Although numerous studies have quantitatively examined the different aspects of supervision, such as satisfaction in clinical and student supervision, empirical evidence on current practices in the supervision of protective services is limited. The present study explored barriers that protective social workers and their supervisors (line managers) face with respect to supervisory support. Moreover, the perceived challenges related to supervision were identified. The participants were recruited from public and private protective service organizations across Taiwan. In-depth interviews were conducted by the authors on 10 social workers and 10 supervisors.
Findings
Through the analysis of the transcripts, four themes were identified: emotional responses, knowledge components, modeling of values and creation of a culture of equality, and tensions related to supervisory accountability. Exploring protective social workers and supervisors’ perspectives on supervision is essential for understanding the complex needs of these employees.
Applications
The present findings fill the research gap on the supervision of protective services and constitute a foundation for future studies on this subject. The findings contribute to the literature on the supervision of protective services, which is beginning to address issues concerning supervisees’ emotional responses, supervisory knowledge, supervisor–supervisee relationships, and supervisory accountability. Potential limitations of the study were also discussed.
AdamsJ. (2007). Managing people in organisations: Contemporary theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
2.
BeddoeL. (2015). Continuing Education, Registration and Professional Identity in New Zealand Social Work. International Social Work, 58(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872812473139
3.
BeddoeL.DavysA. (2016). Challenges in professional supervision: Current themes and models for practice. Jessica Kingsley.
4.
Ben-PoratA.ItzhakyH. (2009). Implications of Treating Family Violence for the Therapist: Secondary Traumatization, Vicarious Traumatization, and Growth. Journal of Family Violence, 24(7), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-00992490
5.
Ben-PoratA.ItzhakyH. (2011). The Contribution of Training and Supervision to Perceived Role Competence, Secondary Traumatization, and Burnout among Domestic Violence Therapists. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.566089
6.
CarasA.SanduA. (2014). The Role of Supervision in Professional Development of Social Work Specialists. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2012.763024
7.
ChenS. F.ShyuS. S. (2016). An Analysis of the Supervisor Evaluation of Counseling Psychology Interns in the Supervisory Process. Journal of Criminology Journal of Counseling Psychology & Rehabilitation Counseling, 29(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.6308/JCPRC
8.
HairH. J. (2013). The Purpose and Duration of Supervision, and the Training and Discipline of Supervisors: What Social Workers say They Need to Provide Effective Services. British Journal of Social Work, 43(8), 1562–1588. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs071
9.
HanL. N.YuM. K. (2019). Seeking the Distance Between Disempowerment and Empowerment: Research on the Experiences of Empowerment During the Supervision for the Medical Social Workers. Social Policy & Social Work, 23(1), 91–136. https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.201912_23(2).0003
10.
HuangY. Y. (2009). A Preliminary Study of Worked-Related Violence Against Front-Line Social Workers in Statutory Child Protection Agencies: A Perspective of Power. Taiwanese Social Work, 6(1), 80–118. https://doi.org/10.29814/TSW.200901.0003
11.
HuntS.GoddardC.CooperJ.LittlechildB.WildJ. (2016). ‘If I Feel Like This, how Does the Child Feel?’ Child Protection Workers, Supervision, Management and Organizational Responses to Parental Violence. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2015.1073145
12.
KadushinA.HarknessD. (2014). Supervision in social work (3rd ed..). Columbia University Press.
13.
LianT. T.ShenC. T. (2014). An Outcome Evaluation on Protective Service for Victims of Intimate Partner Violence. Asian Journal of Domestic Violence and Sexual Offense, 10(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.29804/AJDVSO
14.
LiaoM. Y. (2018). Abused Women in Taiwan who Seek Religious Support. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought. 37(3), 254–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2018.1461044
15.
LiaoM. Y. (2019). Integrating Body–Mind–Spirit Services Used by Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence: A Case Study in Taiwan. International Social Work, 62(2) 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817732378
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
18.
LiuY. L. (2014). Supervisory Relationship of Protective Social Work in Positive Perspective. Taiwanese Social Work, 13(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.29814/TSW
19.
LoweT. B. (2011). Practitioners’ Risk Exposure to Client Violence: A Test of Gender-Sensitive Case Assignment among Supervisors. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.564952
20.
NobleC.IrwinJ. (2009). Social Work Supervision: An Exploration of the Current Challenges in a Rapidly Changing Social, Economic and Political Environment. Journal of Social Work, 9(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017309334848
21.
O’DonoghueK.TsuiM. S. (2013). Social Work Supervision Research (1970–2010): The way we Were and the way Ahead. British Journal of Social Work, 45(2), 616–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/BJSW/BCT115
22.
PartonN. (2014). Social Work, Child Protection and Politics: Some Critical and Constructive Reflections. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 2042–2056. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu091
23.
PattonM. Q. (2017). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage.
24.
ShenC. H. (2009). The Study of Practical Barriers of Social Workers for Marital Violence. Social Policy & Social Work, 13(1), 87–142. https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.200912.0087
25.
ShenC. H.LaiN. J (2013). The Study of Role Transition of Novice Social Work Supervisors in Marital Violence Treatment. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 26(1), 215–248. https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201306_26(2).0002
26.
ShierM. L.TurpinA.NicholasD.GrahamJ. R. (2021). Supervisor–Worker Relationship Dynamics for Workplace Violence Prevention in Public Sector Human Service Organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 45(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2021.1891169
27.
ShulmanL. P. (2010). Interactional supervision (3rd ed..). NASW Press.
28.
SudlandC. (2020). Challenges and Dilemmas Working with High-Conflict Families in Child Protection Casework. Child & Family Social Work, 25(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12680
29.
ThamP. (2018). A Professional Role in Transition: Swedish Child Welfare Social Workers’ Descriptions of Their Work in 2003 and 2014. British Journal of Social Work, 48(2), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx016
30.
TracyS. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed..). John Wiley & Sons.
31.
TsaiS. L. (2012). The Critical Factors in the Development of Supervisory Working Alliance: Perspectives of Supervisors and Supervisees. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(3), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20101020
32.
TuressonA. B. (2020). Conceptions, Norms, and Values in the Work of Child Protective Services with Families at Risk: An Analysis of Social Workers’ Diaries. Clinical Social Work Journal, 48(3), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-019-00720-4
33.
WangS. Y.SuY. R. (2010). The gap Between Ideal Social Work Supervision and Practice: Differing Supervisor and Supervisee Perspectives at Public Domestic Violence Prevention Centers. Taiwanese Social Work, 9(1), 41–84. https://doi.org/10.29814/TSW.201007.0002
34.
WooS. (2013). Development and Validation of a Supervisory Relationship Scale. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 38(1), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.7082/CJGC
35.
YuM. K.LiaoM. Y., (2020). Taiwanese Protective Social Workers Meeting Elected Representatives: Perspectives of Protective Social Workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 46(4), 571–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2019.1612818
36.
ZahavR. R. E.RefaeliT.ShemeshS.GottliebS.Ben-PoratA. (2020). Supervision Satisfaction among Social Work Students in Israel: Supervision Components, Peer Support, and Trauma-Related Factors. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(8), 884–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731520936755
37.
ZurbriggenE. L. (2011). Preventing Secondary Traumatization in the Undergraduate Classroom: Lessons from Theory and Clinical Practice. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 3(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00249
