v stranakh SNG’ [Social Insurance in the CIS Countries], Profsoyuzy1: 15–18.
54.
Lesser, B. (1999) ‘Latvia and EU Integration: a Conceptual Overview’, in B. Lesser (ed.) Latvia and the European Union. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Baltic Economic Management Training Program.
55.
Lieven, A. (1993) The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
Lochmele, N. (1999) ‘Dlia referenduma ne khvataet kvoruma’ [Failure to Reach a Quorum in the Referendum], Novyi Den’ (15 November): 1–3.
57.
Maltby, T. (1994) Women and Pensions in Britain and Hungary. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
58.
Matison, A. (1994) ‘Parafirovan ves’ paket dogovorov o vyvode iz Latvii rossiiskoi armii’ [The Entire Package of Withdrawal of the Russian Army from Latvia], Diena (16 March): 1-1.
59.
Mayhew, A. (1998) Recreating Europe: the European Union's Policy towards Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Millar, J.R. and Wolchik, S. (eds) (1994) The Social Legacy of Communism. New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.
61.
Narzikulov, R. (1997) ‘Slishkom bogatye rabotaiushchie pensionery’ [Working Pensioners are too Well-Off], Nezavisimaia gazeta (18 February): 1-1.
62.
Offe, C. (1993) ‘The Politics of Social Policy in the East European Transitions: Antecedents, Agents and Agenda of Reform’, Social Research60(4): 649–684.
63.
Orenstein, M. (1998) ‘A Genealogy of Communist Successor Parties in East-Central Europe and the Determinants of their Success’, East European Politics and Societies12(3): 472–499.
64.
Paul, S. and Paul, J. (1995) ‘The World Bank, Pensions and Income (In)security in the Global South’, International Journal of Health Services25(4): 697–726.
65.
Perraudin, W. R. M. (1994) ‘A Framework for the Analysis of Pension and Unemployment Benefit Reform in Poland’, Working Paper, International Monetary Fund, April.
66.
Pettai, V. and Kreuzer, M. (1999) ‘Party Politics in the Baltic States: Social Bases and Institutional Context’, East European Politics and Societies13(1): 148–190.
67.
PHARE Consensus Programme (1998) Social Protection in Latvia: Handbook and Dictionary. Copenhagen: PHARE.
68.
Pitruzello, S. (1997) ‘Social Policy Implementation of the Maastricht Fiscal Convergence Criteria: the Italian and French Attempts at Welfare and Pension Reforms’, Social Research64(4): 1589–1636.
69.
Przeworski, A. (1991) Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Remington, T.F. (1994) ‘Conclusion: Partisan Competition and Democratic Stability’, in T.F. Remington (ed.) Parliaments in Transition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
71.
Remmer, K. L. (1986) ‘The Politics of Economic Stabilization: IMF Standby Programs in Latin America, 1954–1984’, Comparative Politics19(1): 1–24.
72.
Republic of Latvia, Gosudarstvennoe buro po pravam cheloveka [State Bureau on Human Rights] (1998) ‘Doklad za 1997 g’ [Report for 1997]. Riga.
73.
Republic of Latvia, Central Electoral Commission (1999) ‘Results of 1999 Referendum, Kopciue rezultati’, http://saule.saeima.lv/cvkserv/balso/kopa.htm
74.
Republic of Latvia, Ministry of Welfare (1999) ‘1999 Social Report’. Riga: Ministry of Welfare.
75.
Resolution of the State Duma (1998) ‘O deistviiakh pravitel'stva RF ponormativnomu pravovomu reguliarovaniiu realizatsii zakona ot 21 iuliia 1997 ischisleniia i uvelicheniia gos. pensii’ [On the Russian Federation Government's Activity on the Normative Realization of the 24 July 1997 Law on Calculating and Increasing State Pensions], Veteran 8:6.
76.
Riazhskii, Y. (2001) ‘Poslednyi otchet’ (Interview with Minister of Labour and Social Development Aleksandr Pochinok), Moskovskii komsomolets (16 May): 2-2.
77.
Rimashevskaia, N. and Bochkareva, V. (1997) ‘Pensionnaia sistema: problemy i strategiia reform’ [The Pension System: Problems and Strategies of Reform], Svobodnaia mysl’5: 37–50.
78.
Rimashevskaia, N. and Bochkareva, V. (2001) ‘V interesakh bol'shinstva Rossiian? Podvodnye kamni pensionnoi reformy’ [In the Interest of Most Russians? Basic Steps of Pension Reform], Nezavisimaia gazeta (25 May): 12-12.
79.
Rose, R. and Makkai, T. (1995) ‘Consensus or Dissensus about Welfare in Post-Communist Societies', European Journal of Political Research28(16–22 May): 203–224.
80.
Rossiiskaia gazeta (1999) ‘Zashchita ot bednosti’ [Protection from Poverty], (9 July): 5.
81.
Rubezh, A. (1999) ‘Predstaviteli mestnogo ob’edineniia pensionerov v Rigu ne poedut’ [Representatives of Local Pensioners’ Associations will not go to Riga], Briva Daugava (3 August): 4-4.
82.
Rupnik, J. (2000) ‘Eastern Europe: The International Context’, Journal of Democracy11(2): 115–129.
83.
Rutkowski, M. (1998) ‘A New Generation of Pension Reform Conquers the East: a Taxonomy in Transition Economies’, Transition (August), World Bank. http://www.worldbank.org/html/prddr/trans/julaug98/rutkowski.htm
84.
Rys, V. (1993) ‘Social Security Reform in Central Europe: Issues and Strategies’, Journal of European Social Policy3(3): 163–175.
85.
Sajo, A. (1996) ‘How the Rule of Law Killed Hungarian Welfare Reform’, East European Constitutional Review5(1): 31–41.
86.
Skocpol, T. (1992) Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: the Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
87.
Sodupe, K. and Benito, E. (1998) ‘The Evolution of the European Union's TACIS Programme, 1991–96’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics14(4): 51–68.
88.
Soros, G. (2000) ‘Who Lost Russia?’, New York Review of Books47(6): 10–16.
89.
Stukuls, D. (1999) ‘Body of the Nation: Mothering, Prostitution and Women's Place in Postcommunist Latvia’, Slavic Review58(3): 537–558.
90.
Sysoyev, V. and Demyanov, D. (2001) ‘Inflation Uppermost in Cabinet's Mind’, Moscow News20: 3-3.
91.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1991) ‘Welfare State Regimes and Welfare Citizenship’, Journal of European Social Policy1(2): 93–105.
92.
Wedel, J. R. (1998) Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe 1989–1998. New York: St Martin's Press.
93.
Wong, L. (1998) Marginalization and Social Welfare in China. New York: Routledge.
94.
World Bank (1994) Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank with Oxford University Press.
95.
World Bank (1997) Report T–7157-RU, Technical Annex, Russian Federation, Social Protection Implementation Loan (10 September). Human Development Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region.
96.
World Bank (1998) ‘Russian Federation, Country Assistance Strategy Progress Report’, December. http://www.worldbank.org/html/pic/cas/casrus.htm
97.
Zakharov, M. L. and Piskov, V. M. (eds) (1972) Sotsial'noe obespechenie i strakhovanie v SSSR [Social Protection and Insurance in the USSR]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura.
98.
Zakharov, M. L. and Tuchkova, E. G. (eds) (1997) Prakticheskii i nauchnyi komentarii k zakonu RF ‘o gos. pensiiakh v RF’ [Practical and Scientific Commentary to the Russian Federation Law on State Pensions]. Moscow: Izdatel'stva BEK.
