Domestic and family violence remains a significant challenge to family wellbeing. The risk of serious harm from domestic and family violence is disproportionally carried by women and children, yet often the complex reality of family life means that many families have ongoing contact with their abusers. Responses to this problem are frequently siloed across child protection and specialist domestic violence services, leading to a lack of holistic intervention. More recently, there has been increased attention on addressing the role and behavior of abusive fathers, especially where fathers remain in families or have ongoing contact postseparation through coparenting. This paper offers a systemic approach for understanding and addressing such amilies.
Findings
An integrated theoretical framework is proposed, which draws together key tenets of feminism, family violence, and intersectional theories within a systems-oriented model. It frames families, inclusive of fathers, within their eco-social contexts, highlighting factors that exacerbate domestic and family violence, and those that increase family safety, which has strong applications for social work practice.
Applications
An integrated theoretical framework offers an approach for social workers for understanding domestic and family violence in a broad-based and holistic manner, and for developing coordinated family focused interventions while concurrently addressing related child welfare concerns and family safety. A range of considerations for case management of families are explored, which, while relevant to most intact families or those who have continuing contact with perpetrators, holds particular relevance for marginalized families that present with complex needs and experiences of disadvantage.
Al’UqdahS. N.MaxwellC.HillN. (2016). Intimate partner violence in the African American community: Risk, theory, and interventions. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9819-x
BabcockJ. C.CanadyB. E.SeniorA.EckhardtC. I. (2005). Applying the transtheoretical model to female and male perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Gender differences in stages and processes of change. Violence & Victims, 20(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667005780905588
BrownJ.JamesK. (2014). Therapeutic responses to domestic violence in Australia: A history of controversies. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667005780905588
7.
BrownridgeD. A.TailieuT.AfifiT.ChanK. L.EmeryC.LavoieJ.ElgarF. (2017). Child maltreatment and intimate partner violence amongst indigenous and non-indigenous Canadians. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9880-5
8.
CallaghanJ. E.AlexanderJ. H.SixsmithJ.FellinL. C. (2018). Beyond “witnessing”: Children’s experiences of coercive control in domestic violence and abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(10), 1551–1581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515618946
9.
ChoS.CrenshawK. W.McCallL. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications and praxis. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
10.
CrenshawK., (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
11.
CrowleyL. (2017). Domestic violence perpetrator programmes in Ireland: Intervention required. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 31, 291–310. https://doi-org/10.1093/lawfam/ebx010
DayA.BowenE. (2015). Offending competency and coercive control in intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 20, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.12.004
14.
EastealP.YoungL.CarlineA. (2018). Domestic violence and property law. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 32(2), 204–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/eby005
15.
EckhardtC.Holtzworth-MunroeA.NorlanderB.SibleyA.CahillM. (2008). Readiness to change, partner violence subtypes, and treatment outcomes among men in treatment for partner assault. Violence and Victims, 23(4), 446–475. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.23.4.446
16.
FeatherstoneB.FraserC. (2012). Working with fathers around domestic violence: Contemporary debates. Child Abuse Review, 21, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2221
FriedmanB. D.AllenK. M. (2014). Systems theory. In J. R. Brandell (Ed.), Essentials of clinical social work (1st ed., pp. 3–20). ResearchGate, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1132.9281
Graham-KevanN. (2007). Domestic violence: Research and implications for batterer programs in Europe. European Journal of Criminal Policy Research, 13, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-007-9045-4
21.
HearnJ. (2012). A multi-faceted power analysis of men’s violence to known women: From hegemonic masculinity to the hegemony of men. The Sociological Review, 60, 589–610https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02125.x
22.
HeiseL.L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4(3), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780 1298004003002
23.
HerrenkohlT. I.SousaC.TajimaE.HerrenkohlR. C.MoylanC. A. (2008). Intersection of child abuse and children’s exposure to domestic violence. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 9(2), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838008314797
24.
Heward-BelleS.LaingL.HumphreysC.ToivonenC. (2018). Intervening with children living with domestic violence: Is the system safe?Australian Social Work, 71(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2017. 1422772
HumphreysC.DiemerK.BornemiszaA.Spiteri-StainesA.KaspiewR.HorsfallB. (2019). More present than absent: Men who use domestic violence and their fathering. Child and Family Social Work, 24, 321–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12617
31.
HumphreysC.HealeyL.KirkwoodD.NicholsonD. (2018). A differential response through multi-agency collaboration. Australian Social Work, 71(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12617
32.
JewkesR.FloodM.LangJ. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385, 1580–1588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61683-4
KellyL.WestmarlandN. (2016). Naming and defining “domestic violence”: Lessons from research with violent men. Feminist Review, 112, 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.52
38.
KimballE. (2016). Edleson revisited: Reviewing children’s witnessing of domestic violence 15 years later. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9786-7
LawsonJ. (2012). Sociological theories of intimate partner violence. Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, 22(5), 572–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2011.598748
41.
Lilley-WalkerS.HesterM.TurnerW. (2018). Evaluation of European domestic violence perpetrator programmes: Toward a model for designing and reporting evaluations related to perpetrator treatment interventions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(4), 868–884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X16673853
MandelD. (2010). Child welfare and domestic violence: Tackling the themes and thorny questions that stand in the way of collaboration and improvement of child welfare practice. Violence Against Women, 16(5), 530–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210366455
44.
MayerA. G. (2017). Intervening with couples experiencing domestic violence: Development of a systemic framework. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 38, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1217
45.
McGoldrickM.CarterB.Garcia-PretoN. (Eds) (2013). The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family, and social perspectives (4th ed.). Pearson.
46.
McGregorH. (1990). Conceptualising male violence against female partners: Political implications of therapeutic responses. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 11(2), 65–70.
47.
MeyerS. (2017). Motivating perpetrators of domestic and family violence to engage in behaviour change: The role of fatherhood. Child and Family Social Work, 23(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.111/cfs.12388
MurrellA. R.ChristoffK. A.HenningK. R. (2007). Characteristics of domestic violence offenders: Associations with childhood exposure to violence. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-007-9100-4
50.
NixonJ.HumphreysC. (2010). Marshalling the evidence: Using intersectionality in the domestic violence frame. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 17(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxq003
O’LearyP.DayA.FosterG.ChungD. (2009). Resistant or ready? The challenges of male readiness for offender programs. In DayA. (Ed.), Domestic violence: Working with men—research, practice and experiences and integrated responses (pp. 168–182). Federation Press.
53.
PelsT.van RooijF. B.DistelbrinkM. (2015). The impact of intimate partner violence (IPV) on parenting by mothers within an ethnically diverse population in Netherlands. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9746-2
54.
PhillipsR. (2006). Undoing an activist response: Feminism and the Australian government’s domestic violence policy. Critical Social Policy, 26(1), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018306059771
Queensland Centre for Domestic and Family Violence Research (2018). Domestic and family violence and its relationship to child protection: Practice paper, Central Queensland University.
RadatzD. L.WrightE. M. (2016). Integrating the principles of effective intervention into batterer intervention programming: The case for moving towards more evidence-based programming. Trauma, Violence & Abuse17(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838014566695
59.
RendellK.RathusZ.LynchA. (2000). An unacceptable risk: A report on child contact arrangements where there is violence in the family. Women’s Legal Service.
60.
RosaM.TudgeJ. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12022
61.
Safe and Together Institute (2016). Engaging domestic violence perpetrators: Invisible practices participant guide.
62.
ScottK. L.CrooksC. V. (2007). Preliminary evaluation of an intervention program for maltreating fathers. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 7(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/brief-treatment/mhm007
63.
ShawE.BourisA.PyeS. (1996). The family safety model: A comprehensive strategy for working with domestic violence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 17(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1467-8438.1996.tb01088.x
64.
SmithJ.HumphreysC. (2019). Child protection and fathering where there is domestic violence: Contradictions and consequences. Child and Family Social Work, 24, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12598
65.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005a). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender: Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalised women in diverse communities. Violence Against Women, 11(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204271476
66.
SokoloffN. J.DupontI. (2005b). Domestic violence: Examining the intersections of race, class, and gender – An introduction. In SokoloffN. J.DupontI., (Eds.), Domestic violence at the margins: Readings on race, class, gender and culture (pp. 1–13). Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.20.1.0085
67.
StanleyN.Graham-KevanN.BorthwickR. (2012). Fathers and domestic violence: Building motivation for change through perpetrator programmes. Child Abuse Review, 21, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2222
68.
StoverC. S.EastonC. J.McMahonT. J. (2013). Parenting of men with co-occuring intimate partner violence and substance abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(11), 2290–2314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260512475312
69.
TaylorA. (2019). Impact of the experience of domestic and family violence on children: What does the literature have to say? Queensland Centre for Domestic and Family Violence Research. Retrieved March 18, 2021, fromhttps://mailchi.mp/9984513d5dfd/children-invisible-victims2019
TsantefskiM.WildeT.YoungA.O’LearyP. (2018). Inclusivity in interagency responses to domestic violence and child protection. Australian Social Work, 71(2). 2, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X2017.1422775
72.
VetereA.CooperJ. (2001). Working systemically with family violence: A strategy for reducing men’s violence against women in relationships. Journal of Family Therapy, 23, 378–396. https://doi.org/10.0163–4445
73.
WendtS.BuchananF.MouldingN. (2015). Mothering and domestic violence: Situating maternal protectiveness in gender. Journal of Women and Social Work, 30(4), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109915570925
74.
WinstokZ. (2007). Toward an interactional perspective on intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.12.001
