High turnover rate among Chinese social work practitioners is a big challenge facing the nation’s social work profession. Turnover intention, the determinant predictor of actual turnover, has been widely used instead of the actual turnover. Among many predictors, burnout (exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy) was recognized as a key predictor of turnover intention. In addition, recently, organizational justice is getting more and more attention by social work scholars in affecting employees’ intention to leave the organization. This article aims to empirically test how different dimensions of organizational justice influence social workers’ turnover intention, regarding burnout as a mediator, and including the development and validation of a new organizational justice scale in Chinese context.
Findings
In total, 616 social workers (223 from Beijing for Study 1 and 393 from Jiangmen for Study 2) participated in the study. The results revealed that interpersonal justice is the most important dimension for predicting social workers’ turnover intention, whereas cynicism plays a mediator role in that relationship.
Application
Turnover is an organizational behavior. Therefore, it is more important for organization managers and policy makers to consider the factors from organizational conditions that are influencing turnover. This study provides the field of social work in China with solid evidence that more attention should be paid to management issues in solving the challenge of a high turnover rate.
AuerbachC.SchudrichW. Z.LawrenceC. K.ClaiborneN.McgowanB. G. (2014).
Predicting turnover: Validating the intent to leave child welfare scale. Research on Social Work Practice,
24, 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513494021
3.
BiesR. J.MoagJ. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In LewickiR. J.SheppardB. H.BazermanM. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (
Vol. 1, pp. 43–55).
JAI Press.
4.
BrockerJ.SiegelP. A.DalyJ. P.MartinC. (1997).
When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly,
42, 558–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393738
5.
Cohen-CharashY.SpectorP. E. (2002).
The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,
86, 278–321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
6.
ColquittJ. A. (2001).
On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure.Journal of Applied Psychology,
86, 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
7.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O.NgK. Y. (2001).
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.Journal of Applied Psychology,
86, 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
8.
ColquittJ. A.GreenbergJ.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational Justice (pp. 3–56).
Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
ColquittJ. A.ShawJ. C. (2005). How should organizational justice be measured? In GreenbergJ.J.ColquittA. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 113–152).
Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
ConlonD. E. (1993).
Some tests of the self-interest and group-value models of procedural justice: Evidence from an organizational appeal procedure.Academy of Management Journal,
36, 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.5465/256648
11.
ConlonD. E.MeyerC. J.NowakowskiJ. M. (2005). How does organizational justice affect performance, withdrawal, and counterproductive behavior? In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 301–328).
Erlbaum.
12.
CordesC. L.DoughertyT. W. (1993).
A review and an integration of research on job burnout. Academy of Management Review,
18, 621–656. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.9402210153
13.
CropanzanoRussell. BowenDavid E..GillilandStephen W. (2007)
The Management of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management Perspectives,
21(4), 34–48. 10.5465/amp.2007.27895338.
14.
CropanzanoR.ByrneZ. S.BobocelD. R.RuppD. E. (2001).
Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
58, 164–209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791
15.
CropanzanoR.GreenbergJ. (1997). Progress in organization justice: Tunneling Through the maze. In CooperC.RobertsonI. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 317–372).
Wiley.
GeurtsS.SchaufeliW. B.de JongeJ. (1998).
Burnout and intention to leave among mental health care professionals: A social psychological approach. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,
17, 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1998.17.3.341
GreenbergJ. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In CropanzanoR.(Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79–103).
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
GreenbergJ. (2001). The seven loose can(n)ons of organizational justice. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR.(Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 245–272).
Stanford University Press.
23.
HeckathornD. D. (2002).
Respondent-driven sampling ii: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems,
49, 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11
24.
HendrixW. H.RobbinsT.MillerJ.SummersT. P. (1998).
Effects of procedural and distributive justice on factors predictive of turnover. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,
13, 611–632.
25.
HopkinsK. M.Cohen-CallowA.KimH. J.HwangJ. (2010).
Beyond intent to leave: Using multiple outcome measures for assessing turnover in child welfare. Children & Youth Services Review,
32, 1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.06.006
26.
JacksonD. L.GillaspyJ. A.Purc-StephensonR. (2009).
Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: A review and some recommendations.Psychological Methods,
14, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
27.
JacksonS. E.SchwabR. L.SchulerR. S. (1986).
Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon.Journal of Applied Psychology,
71, 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.630
28.
JiangH.WangY. (2016).
The role of recognition: An experimental study on the inclination to quit of social workers. Jiangsu Social Sciences, (4), 149–158.
29.
JiangH.WangY.ChuiE.XuY. (2019).
Professional identity and turnover intentions of social workers in Beijing, China: The roles of job satisfaction and agency type. International Social Work,
62(1), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872817712564
30.
Kim, T. K., Solomon,P., & Jang, C. (2012)
Organizational Justice and Social Workers' Intentions to Leave Agency Positions. Social Work Research,
36(1), 31–39. 10.1093/swr/svs001.
31.
KnudsenH. K.DucharmeL. J.RomanP. M. (2006).
Counselor emotional exhaustion and turnover intention in therapeutic communities.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,
31, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.04.003
32.
LeventhalG. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In BerkowitzL.WalsterW.(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (
Vol. 9, pp. 91–131).
Academic Press.
33.
LeventhalG. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In GergenK.GreenbergM.WillisR. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55).
Plenum.
34.
LeventhalG. S.KaruzaJ.FryW. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In MikulaG.(Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167–218).
Springer-Verlag.
35.
LuF. (2014).
Reasons on social workers’ quit in Shanghai: Based on interviews with 50 social workers. Journal of Social Work,
22, 82–84.
McFarlinD. B.SweeneyP. D. (1992).
Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal,
35, 626–637. https://doi.org/10.5465/256489
38.
Mansour-ColeD. M.ScottS. G. (1998).
Hearing it through the grapevine: The influence of source, leader-relations, and legitimacy on survivors’ fairness perceptions. Personnel Psychology,
51, 25–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00715.x
39.
MaslachC.JacksonS. E. (1986). MBI: Maslach burnout inventory; manual research edition.
University of California.
40.
MastersonS. S.Lewis-McclearK.GoldmanB. M.TaylorS. M. (2000).
Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships.Academy of Management Journal,
43, 738–748. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556364
41.
MoormanR. H. (1991).
Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology,
76, 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
42.
Mor BarakM. E.NisslyJ. A.LevinA. (2001).
Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and meta-analysis. Social Service Review,
75, 625–661. https://doi.org/10.1086/323166
43.
NieD.SongS. (2009).
Sociological interpretation on the phenomenon of social workers’ turnover in Mainland China. Social Work,
12, 62–64.
44.
NuallaongW. (2013). Burnout symptoms and cycles of burnout: The comparison with psychiatric disorders. In Bährer-KohlerS. (Eds.), Burnout for experts: Prevention in the context of living and working (pp. 47–72).
Springer Publisher.
45.
PriceJ. L.MuellerC. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement.
Pitman.
46.
PengS.YangJ. (2016).
The new mode of government purchase of social service: Core values and strategies selection. Socialism Study,
1, 91−97.
47.
QinY. (2014).
Troubles and ways of development rural social work talents. Journal of Henan Normal University: Philosophy and Social Sciences,
6, 125−128.
48.
SkarlickiD. P.LathamG. P. (1997).
Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology,
50, 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00707.x
49.
TettR. P.MeyerJ. P. (1993).
Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta‐analytic findings. Personnel psychology,
46, 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb00874.x
50.
ThamP. (2007).
Why are they leaving? Factors affecting intention to leave among social workers in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work,
37, 1225–1246. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl054
51.
TylerTom, R., & BladerSteven, L. (2003)
The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
7(4), 349–361. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07.
52.
Van BogaertP.ClarkeS.RoelantE.MeulemansH.Van de HeyningP. (2010).
Impacts of unit‐level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse‐reported outcomes: A multilevel modelling approach.Journal of Clinical Nursing,
19, 1664–1674. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03128.x
53.
WangY.ZhangH.LeiJ.YuY. (2019).
Burnout in Chinese social work: Differential predictability of the components of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. International Journal of Social Welfare,
28, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12339
54.
XuD. (2017).
Study on social workers’ professional identity and turnover intention – Based on the research of Shenzhen social workers. The Journal of Humanities,
6, 111–118.
55.
ZhangH.RenJ. L. (2014). Disaster relief policy evaluation: A new framework centering on victims.
Social Sciences Academic Press.
56.
ZhangY.FengX. (2011).
The relationship between job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intention among physicians from urban state-owned medical institutions in Hubei, China: A cross-sectional study.BMC Health Services Research,
11, 235. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-235
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
