A number of studies have addressed outdoor and adventure programs over the past 50 years. Despite empirical evidence that demonstrates the personal benefits of group interventions, research investigating the mechanisms responsible for these effects is scarce. This is particularly so for groups in natural outdoor and adventure settings. There is therefore a need to improve our understanding of the processes involved. This research focused on personal and interpersonal processes that occurred during an outdoor group expedition. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 23 subjects aged between 17 and 21 who had participated in an 18-day expedition. The data are examined through a theoretical framework known as “helping factors” often used when studying benefits of a group intervention.
Findings
The results show that participation in the program promoted self-understanding, interpersonal learning, socializing techniques, and cohesion. Altruism, imitative behavior, universality, and imparting information were also important. As for existential factors, corrective recapitulation of the family, catharsis, and hope, these were rarely mentioned if not absent.
Applications
The results give a better understanding of the helping factors in such programs and of their potential role in the group process, as well as their application in social work practice.
AhmedS.AbolmagdS.RakhawyM.ErfanS.MamdouhR. (2010).
Therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy: A study of Egyptian drug addicts.Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery,
5(3–4), 194–213. doi:10.1080/1556035X.2010.523345
2.
BaileyJ. (1999). A world of adventure education. In MilesJ. C.PriestS. (Eds), Adventure programming (pp. 39–24).
State College, PA:
Venture.
3.
BandoroffS.NewesS. (2004). Coming of age: The evolving field of adventure therapy.
Boulder, CO:
Association for Experiential Education.
4.
BettmannJ. E.RussellK. C.ParryK. (2013).
How substance abuse recovery skills, readiness to change and symptom reduction impact change processes in wilderness therapy participants.Journal of Child and Family Studies,
22(8), 1039–1050. doi:10.1007/s10826-012-9665-2
5.
BlochS.CrouchE. (1985). Therapeutic factors in group psychotherapy. In Delucia-WaakJ. L.GerrityD. A.KalonerC. R.RivaM. T. (Eds), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 39–228).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
6.
BowenD. J.NeillJ. T.CrispS. J. R. (2016).
Wilderness adventure therapy effects on the mental health of youth participants.Evaluation and Program Planning,
58, 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.005
7.
BraunT.DierkesP. (2016).
Connecting students to nature – How intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs.Environmental Education Research,
23(7), 937–949. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866
8.
BrouzosA.VassilopoulosS. P.BaourdaV. C. (2015).
Therapeutic factors and members’ perception of co-leaders’ attitudes in a psychoeducational group for Greek children with social anxiety.The Journal for Specialists in Group Work,
40(2), 204–224. doi:10.1080/01933922.2015.1017065
9.
CorsiniR. J.RosenbergB. (1955).
Mechanisms of group therapy: Processes and dynamics.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
51(3), 406–411. doi:10.1037/h0048439
10.
DaviesD. R.BurlingameG. M.JohnsonJ. E.GleaveR. L.BarlowS. H. (2008).
The effects of a feedback intervention on group process and outcome.Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,
12(2), 141–154. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.12.2.141
11.
Davis-BermanJ.BermanD. (1994). Wilderness therapy: Foundations, theory and research.
Dubuque, IA:
Kendall Hunt.
12.
DeaneK. L.HarréN. (2014).
The youth adventure programming model.Journal of Research on Adolescence,
24(2), 293–308. doi:10.1111/jora.12069
13.
EwertA. W.SibthorpJ. (2014). Outdoor adventure education: Foundations, theory, and research.
Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics.
14.
FlanaganJ. C. (1954).
The critical incident technique.Psychological Bulletin,
51(4), 327–358. doi:10.1037/h0061470
15.
GarstB.ScheiderI.BakerD. (2001).
Outdoor adventure program participation impacts on adolescent self-perception.Journal of Experiential Education,
24(1), 41–49. doi:10.1177/105382590102400109
16.
GassM.GillisH. L.RussellK. C. (2012). Adventure therapy: Theory, research and practice.
New York:
Routledge.
17.
HatchK. D.McCarthyC. J. (2005).
Exploration of challenge courses’ long-term effects on members of college student organizations. Journal of Experiential Education,
27(3), 245–264. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ739517
18.
LaraM. A.NavarroC.AcevedoM.BerenzonS.MondragonL.Rubi AngélicaN. (2004).
A psycho-educational intervention for depressed women: A qualitative analysis of the process.Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice,
77(4), 429–447. doi:10.1348/1476083042555424
19.
LeseK. P.Macnair-SemandsR. R. (2000).
The therapeutic factors inventory: Development of a scale. Group,
24(4), 303–317. doi:10.1023/A:1026616626780
20.
LindsayJ.RoyV.MontminyL.TurcotteD.Genest-DufaultS. (2008).
The emergence and the effects of therapeutic factors in groups.Social Work with Groups,
31(3), 255–271. doi:10.1080/01609510801981029
21.
LindsayJ.RoyV.TurcotteD.MontminyL. (2006).
Therapeutic factors in the first stage of men’s domestic violence groups: Men talk about universality and how it becomes operational in the group.Groupwork,
16(1), 29–47. doi:10.1921/0951824X.16.1.29
22.
MagenR. H.GlajchenM. (1999).
Cancer support groups: Client outcome and the context of group process.Research on Social Work Practice,
9(5), 541–554. doi:10.1177/104973159900900502
23.
MalekoffA. (2004). Strenghts-based group work with children and adolescents. In GarvinC. D.GutiérrezL. M.GalinskyM. J. (Eds), Handbook of social work with groups (pp. 227–244).
New York:
Guilford Press.
24.
MartinP.PriestS. (1986).
Understanding the adventure experience. Journal of Adventure Education,
3(1), 18–21. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/36880827
25.
McKenzieM. (2003).
Beyond “the ouward bound process”: Rethinking student learning.Journal of Experiential Education,
26(1), 8–23. doi:10.1177/105382590302600104
26.
MichalskiJ. H.MishnaF.WorthingtonC.CummingsR. (2003).
A multi-method impact evaluation of a therapeutic summer camp program. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal,
20(1), 53–76. doi:10.1023/A:102146750358
27.
MishnaF.MichalskiJ.CummingsR. (2001).
Camps as social work interventions: Returning to our roots.Social Work with Groups,
24(3–4), 153–172. doi:10.1300/J009v24n03_11
28.
MutzM.MüllerJ. (2016).
Mental health benefits of outdoor adventures: Results from two pilot studies.Journal of Adolescence,
49, 105–114. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.03.009
29.
NadlerR. S. (1993). Therapeutic process of change. In GassM. (Ed.), Adventure therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming (pp. 57–72).
Dubuque, IA:
Kendall/Hunt.
30.
OliveiraL. M.MedeirosM.BrasilV. V.OliveiraP. M.MunariD. B. (2008).
Use of therapeutic factors for the evaluation of results in support groups.Acta Paulista de Enfermagem,
21(3), 432–438. doi:10.1590/S0103-21002008000300008
31.
PadgettD. K. (2017). Qualitative methods in social work research (3rd ed.).
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
32.
PanP. J. D.LinC. W. (2004).
Members’ perceptions of leader behaviors, group experiences, and therapeutic factors in group counseling.Small Group Research,
35(2), 174–194. doi:10.1177/1046496403260557
33.
PanicucciJ. (2007). Cornerstones of adventure education. In ProutyD.PanicucciJ.CollinsonR. (Eds), Adventure education: Theory and applications (pp. 33–48).
Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics.
34.
PriestS. (1999). The adventure experience paradigm. In MilesJ. C.PriestS. (Eds), Adventure programming (pp. 159–162).
State College, PA:
Venture.
35.
PriestS.GassM. (2018). Effective leadership in adventure programming (3rd ed.).
Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics.
36.
ProutyD. (2007). Introduction to adventure education. In ProutyD.PanicucciJ.CollinsonR. (Eds), Adventure education: Theory and applications (pp. 3–17).
Champaign, IL:
Human Kinetics.
37.
ReidK. E. (1997). Social work practice with groups: A clinical perspective (2nd ed.).
Pacific Grove, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
38.
ReimerW. L.MathieuT. (2006).
Therapeutic factors in group treatment as perceived by sex offenders: A “consumers report”.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation,
42(4), 59–73. doi:10.1300/J076v42n04_04
39.
RothwellE. W.SiharathK.BadgerH.NegleyS.PiattJ. (2008).
The emotional dynamics of a group during a challenge course experience.Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning,
8(2), 113–131. doi:10.1080/14729670802539453
40.
RoyV.TurcotteD.MontminyL.LindsayJ. (2005).
Therapeutic factors at the beginning of the intervention process in group for men who batter.Small Group Research,
36(1), 106–133. doi:10.1177/1046496404270261
41.
RubinA.BabbieE. R. (2011). Research methods for social work (7th ed.).
Belmont, CA:
Brooks/Cole.
42.
RussellK. C.Phillips-MillerD. (2002).
Perspectives on the wilderness therapy process and its relation to outcome. Child and Youth Care Forum,
31(6), 415–437. doi:10.1023/A:1021110417119
43.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.).
Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
44.
ScheinfeldD. E.RochlenA. B.BuserS. J. (2011).
Adventure therapy: A supplementary group therapy approach for men.Psychology of Men and Masculinity,
12(2), 188–194. doi:10.1037/a0022041
45.
SchoelJ.MaizellR. S. (2002). Exploring islands of healing: New perspectives on adventure based counseling.
Beverly, MA:
Project Adventure.
46.
SchwartzJ. P.WaldoM. (1999).
Therapeutic factors in spouse-abuse group treatment.The Journal for Specialists in Group Work,
24(2), 197–207. doi:10.1080/01933929908411430
47.
SchwartzbergS. L. (1994).
Helping factors in a peer-developed support group for persons with head injury, part 1: Participant observer perspective.The American Journal of Occupational Therapy,
48(4), 297–304. doi:10.5014/ajot.48.4.297
48.
ShechtmanZ. (2007).
How does group process research inform leaders of counseling and psychotherapy groups?Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,
11(4), 293–304. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.11.4.293
49.
ShechtmanZ.Bar-elO.HadarE. (1997).
Therapeutic factors and psycho educational groups for adolescents: A comparison.The Journal for Specialists in Group Work,
22(3), 203–213. doi:10.1080/01933929708414381
50.
SibthorpJ. (2003).
An empirical look at Walsh and Golin’s adventure education process model: Relationships between antecedent factors, perceptions of characteristics.Journal of Leisure Research,
35(1), 80–106.
51.
SribneyC. L.ReddonJ. R. (2008).
Adolescent sex offenders’ rankings of therapeutic factors using the Yalom Card Sort.Journal of Offender Rehabilitation,
47(1/2), 24–40. doi:10.1080/10509670801940367
52.
StottT.HallN. (2003).
Changes in aspects of students’ self-reported personal, social and technical skills during a six-week wilderness expedition in Arctic Greenland.Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning,
3(2), 159–169. doi:10.1080/14729670385200341
53.
TosoneC. (2009). Group work major models: Psychodynamic model. In GittermanA.SalmonR. (Eds), Encyclopedia of social work with groups (pp. 53–55).
New York:
Routledge.
54.
TuckerA. R.JavorskiS.TracyJ.BealeB. (2013).
The use of adventure therapy in community-based mental health: Decreases in problem severity among youth clients.Child & Youth Care Forum,
42(2), 155–179. doi:10.1007/s10566-012-9190-x
55.
TuckerA. R.NortonC. L. (2013).
The use of adventure therapy techniques by clinical social workers: Implications for practice and training.Clinical Social Work Journal,
41(4), 333–343. doi:10.1007/s10615-012-0411-4
WalshV.GolinsG. (1976). The exploration of the outward bound process.
Denver, CO:
Colorado Outward Bound School. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED144754
58.
YalomI. D.LeszczM. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.).
New York:
Basic Books.
