This paper describes the findings from the evaluation of a UK initiative which engaged social work students as community partners within an educational-based family intervention programme. Fourteen social work students in the first year of a BA (Hons) were placed in the programme to meet the volunteering requirements of their ‘Community Project’. By engaging with the community-based family programme at an early stage in their education, students experienced the benefits of interventions, focussing on sustainability, citizenship and parent participation. We describe the approach and discuss the evaluation outcomes to illustrate the potential of utilising co-learning with families in social work education. In taking up the role of community partners, students observed first-hand the value of incorporating horizontal relationships into their learning and experienced direct knowledge exchange with service users at an early stage in their training.
Findings
The findings suggest that this experience enabled students to connect with conceptualisations of macro alongside micro practice in their professional development as social workers. Further, connecting critical social theories with the direct experience of families promoted the learners own empowerment and conscientisation.
Application
This provided a means of embedding social work values and aspirations towards social justice in their future practice orientation.
AbramovitzM. (1993) Should all social work students be educated for social change?Journal of Social Work Education29: 6–11. doi:10.1080/10437797.1993.10778794.
2.
AntonovskyA. (1993) The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science and Medicine36: 725–733. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(93)90033-Z.
3.
BellK.SmerdonM. (2011) A literature review of the role of effective relationships in public services, London, UK: Community Links, Esme Fairburn Foundation.
4.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). A future perspective. In The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design (pp. 3--13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BeresfordP. (2000) The changing roles and tasks of social work: From service users’ perspectives: A literature informed discussion paper, London, UK: Shaping Our Lives.
6.
BogoM.RegehrC.KatzE.LogieC.MylopoulosM. (2011) Developing a tool for assessing students’ reflections on their practice. Social Work Education; The International Journal30: 186–194. doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.540392.
7.
BronfenbrennerU. (1977) The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Cocker, C., & Hafford-Letchfield, T. (Eds). (2014). Rethinking anti-discriminatory practice and anti-oppressive theories for social work practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
9.
CooperA. (2004) Surface and depth in the Victoria Climbié Inquiry. Journal of Child and Family Social Work10: 1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2005.00350.x.
10.
Croisdale-ApplebyD. (2014) Re-visioning social work education: An independent review, London, UK: Department of Health.
11.
CsikaiE. L.RozenskyC. (1997) Social work idealism and students perceived reasons for entering social work. Journal of Social Work Education33: 529–538. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2008.200600147.
12.
DasC. (2016) Re-engaging with community work as a method of practice in social work: A view from Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Work16: 196–215. doi:10.1177/1468017315569644.
13.
ErautM. (1994) Developing professional knowledge and competence, Abingdon, UK: Routledge Falmer Press.
14.
FeatherstoneB.ManbyM. (2006) Working with families: Messages for policy and practice from an evaluation of a school-based project. Children and Society20: 30–39. doi:10.1002/CHI.855.
15.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
16.
FeatherstoneB.MorrisK.WhiteS. (2014a) A marriage made in hell: Early intervention meets child protection. British Journal of Social Work44: 1735–1749. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct052.
17.
FeatherstoneB.WhiteS.MorrisK. (2014b) Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
18.
FletcherJ.FairtloughA.McDonaldL. (2013) Engaging young parents and their families in a multi-family group work intervention: Lessons from a pilot in England. Practice. Social Work in Action25: 151–167. doi:10.1080/09503153.2013.799647.
19.
FoucaultM. (1988) Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977, New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
20.
FreireP. (1973) Pedagogy of the oppressed, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
21.
GilesR.IrwinJ.LynchD.WaughF. (2010) In the field: From learning to practice, Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
22.
GrayM. (2014) The swing to early intervention and prevention and its implications for social work. British Journal of Social Work44: 1750–1769. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct037.
23.
Gray, M., & Webb, S. (Eds). (2013). The new politics of social work. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
24.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. I. Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.
25.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theory of communicative action volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Translated by Thomas A. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
26.
Hafford-LetchfieldT. (2014) Critical educational gerontology: What has it got to offer social work with older people?European Journal of Social Work17: 433–446. doi:10.1080/13691457.2014.885881.
27.
Hafford-LetchfieldT.LambleyS.SpolanderG.DalyN.CockerC. (2014) Inclusive leadership: Managing to make a difference in social work and social care, Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
28.
HardwickL. (2014) Advocacy versus social work: What the setting-up of an advocacy rights hub reveals about social work’s ability to promote social inclusion. British Journal of Social Work44: 1700–1716. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct072.
29.
Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) (2012) Standards of proficiency for social workers in England, Health and Care Professions Council, London, UK: HCPC.
30.
KaufmanR.Segal-EngelchinD.HussE. (2012) Transitions in first year students’ initial practice orientations. Journal of Social Work Education48: 337–359. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2012.201000105.
31.
LamingH. (2009) The protection of children in England: Action plan, London, UK: The Stationery Office.
32.
LevyD.BenS.Shlomo ItzhakyH. (2014) The ‘building blocks’ of professional identity among social work graduates. Social Work Education: The International Journal33: 744–759. doi:10.1080/02615479.2014.883600.
33.
LindsayG.StrandS.CullenM.CullenS.BandS.DavisH.EvansR. (2010) Parenting early intervention programme evaluation, London, UK: Department of Education.
34.
MarloweJ. M.AppletonC.ChinneryS.Van StratumS. (2015) The integration of personal and professional selves: Developing students’ critical awareness in social work practice. Social Work Education: The International Journal34: 60–73. doi:10.1080/02615479.2014.949230.
35.
MoriartyJ.ManthorpeJ. (2014) Controversy in the curriculum: What do we know about the content of social work qualifying curriculum in England?Social Work Education: The International Journal33: 77–90. doi:10.1080/02615479.2012.761689.
36.
MunroE. (2011) The Munro review of child protection: Final report: A child-centred system, London, UK: The Stationary Office.
37.
NareyM. (2014) Making the education of social workers consistently effective: Report of Sir Martin Narey’s independent review of the education of children’s social workers, London, UK: Department of Education.
38.
PayneM. (2005) Modern social work theory, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
39.
PilkingtonR. (2010) Building practitioners skills in personalised eLearning: Messages for professional development. In: O’DonoghueJohn (eds) Technology supported environments for personalised learning: Methods and case studies, Hershe: New York Information Science, pp. 1003–1015.
40.
PrestonS.AslettJ. (2014) Resisting neoliberalism from within the academy: Subversion through an activist pedagogy. Social Work Education; The International Journal33: 502–518. doi:10.1080/02615479.2013.848270.
41.
RuchG. (2009) Identifying ‘the critical’ in a relationship-based model of reflection. European Journal of Social Work12: 349–362. doi:10.1080/13691450902930761.
42.
Ruch, G. (2012). Where have all the feelings gone? Developing reflective and relationship-based management in child-care social work. British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1315--1332. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr134.
43.
ShierM. L.GrahamJ. R. (2015) Subjective well-being, social work, and the environment: The impact of the socio-political context of practice on social worker happiness. Journal of Social Work15: 3–23. doi:10.1177/1468017313503449.
44.
TaylorI.BogoM. (2014) Perfect opportunity perfect storm? Raising the standards of social work education in England. British Journal of Social Work44: 1402–1418. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct077.
45.
TerrionJ. L.HogrebeA. (2007) A Canadian experience with an intervention programme for vulnerable families: Lessons for German social work and policy. European Journal of Social Work10: 401–416. doi:10.1080/13691450701356796.
46.
The College of Social Work (2012) An introduction to qualifying standards and professional social work education, London, UK: TCSW.
47.
WahlerE. A. (2012) Identifying and challenging social work students’ biases. Social Work Education: The International Journal3: 1058–1070. doi:10.1080/02615479.2011.616585.
48.
WeissI.SpiroS.ShererM.Korin-LangerN. (2004) Social work in Israel: Professional characteristics in an international comparative perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare13: 287–296. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2004.00324.x.
