Feminization has been and continues to be a characteristic of social work: it has played a role in the profession's lower status. Despite the similarities between feminism and social work, the profession tends to perpetuate systemic structures of gender inequality. These structural features can increase overload and burnout among female social workers. Our study applies the gender perspective to an analysis of the social work profession. It seeks to ascertain the level of burnout of female social workers in Aragon (Spain), the possible determinants that generate it and some preventive strategies identified in the discourse of professionals. We applied a sequential mixed method, combining a quantitative analysis of burnout via the distribution of questionnaires to a sample of 305 active social workers in Aragon (Spain), with the qualitative analysis of the discourse of 42 professionals in interviews and discussion groups. For the analysis, we followed the theoretical approach of communicative methodology.
Findings
This study concludes that there is a greater degree of burnout and workload among female professionals, a general underrepresentation of women in managerial positions, and a perception that their interventions are undervalued.
Applications
This work seeks to show some of the structural gender differences that still exist in the profession. In addition, from the understanding of the levels of burnout of female social workers as well as the structural and labour elements that can condition its appearance, this article aims to contribute to the approach to professional care in organizations from a gender perspective.
Alcázar-CamposA. (2014). Miradas feministas y/o de género al Trabajo Social, un análisis crítico. Portularia, XIV(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.5218/prts.2014.0003
3.
AtkinsonR.FlintJ. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, 33, 1–5.
4.
BáñezT. (2012). El Trabajo Social como profesión feminizada. RTS. Revista Treball Social, (195), 89–97.
5.
BeerO. W. J.PhillipsR.StepneyL.QuinnC. R. (2020). The feasibility of mindfulness training to reduce stress among social workers: A conceptual paper. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(1), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcz104
6.
BerasaluzeA. (2009). El devenir del Trabajo Social en clave de género. Zerbitzuan. Revista de Servicios Sociales, (46), 133–140.
7.
BerelsonB. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe III. Free Press.
8.
BericatE.SánchezE. (2008). Balance de la desigualdad de género en España. Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
9.
BlancoM.CalzadaI.Cubillos-VegaC.DomínguezA. B.GarcíaT.CarrascoC. L.Martín-EstalayoM.MurielM.SánchezR.SerranoA. (2022). IV Informe Sobre los Servicios Sociales en España y la Profesión de Trabajo Social. Consejo General del Trabajo Social.
10.
BravoJ. (2002). Trabajo social y burnout. Revista de Servicios Sociales y Política Social, 60, 137–158.
11.
BrotheridgeC. M.GrandeyA. A. (2002). Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of “people work”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1815
12.
Campos-VidalJ.CardonaJ.CuarteroM. (2017). Afrontar el desgaste: Cuidado y mecanismos paliativos de la fatiga por compasión. Alternativas. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, (24), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.14198/ALTERN2017.24.07
13.
Caravaca-SánchezF.Barrera-AlgarínE.Pastor-SellerE.Sarasola-Sánchez-SerranoJ. L. (2019). Prevalencia y factores de riesgo asociados al síndrome de burnout entre los profesionales del trabajo social en servicios sociales municipales en España. Trabajo Social Global, 9(17), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v9i17.8284
14.
Caravaca-SánchezF.CarriónJ.PastorE. (2018). Síndrome de burnout y satisfacción laboral en profesionales del trabajo social en prisiones de España. Revista Española de Sanidad Penitenciaria, 20(2), 40–46.
15.
DaveyB. (2002). Management progression and ambition: Women and men in. Research Policy and Planning, 20(2), 21–35.
16.
De la FuenteI. N.SánchezE. (2012). Trabajo social, síndrome de estar quemado por el trabajo y malestar psíquico: Un estudio empírico en una muestra de trabajadores sociales de la comunidad de Madrid. Portularia, 12(extra), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.5218/prts.2012.0013
17.
DeMauroA. A.JenningsP. A.CunninghamT.FontaineD.ParkH.SherasP. L. (2019). Mindfulness and caring in professional practice: An interdisciplinary review of quality research. Mindfulness, 10(10), 1969–1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01186-8
18.
DominelliL. (2002). Feminist social work theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
19.
Domínguez AlonsoJ.López CastedoA.Iglesias VaqueiroE. (2017). Prevalencia del síndrome de burnout en personal de centros de menores: Diferencia según su contexto sociolaboral. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 20(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2017.20.2.7
20.
European Commission. (2009). Gender segregation in the labour market. Publications Office of the European Union.
21.
Eyal-LublingR.Krumer-NevoM. (2016). Feminist social work: Practice and theory of practice. Social Work, 61(3), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/sww026
22.
FawcettB. (2022). Feminisms in social work and social care: Backwards, forwards or something in between. International Social Work, 66(3), 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728221095962
23.
Fernández-MontañoA. (2015). Trabajo social feminista: Una revisión teórica para la definición práctica. Trabajo Social Global - Global Social Work, 5(9), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v5i9.3299
24.
FlechaJ. R.VargasJ.DávilaA. (2004). Metodología comunicativa crítica en la investigación en ciencias sociales: La investigación Workaló. Lan Herremanak: Revista de Relaciones Laborales, II(11), 21–34.
25.
FombuenaJ. (2006). La influencia de la dimensión de género en el Trabajo Social. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social, 19, 133–154.
26.
GascónS.LeiterM.StrightN.SantedM. A.Montero-MarínJ.AndrésE.Asensio-MartínezE.García-CampayoJ. (2013). A factor confirmation and convergent validity of the “areas of worklife scale” (AWS) to Spanish translation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-63
27.
GómezJ.LatorreA.SánchezM.FlechaJ. R. (2006). Metodología comunicativa crítica. El Roure Editorial.
28.
Gómez GarcíaR.Alonso SangregorioM.Lucía Llamazares SánchezM. (2019). Factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS) in a sample of Spanish social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 45(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2018.1480549
29.
GrahamS. M.GrahamJ. R. (2016). Subjective well-being, mindfulness, and the social work workplace: Insight into reciprocal relationships. In HickS. (Ed.), Mindfulness and social work (pp. 103–120). Oxford University Press.
30.
GrauA.SuñerR. (2008). El síndrome de burnout en los trabajadores sociales. AGATHOS. Atención Sociosanitaria y Bienestar, 1, 16–22.
31.
GuaglianoneL.ParisiM. L. (2021). ¿Smartworking? La teoría de la doble carga de trabajo. Temas Laborales: Revista Andaluza de Trabajo y Bienestar Social, (159), 85–103.
32.
HeA. S.PhillipsJ. D.LizanoE. L.RienksS.LeakeR. (2018). Examining internal and external job resources in child welfare: Protecting against caseworker burnout. Child Abuse & Neglect, 81, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.04.013
33.
HendelD. D.HornA. S. (2008). The relationship between academic life conditions and perceived sources of faculty stress over time. Journal of the Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 17(1–2), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911350802165536
34.
HugmanR. (2005). New approaches in ethics for the caring professions: Taking account of change for caring professions. Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
Instituto de las Mujeres. Mujeres en cifras. (2021). Gobierno de España. https://www.inmujeres.gob.es/MujerCifras/Home.htm.
36.
JacksonK. (2014). Social worker self-care. The overlooked core competency. Social Work Today, 14(3), 14.
37.
KempS. P.BrandweinR. (2010). Feminisms and social work in the United States: An intertwined history. Affilia, 25(4), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384075
38.
KimH.JiJ.KaoD. (2011). Burnout and physical health among social workers: A three-year longitudinal study. Social Work, 56(3), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/56.3.258
39.
Lauve-MoonK. R.EnmanS.HentzV. (2020). Mainstreaming gender: An examination of feminist methodology in social work research. Social Work, 65(4), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa039
40.
LeeJ. J.MillerS. E. (2013). A self-care framework for social workers: Building a strong foundation for practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 94(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1606/1044-3894.4289
41.
LeiterM. P.MaslachC. (1999). Six areas of worklife: A model of the organizational context of burnout. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 21(4), 472–489.
42.
LeiterM. P.MaslachC. (2003). Areas of worklife: A structured approach to organizational predictors of job burnout. Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, 3(3), 91–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3555(03)03003-8
MaestreJ. M.GómezM. (2017). Comunidades sostenibles: Dilemas y retos desde el trabajo social. In LimaA. I.PastorE.VerdeC. (Eds), Trabajo emocional, cuidados y bienestar profesional de las trabajadoras sociales (pp. 1219–1227). Aranzadi - Thomson Reuters.
46.
MartinE. M.MyersK.BrickmanK. (2020). Self-preservation in the workplace: The importance of well-being for social work practitioners and field supervisors. Social Work, 65(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swz040
McGarrigleT.WalshC. A. (2011). Mindfulness, self-care, and wellness in social work: Effects of contemplative training. Journal of Religion and & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 30(3), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2011.587384
50.
MillerJ. J.LianekhammyJ.Grise-OwensE. (2018). Examining self-care among individuals employed in social work capacities: Implications for the profession. Advances in Social Work, 18(4), 1250–1266. https://doi.org/10.18060/22320
51.
NebredaM. I. (2019). El género del trabajo social: Una reconstrucción genealógica desde la perspectiva de género [Doctoral thesis]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
52.
Office for National Statistics. (2018) EMP, O. f. www.ons.gov.uk
53.
PlajaT. (2019). Un paso más en la investigación en trabajo social: Aportaciones de la metodología comunicativa crítica. International Jounal of Roma Studies, 1(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijrs.2019.4312
54.
ReynoldsV. (2011). Resisting burnout with justice-doing. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, (4), 27–45.
Roldán-GarcíaE.Leyra-FatouB.Contreras-MartínezL. (2012). Segregación laboral y techo de cristal en trabajo social: Análisis del caso español. Portularia, XII(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.5218/prts.2012.0043
57.
Ruiz-LarreaL. (2022). COVID-19 y desigualdad de género en España: Consecuencias de la pandemia para las mujeres en empleo y salud mental. Revista de Investigaciones Feministas, 13(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.77835
58.
SakamotoI.AnastasJ. W.McPhailB. A.ColarossiL. G. (2008). Status of women in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2008.200600103
59.
SöderfeldtM.SöderfeldtB.WargL. E. (1995). Burnout in social work. Social Work, 40(5), 638–646. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/40.5.638
60.
Soto-RosalesA.González-LosadaS. (2018). Satisfacción laboral y desgaste profesional en trabajadores de servicios sociales de atención a la infancia. Trabajo Social Global-Global Social Work, 8(14), 80–107. https://doi.org/10.30827/tsg-gsw.v8i14.7222
61.
TowerL. E.FaulA. C.Chiarelli-HelminiakC.HodgeD. M. (2019). The status of women in social work education: A follow-up study. Affilia, 34(3), 346–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109919836105
62.
VicenteE.ArredondoR.RodríguezC. (2019). III Informe sobre los servicios sociales en España. Consejo General del Trabajo Social.
63.
Vilà FalguerasM.Cruzate MuñozC.Orfila PernasF.Creixell SuredaJ.González LópezM.Davins MirallesJ. (2015). Burnout y trabajo en equipo en los profesionales de atención Primaria. Atención Primaria, 47(1), 25–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2014.01.008
