The tension between indigenizing versus internationalizing social work knowledge, resulting from local-specific sensitivity, has been a contemporary dispute in the Global South where there are diverse geo-historical backgrounds. This is the case in China, where the mainstream international narrative surrounding social work development has been configured by the normative values and knowledge of a Euromodern origin. Such misrepresentation rarely reflects indigenous voices from the local social work academy. Informed by Foucault’s thesis of power/knowledge, this article first compares the model of state social work in China and the world. Then, as a decolonizing project, a narrative review of 26 Chinese language articles was conducted.
Findings
Distinctive service and policy practices in the Chinese traditional helping system were identified to illustrate how western social work was ethnocentrically repositioned in the “post-socialist” China. These initiatives include micro-level “Civil Affairs” services, meso-level “mass work” practice, and macro-level “Minsheng” State and crossregional Pairing Aid Programs, which are rooted in the cultural (Confucianism), economical (socialist market economy), and political (Marxism) ecosystem in China.
Applications
Through an indigenized epistemological stance, a state-led anti-colonial framework is presented to unveil the making of social work indigenization and social welfare development that de-centers Eurocentric hegemony. To reorient social work knowledge apart from persistent neo-colonialism in the form of academic imperialism, social work development should be tailored into a locally responsive and geopolitically appropriate models in the non-western world.
ChenL. (2009). Dilemma and choices: Social work professionalization and social security reform. Chang Bai Journal,
147(3), 122–126 (in Chinese).
4.
ChenP. (2015).
Innovation in model of system of social management in China: A case study based on four models.Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (04), 5–24 (in Chinese).
5.
ChienS. S.ZhaoL. T. (2015).
State-mediated knowledge transfer and resource mobility: A case study of China local government entrepreneurship. Issues and Studies,
51(2), 39–78.
CoatesJ.GrayM.HetheringtonT. (2006).
An ‘ecospiritual’ perspective: Finally, a place for Indigenous approaches. British Journal of Social Work,
36(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl005
8.
CoxD. (1997). Asia and the Pacific. In N. Mayadas, T. Watts & D. Elliott (Eds), International handbook on social work theory and practice (pp. 369–382). Greenwood Press.
9.
De Sousa SantosB. (2012).
Public sphere and epistemologies of the South. Africa Development,
37(1), 43–67.
10.
DeiG. J. S., & KempfA. (Eds). (2006). Anti-colonialism and education: The politics of resistance (
Vol. 7).
Sense Publishers.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (Trans. A. Sheridan). Penguin Books.
13.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon.
14.
GaoJ. G.YanM. C. (2015).
Social work in the making: The state and social work development in China. International Journal of Social Welfare,
24(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12089
15.
GaoR. H. (2019).
Appearance of people’s livelihood country: Practice and logic of China’s guarantee and improvement of people’s livelihood.Jiang hai Academic Journal, (03), 94–100,254–255.
16.
GrayM. (2008).
Some considerations on the debate on social work in China: Who speaks for whom? International Journal of Social Welfare,
17(4), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00603.x
17.
GrayM. (2005).
Dilemmas of international social work: Paradoxical processes in indigenisation, universalism and imperialism. International Journal of Social Welfare,
14(3), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2005.00363.x
18.
GrayM.CoatesJ. (2010).
Indigenization and knowledge development: Extending the debate. International Social Work,
53(5), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810372160
GuD. H. (2018). Similarities and differences between CPC mass organization work and social work. Social Work and Management,
18(04), 5–11.
21.
GuoW. H. (2014).
The trends of post-professionalization of Western social work and its implications to China’s social work.Sociological Studies,
29(05), 217–240, 244.
22.
HarrisJ. (2008).
State social work: Constructing the present from moments in the past.The British Journal of Social Work,
38(4), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcn024
23.
HeL. Y. (2012).
CPC's mass work innovation and China's social work development in transition. TheJournal of Shanghai Administration Institute,
13(06), 81–89.
HoltzhausenL. (2011).
When values collide: Finding common ground for social work education in the United Arab Emirates. International Social Work,
54(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810372364
26.
HookD. (2007). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. Palgrave MacMillan.
27.
HuJ.WuT.FeiJ. (2018).
Flexible governance in China: Affective care, petition social workers, and multi-pronged means of dispute resolution. Asian Survey,
58(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.4.679
28.
HuangS. W. (2016).
Accelerating the exploration on developmental pathways of professional social work with Chinese characteristic. China Social Work,
15, 8–10 (in Chinese).
29.
JinchaoY. (1995).
The developing models of social work education in China. International Social Work,
38(1), 27–38.
30.
LeiJ. (2014).
Professionalisation or de-professionalisation? An analysis on two discourse of social work development in China, China Social Work Research, (01), 25–40.
31.
LeiJ.HuangW. (2017).
Pragmatic professionalism: A fuzzy Delphi study on the competencies of social workers in Guangzhou, China. The British Journal of Social Work,
48(2), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx035
32.
LeslieC.LeslieC. M.YoungA. (Eds). (1992). Paths to Asian medical knowledge (No. 32).
University of California Press.
33.
LeungT. T. F.TamC. H. L. (2014).
The ‘person-centred’ rhetoric in Socialist China. The British Journal of Social Work,
45(5), 1489–1507. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct192
34.
LeungT. T. F.YipN. M.HuangR.WuY. (2012).
Governmentality and the politicisation of social work in China. British Journal of Social Work,
42(6), 1039–1059. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs065
Marsh, J. (1995). Review of unfaithful angels: How social work has abandoned its Mission Harry Specht and Mark Courtney. Reviewed by Jeanne Marsh, University of Chicago. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 22(2), 9. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol22/iss2/9
38.
McDonaldC.HarrisJ.WintersteenR. (2003).
Contingent on context? Social work and the state in Australia, Britain, and the USA. British Journal of Social Work,
33(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/33.2.191
39.
McDonaldC.MarstonG. (2005).
Workfare as welfare: Governing unemployment in the advanced liberal state. Critical Social Policy,
25(3), 374–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018305054077
40.
McKeeK. (2009).
Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis? Critical Social Policy,
29(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018309105180
41.
MignoloW. (2002).
The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference.The South Atlantic Quarterly,
101(1), 57–96. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/30745
42.
MignoloW. D. (2009).
Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society,
26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
43.
NadanY. (2017).
Rethinking ‘cultural competence’ in international social work. International Social Work,
60(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814539986
44.
NgaiN. P. (1996).
Revival of social work education in China. International Social Work,
39(3), 289–300.
45.
O'brienK. J.LiL. (2000).
Accommodating “democracy” in a one-party state: Introducing village elections in China.The China Quarterly,
162, 465–489. https://www.jstor.org/stable/656017
46.
PeckJ.ZhangJ. (2013).
A variety of capitalism . . . with Chinese characteristics?Journal of Economic Geography,
13(3), 357–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs058
47.
PengH. M. (2017).
The construction of the discipline of social work in China: A hundred years of growth and autonomy controversy. Journal of Social Sciences, (07), 66–73 (in Chinese).
48.
PengX. L. (2018).
Indigenization: Overview of the 30-year reconstruction of China social work. Journal of the Party University of Shijiazhuang City Committee of CPC, (05), 36–40 (in Chinese).
Richards, K. (2017). Social work or social control: Power, and the values and contradictions in social work practice and the American Indian.https://sophia.stkate.edu/msw_papers/781
51.
RoseN.MillerP. (1992).
Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology,
43(2), 173–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/591464
52.
RoweS.BaldryE.EarlesW. (2015).
Decolonising social work research: Learning from critical Indigenous approaches. Australian Social Work,
68(3), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2015.1024264
53.
SewpaulV. (2006).
The global–local dialectic: Challenges for African scholarship and social work in a post-colonial world. British Journal of Social Work,
36(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl003
54.
ShiB. N. (2006). System factors and profession identification – Professionalization strategies for social work. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), (04), 6–11 (in Chinese).
55.
SmithL. T. (2013). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples.
Zed Books Ltd.
56.
TangB. (2014). Social work professionalization in China: The status quo, features and reflections. Learn and Practice,
10, 85–91 (in Chinese).
57.
TeetsJ. C. (2013).
Let many civil societies bloom: The rise of consultative authoritarianism in China. The China Quarterly,
213, 19–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23509564
58.
TongM.WuB. H. (2019). The false trap of professionalization: A reflection on the integrated social service delivery for the families with lost child. Chinese Public Administration, (04), 132–137. DOI: 10.19735/j.issn.1006-0863.2019.04.17 (in Chinese).
59.
TrevithickP. (2008).
Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice.The British Journal of Social Work,
38(6), 1212–1237. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm026
60.
TsangA. K. T.SinR.JiaC.YanM. C. (2008).
Another snapshot of social work in China: Capturing multiple positioning and intersecting discourses in rapid movement. Australian Social Work,
61(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070701818740
61.
TsangA. K. T.YanM. C. (2001).
Chinese corpus, Western application: The Chinese strategy of engagement with Western social work discourse. International Social Work,
44(4), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/002087280104400404
62.
WangS. B. (2001).
The philosophical foundation of help-seeking behaviors and assistance-providing behaviors in China: Cultural and institutional perspective.Sociological Studies, (04), 1–10.
63.
WangS. B. (2011a). The indigenized practice of China’s social work. Jiangsu Social Sciences, (01), 12–17. DOI: 10.13858/j.cnki.cn32-1312/c.2011.01.024 (in Chinese).
64.
WangS. B. (2011b). The embedded development of social work in China. Social Science,2, 206–222 (in Chinese).
65.
WangS. B. (2020a).
The sub-structure and subjectivity construction of social work development in China. China Journal of Social Work, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2020.1742436
66.
WangS. B. (2020b). Analysis of China's social work from embedded development to integrated development. Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition),
20(03), 29–38. DOI: 10.12120/bjutskxb20200329 (in Chinese).
67.
WetherellM.Taylor, S., & YatesS. J. (2001). Discourse theory and practice: A reader.
Sage.
68.
WongY. L. R. (2002). Reclaiming Chinese women's subjectivities: Indigenizing “social work with women” in China through postcolonial ethnography. In Women's studies international forum (Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 67–77). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(02)00222-4
69.
WuY. M. (2002). On construction of the framework of social work theory with Chinese feature. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science), (3), 43–49 (in Chinese).
70.
Xu, Y. (2013). Moral resources, political capital and the development of social work in China: A case study of city J in Shandong province. British Journal of Social Work, 43(8), 1589–1610. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs070
71.
YanM. C. (2011).
Profession, scientific, indigenization: The three conundrums of social work in China in last ten years. Journal of Social Sciences,
1, 63–71 (in Chinese).
72.
YanM. C. (2013).
Towards a pragmatic approach: A critical examination of two assumptions of indigenization discourse. China Journal of Social Work,
6(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2013.766135
73.
YanY. L. (2018).
The new era and the development of Minsheng state.Journal of the Central Institute of Socialism, (01), 78–81 (in Chinese).
74.
YanM. C.ChengS. L. (2009).
Searching for Chinese characteristics: A tentative empirical examination. China Journal of Social Work,
2(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525090802692112
75.
YanM. C.GaoJ. G. (2007).
Social engineering of community building: Examination of policy process and characteristics of community construction in China. Community Development Journal,
42(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsi109
76.
YanM. C.TsangK. T. (2005).
A snapshot on the development of social work education in China: A Delphi study. Social Work Education,
24(8), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500342314
77.
YipK. S. (2007).
Professionalization of social-work practice in the People's Republic of China: A tri-tensional analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development,
17(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650993.2007.9756023
YunongH.XiongZ. (2012).
Further discussion of indigenization in social work: A response to Gray and Coates. International Social Work,
55(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872811406893
ZhaoQ. (2016).
Further exploration on the stage of the embedded development of professional social work. Social Work and Management,16(6), 5–12 (in Chinese).
82.
ZhouP. (2006). Homologous analysis between social work and social security and its significance in constructing harmonious society. Jiang Su Social Science, (
2), 62–67 (in Chinese).
83.
ZhuJ. G.ChenA. (2013). The embeddedness of professional social work into the power relations of urban community: A case study of government service purchase. Sociological Studies,
28(01), 43–64, 242 (in Chinese).
