A modified e-Delphi study was conducted to identify the core competencies required by social workers for disaster management in China. A list of competencies was compiled through an integrative review and in-depth interviews. We then conducted a three-round e-Delphi survey with 25 experts including social work practitioners and academics, government officials and other professionals. After a 4-month period of data collection and analysis, we proposed a specific social work competence framework for disaster management in the unique context of China.
Findings
A total of 87 competencies were identified and categorised into knowledge, values and skills needed for the mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery phases of disaster management (a total of 15 categories). Through a further thematic analysis, we identified four interconnected themes related to disaster resilience building and social justice in various phases.
Applications
This ground-breaking competence framework can inform Chinese social work practice and training in disaster management, thus enabling social workers to better identify their specific professional roles and tasks in disaster contexts. The framework can also enhance transdisciplinary collaboration among social workers and the various disaster management stakeholders, and can also be of value when developing social work core competencies outside of China.
AlstonM.HazelegerT.HargreavesD. (2019). Social work and disasters: A handbook for practice. Routledge.
2.
AnQ.WuS.ChapmanM. V.WuQ. (2017). Culture and context in Chinese field supervision: A case study from Shanghai. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 27(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2016.1275981
3.
BakerJ.LovellK.HarrisN. (2006). How expert are the experts? An exploration of the concept of “expert” within Delphi panel techniques. Nurse Researcher, 14(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2006.10.14.1.59.c6010
4.
BarriosM.GuileraG.NuñoL.Gómez-BenitoJ. (2021). Consensus in the delphi method: What makes a decision change?Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 163, 120484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120484
5.
BolgerF.WrightG. (2011). Improving the Delphi process: Lessons from social psychological research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1500–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.007
6.
BoodramC. A. S.JohnsonE. J. (2016). Environmental health hazards on industrial disasters: A study on how to achieve community-level social support. Natural Hazards, 84(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2410-1
7.
ChalmersJ.ArmourM. (2019). The Delphi technique. In LiamputtongP. (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 715–735). Springer.
8.
ChillerP.CrispB. R. (2012). Professional supervision: A workforce retention strategy for social work?Australian Social Work, 65(2), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.625036
9.
Council on Social Work Education. (CSWE) (2015). 2015 Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards. CSWE.
DominelliL. (1996). Deprofessionalizing social work: Anti-oppressive practice, competencies and postmodernism. The British Journal of Social Work, 26(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011077
12.
DominelliL. (2012). Social work education for disaster relief work. In GreyM.CoatesJ.HetheringtonT. (Eds), Environmental social work (pp. 280–297). Routledge.
13.
DominelliL. (2015). The opportunities and challenges of social work interventions in disaster situations. International Social Work, 58(5), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815598353
DroletJ. L. (2019). Rebuilding Lives Post-Disaster. Oxford University Press.
16.
GillespieD.DansoK. (2010). Disaster Concepts and Issues: A Guide for Social Work Education and Practice. Council on Social Work Education.
17.
GrayM. (2005). Dilemmas of international social work: Paradoxical processes in indigenisation, universalism and imperialism. International Journal of Social Welfare, 14(3), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2005.00363.x
KamP. K. (2014). Back to the ‘social’ of social work: Reviving the social work profession’s contribution to the promotion of social justice. International Social Work, 57(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812447118
22.
KuH. B.MaY. N. (2015). ‘Rural–Urban Alliance’as a new model for post-disaster social work intervention in community reconstruction: The case in Sichuan, China. International Social Work, 58(5), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815583073
23.
LeeY. F.AltschuldJ. W.LeeL. S. (2012). Essential competencies for program evaluators in a diverse cultural context. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(4), 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.01.005
24.
LiuY.YinK.ChenL.WangW.LiuY. (2016). A community-based disaster risk reduction system in Wanzhou, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 19, 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.09.009
25.
LixinY.LinglingG.DongZ.JunxueZ.ZhanwuG. (2012). An analysis on disasters management system in China. Natural Hazards, 60(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0011-6
26.
LymberyM. E. (2003). Negotiating the contradictions between competence and creativity in social work education. Journal of Social Work, 3(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017303003001007
27.
MaglajlicR. A. (2019). Organisation and delivery of social services in extreme events: Lessons from social work research on natural disasters. International Social Work, 62(3), 1146–1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872818768387
28.
ManningC.MillarS.NewtonT.WebbS. (2007). After the wave-the centrelink social work response offshore. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 5(3-4), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1300/j198v05n03_05
29.
MathborG.BourassaJ. (2012). Disaster management and humanitarian action. In LyonsK.HokenstadT.PawarM.HueglerN.HallN. (Eds), The SAGE handbook of international social work (pp. 294–310). Sage Publications Ltd.
30.
MoY. H.LeungT. L.TsuiM. S. (2019). Chaos in order: The evolution of social work supervision practice in the Chinese Mainland. The Clinical Supervisor, 38(2), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2019.1610681
NobleC.IrwinJ. (2009). Social work supervision: An exploration of the current challenges in a rapidly changing social, economic and political environment. Journal of Social Work: JSW, 9(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017309334848
34.
PylesL. (2017). Decolonising disaster social work: Environmental justice and community participation. British Journal of Social Work, 47(3), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw028
35.
RowlandsA. (2013). Social work training curriculum in disaster management. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 12(1-2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2013.784602
36.
SheldonB.ChilversR. (2000). Evidence-based social care: a study of prospects and problems. Russell House.
37.
SimT.DominelliL.LauJ. (2017). A pathway to initiate bottom-up community-based disaster risk reduction within a top-down system: The case of China. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 7(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V7-N3-283-293
38.
SimT.HeM.ChenH.YangW. (2023). Roles and Tasks of Social Workers in Chinese Disaster Management. The British Journal of Social Work, 53(1), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac110
39.
SimT.HeM.DominelliL. (2022). Social work core competencies in disaster management practice: An integrative review. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211055427
40.
SimT.KiY.-T. W.QuenA.DongC. H.HQ. (2013). Rising to the occasion: Disaster social work in China. International Social Work, 56(4), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/002087281
41.
SimT.LauJ.CuiK.WeiH. (2019a). Post-disaster psychosocial capacity building for women in a Chinese rural village. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,10(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019
42.
SimT.LauJ.YoungJ.CuiK. (2019b). Initiating transdisciplinary research in China: A case study. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 22(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2019.22.556080
43.
Stone FishL.BusbyD. M. (2005). The Delphi method. In SprenkleD. H.PiercyF. P. (Eds), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 238–253). The Guilford Press.
44.
TaylorW.WhiteS. (2000). Practising reflexivity in health and welfare: making knowledge. Open University Press.
TrevithickP. (2012). Social work skills and knowledge: A practice handbook (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
47.
TsuiM. (2005). Social work supervision: contexts and concepts. Sage.
48.
TurnerR.SchoenebergC.RayD.LinY. W. (2020). Establishing play therapy competencies: A Delphi study. International Journal of Play Therapy, 29(4), 177. https://doi.org/10.1037/pla0000138
49.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (UNDRR) (2017). Terminology, www.undrr.org/terminology.
50.
van HouwelingenC. T.MoermanA. H.EttemaR. G.KortH. S.Ten CateO. (2016). Competencies required for nursing telehealth activities: A Delphi-study. Nurse Education Today, 39, 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.025
51.
WangX.LumT. Y. (2013). Role of the professional helper in disaster intervention: Examples from the Wenchuan Earthquake in China. Journal of Social Work in Disability & Rehabilitation, 12(1-2), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536710X.2013.784600
52.
WangZ.LiuJ.XuN.FanC.FanY.HeS.JiaoL.MaN. (2019). The role of indigenous knowledge in integrating scientific and indigenous knowledge for community-based disaster risk reduction: A case of Haikou Village in Ningxia, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 41, 101309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101309
Wu (2021). Integration of the disaster component into social work curriculum: Teaching undergraduate social work research methods course during COVID-19. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(5), 1799–1819. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab110
55.
WuY.WenJ.WeiH. (2019). ‘Community-centred’ as an integrated model for post-disaster social work-the case of earthquake-stricken ludian, China. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 29(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2019.1567379
56.
XuB. (2017). The politics of compassion: the Sichuan Earthquake and civic engagement in China. Stanford University Press.
57.
ZhangX.HuangY.LiM. (2011). Collaboration on disaster prevention education curriculum development project and its implications for social work. China Journal of Social Work, 4(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2011.589497
58.
ZhangX.YiL.ZhaoD. (2013). Community-based disaster management: A review of progress in China. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 2215–2239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0471-3
59.
ZhongK.LuX. (2014). “One in trouble, all to help”: The paired assistance program to disaster-affected areas in China. In BrassardC.A.HowittD.Giles (Eds.), Natural disaster management in the Asia-pacific (pp. 87–100). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55157-7_6
60.
ZhongK.LuX. (2018). Exploring the administrative mechanism of China's paired assistance to disaster affected areas programme. Disasters, 42(3), 590–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12262
