The focus of this scoping review was to understand the overall state of research activity related to pro-arrest, pro-charge, and pro-prosecution policies in Canada. The review identified 295 articles, academic (47.5%) and gray literature (52.5%) published between 1983 and 2018 that reported on these policies as a response to domestic violence in Canada.
Findings
The findings acknowledged growing concerns over the ineffectiveness of these policies as a response to domestic violence. In fact, over half of the articles (57.6%) either failed to support these policies or recommended significant revisions; only a small number of articles (1.0%) favored these policies in their current form. Themes related to the effectiveness of these policies included criminalization and public awareness, survivor satisfaction, standardized police response, removal of burden from survivor to charge, and better than nothing. Themes related to the ineffectiveness included disconnect between policy and practice, revictimizes survivors, one-size fits all approach, have not adequately reduced domestic violence in Canada, lack of understanding training and education for all, failure to address structural and systemic factors, lack of trust in the criminal justice system, and success has been difficult to measure.
Applications
The deconstruction of these policies in this review points to the need for future research to address identified gaps in the literature and to explore alternatives that serve their intended emancipatory effect.
AbelS. L. (2007).
Justice? Interviews with front-line domestic violence workers (Publication No. 304788195) [Master’s thesis]. University of Victoria; Social Services Abstracts.
2.
AbrahamM.TastsoglouE. (2016).
Addressing domestic violence in Canada and the United States: The uneasy co-habitation of women and the state. Current Sociology,
64(4), 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392116639221
3.
AddarioL. (2002). Six degrees from liberation: Legal needs of women in legal and other matters. Canada Department of Justice, Programs Branch, Research and Stats Division, Legal Aid and Research Series.
4.
AgnewV. (1998). In search of a safe place: Abuse women and culturally sensitive services. University of Toronto Press.
5.
AlaggiaR.RegehrC.RishchynskiG. (2009).
Intimate partner violence and immigration laws in Canada: How far have we come?International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,
32(6), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.09.001
6.
Anonymous. (2008).
Women and the Canadian legal system: Examining situations of hyper-responsibility. Canadian Woman Studies,
26(3), 94–104.
7.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005).
Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology,
8(1), 19–32.
8.
AtrooshiC. E. (2010).
Dual charging practices in cases of domestic violence: Perpetuating (in)equalities (Publication No. 859916018) [Master’s thesis]. Carleton University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
9.
BalfourG. (2003).
The practice of law as structured action: The role of lawyers in the criminalization of violent men and women (Publication No. 305289086) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Manitoba; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
10.
BandanP. (2009).
The obstacles South Asian victims of spousal violence endure in Vancouver, Canada: Culture vs. the extended family vs. the law (Publication No. AAIMS23758) [Master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
11.
BannerjiK. (2008).
Theoretical frameworks in the construction of domestic violence discourse in socio-legal literature (Publication No. 304395488) [Master’s thesis]. York University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
12.
Barata, P. C., & Schneider, F. (2004). Battered women add their voices to the debate about the merits of mandatory arrest. Women's Studies Quarterly, 32(3–4), 148–163.
13.
BartukS. (2002).
Aid or band-aid? Perspectives from the front-lines on community treatment programs for abusive men (Publication No. 305470916) [Master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
14.
Be The Peace. (2017). Pathways to justice.
Be The Peace Institute.
15.
BecksteadL. (2006).
Violence, policy and the law: An exploratory analysis of crown counsel’s domestic violence policy in British Columbia (Publication No. 304943490) [Master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
16.
BoydS. B. (1997). Challenging the public private divide.
University of Toronto Press.
17.
BriskinL.EliassonM. (1999). Women’s organizing and public policy in Canada and Sweden.
McGill-Queen’s University Press.
18.
BruceS. L. (2005). “It’s not all the cops”—Investigating the variances in police responses to woman abuse (Publication No. 305362019) [Master’s thesis]. The University of New Brunswick; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
19.
BurczyckaM.ConroyS.SavageL. (2018). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile, 2017.
The Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada.
20.
CainT. (2010).
Connecting discourse, policy, and practice: Practitioners’ perceptions of the influence of dominant discourses and stories surrounding women who experience abuse by their intimate male partners (Publication No. 608325025) [Master’s thesis]. Dalhousie University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
21.
CameronA. J. (2012).
Restoring women: Community and legal responses to violence against women in opposite sex intimate relationships (Publication No. 1442476256) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Victoria; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
22.
CheemaS. (1993).
International perspectives on violence against women (Publication No. 89226106) [Master’s thesis]. University of Ottawa; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
23.
ChewterC. L. (2003).
Violence against women and children: Some legal issues. Canadian Journal of Family Law,
20(1), 99–178.
24.
ClairmontD.WatersK. (2015). The Nova Scotia Restorative Justice Program: Assessment of current status and future directions.
Atlantic Institute of Criminology, Dalhousie University. Prepared for The Nova Scotia Restorative Justice Program, Police and Public Safety, Nova Scotia Department of Justice.
25.
CohenL. (2002, October 21).
Did ‘must prosecute’ mean ‘must convict’?The Report Newsmagazine,
29(20), 37.
26.
Community Coordination for Women’s Safety (CCWS). (2007). Dual arrest in cases of relationship violence.
27.
ConnersD. E.JohnsonH. (2017). What do women survivors of partner abuse think about mandatory charging? A review of the research.
University of Ottawa.
28.
CrossP. (2012). It shouldn’t be this hard: A gender-based analysis of family law, family court and violence against women.
Luke’s Place Support and Resource Centre.
29.
DavidsonC. L. (2004).
Protection orders, partner abuse and police liability: A socialist feminist analysis (Publication No. 305200124) [Master’s thesis]. Carleton University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
30.
DavisK.DreyN.GouldD. (2009).
What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.International Journal of Nursing Studies,
46(10), 1386–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010
31.
Department of Justice. (2010). Domestic violence action plan. Province of Nova Scotia.
32.
Dickson-GilmoreE. (2014).
Whither restorativeness? Restorative justice and the challenge of intimate violence in aboriginal communities. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice,
56(4), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2014.S02
33.
DrumblM. A. (1994).
Civil, constitutional and criminal justice responses to female partner abuse: Proposals for reform. Canadian Journal of Family Law,
12(1), 115–170.
34.
DuttonD. (1995). The domestic assault of women: Psychological and criminal justice perspectives.
UBC Press.
EmersonD. (2012).
Taking care in child protection: A descriptive account of practices with women who have experienced violence by their domestic partners (Publication No. 1069261858) [Master’s thesis]. University of Victoria; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
39.
FaubertJ. (1995).
Police intervention in cases of wife assault: A critical perspective on the mandatory arrest policy (Publication No. 304207307) [Master’s thesis]. University of Guelph; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
40.
FraserJ. (2014). Claims-making in context: Forty years of Canadian feminist activism on violence against women (Publication No. 1521132350) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Ottawa; Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database.
41.
GillisJ. R.DiamondS. L.JebelyP.OrekhovskyV.OstovichE. M.MacIsaacK.MandellD. (2006).
Systemic obstacles to battered women’s participation in the judicial system. Violence Against Women,
12(12), 1150–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293500
42.
Girard-BrownA. L. (2012).
Do good intentions beget good policy? Two steps forward and one step back in the construction of domestic violence in Ontario (Publication No. 1512651308) [Doctoral dissertation]. Queen’s University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
43.
GoguenT. (1999).
A study into the impact of feminism upon legal discourse in criminal justice policies on wife battering in Canada (Publication No. 304566018) [Master’s thesis]. University of Ottawa; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
44.
Government of Canada. (2015). Charging and prosecution policies in cases of spousal assault: A synthesis of research, academic, and judicial responses.
45.
Hagemann-WhiteC.HumphreysC.TuttyL.DiemerK. (2015). Overview of current policies on arrest, prosecution and protection by the police and the justice system as responses to intimate partner violence. In H. Johnson, B. Fischer, & V. Jaquier (Eds), Critical issues on violence against women: International perspectives and promising strategies (pp. 47–65). Routledge.
46.
Hannah-MoffatK. (1995). To charge or not to charge: Frontline officers’ perceptions of mandatory charge policies. In M. Valverde, L. MacLeod, & K. Johnson (Eds), Wife assault and the Canadian criminal justice system (pp. 35–46). Centre of Criminology, University of Toronto.
47.
HunjanS. (2003). South Asian women in Canada: Experiences of intimate partner violence (Publication No. 305324886) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Windsor; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
48.
International Federation of Social Workers. (2020). Global social statement of ethical principles.
49.
JarvisS. L. (2000).
Domestic violence and the state-abused women’s perspectives on the “new” integrated services approach (Publication No. 08989095) [Master’s thesis]. University of Windsor; Masters Abstract International.
50.
JiwaniY.BuhagiarL. (1997). Policing violence against women in relationships: An examination of police response to violence against women in British Columbia. FREDA Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children.
51.
JohnsonH. (2010). Protecting victims’ interests in domestic violence court. Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research University of New Brunswick.
52.
JohnsonH. (2012). “No-drop policies” are harming some women.
Social Sciences at the University of Ottawa.
53.
JohnsonH.DawsonM. (2010). Violence against women in Canada: Research and policy perspectives.
Oxford University Press.
54.
KaertH. (2013). Help or hindrance: The impact of the mandatory charge policy.
Trent University. Elizabeth Fry Society of Peterborough.
55.
KaukinenC. E. (2001). The help-seeking of violent crime victims (Publication No. 60412953) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto; Sociological Abstracts.
56.
KharatP. (2014). Power, helplessness and compromising: Influences of resettlement on incidence of intimate partner violence (Publication No. 1651939618) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Calgary; ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text: The Humanities and Social Sciences Collection.
57.
KonarskiR. D. (2002).
Domestic violence and the criminal justice system: An empirical study on the response by police and prosecutors to domestic violence in two communities in British Columbia (Publication No. 305258138) [Master’s thesis]. Simon Fraser University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
LeDucL. R. (2004). Understanding female-to-male violence in Canadian university and college dating relationships—A test of the rebellion thesis (Publication No. 60495798) [Doctoral dissertation]. Carleton University; Dissertations Abstract International.
LightL.RuebsaatG. (2008). Keeping women safe: Eight critical components of an effective justice response to domestic violence.
Critical Components Project Team. Government of British Columbia.
62.
LudwigS. R. (1996). Abused women’s experience with the justice system: Concept mapping (Publication No. 193484835) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Alberta; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
63.
Luke’s Place Support and Resource Centre for The Denise House. (2008). Needs assessment and gap analysis for abused women unrepresented in the family law system: Final report and recommendations.
Government of Ontario, Ministry of the Attorney General.
64.
LustmanL. D. (2008).
Hearing the voices of victims of domestic violence: Agency, no-contact orders, and no-drop prosecution (Publication No. 304401856) [Master’s thesis]. York University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
65.
MacleodL.PicardC. (1989). Toward a more effective criminal justice response to wife assault: Exploring the limits and potential of effective intervention.
Canadian Department of Justice Research Section. Canadian Research Index.
66.
MacQuarrieB. (2005). Voices from the front lines: A report of the Middlesex county coordinating committee to end woman abuse and the London coordinating committee to end woman abuse.
Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children, University of Western Ontario.
67.
McGillivrayA.ComaskeyB. (1999). Black eyes all of the time: Intimate violence, aboriginal women, and the justice system.
University of Toronto Press.
68.
MiedemaB. (2004). Gendered silence: Immigrant women’s access to legal information about woman abuse. In M. Stirling, C. Cameron, N. Nason-Clark, B. Miedema, & N. Brown (Eds), Understanding abuse: Partnering for change (pp. 197–217). University of Toronto Press.
69.
MiedemaB.WachholzS. (1998). A complex web: Access to justice for abused immigrant women in New Brunswick.
Government of Canada.
70.
MiedemaB.WachholzS. (1999).
A complex web: Access to justice for abused immigrant women in new Brunswick. Canadian Woman Studies,
19(1/2), 175–181.
71.
Miedema, B. and Waccholz, S. (2004). Gendered silence: Immigrant women's access to legal information about woman abuse. In M. Stirling, C. Cameron, N. Nason-Clark & B. Miedema Understanding abuse: Partnering for change, pp. 197–217. University of Toronto Press.
72.
MinakerJ. C. (1998).
Women’s needs/available choices, juxtaposing criminal justice response to wife abuse with women’s words (Publication No. 304503127) [Master’s thesis). University of Winnipeg; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
73.
MinakerJ. C. (2001).
Evaluating criminal justice responses to intimate abuse through the lens of women’s needs. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law,
13(2), 74.
74.
MorrisM. (2008). Violence against women in Canada: Effective approaches and resources.
MATCH International.
75.
MoserA. E. (2012)
Validation and expansion of the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment (ODARA) instrument: An early warning system (Publication No. 1464391378) [Master’s thesis]. University of New Brunswick; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
76.
NelundA. (2015).
Policy conflict: Women’s groups and institutionalized restorative justice. Criminal Justice Policy Review,
26(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403413509814
77.
Nova Scotia Criminal Justice Association. (2017). Criminal justice in Canada—Beyond a “one size fits all”. Proceedings of the Nova Scotia Criminal Justice Association Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
78.
Nova Scotia Department of Justice Victims’ Services Division. (2001). A review of the effectiveness and viability of domestic violence interventions as an adjunct to the formal criminal justice system.
Department of Justice, Nova Scotia.
79.
O’NeillT. (2002a, July 8).
A ‘dangerous’ weapon in the hands of police. Report Newsmagazine,
29, 32.
80.
O’NeillT. (2002b, July 8).
Lady justice gets back her blindfold: The B.C. government prepares to dump anti-male spousal-abuse polices. Report Newsmagazine,
29, 32–33.
81.
PaceyK. E. (2001).
Policing beyond VAWIR policy: Criminal harassment pro arrest and the practice of discretionary power [Master’s thesis]. University of British Columbia. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0089924
82.
PaisP. (2016). Challenging the efficacy of no-drop prosecution policies in domestic violence cases: A comparative legal analysis [Doctoral dissertation]. , University of Queensland.
PatersonS. L. (2006). Rethinking wife abuse-violence, resistance, and public policy in Canada (Publication No. 304883616) [Doctoral dissertation]. Carleton University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
PiggS. (2009b, October 3). Why fathers can’t catch a break; more than a decade after a landmark study recommended an overhaul of Canadian divorce law, courts still haven’t caught up to the new reality of Canadian family life. A generation of dads who can’t stand being apart from their children is pushing for change. Toronto Star.http://ezproxy.library.dal.ca/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/439628452?accountid=10406
88.
PollackS.GreenV.AllspachA. (2005). Women charged with domestic violence in Toronto: The unintended consequences of mandatory charge policies.
Woman Abuse Council of Toronto.
89.
RiggsJ. (2011). The impacts of recent law reforms on abused women involved in the family court process in Ontario: An environmental scan of violence against women service providers.
Luke’s Place Support and Resource Centre for Women and Children.
90.
RossiterK.YercichS.JacksonM. (2014). Assessing the complexities and implications of anti-violence service delivery in British Columbia.
The FREDA Centre for Research on Violence Against Women and Children. Simon Fraser University.
91.
RubinP. (2003). Restorative justice in Nova Scotia: Women’s experience and recommendations for positive policy development and implementation report and recommendations.
National Association of Women and the Law.
92.
RumscheidtH. B. (1996).
The limits of law as a feminist response to social problems: A case study of police-charging policies in woman abuse cases (Publication No. 304277725) (Master’s thesis). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
93.
RussellL. (2009).
What women need now from police and prosecutors: 35 years of working to improve police response to male violence against women. Canadian Woman Studies,
28(1), 28–36.
94.
RussellM.LightL. (2006).
Police and victim perspectives on empowerment of domestic violence victims. Police Quarterly,
9(4), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104264495
95.
ScottK.Augusta-ScottT.TuttyL. M. (2017). Innovations in interventions to address intimate partner violence: Research and practice.
Routledge.
96.
SeymourS. L. (1998).
Law enforcement perceptions of domestic assault: An examination of sex role egalitarianism (Publication No. 304439937) [Master’s thesis]. University of Regina; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
97.
SingerV. E. (2012).
Tensions in the dominant domestic violence discourse and the high risk case coordination protocol [Master’s thesis]. Dalhousie University.
98.
SinghR. (2010).
In between the system and the margins: Community organizations, mandatory charging and immigrant victims of abuse. Canadian Journal of Sociology35(1), 31–62.
TamD. M. Y.DawsonM.JacksonM.KwokS. M.ThurstonW. E. (2013).
Comparing criminal justice responses to violence against women in Canada and China. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development,
23(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2013.793020
101.
ThandiG.LloydB. (2011). “This is a man's problem”: Strategies for working with South Asian male perpetrators of intimate partner violence.
Justice Institute of British Columbia.
102.
TuttyL. M.GiurguB.Weaver-DunlopJ.TrayaN.ChristensenJ. (2010). Promising practices to engage ethno-cultural communities in ending domestic violence.
RESOLVE Alberta.
103.
TuttyL. M.GoardC. (2002). Reclaiming self: Issues and resources for women abused by intimate partners.
Fernwood Publishing.
104.
TuttyL. M.KoshanJ.JessoD.OgdenC.WarrellJ. G. (2011). Evaluation of the Calgary specialized domestic violence trial court and monitoring the first appearance court: Final report.
RESOLVE Alberta.
105.
TuttyL. M.WylieK.AbbotP.MackenzieJ.UrselE.KoshanJ. (2008). The justice response to domestic violence: A literature review.
RESOLVE Alberta.
106.
UrselE. J. (2001). Report on domestic violence policies and their impact on aboriginal people.
RESOLVE Manitoba. Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission.
107.
UrselJ. (1998). Mandatory charging: The Manitoba model. In K. Bonnycastle & G. Rigakos (Eds), Unsettling truths: Battered women, policy, politics, and contemporary research in Canada (pp. 73–81). Collective Press.
108.
Van De SandeA. (1998).
Restorative justice alternatives and the question of applicability to family- addressing the issue of domestic violence (Publication No. 304543330) [Master’s thesis]. Dalhousie University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
109.
WachholzS.MiedemaB. (2000).
Risk, fear, harm: Immigrant women’s perceptions of the “policing solution” to woman abuse. Crime, Law and Social Change,
34(3), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008358432117
110.
WilsonH. E. (1998). Victim’s attitudes and perceptions of the pro-arrest policy (Publication No. 08989095) (Master’s thesis). Dalhousie University; Gender Studies Database.
111.
WisniewskiA. (2016). Rural realities faced by service providers and women survivors of intimate partner violence when navigating the justice system.
Muriel McQueen Fergusson Centre for Family Violence Research.
112.
WoodL. P. (2001).
Caught in the net of zero-tolerance, the effect of the criminal justice response to partner violence (Publication No. 304732956) [Master’s thesis]. University of Manitoba; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
113.
ZellererE. (1996). Violence against Inuit women in the Canadian eastern arctic (Publication No. 89243351) [Doctoral dissertation]. Simon Fraser University; ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
