In response to historic and ongoing devaluation of certain people, and concurrently, the places they live, many communities are grappling with how to respond to place-based harms. This has produced a wide range of responses, such as calls for “Land Back,” reparations programs, arts-based neighborhood regeneration, and local history initiatives. This paper explores the potential roles community practitioners can play in these contested places. Drawing on a review of the literature, this paper offers an emerging typology for responding to place-based harms.
Findings:
The proposed typology includes six place-based approaches: Reparation, Remembrance, Regeneration, Resistance, Harm-Reduction, and Repatriation/Rematriation. The authors distinguish each approach by its target and temporal focus, common strategies, primary change agents, and vulnerabilities. While drawing on transdisciplinary scholarship, authors also describe social work's engagement with each approach.
Applications:
This emerging typology may assist social work practitioners, scholars, and students as they study and employ strategies for intervening in contested spaces. It also suggests areas for future research in conjunction with responses to place-based harms.
AlinskyS. (1971). Rules for radicals: A pragmatic primer for realistic radicals. Vintage Books.
2.
AndroffD. (2022). A U.S. truth and reconciliation commission: Social work’s role in racial healing. Social Work, 67(3), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swac018
BellF. M. (2021). Amplified injustices and mutual aid in the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative Social Work, 20(1–2), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325020973326
6.
BellF. M.DennisM. K.KringsA. (2019). Collective survival strategies and anti-colonial practice in ecosocial work. Journal of Community Practice, 27(3–4), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2019.1652947
7.
BilliotS.BeltránR.BrownD.MitchellF. M.FernandezA. (2019). Indigenous perspectives for strengthening social responses to global environmental changes: A response to the social work grand challenge on environmental change. Journal of Community Practice, 27(3–4), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F10705422.2019.1658677
8.
BoboK.KendallJ.MaxS. (2001). Organizing for social change: Midwest Academy manual for activists (4th ed.). Forum Press.
ChambersE. T. (2018). Roots for radicals: Organizing for power, action, and justice (2nd ed.). Continuum Press.
11.
CorburnJ.CurlS.ArredondoG. (2014). A health-in-all-policies approach addresses many of Richmond, California’s place-based hazards, stressors. Health Affairs, 33(11), 1905–1913. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0652
12.
DennisM. K.BellF. M. (2020). Indigenous women, water protectors, and reciprocal responsibilities. Social Work, 65(4), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa033
EvansS. D.KivellN.HaarlammertM.MalhotraK.RosenA. (2014). Critical community practice: An introduction to the special section. Journal for Social Action in Counseling and Psychology, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.6.1.1-15
15.
FarrugiaR.HayK. D. (2020). Women rapping revolution: Hip hop and community building in Detroit. University of California Press.
16.
FisherR. (1994). Let the people decide: Neighborhood organizing in America. Macmillan Reference USA.
17.
FursovaJ. (2018). The “business of community development” and the right to the city. Reflections on the neoliberalization process in urban community development. Community Development Journal, 53(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsw027
18.
GambleD.WeilM. (2010). Community practice skills: Local to global perspectives. Columbia University Press.
19.
GrayM.CoatesJ.Yellow BirdM.HetheringtonT. (2013). Decolonizing social work. Ashgate Publishing Company.
20.
GrayR. R. (2022). Rematriation: Ts’ msyen law, rights of relationality, and protocols of return. Native American and Indigenous Studies, 9(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1353/nai.2022.0010
GutiérrezL. M.GantL. M. (2018). Community practice in social work: Reflections on its first century and directions for the future. Social Service Review, 92(4), 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1086/701640
23.
GutiérrezL. M.LewisE. (1999). Empowering women of color. Columbia University Press.
24.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1707–1791. https://doi.orgy/10.2307/1341787 https://doi.org/10.2307/1341787
25.
IglesiasT. (2018). Threading the needle of fair housing law in a gentrifying city with a legacy of discrimination. Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Development, 27(1), 51–65.
JonesV. N.McElderryC. G. (2021). Social work and reparations: Applying a restorative justice approach. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 32(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/https://https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2021.1949774
28.
JonesV. N.McElderryC. G.ConnerL. R. (2022). Social workers’ attitudes towards reparations for African American descendants. Journal of Social Work, 22(4), 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173211037245
29.
KaimenC. M. (2016). Environmental justice and community based reparations. Seattle University Law Review, 39(4), 1327–1374.
30.
KringsA.CopicC. (2021). Environmental justice organizing in a gentrifying community: Navigating dilemmas of representation, issue selection, and recruitment. Families in Society, 102(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389420952247
31.
KringsA.KornbergD.LaneE. (2019). Organizing under austerity: How residents’ concerns became the Flint water crisis. Critical Sociology, 45(4–5), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920518757053
32.
KringsA.SchuslerT. M. (2020). Equity in sustainable development: Community responses to environmental gentrification. International Journal of Social Welfare, 29(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12425
33.
KringsA.ThomasH. (2018). Integrating green social work and the US environmental justice movement: An introduction to community benefits agreements. In DominelliL. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of green social work (pp. 397–406). Routledge.
34.
LipsitzG. (2018). Conjuring sacred space in gulf coast cities. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 86(2), 497–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfx087
35.
LockhartP.H. (2019, June 20). America is having an unprecedented debate about reparations: What comes next? Vox. https://https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/6/20/18692949/congress-reparations-slavery-discrimination-hr-40-coates-glover
36.
MacLeodM. A.EmejuluA. (2014). Neoliberalism with a community face? A critical analysis of asset-based community development in Scotland. Journal of Community Practice, 22(4), 430–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2014.959147
37.
MalkaM. (2022). Teaching note - Creative place making: An interdisciplinary point between social work and art studies. Journal of Social Work Education, 58(3), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2021.1942351
38.
ManningB. R. M. (2011). Trust in the land: New directions in tribal conservation. University of Arizona Press.
39.
MarkusG. B.KringsA. (2020). Planning, participation, and power in a shrinking city: The Detroit Works Project. Journal of Urban Affairs, 42(8), 1141–1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1779009
40.
MasogaM. A.ShokaneA. L. (2019). Viewpoint: Indigenous knowledge systems and environmental social work education: Towards environmental sustainability. South African Journal of Environmental Education, 35(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v35i1.14
41.
McBayA. (2019). Full spectrum resistance, Volume one: Building movements and fighting to win. Seven Stories Press.
42.
MerjianA. H. (2010). An unbroken chain of injustice: The Dawes Act, Native American Trusts, and Cobell v. Salazar. Gonzaga Law Review, 46(3), 609–658.
43.
MilesS.PaddisonR. (2005). Introduction: The rise and rise of culture-led urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107508
44.
MoultonA. A. (2021). Black monument matters: Place based commemoration and abolitionist memory work. Sociology Compass, e12944. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12944
NissenL. B. (2019). Art and social work: History and collaborative possibilities for interdisciplinary synergy. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(6), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731517733804
Portland Housing Bureau. (2019). State of housing in Portland. City of Portland. https://www.portland.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/phb-soh-2019-web.pdf
49.
PurbrickL.AulichJ.DawsonG. (2007). Contested spaces: Sites, representations, and histories of conflict. Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
QuimboM. T.ParezJ. M.TanF. O. (2018). Community development approaches and methods: Implications for community development practice and research. Community Development, 49(5), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1546199
51.
RahderB.McLeanH. (2013). Other ways of knowing your place: Immigrant women’s experience of public space in Toronto. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 22(1), 145–166. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26193930
52.
RameauM. (2008). Take back the land: Land, gentrification and the Umoja village shantytown. Nia Publishing.
53.
RamirezM. M. (2020). Take the houses back/take the land back: Black and indigenous urban futures in Oakland. Urban Geography, 41(5), 682–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1736440
54.
ReischM. (2018). Social policy and social justice: Meeting the challenges of a diverse society (3rd Ed..). Cognella Academic Publishing.
55.
Roht-ArriazaN. (2004). Reparations, decisions, and dilemmas. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 27(2), 157–219.
56.
SawyerJ.BradyS. (2020). A framework for analyzing, developing, and applying community practice interventions. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 47(3), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.15453/0191-5096.4198
57.
SawyerJ.ColesD. C. (2020). Strengths perspective in critical macro practice: Tentative guidance for strengths-based policy, organizational, and community transformation. In AttwoodJ.MendenhallA.CoreyM. M. (Eds), Rooted in strengths: 30 years of strengths perspective in social work (pp. 131–148). University of Kansas Press.
SmithA. (2012). Indigeneity, settler colonialism, white supremacy. In HoSangD. M.LaBennettO.PulidoL. (Eds), Racial formation in the twenty-first century (pp. 66–90). University of California Press.
60.
SwedbergR. (2018). How to use Max Weber’s ideal type in sociological analysis. Journal of Classical Sociology, 18(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X17743643
61.
TeixeiraS.KringsA. (2015). Sustainable social work: An environmental justice framework for social work education. Social Work Education, 34(5), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1063601
62.
ThurberA. (2019). The Neighborhood Story Project: A practice model for fostering place attachments, social ties, and collective action. Journal of Prevention and Intervention, 49(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2019.1633072
63.
ThurberA.BatesL. K.HalversonS. (2021). Can preference policies advance racial justice and wellbeing in gentrifying neighborhoods?Journal of Community Practice, 29(4), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2021.1992557
64.
ThurberA.ChristianoJ. (2019). Confronting gentrification: Can creative interventions help people keep more than just their homes?Engaged Scholar Journal, 5(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v5i2.68338
65.
ThurberA.KringsA.MartinezL. S.OhmerM. (2021). Resisting gentrification: The theoretical and practice contributions of social work. Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319861500
TopolářováE. (2020). Creating constitutive solidarity in Seattle: Praxis between Duwamish tribe and the Real Rent Duwamish movement. Identity, 20(4), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2020.1842209
68.
TuckE.YangK. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
69.
TysiachnioukM. S.HorowitzL. S.KorkinaV. V.PetrovA. N. (2021). Indigenous-led grassroots engagements with oil pipelines in the US and Russia: The NoDAPL and Komi movements. Environmental Politics, 30(6), 895–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1851534
